I found an interesting article that involves employment law, specifically FMLA for this
week's discussion topic. According to the US Department of Labor, FMLA, better known as
Family and Medical Leave Act, entitles an eligible employee to take unpaid, job-protected
leave for family and medical reasons. This case that I came across involved an employee
who was terminated from his job when his employer found out that he took a vacation to
Mexico while he was on medical leave of absence from work. The employee underwent foot
surgery and received a medical certification from his surgeon that he would need 4-6 weeks
of FMLA leave with a guideline of limited activities post-operatively for recovery. While
recovering, he asked his company if it was ok to go back to work early from his leave of
absence, and was denied due to the fact that he needed another certification from his surgeon
for a letter of back to work status. When the employee was unsuccessful to get such
certificate from his surgeon and learned that he would not be able to return to work, and
while trying to avoid using up all his vacation time, he asked to be paid under the employer's
salary continuation policy, or disability policy. Since he could not return to work earlier, he
decided to go on his previously planned vacation to Mexico. When he noticed discrepancies
in his paycheck, and was not getting what he though he should be getting paid while on this
leave of absence, he contacted HR. From there, HR discovered he took a trip while on this
FMLA leave of absence, they launched an investigation and ultimately fired the employee.
The employee sued his former employer, and the case went to trial. As a result, the state
high court of Massachusetts found that the employers made a knee-jerk decision without
reviewing the facts, including review of all medical information provided by the employee
from his medical providers, stating what the employee can and cannot do while on FMLA
leave of absence. Therefore awarding the employee $1.3 million in damages. Currently in
the United States, the federal minimum wage is $7.25/hr as stated on the Department of
Labor website. This is the amount of pay for an employee that is employed by a business
that is not in a state with additional minimum wage laws. Should a state have minimum
wage laws, then the employee would be paid whichever is the higher amount. For example,
in Ohio, the minimum wage law has the current wage per hour set at $9.30 for employers
that have an annual gross of over $342,000. Those that work a minimum wage paying job
will be paid at the state rate opposed to the federal rate. In recent years the rate of pay for
minimum wage, whether it be the federal or state rate, has been an issue. As stated in an
MSNBC news article, the issue at hand and the question more often being asked is, if the
minimum wage pay is sufficient and "fair" for citizens to live a life outside of poverty
without having to work 100+ hours a week. In 2021 there was talk of the President enacting
a law that would increase the federal minimum wage from $7.25/hr to $15/hr. While this
increase would not fix the huge income gap that at times puts Americans in extreme housing
and food shortage crisis, it could offer some relief. I am going to discuss the fact of
Arkansas being an "employment at will" state. What this means is that the employee or
employer may terminate employment at any moment with or without cause. This has been
used many times over my 13 plus years here. Our company used this practice again during
the COVID pandemic. Ownership had an addendum added to our handbook stating that it
would be a requirement to receive all vaccines available in order to remain employed. This
covered us in the event of retaliation from an employee also. Employees were given a
specific date to provide proof of vaccines or they were given a pink slip for not following
company policy. Since we are a small privately owned company no laws were broken or
even stretched. I am not saying that I agreed with the decision even though we are a medical
based child care facility but it was what was needed to be done in order to keep our doors
open to be able to provide the proper care for our patients in need. In April 2021, Illinois
amended its Human Rights Act to limit the decisions that employers can make about the
conviction records of employees.
“Under the amended Act, which takes effect immediately, it is a “civil rights violation” for
an employer to use a “conviction record” as a basis for adverse employment decisions,
unless:
There is a “substantial relationship” between one or more of the previous criminal offenses
and the employment sought or held; or
The granting or continuation of the employment would involve an unreasonable risk to
property or to the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public.” This
supreme court case highlighted the violation of discrimination laws by terminating
employees for their sexual orientation, specifically for identifying as homosexual or
transgender. While the Eleventh Circuit attempted to dismiss the suit, the Second and Sixth
Circuits found that the cases that involved could not be dismissed and proceeded further
(Schwartz, 2021).
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is prohibited to discriminate against
applicants and current employees based off of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.
This includes the failure, refusal, discipline, and discharge towards any employed individual
or individuals seeking employment (Civil Rights Act, 1964). According to Schwartz (2021),
the court in this specific case held the position that Title VII extends past gender and sex and
should include protection of sexual orientation and gender expressions.
As a result, the employment law of Title VII allowed the court to rule in favor of the victims
and has now paved the way for higher court resolution by prompting states to enact
subsequent legislation instead of leaving the power in the hands of local governments
(Schwartz, 2021). There are many ongoing issues in employment law in the United States.
