The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 1
THE PHILOSOPHICAL AND ETHICAL DEBATE IN GLOBAL CONSERVATION AND ITS
ROLE IN GOVERNMENT POLICIES
by Student's Name
Course Name
Professor's Name
University Name
City/ State
Date
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 2
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government
Policies
During the last fifty years, scientifically proven reality attests to the sobering fact that it is
human activities that drive species to extinction at an unprecedented, catastrophically
unsustainable rate. A 2019 UN report says that a significant number of the world's plants and
animals are now threatened with extinction, likely with deleterious impacts on the planet's
ecosystems. The widespread threats to the diversity of life on Earth from human exploitation in
the form of habitat destruction, climate change, pollution, and unsustainable exploitation of
natural resources, among other human-induced pressures, have already led to destructive rates of
global biodiversity loss. In this respect, many conservation initiatives have been developed at
different scales across the globe, but these are highly complex, nuanced, and often contested in
philosophical and ethical terms.
Moral perspectives differ from each other; clashes are bound to ensue between the
interests of industries and the interests of environmental conservation; competition over the
available funds and resources and harmonizing conservation with the developmental needs of
humans are all challenges and hurdles. The conflicts lie within the choices to prioritize the
interests of individual species, whole ecosystems, or human welfare. These conflicts underscore
the priorities, motivations, and fundamental worldviews among the various stakeholders that
drive and influence the formulation and application of conservation strategies globally. This
essay critically examines in-depth the deep ethical and moral groundings of the conservation
imperative as well as the different sets of roles, impacts, limitations, and challenges undergone
by different entities on the international, national, and grassroots levels as drivers of global
conservation efforts.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 3
Ethical Foundations of Conservation
The conservation debate centers on a fundamental ethical question with great
implications: do non-human species and ecosystems have inherent value, intrinsic rights, and
moral standing, or are they the values that are assigned to them based on their perceived utility
and the instrumental benefits that they provide to human beings? How the question is answered
has much to do with what extent conservation efforts are pursued and what is the moral
imperative behind safeguarding biodiversity. Philosophers such as Peter Singer and those
focused on applied ethics on animal welfare have asserted that the interests of all sentient beings
who can feel suffering or experience wellbeing must be given equal consideration, no matter who
the beings are (Solasz, 2014). Under this view, at least some non-human animals with high
cognitive abilities and capacities for experiencing pain and pleasure deserve direct moral status.
Nonetheless, Singer and other utilitarian ethicists have been criticized for focusing on narrow
issues pertaining to the welfare of individual animals without supporting the conservation of all
species or preserving the integrity of the ecosystem where such measures might not be of direct
benefit to human wellbeing or animal welfare (Wells, 2016).
On the other hand, the deep ecological philosophical stance by Arne Naess Paul Taylor
and other environmental ethicists is for the intrinsic value of all living beings, ecological
communities, and ecosystems themselves, irrespective of their usefulness to the human race
(
Kawall, 2017)
. This approach, from a biocentric, ecocentric perspective, recognizes that
natural entities and processes have their inherent value, providing a firm foundation for ethics in
the context of broad and encompassing conservation efforts toward the preservation of
biodiversity and ecological integrity.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 4
In many regions of the world, indigenous cultures and knowledge systems seek to
understand traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) from a holistic perspective that binds the
inhabitants together to the natural world (Robinson et al., 2021). Such perspectives, which look
at humans as part of rather than separate from or superior to the natural world, dispute Western
anthropocentric biases. Both diverse, those indigenous philosophies rooted in animistic
spiritualities or Earth-centered values can enrich invaluable insights and guiding principles on
how to ensure more ethical and sustainable approaches to conservation.
