Army case study due in 24 hours

CaseStudyRubric.pdf

Advanced Leader Course NCO Common Core Competencies

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing

IAW TP 350-70-7 Appendix C Assessment Instruments IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments

IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments

NAME:

ASSIGNMENT TITLE: Case Study DATE:

FACILITATOR: SFC Garrard

RATING UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR

RANGE 0 – 69.9 70 – 89.9 90 – 100

GRADE

COGNITIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels.

ANALYZING:

Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to each other and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.

APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing.

UNDERSTANDING:

Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.

REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Writing Assignment

Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research to write your case study. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your stance on the topic. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next. Then develop the body of the paper fully using no less than 500 words and no more than 700 words, this does not include the APA format title and references page. Finally, provide a summative conclusion. Provide a total of two references for your references page. Ensure you use Times New Roman 12 point font and the current APA Writing Style.

Facilitator’s Comments:

Facilitator’s Signature:

Learner’s Comments:

Learner’s Signature:

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing (cont.)

INTRODUCTION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6.9 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8.9 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Does not support thesis statement.

Conveys topic, describes subtopics to be reviewed. Generally supports Statement.

Strong introduction of topic clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Fully supports thesis statement.

points for introduction

TOPIC BODY 40%

Unsatisfactory 0-27 pts.

Satisfactory 28-35 pts.

Superior 35-40 pts.

Did not introduce any aspect of the topic or any instances were so vague as to imply there was much more information needed. Made little attempt to correlate the topic to the overarching theme. The body is less than three pages.

Partially introduced some of aspects of the topic. Developed and linked the topic to the overarching theme. The body meets 3-5 pages requirement.

Solidly introduced all aspects of the topic preparedness. Fully linked the topic to the overarching theme. The body meets 500-700 word requirement.

points for body

CONCLUSION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

The conclusion introduces new ideals and/or it does not summarize the body paragraphs.

The conclusion is one paragraph. It summarizes the body paragraphs but does not conclude the essay.

The conclusion is one paragraph. It summarizes the body paragraphs and concludes the essay.

points for conclusion

SEQUENCING AND TRANSITION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent.

Most material clearly related to main topic and subtopic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions.

Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic.

points for sequencing and transition

GRAMMAR AND CORRECTNESS 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation substantially detract from the paper.

Very few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors interfere with reading the paper.

The paper is free of grammatical errors and spelling & punctuation.

points for grammar and correctness

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing (cont.)

READABILITY (sentence structure) 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages.

Writing has minimal awkward or unclear passages.

Writing flows and is easy to follow.

points for readability

APA FORMATTING 5%

Unsatisfactory 0-3 pts.

Satisfactory 4 pts.

Superior 5 pts.

Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper.

No more than 3 errors in APA style that do not detract from the paper.

No errors in APA style. Possesses a Scholarly style.

points for formatting

REFERENCES 5%

Unsatisfactory 0-3 pts.

Satisfactory 4 pts.

Superior 5 pts.

No references. Only one properly formatted reference that matches in-text citations within the body of the paper.

2 properly formatted references that match in-text citations within the body of the paper.

More than 2 properly formatted references that match in-text citations within the body of the paper.

points for references

TOTAL POINTS

CaseStudyAssignmenetInstructions.pdf

A203: Research and Case Studies Learner Handout – History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge

Learning Activity

Leadership Case Study Analysis and Instructions Instructions: The purpose of the leadership case study is to analyze an individual situation (case) using relevant theoretical concepts from your discipline. The case study might then be used to help make a decision about how to do things in another case that has similar features. Learners will use theories, vocabulary, and models to describe their analysis of the case study. The case study analysis should be written in clear concise language. Read the following case study entitled, “History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge”. Pick two issues from the list below to discuss in the case study analysis. Write a 500 – 700 word analysis using the case study format outline.

a) The lack of standardized drills and maneuvers. b) The poor supply acquisition process. c) The lack of policies/procedures that were in place. d) The poor camp layout and sanitation plan. e) Sickness and disease. f) Low morale and desertion.

Case Study Format Outline Paragraph 1: Introduction, Key Problems, Thesis Statement Paragraph 2: Background, (Set the scene/facts/main actors) Paragraph 3: Alternatives (Outline some alternatives, why you rejected them, constraints/reasons, why alternatives are not possible at this time) Paragraph 4: Proposed Solutions (Proposed Course of Action (Solution) (one or two, may have sub components) Paragraph 5: Recommendations (Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution. If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues. What should be done and who should do it?)

