1 / 20100%
BUS309
Preview: BUS309 : Business Ethics
Course Guide
Prerequisites
BUS100
Course Description
Examines the applications of ethical principles through consideration of typical problem areas
encountered in organizations. The course focuses on the ethical perspectives of business decision-
making and policy development in a variety of key areas including individual behavior, human resource
management, work environments, marketing, property rights, and international business. The analysis
of case situations will illustrate the application of various ethical approaches (utility, individual rights,
and justice) in managing organizations.
Instructional Materials
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Required Resources
William H. Shaw. 2017. Business Ethics: A Textbook with Cases. BUS309 Wadsworth, Cengage
Learning 9th edition textbook available at https://www.strayerbookstore.com
Sarah Jorgensen. 2020. New Evidence Against Lori Loughlin and Husband Revealed in Government
Motion. https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/us/new-details-lori-loughlin-mossimo-giannulli-college-
admissions-scam/index.html
R.J. Anderson. 2020. Astros Sign-Stealing Scandal: What to Know About MLB's Penalties Against
Houston. https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/astros-sign-stealing-scandal-what-to-know-about-mlbs-
penalties-against-houston/
Brittany De Lea. 2018. Google Code of Ethics on Military Contracts Could Hinder Pentagon Contracts.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/google-code-of-ethics-on-military-contracts-could-hinder-
pentagon-work
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Business Ethics Highlights. 2018. Can Ad Copy Be False but not Misleading? If so, Is That OK?
https://businessethicshighlights.com/2018/12/20/can-ad-copy-be-false-but-not-misleading-if-so-is-that-
ok/
Stephanie Bank. 2018. Menu Science: The Subtle Ways Restaurants Get You to Spend More.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/personal-finance/household-finances/article-menu-science-
the-subtle-ways-restaurant-get-you-to-spend-more/
Course Learning Outcomes
1
Outline personal thoughts and opinions about an unethical situation observed in
a professional setting.
2
Examine the role capitalism plays in corporate decision making.
3
Determine the ethical considerations for balancing corporate and social
responsibilities.
4
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
Evaluate the ethical implications and impact of the events of selected business
situations using predominant ethical theories and concepts.
Weekly Course Schedule
Week 1 - To Do List
Learn: Read Chapter 1 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Moral Philosophy and Business.
Discuss: Introduce yourself and participate in the discussion, Distinguishing Between Unethical and
Unprofessional Situations.
Week 2 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 1.
Week 2 - To Do List
Learn: Read Chapter 2 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Normative Theories of Ethics.
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Ethical Theories and White Collar Crimes.
Assignment: Complete the assignment, Personal Narrative.
Week 3 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 2.
Learn: Read Chapter 3 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Justice and Economic Distribution.
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Environmental Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility.
Week 4 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 3.
Learn: Read Chapters 4 and 5 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, The Nature of Capitalism and Corporations.
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Capitalism and Business.
Assignment: Complete the assignment, The Role of Capitalism.
Week 5 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapters 4 and 5.
Learn: Read Chapter 6 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Consumers.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
Week 5 - To Do List
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, The Ethics of Product Safety.
Week 6 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 6
Learn: Read Chapter 7 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, The Environment.
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Legislating Social Responsibility.
Assignment: Complete the assignment, Not All Companies Are Viewed as Equal.
Week 7 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 7.
Learn: Read Chapter 8 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Have You Seen an Ethical Issue at Your Work?
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Discrimination in the Workplace.
Week 8 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 8.
Learn: Read Chapter 9 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Do You Have a Healthy Work Environment?
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Social Media and Privacy in the Workplace.
Assignment: Complete the assignment, Workplace Ethics.
Week 9 - To Do List
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
Week 9 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 9.
Learn: Read Chapter 10 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, What Choices Have You Made?
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, The Effects of Insider Trading.
Week 10 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 10.
Learn: Read Chapter 11 in Business
Ethics.
Learn: Watch this week's lecture, Everyone on the Team Is Important!
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Equal Work for Equal Pay.
Week 11 - To Do List
Quiz: Take the quiz for Chapter 11.
Discuss: Participate in the discussion, Wrapping Up.