As governing and organizational bodies oversee many laws that have been created there are
still daily operating practices that continue to discriminate against individuals who could
have one of many diverse differences that are not “social norms” of society operate
conditioning. One major ongoing employment law is discrimination and harassment in a
workplace environment. “The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination” (Laws Enforced by EEOC,
2009/11/21). The federal law Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a civil rights act
prohibiting employment discrimination. This law prohibits discrimination based on race,
ethnicity, sex, religion, disability, and national origin.
The EEOC protects the people (Civil Rights Act of 1964 discrimination and harassment
employment act) people of various cultural backgrounds should not be discriminated against
directly or indirectly. Direct way means that a person is completely rejected from the job
based on his or her ethnicity, race, color, sex, or national origin. Indirect way means to
harass or slowly remove the person from the job based on race, color, sex, or national origin
of the individual. The EEOC protects all such diverse types of people. No matter the cultural
diversity everyone should be given equal rights and equal positions irrespective of color,
race, national origin, or sex says this civil rights act.This civil rights employment act was
applied in the resolution in the following way:
·Title VII makes it unlawful to discriminate the people's employment based on race, color,
national origin, or sex when recruiting, hiring, training, or promotion
·Title VII makes it unlawful to discriminate against people based on race, color, national
origin, or sex in the field of goods and services, banking, government department, transport,
or other professional service
This law has been applied to make it illegal for an employer to retaliate against an individual
based on the person who complained about the discrimination and harassment, filed a charge
of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.
In Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618 (S. Ct. June 15, 2020), the Supreme
Court of the United States held that firing individuals because of their sexual orientation or
transgender status violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s prohibition on
discrimination because of sex. “The Court reached its holding by focusing on the plain text
of Title VII. As the Court explained, ‘discrimination based on homosexuality or transgender
status necessarily entails discrimination based on sex; the first cannot happen without the
second.’” (EEOC, n.d.)
When I was 20 I worked as a manager of a convenience store. I was robbed and received
injuries. I can remember this 23 years later like it was yesterday, however, it's not so much
the incident that I remember as it is the words and actions of the owner. I was interrogated
by him that same evening on how I let it happen. The next day as I was not feeling up to
come back to work, I was injured been at the hospital all night. But I was advised I would be
fired if I didn't. Well, I ended up getting fired, there was no way I could face the area let
alone have people looking at me and asking what happened as my injuries were visible.
As I grew older and then became employed by a law firm did I understand the worker's
compensation laws in IL. At the time of the incident, I was not aware I was protected if hurt
on the job. I was entitled to file for workers' compensation as the employer should have been
paying into that for coverage of his employees.
For this week’s topic, I would like to discuss the food and beverage industry. Its overlooked,
under paid, and under rated, and cheated. I want to speak about what I know, what I have
seen, and what I have experienced. Working over the period of breaks, not being paid the
correct amount of money that was talked about upon hire, when it comes to clocking in, to
the fifth hour of work, to taking your 30min break, to when you clock off, and still have
work to finish known as your side work/obligations in food and beverage. You tell me, does
that sound fair?
There are a lot of issues to cover in the food and beverage industry. I like would like to
focus on what management tries to pull with the young kids that got their first job serving
food. I have been on both sides of the table, from bartender, to serving tables, to
management. When I managed, the owner in meetings would ask me why my employers
were working over the time specified to work, and needed more pay? I would tell them it
was because we were busy, and we have a little staff and work still needed to be finished. If
you want to cut that time in half, hire more people. They did not like that, but it was out of
my control, unless you have a lot of people on staff and not worried about paying them.
There is more to the food and beverage industry beside taking a food order and making a
drink.
As someone who has been overworked and underpaid I know the anger of working overtime
and not being compensated. A big issue that has always been there but is starting to be fix
now is overtime pay and the limit on the amount of overtime a week. Every state is different
so I will focus on Virginia. In Virginia company used to be able to violate overtime laws and
get away with it fairly easy. For instance, one week I worked 60 hours for a company. I was
only paid overtime for 12 hours. They said that because one of the 5 days of the work week
was a holiday 8 of my overtime hours went to pay for that day. That made no since to me as
I was supposed to get my paid holiday as well as the additional hours I worked.
There is however a new law that goes into affect on July 1, 2022. This law states that and
employer that violates the states overtime laws “shall be liable to the employee for the
applicable remedies, damages, or other relief available under the [FLSA].” This means
that if they are found liable they will be responsable for my extra pay as well as other
compensations. This is a very big deal to Virginia residents.