Learner Handout – History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge
Learning Activity

A203_History_of_the_NCO_1700_Valley_Forge.pdf

History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge After a disappointing fall campaign that ended with a British Army occupying Philadelphia, George Washington cast about for winter quarters for his troops. He found a site among the thickly wooded hills around Valley Forge. The American camp lay somewhat to the north but within easy striking distance of the main road from Philadelphia to York, where the Continental Congress had taken refuge. This allowed his army to provide protection for the revolution’s governing body. Valley Forge lay in a rich agricultural region that the contending armies had picked over extensively during the previous years. (Stewart, R. W., (Ed.). (2009). American Military History Volume I, The United States Army Forging of a Nation, 1775 – 1917. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History.) When the 12,000 poorly fed, ill-equipped Continentals, weary from long marches, had staggered into Valley Forge, only about one in three had shoes, and many of their feet had left bloody footprints from the marching. Blankets were scarce; at one point these shortages caused nearly four-thousand men to be listed as unfit for duty. Many Soldiers wounded in previous battles died not from the injuries they sustained, but rather from exposure. In fact, disease, malnutrition and exposure claimed 2,500 Soldiers by the end of the winter. An inspection of the camp grounds found that Soldiers were living in crowded, damp quarters, with no standardized arrangement of tents or sanitation standards. Men relieved themselves where they wished and when an animal died, it was stripped of its meat and the rest was left to rot where it lay. Needless to say, the Army was ravaged by sickness. Not only were supplies non-existent but morale was at its lowest. For many that did not succumb to cold, hunger, or disease desertion was their final means of survival. Desperate to keep the Army intact, Washington tried to stem desertion by resorting to lashings as punishment and then threatening to shoot deserters on sight. Fear of starvation was not the only compelling motive for desertion. Wages for American Soldiers had never been good; during the Revolution in particular, the families of Soldiers often found themselves going from door to door begging for basic necessities. In addition, administrative issues led to further demoralization. An NCO could not transfer from the regiment that had accepted his enlistment to another and retain his grade. Coupled with this was the practice of placing recruits in a unit before they had received training. It is no surprise that desertion was a daily occurrence. The American public, along with Congress, began to criticize Washington for his inability to advance the war effort. Washington himself was painfully aware of the shortcomings of his makeshift Army. Their single file tactics and amalgamation of drills and maneuvers had been the source of confusion and peril on certain occasions. Washington had done his best to establish order at Valley Forge. Nevertheless, so severe were conditions that Washington despaired that “unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place . . . this Army must inevitably . . . starve, dissolve, or disperse, in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can . . .”

CaseStudyRubric.pdf

Advanced Leader Course NCO Common Core Competencies

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing

IAW TP 350-70-7 Appendix C Assessment Instruments IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments

IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments

NAME:

ASSIGNMENT TITLE: Case Study DATE:

FACILITATOR: SFC Garrard

RATING UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR

RANGE 0 – 69.9 70 – 89.9 90 – 100

GRADE

COGNITIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels.

ANALYZING:

Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to each other and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.

APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing.

UNDERSTANDING:

Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.

REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Writing Assignment

Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research to write your case study. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your stance on the topic. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next. Then develop the body of the paper fully using no less than 500 words and no more than 700 words, this does not include the APA format title and references page. Finally, provide a summative conclusion. Provide a total of two references for your references page. Ensure you use Times New Roman 12 point font and the current APA Writing Style.

Facilitator’s Comments:

Facilitator’s Signature:

Learner’s Comments:

Learner’s Signature:

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing (cont.)

INTRODUCTION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6.9 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8.9 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Does not support thesis statement.

Conveys topic, describes subtopics to be reviewed. Generally supports Statement.

Strong introduction of topic clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Fully supports thesis statement.

points for introduction

TOPIC BODY 40%

Unsatisfactory 0-27 pts.

Satisfactory 28-35 pts.

Superior 35-40 pts.

Did not introduce any aspect of the topic or any instances were so vague as to imply there was much more information needed. Made little attempt to correlate the topic to the overarching theme. The body is less than three pages.

Partially introduced some of aspects of the topic. Developed and linked the topic to the overarching theme. The body meets 3-5 pages requirement.

Solidly introduced all aspects of the topic preparedness. Fully linked the topic to the overarching theme. The body meets 500-700 word requirement.

points for body

CONCLUSION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

The conclusion introduces new ideals and/or it does not summarize the body paragraphs.

The conclusion is one paragraph. It summarizes the body paragraphs but does not conclude the essay.

