1 / 9100%
A Form 5701 NOPA (Notice of Proposed Adjustment) or CP2000 is sent out when a third
party, such as an employer or bank, sends the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) information
different from the tax forms filed. The notice will have a designated period that you can
respond to the letter, but it is usually thirty days (Understanding your CP2000 notice, n.d.).
If you agree with the suggested changes, all you need to do is sign the response form and send
it back. If you disagree, fill out the form, sign it, and send it back along with supporting
documents. Contact the reported company or person and ask for a corrected document or
statement if the information is inaccurate. If you do not respond by the deadline, you will
receive an SND (Statutory Notice of Deficiency) and be charged the suggested amount
(Understanding your CP2000 notice, n.d.).
No penalty may be imposed according to Code Section 6751(b)(1) unless an "initial
determination" of the evaluation is approved by the person making the determination or by a
higher-level official that the Secretary designates. Code Section 6751(b)(1) “mandates written
supervisory approval for the initial determination of a penalty no later than when a NOD or
formal communication notifies the taxpayer of the penalty determination and gives them the
opportunity to appeal, according to the Tax Court's decision in Clay (2019) 152 TC 223”
(Proposed penalty assessment is not "initial determination", 2020).
Internal Revenue Code section 7602 authorizes the examination of records "for the purpose of
ascertaining the correctness of any return, making a return where none has been made,
determining the liability of any person for any internal revenue tax or the liability at law or in
equity of any transferee or fiduciary of any person in respect of any internal revenue tax, or
collecting any such liability." (IRC Sec. 7602).
The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) Part 4 details the process for IRS agents to carry out
such examinations (commonly called audits). The IRM is not legal statute, rather a guide for
employees of the IRS, and helpful for taxpayers and their representatives to understand the
process, including response requirements and appeals options.
In my work, we are currently representing a C Corporation client for 2020 and 2021 tax
returns. This examination is still pending results, but we are expecting a Notice of Proposed
Amendment related to loans made by the corporation that did not report interest income as
might be expected.
Regardless of the type of tax return, or the size of taxpayer (individual, small business,
partnership, public corporation), an audit concludes in one of three ways:
No change: an audit in which you have substantiated all of the items being reviewed and
results in no changes.
Agreed: an audit where the IRS proposed changes and you understand and agree with the
changes.
Disagreed: an audit where the IRS has proposed changes and you understand but disagree
with the changes.
The process for IRS to propose changes is the NOPA, or Notice of Proposed Adjustment.
NOPA is provided to taxpayers on Form 5701. Form 5701 has space for each specific issue to
be addressed AND responded to by the taxpayer. As part of the taxpayer response, there is
space to provide additional information that may change the agent's proposed adjustment.
Essentially, the NOPA is the suggested changes to an audit inquiry, but not necessarily the
result. A taxpayer can provide additional information to "negotiate" the proposed adjustments
or move forward with an appeal to the NOPA results.
Additionally, if the taxpayer disagrees in full or in part, there is an option to request a "fast
track settlement". A fast-track settlement request can transfer the dispute resolution to an
independent mediator with a resolution expected within 60 days (unlike the 6 months since I
provided records to the IRS agent and still have not received an update). The fast-track
application is Form 14017, but depending on what type of taxpayer is involved, there are
different Revenue Procedures applicable.
A Form 5701 NOPA (Notice of Proposed Adjustment) or CP2000 is sent out when a third
party, such as an employer or bank, sends the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) information
different from the tax forms filed. The notice will have a designated period that you can
respond to the letter, but it is usually thirty days (Understanding your CP2000 notice, n.d.).
If you agree with the suggested changes, all you need to do is sign the response form and send
it back. If you disagree, fill out the form, sign it, and send it back along with supporting
documents. Contact the reported company or person and ask for a corrected document or
statement if the information is inaccurate. If you do not respond by the deadline, you will
receive an SND (Statutory Notice of Deficiency) and be charged the suggested amount
(Understanding your CP2000 notice, n.d.).
