c4-ass1
10 months ago
20
cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf
c4-ass1.docx
C3-ASS3.docx
cf_example_of_screenshot.pdf
Summary of Findings
• Summary of the type of study • Summary of credibility factors: How credible is the article? • Summary of the importance of the content to your selected diagnosis • Summary of the ability to apply the content to your current workplace or patient population
Article Link
• Include link to article here.
Reference
Maniya, S., Gonzalves, M. V., & Saadan, N. B. (2023). Prevention of kinking in percutaneous tubes.
WCET Journal 43(4), 27-31.
Credibility Factors
• Factor 1 (list factor here) • Factor 2 (list factor here) • Factor 3 (list factor here) • Etc.
Type of Study
Type of Study: Qualitative or Quantitative
Level of Evidence: (list level of evidence)
Methodology: (list methodology)
c4-ass1.docx
Assessment 1
Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.
Expand All
Introduction
Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.
Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.
Preparation
Review the What Is Scholarly? Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:
· What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?
· Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.
These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.
Also, look at the "Find EPB Articles" section of the Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences library guide (found in the guide's left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.
Instructions
Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.
Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:
· Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.
· Review the article for the following criteria:
· Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).
· Credibility factors.
· Importance of content to selected diagnosis.
· The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.
· Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the Example of Screenshot [PDF] document). You can refer to the instructions in the Taking Screenshots [PDF] document.
· Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.
· Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.
· Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you've found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?
· Include a link to your article.
· Include a reference to your article in APA format.
Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
· Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
· Identify the credibility factors of an article.
· Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
· Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
· Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
· Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
· Criterion 1
· Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
· Distinguished
· Determines the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence, providing reasons for the determinations.
· Criterion 2
· Identify the credibility factors of an article.
· Distinguished
· Identifies the credibility factors of an article, including if the article is peer-reviewed.
· Criterion 3
· Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
· Distinguished
· Summarizes the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis, and the information’s implications.
· Criterion 4
· Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
· Distinguished
· Summarizes the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population, providing examples.
· .
· Criterion 5
· Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
· Distinguished
· Provides a flawless APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
C3-ASS3.docx
Assessment 3
Concept Map: The 3Ps and Mental Health Care
Create a concept map of a mental health diagnosis using one of the mental health scenario case studies presented in this section of the course.
Expand All
Introduction
Concept maps are useful tools to help care providers and patients visualize the big picture of a condition. By being able to present a snapshot of symptoms, impacts, treatments, as well as contributing and risk factors, concept maps can improve communication, treatment planning, and health outcomes. Understanding how to create accurate, well-organized, and easy to understand concept maps will help you improve your efficacy as a healthcare practitioner and the outcomes of the patients you work with.
Instructions
Before beginning this assessment, make sure that you have completed the three Sentinel U case study activities included in the assessment. These will form the basis of your assessment.
For this assessment you will select one of the mental health Sentinel U case study activities and create a concept map that outlines the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the mental health diagnosis from your chosen case study.
The key components of a mental health diagnosis concept map include the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the diagnosis. The concept map should outline the key concepts related to the diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The map should be organized using a nursing concept map template, such as spider maps, hierarchical maps, or flow charts, to organize the information. The concept map should be accurate, complete, well-organized, and use appropriate nursing concepts and terminology.
To complete your concept map, you may wish to follow these steps:
1. Select one of the mental health Sentinel U scenarios:
· Ivy Jackson, 61 YO, Female, African American.
· Marco Mancini, 43 YO, Male, Mediterranean.
· Wesley Blanco, 13 YO, Non-Binary, Filipino, White.
2. Research the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment of the chosen mental health diagnosis within the Sentinel-U case study.
3. Complete the case study simulation and download the simulation report showing the patient you selected and showing 100% complete.
4. Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
· You may wish to use the Concept Map Template [DOCX] , but are also free to create your own.
5. Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
Your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria.
· Diagnosis: Describe a mental health diagnosis. The diagnosis should be accurate and supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.
· Make sure that the diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.
· Ensure you have downloaded the completed Sentinel-U simulation report showing the patient you selected.
· Concept Map: Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
· Make sure that your use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant, and that the relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.
· Organization: The concept map should be well-organized and easy to follow. The content should be presented in a logical and clear manner, with a clear purpose and goals.
· Also, you should make sure that your map is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.
· Professional Communication: The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication. The map should be free of errors and typos and should use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis to a professional audience.
· APA format and style: The reference list should be formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic and evidence-based, published within the last 5 years.
Additional Requirements
· Concept Map: 1-page concept map that clearly organizes the 3Ps related to a mental health diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostics, complications, nursing diagnosis, and nursing interventions.
· SIM Report: Ensure you download the completed SIM report showing the patient selected.
· Reference List: Create an APA style reference list for all sources that you used to help build and support the information in your concept map. Include this in the same document as your concept map, but on its own page.
· APA Style: Use current APA style for all in-text citations and any current APA-approved font.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 2: Create evidence based interventions to address the health needs, risks, and resources of individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures.
· Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.
· Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
· The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.
· Competency 4: Perform comprehensive and focused physical assessments using appropriate techniques and tools.
· Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.
· Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care.
· The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.
· The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Expand All
Criterion 1
Describe a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources.
Distinguished
Describes a mental health diagnosis that is supported by relevant and evidence-based sources. The diagnosis is accurate and includes specific symptoms or criteria that support the diagnosis.
Criterion 2
Create a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions.
Distinguished
Creates a concept map that outlines the key concepts related to the chosen diagnosis, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic procedures, medications, complications, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions. The use of evidence to support the concept map is explicit and relevant. The relationships between the concepts are clearly defined.
Criterion 3
Upload the Sentinel-U case study showing the Simulation name OR showing 100% complete.
Criterion 4
The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals.
Distinguished
The concept map is well-organized and easy to follow, with a clear purpose and goals. It is visually appealing and easy to read, incorporating appropriate use of colors, shapes, and symbols.
Criterion 5
The concept map should demonstrate professionalism and effective communication, use appropriate terminology and language. The map should effectively communicate the key concepts related to the diagnosis.
Distinguished
The concept map showcases excellent professionalism and effective communication, is free of errors and typos, utilizes appropriate terminology and language, and effectively communicates the key concepts related to the diagnosis.
Criterion 6
The reference list is formatted in APA style. All sources used should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and published within the last 5 years.
Distinguished
The reference list is in APA format, exceptionally well-organized and provides comprehensive evidence-based support for the topic, utilizing highly relevant and credible sources.
PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE
- Review and Reflect
- Nutrition class
- Riley recieved an 85, 89, and 92 on three tests, how many points does he need to score on three...
- summarize the article
- History
- Question requiring 150 Word response within 7 hours
- Adept Gyst No one else
- phyllis young
- 150 Words Response/Rebuttal due in strictly due in one hour's time.
- HELP WITH ALEKS