Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
4 months ago
8
modulo8.docx
modulo8.docx
Task Analysis
If you search the term “task analysis” on the internet, you will get more than 800,000 results giving directions on how to conduct a task analysis as well as examples with a multitude of both physical and cognitive behaviors. Task analysis involves taking a complex skill and breaking it down into its basic components, so you end up with a sequentially ordered list of steps or tasks that make up the complex skill.
With this in mind, for this Assignment, you will conduct a task analysis on conducting a task analysis. You might wonder why this Assignment was designed this way. The answer is because task analysis has been demonstrated to be an effective way to teach complex skills. There are literally thousands of unique skills on which you could conduct a task analysis. However, whether you are doing a task analysis for this Assignment or tying a shoe with a child with an intellectual disability, it always needs to be personalized for the individual.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To Prepare
· Review the readings and media found in this week’s Learning Resources to gain an understanding of conducting a task analysis.
· Search the internet and/or the Walden library and find examples of task analyses upon which you can model your Assignment.
· Consider the steps for conducting a task analysis based on your Learning Resources and the examples you found in your internet and/or Walden library search.
Assignment (1–2 pages)
· Develop a task analysis with a minimum of 10 steps on how to conduct a task analysis. Use your Learning Resources and the examples you found in your internet and/or Walden Library search.
Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.
By Day 7 of Week 8
Submit your Week 8 Assignment.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Top of Form
|
Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
|
|
Drag a file here, or Choose a file to upload |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<="" div="" style="text-size-adjust: auto; margin: 10px 0px;"> I agree to the tool's End-User License Agreement This assignment submission is my own, original work * |
|
|
|
Bottom of Form
Rubric
PSYC_6731_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
|
PSYC_6731_Week8_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
12 to >10.25 ptsExcellentAssignment demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment provides significant detail, including multiple relevant examples, discerning ideas, and evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). 10.25 to >8.25 ptsGoodAssignment demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment includes moderate detail, discerning ideas, and sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). 8.25 to >4.5 ptsFairAssignment demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples, discerning ideas, evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). 4.5 to >0 ptsPoorAssignment demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples discerning ideas, or sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). |
12 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting |
3 to >2.0 ptsExcellentAssignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment contains multiple appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). 2 to >1.0 ptsGoodAssignment is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). 1 to >0.0 ptsFairAssignment is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Assignment may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Assignment may contain inferior sources (number or quality of scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). 0 ptsPoorAssignment is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Assignment may contain few or no quality sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or the internet). |
3 pts |
Total Points: 15
- ETHICS
- ACC 548 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Reporting Requirements Memo
- HW2
- PSY 480 Week 5 - Team Assignment - Contemporary Issues in Clinical Psychology - A+ guaranteed!
- Training Session Handouts
- Discussion question
- STATS 167 Week 5 - Individual Assignment - Hypothesis Testing and Correlation Worksheet - A+ worksheet!
- Religions
- HRM 324 (Total Compensation) Week 4 Complete A+ Graded
- Precalc