The conclusion is one paragraph. It summarizes the body paragraphs and concludes the essay.

points for conclusion

SEQUENCING AND TRANSITION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent.

Most material clearly related to main topic and subtopic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions.

Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic.

points for sequencing and transition

GRAMMAR AND CORRECTNESS 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation substantially detract from the paper.

Very few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors interfere with reading the paper.

The paper is free of grammatical errors and spelling & punctuation.

points for grammar and correctness

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing (cont.)

READABILITY (sentence structure) 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages.

Writing has minimal awkward or unclear passages.

Writing flows and is easy to follow.

points for readability

APA FORMATTING 5%

Unsatisfactory 0-3 pts.

Satisfactory 4 pts.

Superior 5 pts.

Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper.

No more than 3 errors in APA style that do not detract from the paper.

No errors in APA style. Possesses a Scholarly style.

points for formatting

REFERENCES 5%

Unsatisfactory 0-3 pts.

Satisfactory 4 pts.

Superior 5 pts.

No references. Only one properly formatted reference that matches in-text citations within the body of the paper.

2 properly formatted references that match in-text citations within the body of the paper.

More than 2 properly formatted references that match in-text citations within the body of the paper.

points for references

TOTAL POINTS

CaseStudyAssignmenetInstructions.pdf

A203: Research and Case Studies Learner Handout – History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge

Learning Activity

Leadership Case Study Analysis and Instructions Instructions: The purpose of the leadership case study is to analyze an individual situation (case) using relevant theoretical concepts from your discipline. The case study might then be used to help make a decision about how to do things in another case that has similar features. Learners will use theories, vocabulary, and models to describe their analysis of the case study. The case study analysis should be written in clear concise language. Read the following case study entitled, “History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge”. Pick two issues from the list below to discuss in the case study analysis. Write a 500 – 700 word analysis using the case study format outline.

a) The lack of standardized drills and maneuvers. b) The poor supply acquisition process. c) The lack of policies/procedures that were in place. d) The poor camp layout and sanitation plan. e) Sickness and disease. f) Low morale and desertion.

Case Study Format Outline Paragraph 1: Introduction, Key Problems, Thesis Statement Paragraph 2: Background, (Set the scene/facts/main actors) Paragraph 3: Alternatives (Outline some alternatives, why you rejected them, constraints/reasons, why alternatives are not possible at this time) Paragraph 4: Proposed Solutions (Proposed Course of Action (Solution) (one or two, may have sub components) Paragraph 5: Recommendations (Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution. If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues. What should be done and who should do it?)

Learner Handout – History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge
Learning Activity

A203_History_of_the_NCO_1700_Valley_Forge.pdf

History of the NCO 1700: Valley Forge After a disappointing fall campaign that ended with a British Army occupying Philadelphia, George Washington cast about for winter quarters for his troops. He found a site among the thickly wooded hills around Valley Forge. The American camp lay somewhat to the north but within easy striking distance of the main road from Philadelphia to York, where the Continental Congress had taken refuge. This allowed his army to provide protection for the revolution’s governing body. Valley Forge lay in a rich agricultural region that the contending armies had picked over extensively during the previous years. (Stewart, R. W., (Ed.). (2009). American Military History Volume I, The United States Army Forging of a Nation, 1775 – 1917. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History.) When the 12,000 poorly fed, ill-equipped Continentals, weary from long marches, had staggered into Valley Forge, only about one in three had shoes, and many of their feet had left bloody footprints from the marching. Blankets were scarce; at one point these shortages caused nearly four-thousand men to be listed as unfit for duty. Many Soldiers wounded in previous battles died not from the injuries they sustained, but rather from exposure. In fact, disease, malnutrition and exposure claimed 2,500 Soldiers by the end of the winter. An inspection of the camp grounds found that Soldiers were living in crowded, damp quarters, with no standardized arrangement of tents or sanitation standards. Men relieved themselves where they wished and when an animal died, it was stripped of its meat and the rest was left to rot where it lay. Needless to say, the Army was ravaged by sickness. Not only were supplies non-existent but morale was at its lowest. For many that did not succumb to cold, hunger, or disease desertion was their final means of survival. Desperate to keep the Army intact, Washington tried to stem desertion by resorting to lashings as punishment and then threatening to shoot deserters on sight. Fear of starvation was not the only compelling motive for desertion. Wages for American Soldiers had never been good; during the Revolution in particular, the families of Soldiers often found themselves going from door to door begging for basic necessities. In addition, administrative issues led to further demoralization. An NCO could not transfer from the regiment that had accepted his enlistment to another and retain his grade. Coupled with this was the practice of placing recruits in a unit before they had received training. It is no surprise that desertion was a daily occurrence. The American public, along with Congress, began to criticize Washington for his inability to advance the war effort. Washington himself was painfully aware of the shortcomings of his makeshift Army. Their single file tactics and amalgamation of drills and maneuvers had been the source of confusion and peril on certain occasions. Washington had done his best to establish order at Valley Forge. Nevertheless, so severe were conditions that Washington despaired that “unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place . . . this Army must inevitably . . . starve, dissolve, or disperse, in order to obtain subsistence in the best manner they can . . .”