Grading Scale
Participation
Total Points % of Grade
Discussion Participation
220 22%
Assignment
Total Points % of Grade
Week 2 Quiz - Chapter 1 Quiz
30 3%
Week 2 Assignment - Personal Narrative
75 7.5%
Week 3 Quiz - Chapter 2 Quiz
30 3%
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
Assignment
Total Points % of Grade
Week 4 Quiz - Chapter 3 Quiz
30 3%
Week 4 Assignment - The Role of Capitalism
100 10%
Week 5 Quiz - Chapters 4 and 5 Quiz
60 6%
Week 6 Quiz - Chapter 6 Quiz
30 3%
Week 6 Assignment - Not All Companies Are
Viewed as Equal
125 12.5%
Week 7 Quiz - Chapter 7 Quiz
30 3%
Week 8 Quiz - Chapter 8 Quiz
30 3%
Week 8 Assignment - Workplace Ethics
150 15%
Week 9 Quiz - Chapter 9 Quiz
30 3%
Week 10 Quiz - Chapter 10 Quiz
30 3%
Week 11 Quiz - Chapter 11 Quiz
30 3%
Totals 1000 100%
Final Course Grade
Points Percentage Grade
900 - 1000 90% - 100%
A
800 - 899 80% - 89%
B
700 - 799 70% - 79%
C
600 - 699 60% - 69%
D
0 - 599 59% and below
F
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
Unique Course Features
Grading Scale Notation
Please consult the University Catalog and your academic advisor to determine the final grade needed in
this class to satisfy your specific degree conferral requirements.
Academic Integrity
Please be sure to review the entire Academic Integrity Policy in the Student Handbook before submitting
anything in this course. In order to enforce its Academic Integrity Policy, the University reserves the right
to review any work (draft or otherwise) or exam submitted by a student during his or her entire academic
career at Strayer.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Teaching Assistants
Note: This course will use teaching assistants (TAs) in order to assist the instructor with the learning
experience. TAs play an active role in working with the instructor to provide student support, grading
and grading feedback, and also posting content in the course (e.g., discussion posts). This course also
uses a live chat feature that is tied to the instructor and the TA support team.
Assignments
Week 2 Assignment - Personal Narrative
Summary
Click the linked activity title to access this assignment.
Text
Instructions
In 400–500 words, share a time in your professional life where you observed an unethical situation.
What were your thoughts and opinions on this ethical issue? This assignment is a personal narrative
and does not require any outside sources. It should be written entirely in your own words.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please
refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Outline personal thoughts and opinions about an unethical situation observed in a professional
setting.
Scoring Guide
Describe the unethical situation you observed in your professional life. 70 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not state or
describe an
unethical
situation.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Stated a situation
observed but
does not provide
any context of
where it was
observed.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Stated the
unethical
situation
observed, but did
not provide the
context within
your professional
life.
Competent (80-
89%)
Stated the
unethical
situation
observed in your
professional life.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Described in
detail the
unethical
situation
observed in your
professional life.
Discuss both your thoughts and opinions as to why the situation was unethical. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not state or
discuss your
thoughts or
opinions as to
why the situation
was unethical.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Stated your
situation was
unethical, but did
not provide either
your thoughts or
opinions as to
why.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Stated either your
thoughts or your
opinions, but not
both, as to why
the situation was
unethical.
Competent (80-
89%)
Described in
detail either your
thoughts or your
opinions, but not
both, as to why
the situation was
unethical.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Discussed in
detail both your
thoughts and
opinions as to
why the situation
was unethical.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Follow guidelines for clear and organized writing that includes introductory and concluding
paragraphs; body paragraphs with topic sentences, main ideas, and supporting sentences. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
writing is not
structured with
introductory
paragraphs,
concluding
paragraphs, topic
sentences or
evident main
ideas.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Writing is
structured with
body paragraphs,
but is missing
either an
introductory or
conclusion
paragraph. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not present in
every paragraph.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Writing is
organized with
introductory and
concluding
paragraphs and
body paragraphs
that contain main
ideas. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
Competent (80-
89%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs, topic
sentences and
main ideas.
Supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs with
topic sentences,
main ideas, and
supporting
sentences in
every paragraph.
Week 4 Assignment - The Role of Capitalism
Summary
Click the linked activity title to access this assignment.
Text
Overview
Capitalism is an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled
by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. Socialism is a political and economic theory of
social organization that advocates for the means of production, distribution, and exchange being
owned or regulated by the community as a whole (1). In this assignment, you will write an essay
comparing capitalism and socialism.
Preparation
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Note: You must watch this video on capitalism and socialism before you begin this assignment.
Instructions
Write a 2–3 paragraph essay in which you do the following:
Explain the concepts of capitalism and socialism.
Compare and contrast capitalism and socialism with supporting definitions, explanations, and
examples.
Identify three pros and three cons for both capitalism and socialism.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please
refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Examine the role capitalism plays in corporate decision making.
Sources
1. William H. Shaw. 2014. Business
Ethics:
A
Textbook
with
Cases. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning
8th edition textbook.
Scoring Guide
Explains the key concepts of capitalism and socialism. 35 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Does not submit
or does not
identify the key
concepts of
either capitalism
or socialism.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Identifies either
the key concepts
of capitalism or
the key concepts
of socialism, but
not both.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Identifies the key
concepts of
capitalism and
socialism.
