Create a Comprehensive Risk Assessment

This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.

Instructions

This week you will create a comprehensive risk assessment that builds on the earlier risk tables and circumstances previously provided for your selected organization and the related industry. As you develop your assessment, consult sample risk assessments and adjust your content to extend your previous work specifically, not merely adopting a template or sample on the web. The assessment should also include details that reflect different assessment approaches (e.g., qualitative, expert, quantitative, etc.) while still supplying a single reasoned analysis at the end. And finally, explain how the proposal provides a route to reduce current and future losses.

In your paper, make sure to:

Include a summary that provides an overview for executives (1 page)

Provide a risk assessment and an interpretation with implications for executives (2 pages)

Length: 18 pages including tables and images, not including title and reference pages

References: Beyond the sources in this course, include a minimum of 5 additional scholarly resources from the NCU collection of recent peer-reviewed sources.

The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards.

 CriteriaExcellent (94%-100%) A5 pointsGood (90%-93%) A-4.58 pointsAcceptable (80%-89%) B+, B, B-4.23 pointsDeficient (73%-79%) C+, C3.8 pointsUnacceptable (0% - 72%) C-, F0 pointsCriterion ScoreKey Concepts, Support, and Development 20%

Consistent evidence of understanding  key cybesecurity concepts with originality and depth of ideas; ideas work together as a unified whole; main points are sufficiently supported (with evidence, if necessary); support is valid and specific.

Key cybersecurity concepts discussed and supported sufficiently; support is sound, valid, and logical.

Key cybersecurity concepts and ideas are only indirectly supported; support isn't sufficient or specific, but is loosely relevant to main points.

Lack of support for key cybersecurity concepts; frequent and illogical generalizations without support.

No evidence of understanding of key cybersecurity concepts; Ideas are extremely simplistic, showing signs of confusion or misunderstanding of assignment.

Score of Key Concepts, Support, and Development 20%,/ 5Assignment Instructions 20%

Correctly completed all the assignment instructions.

Incorrectly completed 1 minor part of the assignment.

Incorrectly completed 2 minor parts of the assignment.

Incorrectly completed 3-4 minor parts of the assignment.

Incorrectly completed >4 parts of the assignment.

Score of Assignment Instructions 20%,/ 5Content and Critical Thinking 20%

Strong evidence of content knowledge.

All responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.

Good evidence of content knowledge.

Only 1 response is not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.

Some evidence of content knowledge.

2 responses are not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.

Little evidence of content knowledge.

3 responses are not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.

No evidence of content knowledge.

>3 responses are not thoughtful, thorough, or well-reasoned.

Score of Content and Critical Thinking 20%,/ 5Integration of Resources 20%

All resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.

1 resource is not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.

2 resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.

3 resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.

Resources are not used, not scholarly, or not appropriate for the assignment.

Score of Integration of Resources 20%,/ 5Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA 20%

No misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors.

1-2 misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors.

3-4 misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors.

5-10 misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors.

>10 misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors.

Score of Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA 20%,/ 5

TotalScore of Signature Assignment Grading Rubric (25 Points),/ 25

Overall Score

Excellent

23.5 points minimum

(94%-100%) A

Good

22.5 points minimum

(90%-93%) A-

Acceptable

20 points minimum

(80%-89%) B-,B, B+

Deficient

18.25 points minimum

(73%-79%) C, C+

Unacceptable

0 points minimum

(0% - 72%) F