Competing Priorities and Conflicts of Interest
While moral and philosophical arguments for biodiversity conservation may be widely
accepted in principle by many governments, organizations, and segments of the public, the actual
implementation of effective strategies is severely complicated by competing socioeconomic
interests, conflicting priorities among stakeholders, and difficult trade-offs. Strong conflicts often
arise between profit-oriented corporate entities engaged in extractive activities like mining, fossil
fuel development, logging, industrial agriculture, and other environmentally destructive activities
that seek to realize profits and conservationists' objectives. Profit-maximizing corporations may
exploit natural resources beyond sustainable limits, destroy fragile ecosystems and habitats,
deplete biodiversity, and enhance the impacts of climate change and pollution (Seddon et al.,
2020). Enforcement of environmental regulations may fail due to either regulatory capture or a
lack of stringency in regulating environmentally damaging practices by corporations
(Dechezleprêtre & Sato, 2017). National governments, in turn, often side with industry over
conservationists because they are beholden to corporate lobbying interests or, more generally,
they are beholden to economic growth over sustainability.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 5
In developing countries facing acute poverty, widespread hunger and malnutrition, lack
of access to clean drinking water, and inadequate health and educational services, biodiversity
conservation can be viewed as a less critical issue than addressing these dire social and economic
issues. For subsistence communities that directly depend on nature's bounty for their sustenance
and livelihoods through activities like logging, hunting, fishing, and slash-and-burn agriculture,
conserving biodiversity can be seen as a luxury they cannot afford to embark on without
undermining their immediate wellbeing (Sampaio et al., 2023). The scope of the social and
economic demands that must be satisfied presents a significant moral conundrum for
environmental preservation.
On the other side of the conservation objectives, cultural traditions, indigenous practices,
and profound ways of life will contradict one another in different contexts. Some activities that
encompass, inter alia, activities like subsistence hunting, fishing practices, or certain land use
patterns associated with their cultural identity could be against the need for conservation
(Domínguez and Luoma, 2020). It is the recognition of the rights of indigenous people to their
traditional livelihoods that should be respected; finding an ethical way to harmonize customary
practices with conservation is a complicated issue requiring a lot of negotiating and compromise.
The Role of Organisations in Global Conservation
Various international, national, and local organizations have been doing an extensive
range of work in solving the innumerable and challenging problems of the conservation of
biodiversity on a global scale. These organizations provide funding, policy, research, advocacy,
and even implementation of conservation actions worldwide.
International Organizations and Conservation Agreements
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 6
At the highest level, bodies like the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) serve as leading international
organizations that coordinate global efforts, facilitate scientific cooperation, and provide policy
guidance on environmental protection and sustainable development. Landmark multilateral
agreements, like the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), adopted in 1992, establish
overarching legal frameworks and strategic plans that commit nations to sustainably managing
and conserving biodiversity within their borders (IISD Earth Negotiations Bulletin, n.d.).
However, the effectiveness of such international environmental agreements has been hampered
by shortcomings like inadequate funding, lack of robust compliance mechanisms and
enforcement capabilities, and conflicts with the national interests or economic priorities of
signatory countries unwilling to follow through on their commitments. The Red List by IUCN,
established in 1964, has raised global awareness, but protecting those listed often falls short
(IUCN, 2022). While providing crucial coordination, international bodies are limited in their
ability to drive national-level policy implementation.
National Governments and Protected Areas
The burden of converting broad international commitments into implementable
conservation actions lies on the shoulders of national governments, playing a role in the
designation and management of protected areas such as national parks, wildlife refuges, marine
reserves, and World Heritage sites, among others. It is overseen by national environmental
ministries and agencies, including the US Fish & Wildlife Service, Parks Canada, Natural
England in the UK, and other members of the world such as environmental ministries and
agencies. The governments of this category play a pivotal role in enacting and implementing
environmental laws, setting standards for practices like logging or mining, executing species
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 7
monitoring and assessments for ecological impact, and more (Environmental Audit Committee,
2021). Nonetheless, from a biodiversity hotspot, whether it is in the wilderness or unprotected,
protected areas work only if there is adequate funding regulation that adheres, and there is really
no compromise when it comes to its inviolability. Many of those on the list exist only in name,
subject to chronic underfunding, illegal poaching, and illegal incursions. Several of these places
are also vulnerable to redesignations in response to political pressure and corruption. In wealthy
countries like the UK, political budget cuts and shifts in the priorities of governments put the
integrity of the protected areas in danger or reduce conservation efforts (Patrick, 2022). Another
challenge is expanding protections to unprotected wildlands and wilderness areas that remain
under threat.
Non-Governmental Organizations & Grassroots Initiatives
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) taking environmental and conservation
advocacy come across as indispensable role players within the global system, a role well-placed
to fill the lapses and failings of governments and international bodies. From their cutting-edge
field research, anti-poaching enforcement efforts, and public awareness-mobilizing campaigns,
NGOs like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Conservation International, and the Nature
Conservancy, to name just a few, tirelessly work to protect habitats, species, and ecosystems
worldwide. NGOs differ tremendously in their size, funding sources, approaches, and areas of
focus; however, the largest and most influential of them are backed by philanthropic donations,
corporate partnerships, and government grants to sustain their operations. This model of
financing raises fears of potential conflicts of interest, the threat of overly powerful corporate
influence, and the danger of being beholden to the interests of powerful funders rather than
principled conservation priorities.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 8
There are also concerns about the tactics and motivations of some large NGOs being too
corporate-minded and professionalized, losing touch with the spirit that should drive such efforts
(Begum et al., 2022). These are often small, local community initiatives taking a grassroots
approach operating at a small scale. These initiatives are generally spearheaded by dedicated
individuals or small NGOs with good ties to the land and species they seek to protect. They
usually put into practice sustainable human-environmental relationships together with the
indigenous knowledge of the environment.