No penalty may be imposed according to Code Section 6751(b)(1) unless an "initial
determination" of the evaluation is approved by the person making the determination or by a
higher-level official that the Secretary designates. Code Section 6751(b)(1) “mandates written
supervisory approval for the initial determination of a penalty no later than when a NOD or
formal communication notifies the taxpayer of the penalty determination and gives them the
opportunity to appeal, according to the Tax Court's decision in Clay (2019) 152 TC 223”
(Proposed penalty assessment is not "initial determination", 2020).
Internal Revenue Code section 7602 authorizes the examination of records "for the purpose of
ascertaining the correctness of any return, making a return where none has been made,
determining the liability of any person for any internal revenue tax or the liability at law or in
equity of any transferee or fiduciary of any person in respect of any internal revenue tax, or
collecting any such liability." (IRC Sec. 7602).
The Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) Part 4 details the process for IRS agents to carry out
such examinations (commonly called audits). The IRM is not legal statute, rather a guide for
employees of the IRS, and helpful for taxpayers and their representatives to understand the
process, including response requirements and appeals options.
In my work, we are currently representing a C Corporation client for 2020 and 2021 tax
returns. This examination is still pending results, but we are expecting a Notice of Proposed
Amendment related to loans made by the corporation that did not report interest income as
might be expected.
Regardless of the type of tax return, or the size of taxpayer (individual, small business,
partnership, public corporation), an audit concludes in one of three ways:
No change: an audit in which you have substantiated all of the items being reviewed and
results in no changes.
Agreed: an audit where the IRS proposed changes and you understand and agree with the
changes.
Disagreed: an audit where the IRS has proposed changes and you understand but disagree
with the changes.
The process for IRS to propose changes is the NOPA, or Notice of Proposed Adjustment.
NOPA is provided to taxpayers on Form 5701. Form 5701 has space for each specific issue to
be addressed AND responded to by the taxpayer. As part of the taxpayer response, there is
space to provide additional information that may change the agent's proposed adjustment.
Essentially, the NOPA is the suggested changes to an audit inquiry, but not necessarily the
result. A taxpayer can provide additional information to "negotiate" the proposed adjustments
or move forward with an appeal to the NOPA results.
Additionally, if the taxpayer disagrees in full or in part, there is an option to request a "fast
track settlement". A fast-track settlement request can transfer the dispute resolution to an
independent mediator with a resolution expected within 60 days (unlike the 6 months since I
provided records to the IRS agent and still have not received an update). The fast-track
application is Form 14017, but depending on what type of taxpayer is involved, there are
different Revenue Procedures applicable.
Internal Revenue Code, Section 7602 - Examination of books & witnesses.
However, in sound and reading and researching about recorded cases I encountered a case
that involves a NOPA regarding transfer pricing. I thought it was a good case to discuss as it
combines the topics in the first two modules of this class.
In my research, I came across the audit case of Microsoft Corporation conducted by the
Internal Revenue Service in the late 90s and early 2000s. This is a high-profile case that
clearly illustrates the circumstances under which the IRS might issue a Notice of Proposed
Adjustment (NOPA). Microsoft Corporation, a multinational technology company, had set up
a cost-sharing arrangement with its foreign subsidiaries. The IRS examined this arrangement
under the scrutiny of "transfer pricing" rules, which stipulate that transactions between related
entities should be priced as if they were between independent entities to prevent profit
shifting and tax evasion as presented in section 482. The IRS concluded that Microsoft may
have underpriced these transactions, leading to lower U.S. taxable income.
In response, the IRS issued a NOPA, indicating that it proposed to adjust Microsoft's taxable
income upward. Essentially, in layman's terms, a NOPA is like the IRS saying, "We've taken a
look at your tax returns, and we think you might owe more tax than you've paid. Here's why
we think so, and here's how much more we think you owe." I found it interesting and it is
essential to highlight that the issues listed in a NOPA are not final verdicts. This means that
they are open to negotiation and discussion. Think of it as the IRS opening a dialogue about
the identified discrepancies and expressing its concerns.
In the Microsoft case, the company disagreed with the IRS' proposed adjustments, leading to
negotiations and eventually litigation (Microsoft Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
2002). The case highlighted the significant amounts of money at stake in these audits and the
complex nature of international business taxation. While the NOPA is a serious document that
can signify a significant tax liability, it is essential to remember that it also serves as the
starting point for a discussion with the IRS about your tax situation.
After an audit is completed and/or when the tax determination has been made, the IRS may
issue a NOPA if they determine that the tax return is not correct compared to their records.
