Evaluation
2 years ago
10
EvaluationPlan.docx
EvaluationPlanrubric.docx
- DistanceEducationinSouthDakota-AnEvaluationReport.doc
- AEIOUreports.doc
- defchapter12fifthedition.pdf
EvaluationPlan.docx
A formative and summative evaluation plan will be proposed. An approach such as the AEIOU model, or the CIPP model will be followed. This plan will be two to four pages, single-spaced, and will be related to the design plan. (Multimedia for Arts and Chemistry). Your instructor will provide examples of how each of these categories might be measured or assessed.
Accountability
Effectiveness
Impact
Organizational Context
Unanticipated Consequences
See attached rubrics for additional information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oq-Ebqn9Q0
EvaluationPlanrubric.docx
Evaluation Plan rubric
|
Criteria |
Needs work
|
Average
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary
|
|
Abstract (100 word maximum) (write this last) |
No abstract is apparent |
The abstract either 1) exceeds; or 2) falls well short of the word limit; or 3) not explanatory |
An abstract is apparent and introduces and summarizes the plan |
The paper includes a concise well-written 100-word abstract, which introduces and summarizes the paper. |
|
Explanation of the Model |
Incomplete and/or unfocused. |
Explains the model |
Clearly states the model and why it is appropriate for this plan |
Clearly and concisely states the |
|
Measures |
Unclear or incomplete |
Shows generalizable measures for evaluation |
Clearly shows how formative evaluation will be used during the development of the project, and how summative information will be used |
Shows the potential to contribute to the improvement of the project and contribute to the design literature |
|
Structure |
Narrative inappropriate or missing |
The document does not include relevant subheadings |
The document uses subheadings based upon the thesis statement |
Uses relevant subheadings developed from the thesis; introduction provides a concise explanation of the paper; & conclusions do not introduce new material. The model to be followed, such as AEIOU should be the basis for the structure of the design plan. |
|
Level of detail |
The document is missing key element of the assignment |
The document is lacking sufficient detail |
The document makes an explanation and elaborates with detail. |
The document makes a thorough explanation and provides relevant, explicit details. |
|
Mechanics |
Difficult to comprehend due to errors. |
Numerous grammatical, syntactical, or other errors. |
Minor grammatical, syntactical, or other errors. |
No grammatical, syntactical, or other errors. |
|
References |
References not cited or few to none reported |
Cites references |
Cites references; may include web pages or other non-peer reviewed articles |
Cites and includes research results from articles, or other quality sources |
|
APA Style |
Does not use APA style; numerous errors |
More than one of the following incorrect: length, title page, citations, references |
APA style, but one of the following incorrect: length, title page, citations, references |
Appropriate APA style, length correct, title page, citations, references. |
- STR 581 Week 3 External and Internal Environmental Analysis
- MAT126 week 2 assignment
- two esays
- INF 336 W4 - Assignment - City of Granston
- WK8 Quiz CO101 Intro to Public Speaking
- ENG315 week 3 quiz
- Eng 121-Finally Returning To School-Final (1)
- Java Programming
- DUE TODAY
- Charitable Facilities For (Tutor Olikeg2005 only)