Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
2 years ago
20
Benchmark-LiteratureReview.docx
NRS-465-RS-T3-PICOTDevelopment1.docx
- NRS-465-T4-LiteratureEvaluationTable4.docx
Benchmark-LiteratureReview.docx
Benchmark - Literature Review
SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT
Start Date
Mar 4, 2024, 12:00 AM
Due Date
Mar 10, 2024, 11:59 PM
Points
40
Rubric
Status
Active
Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.
A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the PICOT question from the earlier "PICOT Question" template and information from the "Literature Evaluation Table" assignment to develop a review.
Using eight peer-reviewed articles, write 750-1,000-word review that includes the following sections:
· Introduction section (including PICOT Question)
· A summary of the purpose of the studies
· A comparison of sample populations
· A synthesis of the studies' conclusions (when looking at all of the studies together, group the conclusions by themes )
· A summary of the limitations of the studies
· A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research
You are required to cite a minimum of eight peer-reviewed articles to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN-BSN
4.1: Advance the scholarship of nursing.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 4.1
NRS-465-RS-T3-PICOTDevelopment1.docx
PICOT Question
Student Name: Andi Curbelo
Faculty Name: Grand Canyon University
PICO(T) Question: Use the PICOT question developed in Topic 3 Discussion Question 1 and refine it as needed based on feedback received.
|
PICO(T) Question Template |
||
|
P |
Population |
People with diabetes who live in an underserved urban community. |
|
I |
Intervention |
Setting up a community-based diabetes management program with support networks education on how to control diabetes, and easy access to medications and supplies at low cost. |
|
C |
Comparison |
Standard diabetes care practices without the improved program |
|
O |
Outcome |
Change in glycemic control.
|
|
T |
Timeline |
Within one year of program implementation. |
|
PICOT Question |
||
|
In individuals living with diabetes in an underserved urban community (P), how does the implementation of a community-based diabetes management program that includes education on diabetes management, affordable access to medications and supplies, and support systems (I) compared to standard diabetes care practices without the improved program (C) change their glycemic control (O) within one year of program implementation (T)?
|
||
|
Problem Statement |
||
|
This part will be changed to explain why an underserved urban neighborhood needs a community-based diabetes management program. The focus will be on how important it is to improve glycemic control to lower complications and improve the quality of life for people with diabetes. It will show the difference in how care is given and how the planned intervention might help. |
||
|
Population |
||
|
People who live in underserved urban areas have diabetes. It focuses on how difficult it is for them to manage their condition because of social factors and limited access to healthcare resources, and how these problems affect their ability to control their blood sugar. |
||
|
Nursing Intervention |
||
|
Explains the parts of the community-based diabetes management program, such as teaching people how to manage their diabetes, making medications and supplies more cheap, and setting up support networks, and how these are meant to help the target population better control their blood sugar. |
||
|
Comparison |
||
|
Describes the proposed community-based diabetes management program and standard diabetes care practices. It shows how the two are different in terms of how they work, the tools they offer, and the results they hope to see in terms of controlling blood sugar. |
||
|
Outcome |
||
|
Changes in HbA1c numbers are used to measure how well long-term glycemic management is working. This article talks about how better glycemic control can help people with diabetes have fewer complications and a better quality of life. |
||
|
Time Frame |
||
|
The predicted results will be looked at within a year of the program starting. This gives a clear time frame for checking how well the intervention worked. |
References
Ariel-Donges, A. H., Gordon, E. L., Dixon, B. N., Eastman, A. J., Bauman, V., Ross, K. M., & Perri, M. G. (2020). Rural/urban disparities in access to the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Translational behavioral medicine, 10(6), 1554-1558.
Flood, D., Geldsetzer, P., Agoudavi, K., Aryal, K. K., Brant, L. C. C., Brian, G., ... & Manne-Goehler, J. (2022). Rural-urban differences in diabetes care and control in 42 low-and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual-level data. Diabetes Care, 45(9), 1961-1970.
Yin, Z., Lesser, J., Paiva, K. A., Zapata Jr, J., Moreno-Vasquez, A., Grigsby, T. J., ... & Wang, J. (2020). Using mobile health tools to engage rural underserved individuals in a diabetes education program in South Texas: feasibility study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(3), e16683.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
image1.png
- Last week we discussed the importance of ongoing communication with kids especially when it comes to sex and relationships). By the time kids reach the late adolescence stage their relationships are more complex, as are the issues they face. Based on the
- management help cont.
- Ethics Disscusion
- economy and religion in asia
- Financial Accounting and reporting review
- A bond has a par value of $1,000, a time to maturity of 10 years, and a coupon rate of 8%
- we are the world song, I want a rhetorical analysis essay about the Michael Jackson song which is we are the word discus in this essay the ethos which is the Arthur, pathos which is the audience , and logos which is the propose everything about the song
- Research Topic and Proposal
- The DOT Emergency Response Guidebook is a good start for a hazardous materials incident, discuss some other resources that could be used to gain some additional information.
- Assignment-2