1 / 2100%
SPIRITUALITYd ANDd QUIETd EGO d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 1
d Yourd studyd ond thed relationshipd betweend spiritualityd andd egod reflectsd ad well-put-
togetherd sectiond ofd thed research.d Ind thed firstd sectiond ofd yourd research,d youd describedd
thed demographicd attributesd ofd thed sampled usingd descriptived andd frequencyd statisticsd
whiled notingd thed symmetryd andd skewnessd ofd thed sampled basedd ond thed demographicd
characteristics.d Ind thed secondd sectiond ofd thed study,d thed Pearsond correlationd
coefficientd wasd correctlyd usedd tod evaluated thed relationshipd betweend thed independentd
andd dependentd variables.d Formattedd thed tabled usingd thed tablesd ind APAd formatd andd
namedd themd appropriatelyd wasd alsod correctlyd putd together.d Further,d youd correctlyd
usedd scatterplotd tod visualized thed relationshipd betweend egod andd spirituality.
Yourd interpretationd ofd thed outputd wasd alsod correct,d andd yourd decisiond notd tod rejectd thed
nulld hypothesisd withd ad p-valued ofd 0.336d wasd alsod valid.d However,d youd didd notd
commentd ond thed directiond andd strengthd ofd thed relationshipd betweend egod andd
spirituality.d Wasd thed relationshipd weak,d moderate,d ord strong,d andd didd and increased ind
spiritualityd leadd tod lowerd ord higherd levelsd ofd quietd ego?d Id thinkd youd incorrectlyd referredd
tod thed correlationd coefficientd asd thed coefficientd ofd determination.
Ind thed discussiond section,d youd firstd summarizedd thed purposed ofd thed study,d thed
methodology,d andd thed findings.d Youd wered alsod correctd ind statingd thed weaknessd ind thed
studyd asd itd involvedd onlyd peopled whod usedd Facebookd asd theyd mayd shared specificd
characteristicsd thatd ared notd representatived ofd thed generald population.d Youd thend relatedd
thed resultsd ofd yourd studyd tod previousd findings.d Id commendd youd ford usingd studiesd
alignedd withd yourd resultsd andd thosed thatd contractedd yourd results,d makingd yourd
discussiond broadd andd well-rounded.
Youd furtherd notedd nuancesd ind thed definitiond ofd spiritualityd andd religiousness,d whichd
mayd haved ledd tod ad differenced ind thed expectedd andd thed actuald results.d Finally,d thed studyd
suggestedd furtherd studyd ford thed topicd whiled notingd itsd importanced andd usingd well-
formattedd references.d Overall,d thed studyd wasd welld thoughtd outd andd articulated.
Thed firstd strengthd ind yourd resultd andd discussiond sectionsd isd yourd breakdownd ofd yourd
demographics,d andd thed associatedd limitationsd presented.d Futured researchersd cand
attemptd tod furtherd diversifyd thed sampled ofd participants.d Yourd secondd strengthd isd yourd
effectived used ofd graphs.d Thed correlationsd graphd presentedd relevantd informationd tod
yourd readerd andd thed scatterplotd capturedd thed disassociationd betweend yourd twod
variables.
Thed firstd recommendationd Id wouldd maked isd includingd previousd researchd methodsd andd
tod comparisond themd tod yoursd sod thatd thed readerd isd abled tod graspd ad fulld pictured
conceptd ond lessonsd learnedd and/ord ford repeatd purposesd (15d Steps,d n.d.).d Thed secondd
suggestiond isd tod included ifd youd didd ord didd notd briefd participantsd overd thed definitionsd ofd
yourd variablesd (15d Steps,d n.d.).d Youd explainedd quited welld ind yourd discussiond sectiond
howd definingd thed termsd cand complicated andd negativelyd impactd researchd efforts.d Thed
thirdd suggestiond isd stressingd thed bigd pictured ond whyd researchd ind thisd aread isd importantd
andd thed positived outcomesd itd cand haved (15d Steps,d n.d).
SPIRITUALITYd ANDd QUIETd EGO d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 2
d d d d d d d d d d d d Thed studyd youd mentionedd wasd relevantd andd yourd toned andd wordd usaged wasd
appropriate.
Yourd resultsd andd Discussiond wered welld constructed.d Oned suggestiond wouldd bed tod
maintaind thed anonymityd ofd thed participatesd isd ifd youd wouldd haved allowedd mored
participantsd tod filld outd thed formd andd randomlyd selectedd thed numberd ofd participantsd ford
thed studyd ord postd thed linkd ond twod differentd sociald sitesd tod obtaind ensured thatd
anonymityd wasd indeedd protected.d Youd nicelyd explainedd thed resultsd sectiond ofd thed
studyd andd providedd thed properd tabled andd figured ind APAd format,d whichd gaved ad greatd
visuald ofd thed results.d Oned weaknessd isd thatd thered isd notd ad notesd sectiond ford thed figure,d
althoughd notd required,d itd wouldd haved maded thed resultsd ind thed figured easierd tod
understandd (Americand Psychologicald Association,d 7
th
d ed,d p.d 227).d Anotherd greatd
aspectd ofd yourd researchd isd thed used ofd relevantd references.d Thisd aidedd ind thed supportd
ofd yourd study.d d Lastly,d youd didd notd discussd whatd thed resultsd meand ford thed field,d andd
thisd impactsd thed bigd picture.
Americand Psychologicald Association.d (7thd ed.).d Publicationd Manuald ofd thed American
Psychologicald Association.d Washington,d DC:d Americand Psychologicald Association
Students also viewed