Psychology Assignment

profileYoyobaba

please read carefully and let me know if you have any questions. Please no Al or Turnitin

  • 8 months ago
  • 1
files (3)

Week6_Assignment5.pdf

Due Nov 16 by 10:59pm Points 97 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

 Back to Week at a Glance (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/191666/modules/items/7983991

ASSIGNMENT 2: CASE STUDY—TIMOTHY

Imagine that you are a psychologist at a local mental health center. Meet Timothy, a fictitious client who is visiting a psychologist for the first time. During his visit, Timothy shares a series of symptoms and experiences that are having a negative impact on his daily life.

For this Assignment, you will evaluate Timothy's case file, engage with artificial intelligence (AI), and apply your knowledge of assessment and the DSM-5 criteria to consider the diagnosis that may be the best fit. You also will examine effective treatment options to support Timothy's mental health and well-being.

(https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Adobe/OrigImage- LgRendition/AdobeStock_141147591.jpeg)

RESOURCES

Document: Case Study: Timothy (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/191666/fi

Reading 

Submit a 600- to 1,000-word paper in which you:

Ask AI to identify the diagnosis/diagnoses that best fit the information in Timothy’s case file. Copy and paste the question you asked the AI chatbot and the response you received.

Based on your knowledge of the DSM-5 clinical criteria, explain why you feel AI's diagnosis/es was right or wrong. If wrong, provide another diagnosis. Identify and explain two specific clinical criteria that Timothy meets for the diagnosis you believe best fits him. Identify and explain two additional pieces of information that you would want to obtain in the clinical interview and/or through testing to further support your diagnosis and explain how they would affect your assessment. Identify and explain the treatment option you think would work best for Timothy based on his clinical presentation. Describe two challenges that Timothy could face because of the disorder (e.g., inability to maintain work, ruptured family relationships) and explain a strategy that could be used to address each.

To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work by referring to specific information from the learning resources. Cite and reference the sources you use.

Be sure to review the Week 6 Assignment 2 Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

les/15689971?wrap=1) (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/191666/fi les/15689971/download?download_frd=1)

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

PSYC_3004_Week6_Assignment2_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Asked AI to identify diagnoses based on information in case file. Copied and pasted the question and response in the submission.

12 pts

Explained why they believed the AI's diagnosis/es were right or wrong. If wrong, provided an alternative diagnosis. Identified and explained two clinical criteria Timothy met for their alternative diagnosis.

20 pts

Identified and explained two additional pieces of information they would

20 pts

12 to >11.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) This component is fully addressed and logically presented.

11 to >8.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.

8 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations) This component is not present or not clearly addressed.

20 to >18.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) This component is fully addressed and logically presented.

18 to >14.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.

14 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations) This component is not present or not clearly addressed.

20 to >18.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) This component is fully addressed and logically presented.

18 to >14.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) This component is addressed. Further development would

14 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations) This component is not present or not clearly addressed.

Criteria Ratings Pts

want to obtain in the clinical interview or through testing to support their diagnosis, and explained how those would affect their assessment.

Identified and explained the treatment option they believed would work best for Timothy based on his clinical presentation.

12 pts

Described two challenges that Timothy could face because of the disorder and explained a strategy that could be used to address each.

15 pts

strengthen this component.

12 to >11.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations)

This component is fully addressed and logically presented.

11 to >8.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations)

This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.

8 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)

This component is not present or not clearly addressed.

15 to >13.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations)

This component is fully addressed and logically presented.

13 to >10.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations)

This component is addressed. Further development would strengthen this component.

10 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)

This component is not present or not clearly addressed.

Criteria Ratings Pts

Format and Writing

10 pts

Timeliness

8 pts

Total Points: 97

10 to >9.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) Any spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English are minor and do not affect clear communication. Communication demonstrates discipline-specific conventions, such as stylistic choices appropriate to an academic audience. Work includes multiple explicit mentions of concepts or ideas from the required sources, if specified by the assignment. These concepts or ideas are correctly cited and formatted in accordance with APA guidelines. A reference page and/or a title page are included, if specified by the assignment, and properly formatted in APA style.

9 to >7.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) Submission contains few spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English OR these deviations do not affect clear communication.   Work includes one or more explicit mentions of a concept or idea from the required sources, if specified by the assignment/discussion’s directions and an attempt at using APA to cite the source has been made. A reference page and/or a title page are included, if specified by the assignment.

7 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations)

Multiple spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English affect clear communication. Work does not include any explicit mention of concepts or ideas from the required resources, OR it contains one or more explicit mention of a concept or idea from the required sources, but without attempting to cite the source.

8 to >7.0 pts Exemplary (Exceeds Expectations) The assignment was submitted on time unless there was a prior agreement with the instructor.

7 to >5.0 pts Proficient (Meets Expectations) The assignment was submitted within 7 days of the due date.

5 to >0 pts Developing (Does Not Fully Meet Expectations) The assignment was not submitted within 7 days of the due date.