Nursing Assignment Description: 2-DNP-870

nikkyvu

Main
Similar Questions

Home >Homework Answsers >Nursing homework help

Care Dilemma Case Study

a day ago
19.07.2026
30

Report issue

files (2)

Module2Assignment.docx
Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Module2Assignment.docx

Assignment Description:

Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study

Write a 2500-word essay addressing the care dilemma case study. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. This should be an advocacy essay focused on local policymakers. Support your ideas with at l east FOUR (4) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations in APA style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count toward the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

· In a small community outside of a large metropolitan area, there is a free clinic that provides care to the working poor, which is primarily Hispanic. Thirty-five percent of the population have diabetes and are prescribed oral medications. Patients have their blood glucose checked at their monthly appointments. Half of the patients miss their monthly appointments as they cannot leave their jobs to go to the clinic.

· Identify the care dilemma experienced by this population and how the factors of the social determinants of health are impacting their ability to receive care, access medical devices, and promote a healthy lifestyle.

· Describe a viable solution to this care dilemma.

· Describe a health policy and why it should be supported with evidence-based rationale.

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

· Length: 2500 words

· Structure: Include a title page and reference slide in APA style. These do not count toward the minimal word slide count for this assignment.

· References: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Scholarly sources to support your claims. PEER REVIEW ARTICLES ONLY. Scholarly articles from 2021 to 2026 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric. Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal.

Required Resources

Porche, D. J. (2023). Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapter 6.

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Content Weight:

/ 30

points

Topic is inappropri

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

standing of con

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

stand; does not ad

dress many assign

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

tion to the assign

ment topic.

points

Topic is mostly cov

ered and appropri

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

quately demonstrate

accurate under

standing of con

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

Topic is covered

completely and ap

propriate to assign

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

sions is evident;

clear and under

standable; ad

dresses all of the re

quirements of the

assignment descrip

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

ing clarity and ex

planation of con

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

cused details.

Organization

Weight: 25%

0 points

Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.

Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points

Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information.

20 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.

Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.

Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

/ 25

Logic/Argument

Weight: 15%

0 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points

Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

/ 15

Support Weight:

20%

0 points

Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

APA format and style are not evident.

14 points

Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.

16 points

Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style.

20 points

Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

/ 20

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

points

Style and voice inap

propriate or do not

address given audi

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

ate to given audi

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

priate language are

used.

points

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

cific, purposeful, dy

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

dard, written, aca

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Overall Score

Level 1

points minimum

Level 2

points minimum

Level 3

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Content Weight:

/ 30

points

Topic is inappropri

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

standing of con

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

stand; does not ad

dress many assign

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

tion to the assign

ment topic.

points

Topic is mostly cov

ered and appropri

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

quately demonstrate

accurate under

standing of con

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

Topic is covered

completely and ap

propriate to assign

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

sions is evident;

clear and under

standable; ad

dresses all of the re

quirements of the

assignment descrip

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

ing clarity and ex

planation of con

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

cused details.

Organization

Weight: 25%

0 points

Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.

Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points

20 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.

Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.

Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

/ 25

Logic/Argument

Weight: 15%

0 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points

Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

/ 15

Support Weight:

20%

0 points

APA format and style are not evident.

14 points

16 points

20 points

Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

/ 20

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

points

Style and voice inap

propriate or do not

address given audi

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

ate to given audi

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

priate language are

used.

points

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

cific, purposeful, dy

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

dard, written, aca

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Overall Score

Level 1

points minimum

Level 2

points minimum

Level 3

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Module2Assignment.docx

Assignment Description:

Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study

· Describe a viable solution to this care dilemma.

· Describe a health policy and why it should be supported with evidence-based rationale.

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

· Length: 2500 words

· Structure: Include a title page and reference slide in APA style. These do not count toward the minimal word slide count for this assignment.

· References: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

Required Resources

Porche, D. J. (2023). Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapter 6.

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Content Weight:

/ 30

points

Topic is inappropri

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

standing of con

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

stand; does not ad

dress many assign

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

tion to the assign

ment topic.

points

Topic is mostly cov

ered and appropri

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

quately demonstrate

accurate under

standing of con

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

Topic is covered

completely and ap

propriate to assign

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

sions is evident;

clear and under

standable; ad

dresses all of the re

quirements of the

assignment descrip

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

ing clarity and ex

planation of con

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

cused details.

