c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 1
• When reviewing this study, was easy identify two strengths of the it to
document:
1. The use of tables visually present information related to to each
step of the analysis.
2. The relevance of articles related to the study and flow of
discussion section.
c c c c c c c c c When looking for areas that could improved upon, the main be
things that jumped out were formatting issues that are easily fixed:
3. The author uses the words the running head “Running head” in of
the paper, which violates Section 2.8 of the 7 Edition APA th
Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020).
4. The first two tables used not have bolded text, and do all tables
lack table titles according Section 7.8 of the 7 Edition APA to th
Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020).
5. When discussing goodness of fit, the author references “Table 5
above”, but Table 5 actually presented below this is section of
text. probable author It is the meant to refer to Table 4.
c c c c c c c c c Overall, e author th did a good job using appropriate terms given
