Research Paper: Part 1 – Cases Summary Instructions
Student Name
Course:
Instructor:
Strayer University
CRJ 310 - Law Enforcement Operations and Management
Research Paper: Part 1 – Cases Summary Instructions
Since 1963, a series of United States Supreme Court case decisions have clarified that in+criminal+cases,
prosecutors must disclose to the defense evidence favorable to the defendant. This includes information
that may be used to impeach the credibility of government witnesses, including+law+enforcement
officers. These decisions mean that police officers who have documented histories of lying in official
matters are liabilities to their agencies, and these histories may render them unable to testify credibly.+
Summarize the main issues that are involved in the following United States Supreme Court cases. You
must have pages, not including your title page.+
Introduction to New York v. Quarles :
New York v. Quarles is a U.S. Supreme Court case from 1984 that deals with the public safety
exception to the Miranda warnings requirement. Answer the following questions:
1. What constitutional issue did New York v. Quarles address, and how did the case contribute to
the legal standards surrounding the public safety exception to the Miranda warnings
requirement?
2. Discuss the circumstances in New York v. Quarles that led to the legal dispute, emphasizing the
law enforcement actions and the invocation of the public safety exception.
3. Analyze the Supreme Court's decision in New York v. Quarles regarding the application of the
public safety exception and its impact on the admissibility of statements.
4. Provide a brief overview of the factual background of New York v. Quarles, emphasizing the
circumstances that led to the legal dispute and the Supreme Court's decision.
5. How has New York v. Quarles influenced legal practices and the understanding of the public
safety exception in cases involving Miranda warnings?
Grading Rubric...
Criteria Points
Possible Points
Earned Instructor’s Comments All key components of the case are explained. 20
Clear, logical flow to paper. 20
Major points are stated clearly. 20
Major points are supported by the following:
1. Lecture material or Scripture;
2. Good examples (pertinent conceptual or personal examples are acceptable);