However, such projects are very inadequately funded and unable to have much
institutional support or any budgets to show for them. They have the challenges of low scale and
influence, no international media attention, and are often at risk of being co-opted or having their
efforts undermined by powerful forces that benefit from them (Kleinfeld, 2023). Yet they are also
invaluable for their cultural resonance and the capacity to develop really community-driven,
bottom-up solutions.
Case Studies: Challenges and Complexities
It is useful to look at a number of in-depth case studies, including endangered species,
particular conservation programs and initiatives, and legislative approaches, in order to give an
idea of the complex ethical concerns and practical challenges inherent to conservation efforts.
African Elephant Conservation
The African elephant exemplifies the manifold difficulties in protecting a treasured,
iconic megafauna species. Endangered by the scourges of illegal poaching, fueled by lucrative
ivory markets, rampant habitat loss from agricultural expansion and deforestation, and increasing
human-wildlife conflicts that are displaced closer to human settlements, the African elephant has
seen plummeting populations across its ranges in recent decades (Mekonen, 2020). Though
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 9
NGOs like the African Elephant Coalition, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), Save
the Elephants, and others have heroically campaigned against poaching, protected habitat
corridors, and mitigated conflicts through methods like building wildlife fences and corridors,
the scale of the threats has been unmatched by the scope of their efforts (www.fws.gov, n.d.).
Advanced poaching operations by organized criminal syndicates have killed elephants in large
groups, while the communities resort to small-scale poaching because of poverty and the lack of
economic alternatives (Kuiper et al., 2023). The animals also have to face the fury of such
measures as the fencing that confines migratory ranges of elephants or methods such as cropping
ivory, which requires harming the living animals.
Conservationists have advocated strongly for more aggressive law enforcement and
ranger patrols, sometimes even blurred lines between civilians and the military, as a step to come
up with measures for anti-poaching (Moore et al., 2017). On the other hand, animal welfare
advocates have criticized some measures, such as fencing, which reduces elephant ranges during
migration, and the methods that involve cropping ivory, which would result in killing living
elephants (Shaffer et al., 2019). To others, the solution lies in legalizing, regulating ivory
markets, and allowing it.
There are inherent conflicts between the interests of elephants, a wandering species that
requires large tracts of land for the species to thrive, and those of subsistence farmers whose
crops and livelihoods have been threatened by the large, ravenous herbivores (Bookless, 2019).
The quest for compensation and living in harmony with elephants remains a formidable
challenge.
Great Barrier Reef Conservation
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 10
Marine conservationists and industry spokespersons have long since poured cold water
over the intentional preservation and rehabilitation of the unique underwater environment—the
Great Barrier Reef, the largest coral reef ecosystem in the world and stretching more than 1,400
miles off the coast of Australia (Guzman, 2022). In response to the manifold challenges the reef
faces due to climate change-induced ocean warming and acidification, water pollution due to
coastal run-off, and non-sustainable tourism and fishing practices, a range of protective measures
by the Australian government, in conjunction with agencies like the Great Barrier Reef Marine
Park Authority, has been put in place (Delany-Crowe et al., 2019). These include increased
marine protected areas, fishing regulations, improved sewage and nutrient management, coastal
habitat restoration, and tourist permitting systems (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority,
2019).
However, among environmental activists and organizations, including the Australian
Marine Conservation Society and Greenpeace, criticism of these measures has been
considerable, calling them insufficient because they have done little to stop the core threat of
climate change. They point out that without an imminent transition from fossil fuels to cleaner,
renewable energy and drastic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, no amount of localized
protection can save the coral reef system from eventually succumbing to warm waters,
acidification, and other climate impacts.
The Australian government has received rigorous censure and condemnation from
environmentalists for continued backing and subsidy of coal and natural gas industries, as well as
a lack of commitment under the Paris Climate Agreement. The members contend that preserving
the Great Barrier Reef is incompatible with Australia's dependence on its substantial export of
fossil fuels, which remains a key contributor to the global climate change crisis (Chang, 2023).
