political science research paper
RUBRIC!!
CriteriaA1—ExcellentA2—Very GoodB—GoodC—AdequateD—Needs ImprovementF—Does Not Meet Criteria0—Missing EntirelyCriterion ScoreThesis/Statement of Purpose Transparency20 points
Includes a transparent thesis in relation to the essay/research question.
18 points
Includes a thesis, but needs to be adjusted somewhat.
16 points
Possesses transparent thesis, but could be clarified, centralized, or stronger.
14 points
Possesses adequate thesis, but needs to be centralized and more transparent.
12 points
Thesis needs to be clarified or strengthened significantly.
10 points
Does not include a transparent thesis or statement of purpose in relation or appropriate to the question.
0 points
Insufficient material to assess
Score of Thesis/Statement of Purpose Transparency,/ 20Organizational Structure & Formatting20 points
Includes a strong, balanced Introduction & Conclusion sections and a balanced paragraph structure.
18 points
Includes a structural framework as far as the Introduction & Conclusion sections; paragraph sizes run too long or too short.
16 points
Overall well-organized, but could be enhanced by more focused Introduction or Conclusion sections.
14 points
Exemplifies clear pattern of organization, but needs more balanced paragraph structure; some paragraphs are too long/short.
12 points
Introduction and/or Conclusion sections are missing; generally disorganized in formatting and structure.
10 points
Is not sufficiently organized; missing structural elements; lacking in structure for an academic paper.
0 points
Non-existent structure
Score of Organizational Structure & Formatting,/ 20Coherence of Narrative, Analyses, & Arguments20 points
Possesses coherent, ordered points throughout; consistent narrative patterns; stays on point; uses an appropriate third-person narrative.
18 points
Provides coherent narrative overall, but could be adjusted in places.
16 points
Original narrative, but needs more depth in terms of including other perspectives & evidence.
14 points
Has original positions, but too much editorializing; uses first-person narrative. Arguments need more development & depth.
12 points
Original, but includes undeveloped arguments and points; relies too much on sources or quotes to establish narrative.
10 points
Ideas and arguments are not developed sufficiently. Possesses unoriginal or incoherent narrative.
0 points
Incoherent narrative and/or Plagiarism
Score of Coherence of Narrative, Analyses, & Arguments,/ 20Grammar & Mechanics for Academic Writing20 points
Demonstrates mastery of diction, syntax, usage, grammar, and academic writing mechanics.
18 points
Displays mastery, but one or two careless mistakes that do not detract from the overall quality nor meaning.
16 points
Demonstrates competence, but some isolated mistakes or typos in places.
14 points
Demonstrates competence, but displays repetitive mistakes or patterns in flawed grammar.
12 points
Needs significant proofreading and editing; grammar problems throughout.
10 points
Does not meet academic writing standards.
0 points
Does meet college-level standards.
Score of Grammar & Mechanics for Academic Writing,/ 20Sourcing/Referencing for Academic Writing20 points
Incorporates appropriate sources, references, & citations.
18 points
All sources are accounted for, but not all sources are relevant to the topic.
16 points
Shows care for sourcing apparent, but has some simple formatting mistakes or contextual issues with applying sources.
14 points
Uses sources properly formatted, but needs a broader range of sources; some misunderstood or inappropriately applied; has excessive quotations.
12 points
Needs much more development in using appropriate sources or formatting citations or references; over-relies on quoted material.
10 points
Appropriate sourcing is not evident; fails to use or cite references appropriately; inconsistent formatting.
0 points
No sources, citations, and/or references
Score of Sourcing/Referencing for Academic Writing,/ 20Rubric Total Score
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at1.41.27AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at1.57.12AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at1.59.30AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at2.05.51AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at2.05.58AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at2.28.33AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at2.28.43AM.png
- ScreenShot2021-04-15at2.29.03AM.png
- rawlsandbeyond.pdf
- acontemoorycritique.pdf
- ACritiqueofJohnRawlssPrinciplesofJustice.pdf
- shouldrawlsbeasocialist.pdf
5 years ago
80
Purchase the answer to view it

- PoliticalScienceResearch12.docx
- pol.pdf
- Business Analytics
- PSY 430 Week 4 Individual Assignment Group Motivation Inventory Paper
- Discussion Post - 2 paragraphs
- accounting problems
- Perfect Solution Speedy Delivery Systems can buy a piece of equipment that should provide an 6 percent return and can be financed at 3 percent with deb.
- MGT 498 Week 1 Individual Assignment Strategic Management Process Paper
- HUM Appendix A critical thinking stages Answer
- Ratio Analysis
- Fundamentals of Reimbursement in Healthcare
- HRM Legal 2