benchmark 3

Skip to Main Content

1. Levi Watkins Learning Center
2. Research Guides Homepage
3. SWK 450: Applied Research
4. Steps in Writing a Literature Review

Search this Guide Search

SWK 450: Applied Research: Steps in Writing a Literature Review

This subject guide will assist you in finding books, journal articles, and websites, as well as assist you in developing your research skills using the recommended resources.

• Welcome
• Annotated Bibliography
• The Literature Review Toggle Dropdown
  • Types of Literature Reviews
  • Steps in Writing a Literature Review
  • Writing Your Literature Review
  • Mistakes to Avoid
• Articles
• Books
• Websites
• Ethics in Research
• APA Style

1. Find a focus

A literature review is organized around ideas, not the sources themselves. As you read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider what themes or issues connect your sources together. Do they present one or different solutions? Is there an aspect of the field that is missing? How well do they present the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory? Do they reveal a trend in the field? Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your review.

2. Construct a working thesis statement

Use the focus you’ve found to construct a thesis statement. Your thesis statement will not necessarily argue for a position or an opinion; rather it will argue for a particular perspective on the material.

3. Consider organization

What is the most effective way of presenting the information? What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc., that your review needs to include? In what order should you present them? Develop an organization for your review:

• Cover the basic categories :an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper.
  • Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern. 
  • Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized chronologically, thematically, or methodologically (see below for more information on each). 
  • Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?
• Consider how you will present the sources within the body of your paper. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further.

• Types of Literature Reviews

4. Begin Composition

• Use evidence Your research must be backed up with evidence
• Be selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. 
• Use quotes sparingly
• Summarize and synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each paragraph as well as throughout the review.
• Keep your own voice
• Use caution when paraphrasing Be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words.

5. Revise

REVISE, REVISE, REVISE!!!

• << Previous: Types of Literature Reviews
• Next: Writing Your Literature Review >>

• Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025 11:47 AM
• URL: https://alasu.libguides.com/swk450
• Print Page

Login to LibApps Subjects: Social Work View this page in a format suitable for printers, screen readers, or mobile devices. 915 South Jackson Street • Montgomery, Alabama 36101 • (334) 604-9164

2

The Role of Organizational Culture in Moderating Ethical Leadership and Employee Decision-Making

Thaddeus Cain Arizona State University

OGL 593 October 19, 2025

Introduction

Ethical failure is an organizational, stakeholder, and business sustainability issue that is still an issue in the contemporary business world amidst increased globalization. Nevertheless, ethical leadership programs are increasingly being used. The examples of Volkswagen, Wells Fargo, and so on show that the quality of the leadership training is not the factor that will ensure ethical behavior in multinational corporations (MNCs) (Disch, 2024; Zhang et al., 2023). Such incidents point to the uniform imbalance between the motives of the leaders and the judgments of the employees, triggered largely by the organizational culture. Even though ethical leaders teach integrity and accountability, they prove ineffective in situations where the organizational culture tolerates malpractices or the profit becomes more valuable than ethics (Bedi et al., 2016). It is the nature of this applied research project to close the gap in that disconnect. Particularly, it investigates the role of the organizational culture in mediating between ethical leadership and ethical decision-making among employees of MNCs. The project suggests the Cultural Alignment and Ethical Leadership Framework (CAELF), a research-grounded, practical framework used to align leadership conduct with cultural norms to enhance ethical consistency in international organizations. The proposed project will provide answers to the question through a qualitative methodology by synthesizing the available literature and using secondary analysis of cases to determine how, in fact, cultural systems enhance or reduce the moral power of leaders. Lastly, it is supposed to come up with a model that would assist organizations in creating ethical awareness, stakeholder trust, and sustainable business practices (Aydin, 2018; Kuenzi et al., 2020).

Thesis Statement

Despite the parallel implementation of ethical leadership programs throughout multinational companies, the prevalence of unethical behavior has yet to prove that leadership is the sole factor that can either define ethical decision-making results. The Cultural Alignment and Ethical Leadership Framework (CAELF) suggests that the effectiveness of ethical leadership depends on how it aligns with the organizational culture. The framework aims at ensuring the establishment of ethical awareness, accountability, and trust in the organization through the integration of cultural norms, communication structures, and ethical conduct of leadership that is likely to reinforce legitimacy and trust among the stakeholders in an establishment (Ko et al., 2018; Eisenbeiss, 2012).

Next Steps and Anticipated Deadlines

The tasks below describe how the final project and the creation of the practitioner-oriented white paper will be completed by the end of the semester.

Week 1-2: Refinement and Planning.

· Complete the project proposal with the input of instructors.

· Establish inclusion and exclusion criteria of literature and case study selection.

· Compare and contrast the annotated bibliography of fundamental literature on ethical leadership, culture, and ethical decision-making.