Competent (80-
89%)
Defines the key
concepts of
capitalism and
socialism.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Explains the key
concepts of
capitalism and
socialism.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Compare and contrast capitalism and socialism with supporting definitions, explanations, and
examples. 35 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
does not
describe
capitalism and
socialism.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Describes
capitalism and
socialism.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Compares and
contrasts
capitalism and
socialism, but
omits some
supporting
definitions,
explanations, or
examples.
Competent (80-
89%)
Compares and
contrasts
capitalism and
socialism with
supporting
definitions and an
explanation.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Compares and
contrasts
capitalism and
socialism with
supporting
definitions,
explanations and
examples.
Identify three pros and three cons for both capitalism and socialism. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not identify a
pro or con for
capitalism, or a
pro or con for
socialism.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Identifies one pro
and one con for
capitalism and
socialism.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Identifies two
pros and two
cons for
capitalism and
socialism.
Competent (80-
89%)
Identifies three
pros and three
cons for
capitalism or
three pros and
three cons for
socialism, but not
both.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Identifies three
pros and three
cons for both
capitalism and
socialism.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Follow guidelines for SWS citations and formatting and for clear and organized writing that
includes introductory and concluding paragraphs; body paragraphs with topic sentences, main
ideas, and supporting sentences. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
writing is not
structured with
introductory
paragraphs,
concluding
paragraphs, topic
sentences or
evident main
ideas. There are
more than 9
errors in
citations,
references, or
formatting.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Writing is
structured with
body paragraphs,
but is missing
either an
introductory or
conclusion
paragraph. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not present in
every paragraph.
There are 7–9
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Writing is
organized with
introductory and
concluding
paragraphs and
body paragraphs
that contain main
ideas. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
There are 5–6
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Competent (80-
89%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs, topic
sentences and
main ideas.
Supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
There are 3–4
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs with
topic sentences,
main ideas, and
supporting
sentences in
every paragraph.
There are 2 or
fewer errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Week 6 Assignment - Not All Companies Are Viewed as Equal
Summary
Click the linked activity title to access this assignment.
Text
Overview
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
In the land of free trade, the public does not view all industries as equal in terms of being good or bad
actors. Should consumers have a right to full disclosure of ethical issues when making a choice in the
products they purchase? Do companies have an ethical obligation to protect people?
Preparation
1. Download and review the Week 6 Assignment Template [DOCX]. Use it to assist you with the
assignment.
2. Choose one of the following industries to frame your paper:
The pharmaceutical industry.
The payday loan industry.
Cloning for medical purposes.
Instructions
Write a paper in which you:
Describe the background of the industry and its customer base for which you are framing your
argument.
Prepare a sound argument that explained the major reasons you support the industry or the
customer with strong supporting evidence.
Justify your beliefs on whether it is possible for a company to simultaneously cater to both its best
interest and that of the consumer, or if one always must prevail.
Use at least two quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as
academic resources.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please
refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Determine the ethical considerations for balancing corporate and social responsibilities.
Scoring Guide
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Describe the background of the industry and its customer base for which you are framing your
argument. 35 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not state the
industry or its
customer base
for which you are
framing your
argument.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Stated the
industry or its
customer base,
but not both, for
which you are
framing your
argument.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Stated the
industry and its
customer base
for which you are
framing your
argument.
Competent (80-
89%)
Described the
background
industry and its
customer base
for which you are
framing your
argument.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Described in
detail the
background of
the industry and
its customer
base for which
you are framing
your argument.
Prepare a sound argument that explained the major reasons you support the industry or the
customer with strong supporting evidence. 35 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not identify
reasons you
support the
industry or the
customer, and
did not provide
arguments.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Identified
reasons you
support the
industry or the
customer, but did
not provide
arguments.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Prepared a poor
argument for the
major reasons
you support the
industry or the
customer with no
supporting
evidence.
Competent (80-
89%)
Prepared an
argument that
explained the
major reasons
you support the
industry or the
customer with
modest
supporting
evidence.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Prepared a
sound argument
that explained the
major reasons
you support the
industry or the
customer with
strong supporting
evidence.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Justify your beliefs on whether it is possible for a company to simultaneously cater to both its
best interest and that of the consumer, or if one always has to prevail. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not provide
any statement
about beliefs on
the issue.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Provided a
statement of your
beliefs, but the
statement was
not in context of
addressing the
simultaneous
catering of a
company to its
best interest and
the customer.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Stated your
beliefs on
whether it is
possible for a
company to
simultaneously
cater to both its
best interest and
that of the
customer, or if
one always has
to prevail.
