Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
20 days ago
25
casestudy4.docx
casestudy4.docx
Advanced Primary Care of Family I-HBN-HY01 Luis Serrano 5 pages
🩺 CASE STUDY 4: Depression, Anxiety, Substance Use, and Chronic Pain
CASE STUDY 4 - Depression, Anxiety, Substance Use, and Chronic Pain
Case Scenario
Ms. R.D. is a 45-year-old female presenting with insomnia, fatigue, chronic low back pain, and mood changes.
History
· PMH: Chronic pain, prior opioid exposure
· Reports alcohol use nightly
· PHQ-9: 17, GAD-7: 15
Student Assignment Requirements
1. Pathophysiology (25%)
· Neurobiology of depression and anxiety
· Substance use impact on CNS
· Pain–mood interaction
2. Mental Health Assessment (35%)
· Diagnostic differentiation
· Suicide risk screening
· Substance use screening
· Safety planning
3. Pharmacology & Integrated Treatment (30%)
· Antidepressant selection and titration
· Avoidance of high-risk medications
· Non-pharmacologic and referral planning
4. APA & Evidence Use (10%)
RUBRIC – CASE STUDY 4 - Mental Health, Substance Use & Chronic Pain (100 Points)
1. Neurobiologic Pathophysiology (25 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (23–25) |
Integrates neurobiology of mood disorders, substance use, and pain with strong application to clinical symptoms. |
|
Satisfactory (18–22) |
Accurate explanation with limited integration. |
|
Unsatisfactory (13–17) |
Partial or unclear explanation. |
|
Poor (1–12) |
Incorrect or superficial discussion. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
2. Mental Health & Safety Assessment (35 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (33–35) |
Comprehensive assessment including diagnostic differentiation, suicide risk, substance use screening, and safety planning. |
|
Satisfactory (26–32) |
Assessment is appropriate but lacks depth or clarity in prioritization. |
|
Unsatisfactory (18–25) |
Incomplete assessment or missed safety considerations. |
|
Poor (1–17) |
Unsafe or inadequate evaluation. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
3. Pharmacology & Integrated Care Plan (30 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (28–30) |
Evidence-based medication selection with safe prescribing, clear rationale, and integrated non-pharmacologic strategies. |
|
Satisfactory (22–27) |
Appropriate plan but lacks optimization or monitoring detail. |
|
Unsatisfactory (16–21) |
Limited pharmacologic understanding or justification. |
|
Poor (1–15) |
Unsafe or inappropriate treatment decisions. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
4. APA & Scholarly Writing (10 points)
(Same descriptors as Case 1)
Submission
Drag files here
Maximum size: 512 MB
or
Details & Information
- Your task is to create a Justification/Recommendation Report proposing a positive change you want to make in an organization in which you operate (military, business, civic, church, family unit, club, etc.).
- Assignment 5: Creating Your Dream Job, Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper
- CJHS337 Phase 4 DB One of your supervisees comes to you with an issue. He has been arguing with another supervisee regarding the full extent of client rights. After listening to the supervisee, you conclude that neither supervisee has a complete understan
- hi can anyone do my achieve 3000 articles?? i have 12.
- Finance Assignments - Balance Sheet and Market Value
- Finance Assignment A++ Tutorial Use As Guide
- Finance Question - Financial Engineering
- Finance Assignment - Risk and Return
- Week 4 - Assignment 1
- java