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 11
Coastal construction projects, like new ports and facilities and marine construction
affecting the coral reef environment, were among the measures opposed. Sustainable marine
conservation would require marine protective areas and no-take and no-take marine reserves that
leave out all extractive human activities (Hoppit et al., 2022). The case reveals that conservation
tactics are unsustainable in the face of nations that are unready or unwilling to confront or
become invested in overarching forces for environmental degradation, such as climate change,
pollution, and unsustainable economic orientations. It shows how brittle even the most closely
monitored and highly regulated ecological treasures can remain without addressing the root
drivers of destruction at national and global policy levels.
UK Biodiversity Action Plans
In the United Kingdom, there has been an attempt to balance conservation and
development through the implementation of Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) that are concerned
with conserving and improving the quality of local, regional, and national biodiversity through
an overtaking framework. The UK Biodiversity Action Plan was first launched in 1994, which
mapped out a comprehensive inventory, action plans, and monitoring of priorities for species and
habitats showing threats to biodiversity (Sutton, 2021). Hence, it has been mandated to monitor
the population levels, set goals for recovering and maintaining, come up with the measures for
conservation, and coordinate efforts through a wider scale—between different government
agencies, NGOs like the RSPB and Wildlife Trusts, private landowners, and local authorities.
Although the framework of BAP has had successes in curtailing some of the losses in
biodiversity and partly improving the population status of certain priority species, such as the
bittern and proboscis monkey, it has also provided better protection to certain important
ecosystems, such as chalk grasslands (Sutton, 2021). Still, various issues remain unresolved.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 12
Insufficient funding, lack of strong enforcement mechanisms, conflicts over land use priorities of
development interest, and failure to meet stated targets have handicapped progress. One of the
limitations of the BAP priority lists has been their inadequate scope and spotlighting of relatively
few at-risk species while overlooking the protection of a wider set of ecosystems and less-
threatened but ecologically vital creatures (JNCC, 2019). Conservationists have pointed out that
recovery from endangered species is not enough if the habitat quality and ecological
communities they depend on still remain degraded and fragmented.
BAP planning and implementation across multiple stakeholders have also been criticized
over the collaborative fashion. Although engaged with many parties, there is, nevertheless,
bureaucratization that goes with it, diverging interests cutting across multiple issues and the
conflicting interests that the country may have in prioritizing its economic needs over the long-
term environmental ones.
The BAP experience in the UK highlights some of the major challenges of balancing
biodiversity conservation with other societal needs, especially in densely populated nations with
limited land areas facing housing crises and development drives. While any comprehensive
policy framework is significant, it should be supported by ample resources, stringent
enforcement, and consistent government commitment to ensuring conservation is a priority of
conservation above short-term economic considerations.
Conclusions & Recommendations
The broad range of philosophical and ethical debates on global conservation initiatives
reflects a wide range of perspectives, priorities, and interests of various stakeholders from all
scales. Although there are many differences in opinions, there seems to be a general consensus
that the prevention of catastrophic biodiversity loss and the protection of threatened species is a
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 13
moral imperative. However, competing forces such as financial incentives, corporate profit-
seeking tactics, and strong development demands typically prevail, preventing this goal from
being completely realized. In many subsistence communities and nations of the developing
world, fighting against immediate poverty and human welfare deficits takes precedence over
long-term sustainability. Many traditional cultural practices go against conservation intentions. In
areas where ethics are strong, the lack of resources, enforcement, and competing land-use
demands are beyond the call of duty to shield vulnerable species and habitats from extractive
encroachment.
Individuals have to lift up the ethical value systems, whether secular environmental
philosophy or spiritual Earth-centric indigenous wisdom traditions that recognize humanity's
place within the natural world and, therefore, our moral duty as stewards to protect its great
richness and robustness. In this regard, adopting perspectives like deep ecology that give
intrinsic value to life and ecological processes can facilitate the shift of consciousness needed to
prioritize biodiversity above short-term economic pursuits. Clearly, transnational institutional
empowerment, effective national policy, creating strategic partnerships of NGOs, and revamping
our ethical commitments to non-human nature can assist humanity in the negotiation of the stiff
challenges facing conservation efforts.
Recommendations
On a practical level, key components of a comprehensive global conservation strategy must
include:
Scaling up massively, governments, philanthropies, and the private sector's investments
in biodiversity conservation (IUCN event, 2022).
