Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Post-Master Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner

MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

Image credit: Picture by ncci.com Identify your problems, but give your

power and energy to solutions. – Tony Robbins

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to write the first half of your literature review on the topic selected for your research paper on the topic of your choice from a psychiatric and behavioral issues affecting the community.

COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes.

• Identifying clinical problems specific to psychiatric-mental health nursing research • Uses current healthcare research findings and other evidence to expand clinical knowledge,

enhance role performance, and increase knowledge of professional issues. • Apply principles of research and evidence-based practice to impact client outcomes. • Contributes to an environment that promotes interprofessional education. • Critically analyzing and interpreting research for application to practice.

Program Outcomes

• 1. Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings.

• 3. Analyze quality initiatives to improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. • 6. Examine the effect of legal, ethical, and regulatory processes on healthcare delivery, practice, and

health outcomes.

AACN

Knowledge for Nursing Practice

• Integrate foundational and advanced specialty knowledge into clinical reasoning. • Synthesize current and emerging evidence to Influence practice.

Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

2

• Apply and critically evaluate advanced knowledge in a defined area of nursing practice. • Use diverse sources of evidence to inform practice.

APNA

Standard #2-3-4-5-9

NONPF

• Domain 1: Knowledge of Practice • Domain 2: Person-Centered Care • Domain 4: Practice Scholarship and Translational Science • Domain 5: Quality and Safety

Nurse Executive Role-Specific Competency

à Knowledge of Healthcare à Communication à Leadership à Professionalism

DUE DATE: Submit to the Moodle by Sunday of the end Week 3 at 11:59 p.m. ET.

POINTS: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.

REQUIREMENTS

à To complete this application, you will need to access to the Miami Regional College virtual library database. following databases: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm. Additionally, the virtual Ask a Librarian feature is available in Moodle.

à This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.

à APA format and effective writing is required for the paper. Use your APA 7th ed. manual to check and correct your formatting. Use Grammarly and the grammar and spelling check on your Word Processor

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

3

and criteria for effective writing to assure that your paper well written. APA format is required, with both a title page and reference page.

à Create your manuscript using the version of Microsoft Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”.

à Follow the directions and grading criteria closely.

à This paper will be submitted through Turnitin, a Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.

à A minimum of 5 current scholarly references that are 5 years old or less for this section.

DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA

Category Description

Introduction Begin by describing which databases you searched, search terms you used, how you narrowed your search, how you selected those references you will discuss in this section.

Elaboration on the selected topic and rationale for selecting this

topic.

Please share the findings from at least 5 scholarly articles.

Clarity of writing & APA 7th edition

Please follow APA formatting. Indent each first sentence of each paragraph by 0.5. Use bolded headers between sections. Please include an intro, a title page, and a reference page.

Total: A quality essay will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

4

GRADING RUBRIC

Assignment Criteria

Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria

Content (30 pts)

In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding

clarity and explanation of concepts

demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment

with depth and breadth, without

redundancy, using clear and focused details.

27 – 30 points

Topic is covered completely and appropriate to

assignment; overview of key concept

dimensions is evident; clear and

understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the

assignment description, with adequate

attention to detail.

15 – 26 points

Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to

assignment, but does not adequately

demonstrate accurate understanding of

concepts; mostly clear and understandable with

some areas unclear; lacks some of the

requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main

topic, but few details and/or examples are

given. 0 – 14 points

Organization (25 pts)

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and

thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of

reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous

terms. Excellent concluding summary

with succinct and precise ideas that

impact reader.

20 – 25 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious

framework. Proficient introduction that is

interesting and states topic. Conclusion

contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and

introduces no new information.

13 – 19 points

Ideas are sometimes Disorganized,

Irrelevant, or confusing. Flow is

sometimes choppy; somewhat clear

organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented

in an uninteresting way. Conclusion

contains basic summary of topic

without final concluding ideas, may

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

5

inappropriately introduces new

information. 0 – 12 points

Logic and arguments

(15 pts)

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for

the claims and thoughts within the

assignment. 10-15 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the

claims and thoughts within the assignment.

6-9 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for

the claims and thoughts within

assignment; Many claims are weak or

illogical or lack logical reasoning.

0 - 5 points

Support Weight (20 pts)

Provides very strong support from credible,

current, relevant, academic citations;

Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in

assignment description. Accurate citations and

references are presented.

17 – 20 points

Provides sufficient support with credible,

current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required

citations in assignment description. ; In-text

citations and a reference page are present with few

format errors. 10-16points

Provides weak support or not enough support.

Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or

academic; and not referenced. Does not meet

the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

0 – 9 point

Clarity of writing & APA

(10 pts)

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

9-10 points

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.

6 – 8 points

Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

0 – 5 points

Total Points Possible = 100 points

Post-Master Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner

MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

Image credit: Picture by ncci.com Identify your problems, but give your

power and energy to solutions. – Tony Robbins

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper is to write the first half of your literature review on the topic selected for your research paper on the topic of your choice from a psychiatric and behavioral issues affecting the community.

COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes.

• Identifying clinical problems specific to psychiatric-mental health nursing research • Uses current healthcare research findings and other evidence to expand clinical knowledge,

enhance role performance, and increase knowledge of professional issues. • Apply principles of research and evidence-based practice to impact client outcomes. • Contributes to an environment that promotes interprofessional education. • Critically analyzing and interpreting research for application to practice.

Program Outcomes

• 1. Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings.

• 3. Analyze quality initiatives to improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. • 6. Examine the effect of legal, ethical, and regulatory processes on healthcare delivery, practice, and

health outcomes.

AACN

Knowledge for Nursing Practice

• Integrate foundational and advanced specialty knowledge into clinical reasoning. • Synthesize current and emerging evidence to Influence practice.

Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

2

• Apply and critically evaluate advanced knowledge in a defined area of nursing practice. • Use diverse sources of evidence to inform practice.

APNA

Standard #2-3-4-5-9

NONPF

• Domain 1: Knowledge of Practice • Domain 2: Person-Centered Care • Domain 4: Practice Scholarship and Translational Science • Domain 5: Quality and Safety

Nurse Executive Role-Specific Competency

à Knowledge of Healthcare à Communication à Leadership à Professionalism

DUE DATE: Submit to the Moodle by Sunday of the end Week 3 at 11:59 p.m. ET.

POINTS: This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.

REQUIREMENTS

à To complete this application, you will need to access to the Miami Regional College virtual library database. following databases: CINAHL Complete Database, MEDLINE Complete Database, LIRN, and so forth. Our Librarian is available to help on campus from Monday to Friday 7:30 am to 9:00 pm & Saturday 8:00 am to 3:00 pm. Additionally, the virtual Ask a Librarian feature is available in Moodle.

à This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria and rubric.

à APA format and effective writing is required for the paper. Use your APA 7th ed. manual to check and correct your formatting. Use Grammarly and the grammar and spelling check on your Word Processor

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

3

and criteria for effective writing to assure that your paper well written. APA format is required, with both a title page and reference page.

à Create your manuscript using the version of Microsoft Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”.

à Follow the directions and grading criteria closely.

à This paper will be submitted through Turnitin, a Turnitin similarity score of 20% or less is expected.

à A minimum of 5 current scholarly references that are 5 years old or less for this section.

DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA

Category Description

Introduction Begin by describing which databases you searched, search terms you used, how you narrowed your search, how you selected those references you will discuss in this section.

Elaboration on the selected topic and rationale for selecting this

topic.

Please share the findings from at least 5 scholarly articles.

Clarity of writing & APA 7th edition

Please follow APA formatting. Indent each first sentence of each paragraph by 0.5. Use bolded headers between sections. Please include an intro, a title page, and a reference page.

Total: A quality essay will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

4

GRADING RUBRIC

Assignment Criteria

Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria

Content (30 pts)

In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding

clarity and explanation of concepts

demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment

with depth and breadth, without

redundancy, using clear and focused details.

27 – 30 points

Topic is covered completely and appropriate to

assignment; overview of key concept

dimensions is evident; clear and

understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the

assignment description, with adequate

attention to detail.

15 – 26 points

Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to

assignment, but does not adequately

demonstrate accurate understanding of

concepts; mostly clear and understandable with

some areas unclear; lacks some of the

requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main

topic, but few details and/or examples are

given. 0 – 14 points

Organization (25 pts)

Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and

thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of

reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous

terms. Excellent concluding summary

with succinct and precise ideas that

impact reader.

20 – 25 points

Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious

framework. Proficient introduction that is

interesting and states topic. Conclusion

contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and

introduces no new information.

13 – 19 points

Ideas are sometimes Disorganized,

Irrelevant, or confusing. Flow is

sometimes choppy; somewhat clear

organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented

in an uninteresting way. Conclusion

contains basic summary of topic

without final concluding ideas, may

PMC -PMHNP MSN5027 – Week #3 Research Paper – Literature Review Part I

MSN5027 Week #3

5

inappropriately introduces new

information. 0 – 12 points

Logic and arguments

(15 pts)

Provides exemplary logical reasoning for

the claims and thoughts within the

assignment. 10-15 points

Uses solid logical reasoning for the

claims and thoughts within the assignment.

6-9 points

Demonstrates little logical reasoning for

the claims and thoughts within

assignment; Many claims are weak or

illogical or lack logical reasoning.

0 - 5 points

Support Weight (20 pts)

Provides very strong support from credible,

current, relevant, academic citations;

Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in

assignment description. Accurate citations and

references are presented.

17 – 20 points

Provides sufficient support with credible,

current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required

citations in assignment description. ; In-text

citations and a reference page are present with few

format errors. 10-16points

Provides weak support or not enough support.

Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or

academic; and not referenced. Does not meet

the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.

0 – 9 point

Clarity of writing & APA

(10 pts)

Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.

9-10 points

Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.

6 – 8 points

Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.

0 – 5 points

Total Points Possible = 100 points