1 / 7100%
Deprofessionalization in medicine. What is it? What risks does it create? Does it eliminate
the original profession? A professional is one whose occupation “maintains a monopoly
over a theoretical base of knowledge” Kritzer (2001). A professional also has the
expectation of autonomy in day-to-day work and an expectation of service to others above
self-interest and the obligation to uphold ethical duties (DeCamp, 2021). Medicine and
dentistry have always been considered a profession, but several specific developments are
creating a loss of those unique occupational qualities resulting in deprofessionalism
(Kritzer, 2001).
Changing practice dynamics that place a greater emphasis on the business aspects of
medicine/ dentistry, the compartmentalization of knowledge, and the increased use of tools
to apply knowledge are pushing deprofessionalization in medicine/ dentistry.
Compartmentalization of knowledge comes thru the use of auxiliaries like PAs and NPs
and LPNs and CNAs and DTs. These changes are meant to achieve better patient outcomes
and reduce costs (DeCamp, 2021) and can be seen as a natural development. However,
these same dynamics can create challenges for physicians/ dentists as they attempt to have
dual loyalty to their employers/ health systems and their patients.
Trust is the foundation of the patient-provider relationship. It is based on expertise,
competence, honesty, transparency, and good intentions. Efficiency and productivity and
value-based care are important, but they are secondary to serving the needs of the patient
(DeCamp, 2021). This is where, despite the push to deprofessionalize medicine, the
original profession must not be lost. Physicians/ dentists have an individual and collective
obligation to uphold their ethical duties that may conflict with other goals and practices
(DeCamp, 2021). It is this sense of professionalism, clinical integrity, and motivation of
service to others that must be the guide for their actions to preserve the patient-provider
relationship and be a voice for their patients above all else.
"The way we have always done it." I consider this the most dangerous phrase ever created
and used within the human language. In our every day normal, most people, typically who
are uneducated on the differences would prefer a physical versus a physician assistant or
nurse practitioner. In line with the many issues including staffing shortages across the
country, many healthcare settings have opted to hiring and recruiting different types of
clinicians such as the ones I mentioned above. In my view, it is all about the hierarchy of
the profession itself. In pretty much any setting, especially the hospitals, and different
offices and medical centers, the "deprofessionalized" options usually work under the
doctor. In most cases, a report and consult would occur to ensure different systems of
checks and balances. Unfortunately, nurses and physicians maintain a type of control over
the "lower professions." For example, in other states, Critical care paramedics exist and
exist within the function to perform critical transfers usually overseen by a nurse. The
difference? Nothing except for the salary which for the medic is lower. Truth be told, the
word deprofessionalization is silly and should be dropped and forgotten. Less school,
similar authority and autonomy along with great money and the ability to advance? Sign
me up! They may have a little less education but they have plenty of clinical time and less
debt!
I had to really think about this week's discussion and the deprofessionalization in health
care. As I have come to understand, deprofessionalization refers to the loss of power of a
position and no longer needing the original profession. The lose of the original profession
won't necessarily happen in healthcare, however, there are many new positions that arise
due to shortages and with this comes the loss of power. The example given to us from our
Professor, is the term nurse, because now we have Advance Nursing, registered nurse,
licence practical nurse (LPN) nursing assistant, medical assistant (MAs). These terms can
be used interchangeably sometimes, which really devalues the term. I do think all of these
professions are needed and warranted, however, should not be interchangeable. When I
worked in the field, I worked specifically with a Physicians Assistant. He was great and
our patients loved him, but they would call him "doctor' and it always bugged me, because
he was NOT a doctor. It totally devalued the physicians that we did work for. We now call
people who work in healthcare as "healthcare providers". We throw this around and lump
everyone into one category. Physicians use to enjoy the prestige, power and autonomy but
now many doctors have loss their since of power and autonomy due to the control from
corporate entities (Marlow, 1997).
I believe this will continue. As our healthcare moves toward institutionalize medicine,
healthcare providers such as physicians, physician assistants, advance nurse practitioners,
etc will have to abide by what the corporate institution says then what medicine suggests.
"Economic, technological, and societal pressures will hasten and augment emerging low
price immediate access where healthcare providers with little to no close supervision by
physicians. This will result in a public image that all healthcare professions expertise and
advice are equally appropriate" (Nasca, & Thomas, 2015).
I found the research process for this week’s discussion topic to be very challenging. The
term “deprofessionalization” in the context of health care has many different
interpretations. One source describes medical deprofessionalization as the process of
transitioning from learned professionals to skilled workers (Duvefelt, 2016). Another
source describes it as the decreasing distance in both knowledge and education between a
caregiver and the patient (Kritzer, 2001). Yet another source states that the
deprofessionalization of physicians relates to the demand that they take on more
managerial responsibility, which blurs the lines between a profession and an occupation
(Moller & Kuntz, 2013). However, you decide to define deprofessionalism in the medical
field, one truth remains: deprofessionalism is happening and is increasing. However, I do
not believe that it is eliminating the learned professional from the equation.