Another reason the NOPA may be issues can be related to the topic from last week of price
transferring. If their valuation of the transfer falls out of the threshold 50%-200% then the
IRS would issue a NOPA.
Once receiving a NOPA, the client may agree, partly agree, or disagree with the NOPA based
on the form 5701. Note that the form 5701 is provided only for large business and
international businesses. Very often the IRS will also provide form 886-A along with the
form 5701. b Form 886-A will provide a full understanding of the audit trails and include laws
supporting, whereas form 5701 is a summary of form 886-A. The initial response time is
within 30 days; however, the CEP case manager may extend this time. The client must
respond in writing in detail and referencing their legal potion.
Internal Revenue Code section 7602 authorizes the examination of books and witnesses “for
the purpose of ascertaining the correctness of any return, making a return where none has
been made, determining the liability of any person for any internal revenue tax or the liability
at law or in equity of any transferee or fiduciary of any person in respect of any internal
revenue tax, or collecting any such liability”.
A Notice of Proposed Adjustment, NOPA, is issued by the IRS to propose changes to a tax
return after an audit. A NOPA can be issued to a taxpayer if the IRS has received a financial
document, such as a brokerage statement from an institution, that was not included in the
return. A NOPA can be issued for various reasons that do not always include a difference in
what a taxpayer reported and what was reported to the IRS by an employer, bank, or other
institution. For example, the IRS can issue a NOPA for topics such as charitable contributions
and the value of property.
At the small tax firm I work at, we have a client that received a NOPA due to a noncash
charitable contribution they claimed. This client donates Asian cloth artwork and has the
artwork appraised every year by an appraiser. Although they get it appraised by a
professional, the IRS sent them a NOPA, after appraising the artwork themselves, disagreeing
with the amount the client listed and proposed a new amount they believe it should be valued
at. The IRS issued the NOPA on Form 5701. The client was given 30 days to respond if they
agree with the proposed adjustment or disagree with it. While in this case, our client agreed
with the NOPA, if they had not responded to it within the 30 days they would have received a
letter of deficiency. A letter of deficiency explains any adjustments that were made and how
the amount of deficiency was calculated. The taxpayer is given the option to agree and pay
the tax liability plus interest and penalties or challenge it in tax court. The taxpayer has 90
days to respond to this letter.
While a taxpayer can disagree with a NOPA, it is not negotiable per se. If the taxpayer
disagrees with the proposed adjustments, they can check off the box saying they disagree and
provide documentation they have as to why they disagree with the NOPA. I say it is not
negotiable per se as the taxpayer is not going to sit down with the revenue agent and negotiate
an amount to settle on. This type of negotiation would be seen when a tax attorney would sit
down and negotiate a Revenue Agent Report with the auditor. b
Internal Revenue Code, Section 7602 – Examination of books & witnesses
References
Sec. 4.46.4.13.2
Sec. 4.46.4.13.3
Internal Revenue Service - Internal Revenue Manual, Part 4: Examining Process.
https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4
Internal Revenue Service - IRS Audits. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-
employed/irs-audits#conclude
Internal Revenue Service - Fast Track. https://www.irs.gov/appeals/fast-track
Proposed penalty assessment is not “initial determination.” Thomson Reuters Tax &
Accounting News. (2020, February 24). https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/news/proposed-
penalty-assessment-is-not-initial-determination/
Understanding your CP2000 notice. Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.).
https://www.irs.gov/individuals/understanding-your-cp2000-notice
Internal Revenue Code, Section 7602 - Examination of books & witnesses.
Internal Revenue Service - Internal Revenue Manual, Part 4: Examining Process.
https://www.irs.gov/irm/part4
Internal Revenue Service - IRS Audits. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-
employed/irs-audits#conclude
Internal Revenue Service - Fast Track. https://www.irs.gov/appeals/fast-track
Proposed penalty assessment is not “initial determination.” Thomson Reuters Tax &
Accounting News. (2020, February 24). https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/news/proposed-
penalty-assessment-is-not-initial-determination/
Understanding your CP2000 notice. Internal Revenue Service. (n.d.).
https://www.irs.gov/individuals/understanding-your-cp2000-notice
Students also viewed