Organization

Weight: 25%

0 points

Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.

Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points

20 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.

Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.

Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

/ 25

Logic/Argument

Weight: 15%

0 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points

Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

/ 15

Support Weight:

20%

0 points

APA format and style are not evident.

14 points

16 points

20 points

Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

/ 20

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

points

Style and voice inap

propriate or do not

address given audi

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

ate to given audi

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

priate language are

used.

points

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

cific, purposeful, dy

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

dard, written, aca

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Overall Score

Level 1

points minimum

Level 2

points minimum

Level 3

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Module2Assignment.docx

Assignment Description:

Advocacy Essay: Care Dilemma Case Study

· Describe a viable solution to this care dilemma.

· Describe a health policy and why it should be supported with evidence-based rationale.

The following specifications are required for this assignment:

· Length: 2500 words

· Structure: Include a title page and reference slide in APA style. These do not count toward the minimal word slide count for this assignment.

· References: Use the appropriate APA citations and references on each slide for all resources utilized. Include at least FOUR (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

Required Resources

Porche, D. J. (2023). Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN. Read chapter 6.

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1

Course: DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Content Weight:

/ 30

points

Topic is inappropri

ate to assignment,

inaccurate under

standing of con

cepts, unclear and

difficult to under

stand; does not ad

dress many assign

ment requirements.

Information has

weak or no connec

tion to the assign

ment topic.

points

Topic is mostly cov

ered and appropri

ate to assignment,

but does not ade

quately demonstrate

accurate under

standing of con

cepts; mostly clear

and understandable;

lacks some of the

requirements of the

assignment descrip

tion and/or provides

little detail;

Information relates

to the main topic,

but few details

and/or examples are

given.

points

Topic is covered

completely and ap

propriate to assign

ment; overview of

key concept dimen

sions is evident;

clear and under

standable; ad

dresses all of the re

quirements of the

assignment descrip

tion, with adequate

attention to detail.

points

In-depth coverage

of topic; outstand

ing clarity and ex

planation of con

cepts demonstrated

in information pre

sented; approaches

assignment with

depth and breadth,

without redundancy,

using clear and fo

cused details.

Organization

Weight: 25%

0 points

Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.

Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points

20 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.

Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.

Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

/ 25

Logic/Argument

Weight: 15%

0 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points

Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

/ 15

Support Weight:

20%

0 points

APA format and style are not evident.

14 points

16 points

20 points

Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

/ 20

Total

/ 100

Quality of

Written

Communication

Weight: 10%

/ 10

points

Style and voice inap

propriate or do not

address given audi

ence, purpose, etc.

Word choice is ex

cessively redundant,

clichéd, and unspe

cific. Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

punctuation, and

paragraphing.

Surface errors are

pervasive enough

that they impede

communication of

meaning.

points

Style and voice are

somewhat appropri

ate to given audi

ence and purpose.

Word choice is of

ten unspecific,

generic, redundant,

and clichéd.

Repetitive mechani

cal errors distract

the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present.

points

Style and voice are

appropriate to the

given audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout. Minimal

mechanical or typo

graphical errors are

present, but are not

overly distracting to

the reader. Correct

sentence structure

and audience-appro

priate language are

used.

points

Style and voice are

not only appropriate

to the given audi

ence and purpose,

but also show origi

nality and creativity.

Word choice is spe

cific, purposeful, dy

namic and varied.

Free of mechanical

and typographical

errors. A variety of

sentence structures

and effective figures

of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in

command of stan

dard, written, aca

demic English.

7/13/26, 8:34 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP870 Sect1 Health Policy, Advocacy and Partnerships - Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

Overall Score

Level 1

points minimum

Level 2

points minimum

Level 3

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/120526/viewContent/6403102/View 1/5

1/5

other Questions(10)

Nursing Assignment Description: 2-DNP-870

Module2Assignment.docx

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Module2Assignment.docx

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Module2Assignment.docx

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Module2Assignment.docx

Module2Assignment-RUBRIC.docx

Nursing WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT

Nursing WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT

Nursing Problem Statement-Week 1 Assignment

Nursing WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT

Nursing week 5_Assignment_DNP850

Nursing Module 1 Assignment 1.2

Nursing Week 2_Assignment_DNP855

Nursing Module 4 Assignment 4.3

Nursing Week 6_Assignment_DNP855

MODULE 1_DNP860