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 14
Strengthening and increasing the systematically enforced, inviolable boundaries that
shield biodiversity hotspots from encroachment (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Rietig, and
Scobie, 2022).
Switching to sustainable, biodiversity-friendly economic activities while rapidly phasing
out extractive industries that degrade habitats (United Nations, 2021).
Incorporating traditional ecological knowledge from indigenous communities in
conservation management plans (Gordon (Iñupiaq) et al., 2023).
Developing alternative livelihoods in a bid to reduce human-animal conflict and the
destruction of environments due to subsistence practices (König et al., 2020).
Empowering local communities in stakeholder and leadership positions for place-based
conservation (Dawson, 2023).
Elevating the authority and enforcement capabilities of international environmental
agreements and protocols (Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Rietig and Scobie, 2022).
Above all else, all the policy measures must be undergirded by an ethical reawakening
that respects all forms of life, not only those that offer economic benefits. Understanding that our
human wealth and flourishing ultimately depend on the health of the complete ecological
systems in which we reside and are fully dependent. Only through this philosophical change that
shifts values beyond anthropocentric limitations can we hope to secure a life of dignity and
vibrancy for humanity, as well as the biodiversity co-habiting this Earth.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 15
References
Begum, A., Liu, J., Hina Qayum and Amr Mamdouh (2022). Environmental and Moral
Education for Effective Environmentalism: An Ideological and Philosophical Approach.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 19(23),
pp.15549–15549. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315549.
Bookless, DJC, 2019. Why should wild nature be preserved? A dialogue between biblical
theology and biodiversity conservation (Doctoral dissertation).
Chang, A. (2023). Open Letter: Pressure Grows to Put Science Before Politics & Fossil Fuels.
[online] The Australia Institute. Available at: https://australiainstitute.org.au/post/open-
letter-pressure-grows-to-put-science-before-politics-fossil-fuels/.
Dawson, N. (2023). Journeys to more equitable and effective conservation: the central role of
Indigenous peoples and local communities - News | IUCN. [online] www.iucn.org.
Available at: https://www.iucn.org/news/202308/journeys-more-equitable-and-effective-
conservation-central-role-indigenous-peoples-and [Accessed 15 Mar. 2024].
Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on
Competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013
Delany-Crowe, T., Marinova, D., Fisher, M., McGreevy, M. and Baum, F. (2019). Australian
policies on water management and climate change: are they supporting the sustainable
development goals and improved health and wellbeing? Globalization and Health, 15(1).
doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0509-3.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 16
Domínguez, L. and Luoma, C. (2020). Decolonising Conservation Policy: How Colonial Land
and Conservation Ideologies Persist and Perpetuate Indigenous Injustices at the Expense
of the Environment. Land, 9(3), p.65. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030065.
Environmental Audit Committee (2021). Biodiversity in the UK: bloom or bust? [online]
publications.parliament.uk. Available at:
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5802/cmselect/cmenvaud/136/136-report.html.
Gordon (Iñupiaq), H.S.J., Ross, J.A., Bauer-Armstrong, C., Moreno, M., Byington (Choctaw), R.
and Bowman (Lunaape/Mohican), N. (2023). Integrating Indigenous Traditional
Ecological Knowledge of land into land management through Indigenous-academic
partnerships. Land Use Policy, 125, p.106469.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106469.
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2019). Strategies to manage the Reef | gbrmpa.
[online] Gbrmpa.gov.au. Available at: https://www2.gbrmpa.gov.au/our-work/reef-
management-strategies/strategies-manage-reef.
Guzman, J. (2022). Australia pledges $700 million to protect Great Barrier Reef threatened by
climate change. [online] The Hill. Available at:
https://thehill.com/changing-america/sustainability/climate-change/591811-australia-
pledges-700-million-to-protect-great/.
Hoppit, G., Schmidt, D.N., Brazier, P., Mieszkowska, N. and Pieraccini, M. (2022). Are marine
protected areas an adaptation measure against climate change impacts on coastal
ecosystems? A UK case study. Nature-Based Solutions, 2, p.100030.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100030.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 17
IISD Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (n.d.). Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD. [online]
Available at: https://enb.iisd.org/negotiations/convention-biological-diversity-
cbd#:~:text=The%201992%20Convention%20on%20Biological.
IUCN (2022). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [online] IUCN Red List of Threatened
Species. Available at: https://www.iucnredlist.org/about/background-history.