· Develop theoretical backgrounds of the Cultural Alignment and Ethical Leadership Framework (CAELF) based on the moral management, social learning, and transformational leadership theories (Walumbwa et al., 2011; Khan, 2016).

Week 3-5: Literature Review and Theoretical Integration.

· Complete a comprehensive literature review of ethical leadership and organizational culture, including the determination of the effect of shared values on the creation of ethical climates (Kussatz, 2023).

· Contrast and integrate key theories to find gaps, inconsistent areas, and areas of alignment.

· Prepare a conceptual map of the relationship between leadership behavior and cultural norms with ethical outcomes.

· Prepare the section of the literature review, with the focus on the empirical studies that illustrate the moderating role of culture (Newman et al., 2020).

Weeks 6–8: Case Study Analysis

· Choose three big case studies: Volkswagen, Wells Fargo, and one organization that offers good ethical performance.

· Use thematic analysis to determine trends in leadership behavior, cultural values, and employee performance.

· Research the effect of corporate ethics codes, communication, and cross-cultural dynamics on ethical compliance (Bedi et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018).

· Ground results on literature-based constructs of ethical climate and leadership effectiveness.

Week 9-10 Framework Development and Synthesis.

· Develop the CAELF model and specify the three elements of the model (1) Ethical Leadership Inputs, (2) Cultural Moderators, and (3) Decision-Making Outcomes.

· Graphical pathway causal maps.

· Combine both literature and case-based findings so as to propose and refine framework propositions (Rukh & Qadeer, 2018).

· Develop the outline chapter and the practice implementation rules of the organizational leaders.

Weeks 11-12: Finalized and Submitted.

• Finalize and correct the white paper and make sure that there is a sense of coherence in the document.

· Peer and instructor reviews need to be conducted to promote clarity and academic integrity.

· Write the executive summary and conclusion of managerial implications and best practices of ethical leadership.

End product: The practitioner-oriented white paper, Cultural Alignment and Ethical Leadership Framework, developed due to the support of empirical and theoretical data, will have to be finalized.

Projected Deliverable

The last product will be a Cultural Alignment and Ethical Leadership Framework (CAELF) presented in a white paper with a practitioner orientation and targeting leaders, compliance officers, and HR executives in multinational corporations. This paper shall offer evidence-based measures of balancing leadership and cultural values towards fostering ethical practices. It will entail a conceptual framework, a practical implementation process, and metrics for measuring ethical performance and employee decision-making.

The project developed will become a part of the leadership scholarship by bridging the gap between moral intention and ethical practice. This project contributes to the argument of sustainable ethical behavior, which assumes cultural change as well as leadership integrity by exhibiting that culture is not a passive setting but rather an active moderator of the leadership influence. Finally, the CAELF framework will assist the organizations in institutionalizing ethical behavior, reducing misconduct, and restoring trust among the global stakeholders (O’Keefe et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2022).

References

Aydın, B. (2018). The role of organizational culture on leadership styles. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmala Dergisi, 7(1), 267–280. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mjss/issue/40516/485849

Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1

Disch, H. (2024). Exploring business ethics and responsibility: A case study in the automobile industry (Doctoral dissertation, Middle Georgia State University).

Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.001

Khan, B. E. R. N. A. D. E. T. T. E. (2016). Transformational leadership. In Nursing Concept Analysis: Applications to Research and Practice (Part 3, pp. 283–296).

Ko, C., Ma, J., Bartnik, R., Haney, M. H., & Kang, M. (2018). Ethical leadership: An integrative review and future research agenda. Ethics & Behavior, 28(2), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1318069

Kuenzi, M., Mayer, D. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2020). Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical climate, and unethical behavior. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12356

Kussatz, S. B. (2023). The Dynamics of Ethical Leadership: Unraveling Influences on Individual Behavior within Organizations. University of Vaasa.

Newman, A., Le, H., North-Samardzic, A., & Cohen, M. (2020). Moral disengagement at work: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 535–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04173-0

O’Keefe, D. F., Howell, G. T., & Squires, E. C. (2020). Ethical leadership begets ethical leadership: Exploring situational moderators of the trickle-down effect. Ethics & Behavior, 30(8), 581–600.

Rukh, H., & Qadeer, F. (2018). Diagnosing culture of public organizations utilizing competing values framework: A mixed methods approach. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(1), 398–418.

Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.002

Wang, Z., Xu, H., & Liu, Y. (2018). How does ethical leadership trickle down? Test of an integrative dual-process model. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3361-x

Zhang, X., Zheng, X., He, H., & Zhu, W. (2023). Ethical leadership and employee moral identity: Revisiting the moral person and moral manager dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(4), 901–915.

Zheng, Y., Epitropaki, O., Graham, L., & Caveney, N. (2022). Ethical leadership and ethical voice: The mediating mechanisms of value internalization and integrity identity. Journal of Management, 48(4), 973–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211002611