Art History 20th century
Beginning as early as 1912, Marcel Duchamp called the value of art into question. So great
was his skepticism that he abandoned art after a short career (or at least he appeared to).
Nevertheless, and in spite of his efforts to undermine art, his work and ideas have had a profound
impact on the direction and character of art in our own time.
Consider the following question and provide a response: Why and in what ways is art of
value? What features or aspects of art make it valuable for society? These are fundamental
questions that lie behind our discipline, our chosen careers. If art isn’t valuable, then there’s no
need for artists or for a study of art’s history.
These questions can be answered from a number of different perspectives: 1) An artist’s
viewpoint: How is the practice of art valuable to the artist, the maker? 2) An observer’s viewpoint:
How is art valuable to a viewer? What benefits does society receive from art? 3) The art object:
What specific criteria or features make art something worth preserving or something worth
experiencing? What sets it apart from other created objects, for example shoes or automobiles?
Choose a single perspective to investigate or develop a more holistic approach that explains
how art is valuable for the maker, how making imbues the art with significance, and how the work
bestows benefits on a viewer. Explain your criteria for value: what constitutes value?
Provide and point to examples of artworks (painting, print, drawing, sculpture, or building) as
needed to support your argument. When a work of art is presented as evidence of value, describe
what benefits accrue to the person who creates, experiences, or comes to know this work. Be
sure to include reproductions of artworks you refer to in your paper and provide an appropriate
label and citation.
You must do research to expand your knowledge of different arguments made for the value
of art and to support the positions you ultimately present in your paper. Other fields of knowledge
like philosophy, psychology, anthropology, religion, and the sciences have much to add to a
discussion of the value of art. Use these to present a broad but focused argument for art’s value. A
minimum of 5 substantive sources is required, properly cited in MLA style. It is inappropriate to
use a dictionary or encyclopedia as one of these sources!
8 years ago
28
Purchase the answer to view it

- MarcelDuchampvalueofart.docx
- ArtHistory20thCenturypdf.pdf
- Your team is a large U.S. corporation that manufactures rubber tires, and you want to begin manufacturing and distribution in Germany. As a team, choose a country in which you would like to start a manufacturing plant.
- Strategic Management
- ENG 122 100$ for first two weeks Start now
- Coogly Company is attempting to identify its weighted average cost of capital for the coming year and has hired you...
- You have just left the office of your Patent Lawyer. They told you that no one will fund the next...
- Case 6B Chester & Wayne
- Finance Homework 2
- design a structural model of a pipelined CPU with 13 instructions using Verilog HDL. i have all the components (.v...
- Acct 557 Chapter 12 quiz
- Analysis of global concern