IUCN event (2022). Scaling Finance for Nature: Forging Philanthropy-Finance-Government
Partnerships - events | IUCN. [online] www.iucn.org. Available at:
https://www.iucn.org/events/iucn-event/scaling-finance-nature-forging-philanthropy-
finance-government-partnerships [Accessed 15 Mar. 2024].
JNCC (2019). UK BAP | JNCC - Adviser to Government on Nature Conservation. [online]
Jncc.gov.uk. Available at: https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/.
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Rietig, K. and Scobie, M. (2022). Agency dynamics of International
Environmental Agreements: actors, contexts, and drivers. International Environmental
Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-022-
09571-w.
Kawall, J. (2017). A history of environmental ethics. The Oxford handbook of environmental
ethics, 13-26. https://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=CQNLDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=Arne+Naess+and+Paul+Tay
lor,+and+other+environmental+ethicists,
+is+for+the+intrinsic+value+of+all+living+beings,+ecological+communities,
+and+ecosystems+themselves,
+irrespective+of+their+usefulness+to+the+human+race&ots=M37eaQQBKa&sig=1qhrF
KPSWPmEb3IbIk209dNT2A8#v=onepage&q&f=false
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 18
Kleinfeld, R. (2023). Polarization, Democracy, and Political Violence in the United States: What
the Research Says. [online] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at:
https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/09/05/polarization-democracy-and-political-
violence-in-united-states-what-research-says-pub-90457.
König, H.J., Kiffner, C., Kramer‐Schadt, S., Fürst, C., Keuling, O. and Ford, A.T. (2020).
Human-wildlife coexistence in a changing world. Conservation Biology, 34(4), pp.786–
794. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13513.
Kuiper, T., Altwegg, R., Beale, C., Carroll, T., Dublin, H.T., Hauenstein, S., Kshatriya, M.,
Schwarz, C., Thouless, C.R., Royle, A. and Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2023). Drivers and
facilitators of the illegal killing of elephants across 64 African sites. Proceedings of the
Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 290(1990).
doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2270.
Mekonen, S. (2020). Coexistence between human and wildlife: the nature, causes and
mitigations of human wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park, Southeast
Ethiopia. B.M.C. Ecology, 20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00319-1.
Moore, J.F., Mulindahabi, F., Masozera, M.K., Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E., Turikunkiko, E. and
Oli, M.K. (2017). Are ranger patrols effective in reducing poaching-related threats within
protected areas? Journal of Applied Ecology, [online] 55(1), pp.99–107.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12965.
Patrick, S. (2022). To Prevent the Collapse of Biodiversity, the World Needs a New Planetary
Politics. [online] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at:
https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/11/28/to-prevent-collapse-of-biodiversity-world-
needs-new-planetary-politics-pub-88473.
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 19
Robinson, J.M., Gellie, N., MacCarthy, D., Mills, J.G., O'Donnell, K. and Redvers, N. (2021).
Traditional ecological knowledge in restoration ecology: a call to listen deeply, to engage
with, and respect Indigenous voices. Restoration Ecology, 29(4).
doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13381.
Sampaio, R., Morato, R.G., Royle, A., Abrahams, M.I., Peres, C.A. and Chiarello, A.G. (2023).
Vertebrate population changes induced by hunting in Amazonian sustainable-use
protected areas. Biological Conservation, 284, pp.110206–110206.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110206.
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020).
Understanding the Value and Limits of Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change and
Other Global Challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 375(1794), 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
Shaffer, L.J., Khadka, K.K., Van Den Hoek, J. and Naithani, K.J. (2019). Human-Elephant
Conflict: A Review of Current Management Strategies and Future Directions. Frontiers in
Ecology and Evolution, [online] 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00235.
Solasz, M. (2014, November 18). PH115: Introduction to Ethics | Fall 2014 | Page 2.
https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/millsonph115/page/2/
United Nations (2021). Our global food system is the primary driver of biodiversity loss. [online]
UN Environment. Available at: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/our-
global-food-system-primary-driver-biodiversity-loss.
Wells, T. (2016, October 24). The Incoherence of Peter Singer's Utilitarian Argument for
Vegetarianism. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/the-incoherence-of-peter-
singers-utilitarian-argument-for-vegeta/10096418
The Philosophical and Ethical Debate in Global Conservation and its Role in Government Policies 20
www.fws.gov. (n.d.). African Elephant Conservation Fund | What We Do | US Fish & Wildlife
Service. [online] Available at: https://www.fws.gov/program/african-elephant-
conservation-fund/what-we-do [Accessed 15 Mar. 2024].
