3.21 service operation management

profileduty13

follow the requirement 20slides + 10mins speech

  • 2 years ago
  • 120
files (7)

CORP3171-2324Assessment2Rubric1.pdf

Criteria/  scale 

Poor  Pass  Good  Very good  Excellent 

Style 10%

Week presentations style with no structure in the presentation

Acceptable presentation style and structure with many improvements possible

Acceptable presentation and structure

Interesting presentation and structure with good use of figures, charts, tables, etc.

Perfect and presentation structure and illustration of all required tools, figures, etc.

Justification 15%

No evidence why those two areas have been selected

A basic discussion regarding the two selected areas

Some basic evidence and discussion regarding the selected areas

Using data analysis and clearly discussing the reason for selected areas

Use of Pareto analysis and chart or any other relevant tool to demonstrate why two areas have been selected

Explanation 25%

No evidence only including some basic discussion with no use of tools and methods

Some basic discussion and inappropriate use of fishbone chart, tree diagram, etc.

Limited use of fishbone chart, tree diagram, etc. for explaining the problems

Using fishbone chart, tree diagram, etc. for explaining the problems; however, deeper investigation is possible

Perfect use of fishbone chart, tree diagram, etc. in explaining the problems with in- depth investigation

Evaluation 20%

No evidence of solution evaluation. Only some basic issues are discussed.

Basic and inappropriate use of problem- solution matrix or option matrix

Appropriate use of problem- solution matrix, options matrix, etc. for evaluating the possible solutions. However, the data gathering, process, etc. are not clearly mentioned

Good use of problem-solution matrix, options matrix, etc. for evaluating solutions with a clear presentation of data gathering, process, etc.

Perfect use of problem-solution matrix, options matrix, etc. for evaluating solutions and in-depth presentation of sources, data, process, and analysis in each area.

Conclusion 20%

Recap, discussion, and conclusion have not been presented appropriately

A fine recap with basic discussion, with no implications and support

Fine recap, with some discussion and no practical and managerial implications for the case study

Fine recap and discussion with practical and managerial implications and some basic recommendations

Complete recap, discussion, the implications for the case study, and also some general recommendations for a change in future

Referencing 10%

No evidence of relevant references with inappropriate referencing style

Very Limited use of relevant references with appropriate referencing style

Acceptable use of references with appropriate referencing style

Good use of sources by considering relevant references and appropriate referencing style

Perfect use of possible sources by applying relevant and updated references and appropriate referencing style