The United States has come a long way over the past century, but there’s still work to be
done... Much of women’s progress is thanks to RBG and her brave and tireless advocacy.
Many years ago, women were treated as property, owned by men. Only 102 years ago (in
1920), women were granted the right to vote. Fast forward fifty years… RBG was making
moves to forever shift the inequalities between men and women in the workforce, by
fighting gender discrimination. One example of this is her influence in the ratification of the
Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which identifies pregnant women as a protected class. In the
past, women could have been fired, demoted, or otherwise harassed for becoming, or
wanting to become pregnant. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act identified these actions as a
type of gender discrimination. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg knew firsthand what it felt like to be
discriminated against purely on the basis of her gender: As one of only nine female students
at Harvard Law in 1956, she was famously asked why she was taking the place of a man.
After she transferred to and graduated from Columbia, at the top of her class, she could
barely get a job. And when she finally landed a teaching job at Rutgers School of Law in
1963, she hid her pregnancy under her mother-in-law’s baggy clothes until her contract was
renewed.
These experiences would lay the groundwork for a career spent slowly dismantling gender
discrimination in American life and work, and it is for this work that Ginsburg is most often
celebrated. In my experience working in various fields and having non-exempt and exempt
work status; no one cares. Everyone states that there are laws and organizations to help
protect the individual that is being trespassed however when an individual brings the
"breaking of law when it comes to labor or civil rights" its almost a burden of extreme proof
the victim of discrimination, harassment, or labor law breach to get justice.I am a very
positive enthusiastic morale-boosting employee engagement activist. This is how I fight the
fight. I like being a leader and leading by example. My recent problem has been unable to
secure a position high enough to do my calling. We need people of the light in higher-level
positions than front-line workers occupancy to truly see a change that is needed. Everyone
can talk the talk all day. However, even the most positive outgoing extrovert may be
oppressed and subjected to being ostracized even before they speak out.If a company
advertises and states they are diversity, equity, and inclusion focused look at the
management setup with their diversity. If the management is STILL "Caucasian only" while
other cultures are in other positions like HR and assistants: don't make the company diverse,
equity, and inclusive focused at all. Some companies don't mind paying the OT when it's set
up like Hebrews working for the Egyptian Pharaohs for bread and water. History is there for
lessons to be learned or situations to be remembered. An individual should know the
audience even when they are desperately trying to take care of their own family: the ones
they love.I am glad to hear that there is a new law pertaining to non-exempt employees
receiving OT however, we will start to see more exempt positions. A celebration perhaps for
a few. Worker's compensation does carry advantages and disadvantages that goes along with
it. Although it may differ in policies from state to state, it still holds the main pro argument,
that it is an employer paid insurance policy which provides benefits and medical care for
employees who are injured or become ill on the job as a direct result of the job. I would
agree that even though it provides such benefits to injured employees, it still proves itself to
be such a task monster in the way many (if not all) companies handle such claims. I have
heard many stories about worker's comp claims lasting and dragging on and on, only
resulting in delaying real proper help and/or medical attention to the employees who may be
in dire need. The minimum wage in our country has always been too low for me. I can see
this being a minimum wage amount issues to a teenager but as an adult the 7.25 hourly wage
is not enough. In today's market everything is so inflated. The cost of living is increasing
daily, so it is very important that the minimum wage is raised. With the amount of minimum
wage almost doubling this will help a lot of people. I like how you put it by saying close the
income gap.
Recently in my area Target raised their minimum wage to $18 an hour. I almost started to
apply at target, but I am not a big on sales or retail. I think that this was a big step for Target,
and it also sets a standard for other employers. When someone is applying for a job and the
competition is Walmart at $9 and Target at $18 the choice is easy. This also shows that
target cares about their employees and they feel like they deserve more than the bare
minimum. Hopefully, the minimum wage law will go in effect across the nation. The cost of
living is increasing everywhere, Gas prices are high, the cost of food has increased, and bills
have also gone up. It is important that minimum wage goes up and that not only minimum
wage, but also companies are held accountable in increasing their workers' pay.
Schwartz, P. (2021, August 20). Top Five emerging employment law topics for 2021.
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. Retrieved June 16, 2022, from
https://www.dbllawyers.com/emerging-employment-law-topics-2021/
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. US EEOC. (n.d.). Retrieved June 16, 2022, from
https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-
1964#:~:text=Title%20VII%20prohibits%20employment%20discrimination,religion%2C%2
0sex%20and%20national%20origin.