The management of many diseases, including chronic diseases such as diabetes,
hypertension, depression, and cardiovascular disease, require extensive knowledge,
experience, and independent judgement that can only be accomplished through
multidisciplinary teams led by physicians (Duvefelt, 2016). Less educated and less skilled
medical staff predominantly provide care based on established protocols and guidelines;
however, complex diseases cannot be handled by “one-size-fits-all” care protocols, and
this approach is detrimental to patient care outcomes (Duvefelt, 2016). As the medical
science field continues to expand and the knowledgebase grows, independent judgements
by extensively trained and educated physicians will become even more critical (Duvefelt,
2016).
Studies have shown that care provided by mid-level practitioners is of lower quality than
care provided by physicians, including higher rates of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions
and lower quality of referrals among the mid-level practitioners (Cayley, 2016). Modern
care models have shifted from the solo-physician model to the multidisciplinary team led
by physicians, and I do not see the physician exiting this care model in the future (Cayley,
2016). Deprofessionalization breaks down the public’s trust in the health care system,
removes physician and nurse autonomy, and restricts independent clinical judgement
(Erlich & Gravel, 2021). Obviously, this is not the direction our industry wants to take.
all medical professionals have been educated and trained for the goal of serving the world,
deprofessionalism does not remove the original profession within health care. Medical
practitioners have a primary responsibility to give the greatest service and care to the best
of their abilities. Medical personnel, particularly doctors, are being subjected to a
production and efficiency standard rather than individual patient care or ethics. The
Hippocratic Oath has been denied historical legitimacy, according to Trappenburg, Van
Beek (2019); each of its principles has been questioned, and its meaning is debatable or
seen merely as a shifting creation of cultural mores. This is an example of how medical
practitioners may hide their mistakes by presenting so many loopholes to hide the reality.
Nurses and doctors are still needed in healthcare, notwithstanding deprofessionalization.
Even though nursing assistants and medical assistants are being hired, the primary
function of nurses and doctors is still highly valued. This is because there is generally a
high demand for all the professionals since one patient may need a variety of services. On
the same night, a patient could need a surgeon, an on-call doctor or resident, a nurse, a
phlebotomist, and a medical assistant for paperwork. There is so much that must be done
that one doctor and one nurse cannot possibly handle it all. This is unlikely to alter in the
future; the sector will continue to carve out jobs if it finds it efficient to have many distinct
layers of specialists. It may be preferable this way because if a patient can visit a nurse
practitioner or physician assistant instead of a physician, expenditures may be reduced.
Trappenburg, M., & van Beek, G. (2019). 'My profession is gone': how social workers
experience de-professionalization in the
Cayley, W. (2016). Will mid-level practitioners replace primary care physicians? The bmj
opinion. Retrieved March 1, 2022 from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/04/05/william-
cayley-will-mid-level-practitioners-replace-primary-care-physicians/
Desdemona, M. & Kuntz, L. (2013). Physicians as managers: deprofessionalization versus
collaboration. International Journal of Management, 30(3), 86.
link.gale.com/apps/doc/A339919482/AONE?u=clemsonu_main&sid=googleScholar&xid=
ac934c7e. Accessed 1 Mar. 2022.
Duvefelt, H. (2016). From Learned Professionals to Skilled Workers: The Dangerous De-
professionalization of Medicine. Retrieved March 1, 2022 from
https://acountrydoctorwrites.blog/2016/03/06/from-learned-professionals-to-skilled-
workers-the-dangerous-de-professionalization-of-medicine/
Erlich, D. & Gravel, J. (2021). Professional Identity Misformation and Burnout: A Call for
Graduate Medical Education to Reject “Provider”. J Grad Med Educ, 13(2), 167–169. doi:
https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-01100.1
Kritzer, H. M. (2001). Deprofessionalization. Deprofessionalization - an overview.
ScienceDirect Topics. Retrieved March 1, 2022, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/deprofessionalization
J. Nasca, T., & W. Thomas, C. (2015). Medicine in 2035: Selected insights from
ACGME's scenario planning. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 7(1), 139–142.
https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-14-00740.1
Marlow, A. E. (1998). The Professional Decline of Physicians in the Era of Managed Care.
New England Journal of Public Policy, 13(2). https://doi.org/
http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol13/iss2/8
“Pa vs MD: Which Career Path Should You Choose?” AUC School of Medicine, 4 Mar.
2021, https://www.aucmed.edu/blog/pa-vs-md-whats-the-difference.
BeMo Academic Consulting Inc. “Pa vs MD: Similarities & Differences in 2022.”
BeMo®, BeMo Academic Consulting Inc., 1 Oct. 2021,
https://bemoacademicconsulting.com/blog/pa-vs-md.
DeCamp, M. (2021). Ethical and professionalism implications of physician employment
and healthcare business practices. Annals of Internal Medicine. Retrieved February 28,
2022, from https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-7093
Kritzer, H. (2015). Deprofessionalization and post-professionalism. ScienceDirect.com |
Science, health and medical journals, full text articles and books. Retrieved February 28,
2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Students also viewed