ROMCOM
9 months ago
60
Rubric.pdf
- ROMCOM.pdf
- Sample.pdf
Rubric.pdf
Week 2: Content Application Assessment
Levels of Achievement
Criteria A=93% to 100% Distinguished B=84% to 92% Proficient C = 75% to 83% Basic D/F= 74% or below Non- Performance
Criterion 1: (55 Points/55%) Uses the Community Assessment Guide to collect community/neighborhood level data for the assigned categories; Community People (Demographics and Health), Physical Environment, Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative data from county and state where indicated. Data is accurately represented and complete. Assessment includes an introduction and a conclusion.
51 to 55 points
Uses the Community Assessment Guide to collect data for the 3 assigned categories; Community People, Physical Environment, Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative data from county and state where indicated. Data is accurately represented. Assessment includes an introduction and a conclusion.
46 to 50 points
Community assessment guide includes all required data and comparative data but may need more detail/explanation. Assessment includes an introduction and a conclusion.
41 to 45 points
Community assessment guide is utilized but some data and comparative data are incomplete or county, state and federal data are used too frequently for primary data. May be missing an introduction or a conclusion.
0 to 40 points
Uses the CAG to display data but a significant amount of data is in the wrong category or too broad, OR CAG is not used and data is not accurate, relevant /connected to the community. May be missing both an introduction and conclusion.
Criterion 2: (25 Points/25%) Displays all data required in the Community Assessment Guide (CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner. Integrates and applies information/ uses skills gained from assigned readings, course content, and discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG to provide context or to make clarifications where needed.
23.25 to 25 points
Displays all data required in the Community Assessment Guide (CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner. Integrates and applies information/ uses skills gained from assigned readings, course content, and discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG to provide context or to make clarifications where needed.
21 to 23 points
Displays most data in a clear, concise, and organized manner. Integrates and applies information/ uses skills gained from assigned readings, course content, and discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG to provide context or to make clarifications where needed.
18 to 20 points
Some data is confusing/disorganized, incomplete or lacks clarity. Stronger evidence of integration of course content and outside resources needed. May not use the comment section to provide context or make clarifications when required.
0 to 17 points
Data is mostly disorganized, or unformatted, lacks clarity and/or multiple categories are incomplete throughout. Majority of categories are incomplete and explanations are not utilized when needed.
Criterion 3: (10 Points/13%) Includes at least one reference from this week’s learning and one new, current (within 3 years), peer-reviewed scholarly source from the UIC library that is not listed in the course material. (This is the minimum; other references can be utilized to provide more support.) References are related to content.
9.3 to 10 points
Includes at least one reference from this week’s learning and one new, current (within 3 years), peer- reviewed scholarly source from the UIC library that is not listed in the course material. (This is the minimum; other references can be utilized to provide more support.) References are related to content.
8.4 to 9.2 points
Includes at least one resource from the Learning Resources and one current resource from the UIC Library on the topic that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old. Resource is somewhat appropriate to the topic. Content included is synthesized from the resources (not simply copied and pasted.)
7.5 to 8.3 points
Includes at least one resource from the Learning Resources and one current resource from the UIC Library on the topic that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old. Content included is mostly synthesized from the resources but some content lacks connection and/or some statements in the paper do not match references.
0 to 7.4 points
Includes only 1 required resource and/or some statements or data in the paper do not match references. Content is not synthesized and/or is simply copied and pasted with minimal evidence of connection to resource or assigned resources are not utilized as required or references are not included.
Criterion 4: (10 Points/13 %) Writing is clear, with appropriate spelling, sentence structure and punctuation. Data is cited. In-text citations have a corresponding reference listing. Complete and error-free APA formatting is utilized for both reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct quotations are not used.
9.3 to 10 points
Writing is clear, with appropriate spelling, sentence structure and punctuation. Data is cited appropriately. In-text citations have a corresponding reference listing. Complete and error-free APA formatting is utilized for both reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct quotations are not used.
8.4 to 9.2 points
No more than 2-4 formatting/APA errors. Writing is clear, with appropriate spelling, sentence structure and punctuation. In- text citations are used with a corresponding reference listings Most data is cited. Direct quotations are not used.
7.5 to 8.3 points
4-5 formatting, writing, grammar, or APA errors and/or in-text citations may not be present or match reference (s). Some data points not cited. Direct Quotations are not used
0 to 7.4 points
More than 5 grammar, spelling, writing, or APA errors and paper is very difficult to follow due to structure/formatting issues and/or direct quotations are used frequently. In text citations are used inappropriately, infrequently or completely omitted where required. Data is rarely cited or not cited at all.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 1/2
View Associated Items
Print Close Window
6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362
https://uic.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_136031_1&course_id=_257748_1 2/2
- Wireless Topology Paper: Wireless communication, generally, useless three configuration topologies (1) point to point; (2) point to multipoint; and (3) multi-point to point. In this paper, (a) define each topology, (b) provide a scenario for using each t
- Deliverable length: Case study: 700–1,000 words; 2 analytical frameworks: 350–700 words each; 250-word summary This week you will continue to refine and build on the case study by including the following section on personality.. Personality To complete
- Paper of Richard Jewell
- N_Theory350
- History work
- Corporate Regulations: A Legal Study
- project manager
- Discussed
- Analysis of Impact Draft . topic :Neuromorphic technology (Computer chips that mimic the human brain)
- SOC-320 Week 3 Assignment What is Love?