CaseStudyRubric.pdf

Advanced Leader Course NCO Common Core Competencies

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing

IAW TP 350-70-7 Appendix C Assessment Instruments IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments

IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments

NAME:

ASSIGNMENT TITLE: Case Study DATE:

FACILITATOR: SFC Garrard

RATING UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR

RANGE 0 – 69.9 70 – 89.9 90 – 100

GRADE

COGNITIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels.

ANALYZING:

Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to each other and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.

APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing.

UNDERSTANDING:

Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.

REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Writing Assignment

Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research to write your case study. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your stance on the topic. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next. Then develop the body of the paper fully using no less than 500 words and no more than 700 words, this does not include the APA format title and references page. Finally, provide a summative conclusion. Provide a total of two references for your references page. Ensure you use Times New Roman 12 point font and the current APA Writing Style.

Facilitator’s Comments:

Facilitator’s Signature:

Learner’s Comments:

Learner’s Signature:

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing (cont.)

INTRODUCTION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6.9 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8.9 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Does not support thesis statement.

Conveys topic, describes subtopics to be reviewed. Generally supports Statement.

Strong introduction of topic clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Fully supports thesis statement.

points for introduction

TOPIC BODY 40%

Unsatisfactory 0-27 pts.

Satisfactory 28-35 pts.

Superior 35-40 pts.

Did not introduce any aspect of the topic or any instances were so vague as to imply there was much more information needed. Made little attempt to correlate the topic to the overarching theme. The body is less than three pages.

Partially introduced some of aspects of the topic. Developed and linked the topic to the overarching theme. The body meets 3-5 pages requirement.

Solidly introduced all aspects of the topic preparedness. Fully linked the topic to the overarching theme. The body meets 500-700 word requirement.

points for body

CONCLUSION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

The conclusion introduces new ideals and/or it does not summarize the body paragraphs.

The conclusion is one paragraph. It summarizes the body paragraphs but does not conclude the essay.

The conclusion is one paragraph. It summarizes the body paragraphs and concludes the essay.

points for conclusion

SEQUENCING AND TRANSITION 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent.

Most material clearly related to main topic and subtopic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Attempts to provide variety of transitions.

Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic.

points for sequencing and transition

GRAMMAR AND CORRECTNESS 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Grammatical errors or spelling & punctuation substantially detract from the paper.

Very few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors interfere with reading the paper.

The paper is free of grammatical errors and spelling & punctuation.

points for grammar and correctness

Form 1009W, Assessing Writing (cont.)

READABILITY (sentence structure) 10%

Unsatisfactory 0-6 pts.

Satisfactory 7-8 pts.

Superior 9-10 pts.

Word choice is informal in tone. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages.

Writing has minimal awkward or unclear passages.

Writing flows and is easy to follow.

points for readability

APA FORMATTING 5%

Unsatisfactory 0-3 pts.

Satisfactory 4 pts.

Superior 5 pts.

Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper.

No more than 3 errors in APA style that do not detract from the paper.

No errors in APA style. Possesses a Scholarly style.

points for formatting

REFERENCES 5%

Unsatisfactory 0-3 pts.

Satisfactory 4 pts.

Superior 5 pts.

No references. Only one properly formatted reference that matches in-text citations within the body of the paper.

2 properly formatted references that match in-text citations within the body of the paper.

More than 2 properly formatted references that match in-text citations within the body of the paper.

points for references

TOTAL POINTS

CaseStudyAssignmenetInstructions.pdf

A203_History_of_the_NCO_1700_Valley_Forge.pdf

CaseStudyRubric.pdf

CaseStudyAssignmenetInstructions.pdf

A203_History_of_the_NCO_1700_Valley_Forge.pdf

CaseStudyRubric.pdf

CaseStudyAssignmenetInstructions.pdf

CASE STUDY