Competent (80-
89%)
Discussed your
beliefs on
whether it is
possible for a
company to
simultaneously
cater to both its
best interest and
that of the
customer, or if
one always has
to prevail.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Justified your
beliefs on
whether it is
possible for a
company to
simultaneously
cater to both its
best interest and
that of the
consumer, or if
one always has
to prevail.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Follow guidelines for SWS citations and formatting and for clear and organized writing that
includes introductory and concluding paragraphs; body paragraphs with topic sentences, main
ideas, and supporting sentences. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
writing is not
structured with
introductory
paragraphs,
concluding
paragraphs, topic
sentences or
evident main
ideas. There are
more than 9
errors in
citations,
references, or
formatting.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Writing is
structured with
body paragraphs,
but is missing
either an
introductory or
conclusion
paragraph. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not present in
every paragraph.
There are 7–9
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Writing is
organized with
introductory and
concluding
paragraphs and
body paragraphs
that contain main
ideas. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
There are 5–6
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Competent (80-
89%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs, topic
sentences and
main ideas.
Supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
There are 3–4
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs with
topic sentences,
main ideas, and
supporting
sentences in
every paragraph.
There are 2 or
fewer errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Week 8 Assignment - Workplace Ethics
Summary
Click the linked activity title to access this assignment.
Text
Overview
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
This assignment requires you to choose an article and then write about the ethical implications and the
impact of the events that are described in the article.
Preparation
Read and reflect on one of the following articles.
Google Code of Ethics on Military Contracts Could Hinder Pentagon Contracts.
Can Ad Copy Be False but not Misleading? If so, Is That OK?
Menu Science: The Subtle Ways Restaurants Get You to Spend More.
Instructions
Write a paper in which you:
Analyze the following questions associated with your chosen article and discuss them using
concepts you learned in this course.
What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake?
Have any moral rights been violated?
What would a Utilitarian recommend?
What would a Kantian recommend?
Explain your rationale for each of your answers for your chosen article, with supporting evidence.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please
refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your
professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Evaluate the ethical implications and impact of the events of selected business situations using
predominant ethical theories and concepts.
Scoring Guide
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Analyze the ideals, effects, and consequences at stake, incorporating concepts of business
ethics and supporting evidence. 35 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not state
ideals, effects,
and
consequences at
stake.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Stated the ideals,
effects, and
consequences at
stake.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Discussed the
ideals, effects,
and
consequences at
stake.
Competent (80-
89%)
Analyzed the
ideals, effects,
and
consequences at
stake,
incorporating
concepts of
business ethics.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Analyzed the
ideals, effects,
and
consequences at
stake,
incorporating
concepts of
business ethics
and supporting
evidence.
Analyze moral rights violations incorporating concepts of business ethics and supporting
evidence. 35 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not state
moral rights
violations.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Stated moral
rights violations.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Discussed moral
rights violations.
Competent (80-
89%)
Analyzed moral
rights violations,
incorporating
concepts of
business ethics.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Analyzed moral
rights violations
incorporating
concepts of
business ethics
and supporting
evidence.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Explained possible recommendations from both a utilitarian and kantian perspective in the
context of business ethics and with supporting evidence. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
did not state
possible
recommendation
s from either a
Utilitarian or
Kantian
perspective.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Stated possible
recommendation
s from a
Utilitarian
perspective or a
Kantian
perspective, but
not both.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Stated possible
recommendation
s from both a
Utilitarian and
Kantian
perspective.
Competent (80-
89%)
Explained
possible
recommendation
s from both a
Utilitarian and
Kantian
perspective in the
concept of
business ethics.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Explained
possible
recommendation
s from both a
Utilitarian and
Kantian
perspective in the
context of
business ethics
and with
supporting
evidence.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
Follow guidelines for SWS citations and formatting and for clear and organized writing that
includes introductory and concluding paragraphs; body paragraphs with topic sentences, main
ideas, and supporting sentences. 15 %
Unacceptable
(Below 60%)
Did not submit or
writing is not
structured with
introductory
paragraphs,
concluding
paragraphs, topic
sentences or
evident main
ideas. There are
more than 9
errors in
citations,
references, or
formatting.
Needs
Improvement (60-
69%)
Writing is
structured with
body paragraphs,
but is missing
either an
introductory or
conclusion
paragraph. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not present in
every paragraph.
There are 7–9
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Satisfactory (70-
79%)
Writing is
organized with
introductory and
concluding
paragraphs and
body paragraphs
that contain main
ideas. Topic
sentences and
supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
There are 5–6
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Competent (80-
89%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs, topic
sentences and
main ideas.
Supporting
sentences are
not evident in
every paragraph.
There are 3–4
errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
Exemplary (90-
100%)
Writing is
organized with
clear introductory
and concluding
paragraphs, body
paragraphs with
topic sentences,
main ideas, and
supporting
sentences in
every paragraph.
There are 2 or
fewer errors in
citations,
references,
formatting or
writing
mechanics.
2020 Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary
information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written
permission of Strayer University.
2021 Strategic Education, Inc., Version 4
Students also viewed