As noted by the works of Johnson, the tension between Christianity and
psychology can be regarded as a calling rather than a problem (Johnson,
2010). As Christian practitioners of the study of psychology, it is up to us
to bridge the gap between Christianity and psychology, constantly
working to
refine it to construct a methodology that effectively synthesizes the best
elements of the two fields of study, so that they are seen as a whole
system
as opposed to separate entities functioning separately. Reframing the
tension between the two fields as a calling serves to create an objective
that is attainable as opposed to one that is daunting and not within reach.
Through a foundation grounded in Scripture, I can work to refine my
research
so that it seeks to incorporate aspects of Christian faith and scientific
research. This attainable challenge is in line with Wolters' discussion of
how human nature gravitates directionally either toward sin or away from
it
(Wolters, 2005).
As a Christian psychologist, it will be up to me and others in
the field of developmental psychology and other psychological disciplines
to
utilize methods that help steer research back towards the foundational
elements of the Gospel, much like these methods can then be
implemented to
help others to find their way back on the path toward goodness and
redemption, thereby restoring the true nature of themselves as God
intended
(Wolters, 2005). In the field of developmental psychology, individuals may
have
developed negative emotional responses or other maladies due to their
upbringing--with the guidance of the Gospel, Christian practitioners can
work to employ appropriate biblical counseling methods and both
quantitative
and qualitative observation to analyze the makeup of an individual and
their
behavior, not limiting themselves to physical aspects, but also stretching
their practice to identify mental processes, thoughts, and complex
emotions
through in depth cognitive interviewing techniques, ultimately allowing for
them to come up with an effective method of treatment that addresses a
particular issue that can is both innately and outwardly experienced by
the
patient. The intellectual crisis that came about with the rise of the
scientific method does not have to replace evangelical theory and the
Gospel. Instead, the development of scientific methods should be
regarded as
opportunities and resources that are available to society; with the proper
outlook and understanding of how to shape the scientific method so that it
fits within the mold of the Gospel message, we as Christian practitioners
can continue to spread the importance of our faith and develop effective
methods to help those in need.
In the future, I look forward to refining my research and learning from
other
experts in the field to perform my work and
study in psychology while carrying out the message of the Gospel to
restore
humankind through the Christian worldview. Thus, the calling to alleviate
the tension between psychology and Christianity is an opportunity to
regain
what was lost for both the Christian practitioner and the individual being
treated, ultimately benefiting everyone to live a healthier and improved
life.
2
References
Johnson, E. (2010). Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.).
Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity Press.
Wolters, A.M. (2005). Creation Regained (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI:
William B. Eerdmans
Publishing.
