1 / 2100%
q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q 1
Inq responseq toq yourq requestq forq aq peerq reviewq ofq yourq manuscriptq onq theq relationshipq betweenq
spiritualityq andq loneliness,q Iq haveq addressedq whatq Iq believeq toq beq twoq areasq ofq strengthq andq
threeq areasq ofq potentialq improvement.
Strengths
1. Theq manuscriptq isq well-organized,q cogent,q andq devoidq ofq majorq formattingq errors.q
Theq appropriateq useq ofq headings,q spacing,q table/figureq formatting,q andq yourq
adherenceq toq theq assignmentq instructionsq contributeq toq anq overallq easeq ofq readabilityq
andq demonstrateq yourq commitmentq toq theq proofingq andq revisionq process.
2. Theq demographicq dataq isq presentedq inq aq meaningfulq wayq andq theq figureq includedq
supportsq theq reader’sq understandingq ofq thatq data.q Furthermore,q theq variablesq ofq
interestq areq clearlyq stated,q asq isq theq hypothesis.q Theq correctq statisticalq analysisq wasq
usedq andq aq decisionq regardingq theq nullq hypothesisq isq statedq conciselyq andq accurately.
Weaknessesq q
1. Aq criticalq figureq isq missing.q Perq theq assignmentq instructionsq (1.b.iii.2),q theq
manuscriptq requiresq aq figureq relatedq toq theq testedq hypothesis,q which,q inq thisq case,q
wouldq haveq beenq aq scatterplotq depictingq theq relationshipq betweenq spiritualityq andq
lonelinessq (Harris,q 2022).
2. Thereq areq multipleq errorsq inq theq statisticalq writeq up.q Althoughq youq correctlyq failedq
toq rejectq theq nullq hypothesis,q asq supportedq byq theq SPSSq output,q theq degreesq ofq
freedomq areq incorrectq (40q isq stated;q 38q isq correctq [N-2]),q theq rq valueq isq incorrectq
(.75q isq stated;q .075q isq correct),q andq theq coefficientq ofq determinationq isq absent,q
q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q 2
thoughq itq shouldq beq included,q despiteq theq non-significantq findings,q perq theq Helpfulq
Hintsq forq Successq documentq locatedq inq Moduleq 1q (St.q Peters,q 2022;q Harris,q 2022).
3. Theq discussionq portionq ofq theq manuscriptq lacksq clarityq andq depthq ofq thoughtq
regardingq theq relevanceq ofq theq findings.q Sectionq 2.dq ofq theq assignmentq instructionsq
necessitatesq aq presentationq ofq theq “bigq picture”q (Harris,q 2022),q yetq neitherq theq
importanceq ofq theseq variablesq asq individualq constructsq norq theq importanceq ofq
understandingq theq relationshipq betweenq theq twoq isq adequatelyq presentedq here.q q q q
Oneq strengthq ofq yourq paperq isq thatq itq isq apparentq thatq youq haveq putq aq lotq ofq thoughtq intoq
it.q Youq thoroughlyq consideredq yourq populationq andq howq thatq mayq haveq affected,q orq notq
affected,q yourq results.q Anotherq strengthq isq thatq youq haveq aq lotq ofq substantialq supportq bothq forq
andq againstq yourq hypothesis,q showingq theq differencesq andq similaritiesq inq otherq studies.q Youq alsoq
consideredq manyq potentialq confoundsq ofq yourq study.q Oneq suggestionq Iq wouldq haveq wouldq beq toq
considerq futureq implicationsq ofq aq relationship,q orq nonq relationship,q ofq yourq variables.q Also,q
don'tq forgetq aq graphq inq yourq paperq toq visualizeq yourq results.q Last,q considerq breakingq upq yourq
ideasq intoq moreq paragraphs.q
Students also viewed