Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
a day ago
25
CASESTUDY4.docx
CASESTUDY4.docx
CASE STUDY 4: Depression, Anxiety, Substance Use, and Chronic Pain
CASE STUDY 4 - Depression, Anxiety, Substance Use, and Chronic Pain
Case Scenario
Ms. R.D. is a 45-year-old female presenting with insomnia, fatigue, chronic low back pain, and mood changes.
History
· PMH: Chronic pain, prior opioid exposure
· Reports alcohol use nightly
· PHQ-9: 17, GAD-7: 15
Student Assignment Requirements
1. Pathophysiology (25%)
· Neurobiology of depression and anxiety
· Substance use impact on CNS
· Pain–mood interaction
2. Mental Health Assessment (35%)
· Diagnostic differentiation
· Suicide risk screening
· Substance use screening
· Safety planning
3. Pharmacology & Integrated Treatment (30%)
· Antidepressant selection and titration
· Avoidance of high-risk medications
· Non-pharmacologic and referral planning
4. APA & Evidence Use (10%)
RUBRIC – CASE STUDY 4 - Mental Health, Substance Use & Chronic Pain (100 Points)
1. Neurobiologic Pathophysiology (25 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (23–25) |
Integrates neurobiology of mood disorders, substance use, and pain with strong application to clinical symptoms. |
|
Satisfactory (18–22) |
Accurate explanation with limited integration. |
|
Unsatisfactory (13–17) |
Partial or unclear explanation. |
|
Poor (1–12) |
Incorrect or superficial discussion. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
2. Mental Health & Safety Assessment (35 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (33–35) |
Comprehensive assessment including diagnostic differentiation, suicide risk, substance use screening, and safety planning. |
|
Satisfactory (26–32) |
Assessment is appropriate but lacks depth or clarity in prioritization. |
|
Unsatisfactory (18–25) |
Incomplete assessment or missed safety considerations. |
|
Poor (1–17) |
Unsafe or inadequate evaluation. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
3. Pharmacology & Integrated Care Plan (30 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (28–30) |
Evidence-based medication selection with safe prescribing, clear rationale, and integrated non-pharmacologic strategies. |
|
Satisfactory (22–27) |
Appropriate plan but lacks optimization or monitoring detail. |
|
Unsatisfactory (16–21) |
Limited pharmacologic understanding or justification. |
|
Poor (1–15) |
Unsafe or inappropriate treatment decisions. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
- supply chain management 304
- michael.smith - What would Socrates do?
- dq
- Strategic Plan and Self Reflection Summary
- Epidemiology of HIV.
- accounting theory assignment
- Solve Quiz
- Market Structures" Please respond to the following: •From the scenario, assuming Katrina’s Candies is operating in the monopolistically competitive market structure and faces the following weekly demand and short-run cost functions: VC = 20Q+0.006665 Q2 w
- <object:standard:macc.912.g-srt.3.6>A lamppost, CAB, bent at point A after a storm. The tip of the lamppost touched the ground at point...
- only to prof. farell