C2sin

FEEDBACK FROM CASE 1

You did a nice job of detailing why the GI Bill of 1944 transformed the landscape and need for higher education administrators after WWII. The veterans that took advantage changed the culture and attitudes on who could attend and the purpose of college. It was no longer for the upper class.

Great use of current sources to support your argument. When citing in the reference not every word of the title is capitalized. I would encourage you to refer to an APA 7 guide to ensure proper format.

The information presented in the assignment was detailed. However, the structure of it was not scholarly. There were multiple three sentence paragraphs, which is too short for doctoral students. You should aim to have well written five to seven paragraphs. I made notes on how you could have strengthened those short paragraphs. Even by combining two short ones into a larger one would make it scholarly.

Overall, the content was excellent, just need to structure the paper a little better to be more scholarly.

Case Assignment

In a 3- to 4-page paper, use the background readings to discuss the primary factors to consider in academic program development and the role of accreditation in the process. First, identify at least three factors to consider in the development of a new academic program. Next, identify the Regional Accrediting Organization that oversees the region of your current work site, and briefly describe the requirements for submission of a proposal. In conclusion, discuss the importance of academic program development and accreditation in your current, or future, role as an educational leader.

Assignment Expectations

Assignment-Driven Criteria: Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way. 

Critical Thinking/Application to Professional Practice: Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and careful consideration of experts or research in the field of educational leadership. Module content and concepts are thoroughly and thoughtfully analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice in an exceptional manner.

Scholarly Writing: Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication at the doctoral level.

Quality of References and Assignment Organization: Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content from the module readings or other sources to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic, and shape the whole work. 

Citing Sources: Demonstrates mastery applying APA formatting standards to both in-text citations and the reference list.

Professionalism and Timeliness: Demonstrates excellence in taking responsibility for learning by adhering to course requirement policies and expectations. Assignment submitted on time or student collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.