Achilles' Defense in Iliad by Homer
GRK 3002 – Homer
University of Cincinnati
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I stand to defend my client, Achilles, who has been blamed
for causing deaths of many Greeks during the Trojan war. My client, Achilles, is the son of sea
goddess Thetis and Peleus, a mortal husband. Homer describes Achilles is the most influential
leader of Myrmidons, who fights many victorious battles. Achilles is directly connected to
gods, making it incredibly dangerous to annoy him. Achilles is semi-divine, and when he gets
offended, there is a high chance that great destruction could occur, which cannot be blamed on
him. Therefore, the damage and loss that occurs when a warrior with semi-divine power
withdraw from war should not be blamed on the individual since there power is beyond their
control.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
Jury members, it is without a doubt that anger disturbs the distance between humans and gods
in Illiad, leading to the destruction of an orderly relationship and upset actions between gods
and humans. However, Achilles' actions were meant to bring systematic relationships in the
camp, which is essential in winning the battle. Just like any other human being, Achilles had
the reason to get angry after knowing the truth behind the plague that was killing soldiers. Also,
any other person could have acted similarly when their most valued gift of war is taken away
from them. Across book 1, Achilles wanted to know the reason behind the plagues that were
killing soldiers, yet those in authority were not willing to act. At some point, Achilles succeeded
in returning the order at Achaian camp, but the order was disrupted when it became known that
Agamemneos was responsible for the deadly diseases. Achilles had sufficient reasons to get
angry and leave the Achaean army after the plague, and his decision was not the cause of the
massive deaths of Greeks during the war. When he withdrew from the war, Achilles never took
soldiers or other weapons of war with him; therefore, he cannot be blamed for the death of
Greeks. Dear jury, pride, and honor are essential principles of Greeks, especially for leaders
and heroes, since the trait involves public perception. When Achilles revealed pride and honor
during the compromised decision involving the two women captives is acceptable. Achilles'
reason for leaving the battlefield cannot be labeled as pride since any soldier could have acted
in a similar war after snatching of valued war price. Later, when Agamemnon is forced to
release his captive, he decided to take Briseis from Achilles, an act that angered him, making
him refrain from fighting. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for leaving camp and the subsequent
loss of battles, which led to the death of many Greeks. If Achilles was allowed to keep his war
prize, he could have stopped the Trojan from defeating and killing hundreds of Greeks.
Therefore, across books 1, 6, and 9, the action of Achilles to withdraw from the war was not
contributed by his pride and anger; instead, it was a reasonable way of avoiding more conflicts.
As a warrior and hero, Achilles had all the right and reasons to refuse later offers, which
compromised his honor. Achilles cannot thus be blamed for the loss of the Trojan war, which
killed many Greeks.
My client is not responsible for the loss of Greeks by indulging in his fear and anger. Even after
exiting the war, Achilles tried to help the Achaean warriors to prevent massive deaths from the
Trojans. Across book 16, when the Trojans reached Achean ships and intended to set them on
fire and strands, the Greeks on the shores. As a way of helping the warriors and avoiding the
death of innocent people, Achilles sent Patroclus out to lead the team and drive the Trojans
away. The plan was only to draw the Trojans away and return to their campo. Achilles warned
the troop not to go after the Trojans, but they failed to follow his advice, a mistake that later
caused the death of many Greeks. If the team had headed to the advice given on them by my
client, they could have averted the loss of many Greeks; therefore, my client is not responsible
for mass destruction.
Across chapters sixteen to nineteen, it is evidential that my client’s actions were not driven by
anger and pride. The decision of Achilles to return to the war was made out of sympathy and
love for his country. Achilles knew the decision was fatal and that the fall of Troy was
inevitable. According to Achilles, the scheme suggested by Patroklos was a perfect solution to
end his dilemma between elements of his soul to save his fellow soldiers and obsessive sense
of honor. The statement of Achilles, "I've lost the will to live," signified his return to battle,
having forgiven and reconciled with Agamemnon. It shows that Achilles was no longer driven
by anger and pride when he chose to return to fight Trojans. The death of Potroklos in chapter
18 signified the high risk that Achilles had taken in pursuit of Trojans and revenge against the
killers of his best friend. In chapter 19, after receiving the new armor, Achilles assembled all
Achaian army and announced the end of the conflict with King Agamemnon, and he was ready
to lead them in war. Therefore, Achilles was committed to saving lives during the last battles,
and he did not contribute to the deaths of Greeks during the war. In his last war, Achilles' focus
was not to collect gifts; instead, he focused on defeating Trojans. Achilles cannot thus be
blamed for the results of war where hundreds of Greeks lost their lives; in every war, there have
to be deaths and casualties.
