Dear Advisor,
As you are aware, I am conducting research that seeks to
investigate potentially racist hiring practices. However, I fear that if the
true nature of the study were known, it could influence the results. With
that in mind, I have reviewed the ethical principles and standards set by
the APA. I believe that I have come up with a couple of solutions that I
would like your opinion on.
First, I feel that the use of deception could be a viable option.
According to section 8.07(a) Deception in Research, psychologists can use
deceptive methods when nondeceptive methods are not feasible.
Deception is necessary when knowledge of the study would affect its
scientific and application value (American Psychological Association, 2017
With my deception, I would tell the participants that I am interested in the
interview processes that various companies use when hiring new
employees. At the same time, according to Principle C: Integrity, it is
important to address the deception. By addressing the deception, I would
correct any mistrust that may have been the result of deception
(American Psychological Association, 2017). This deception would be
corrected during the debriefing portion of the study. The participant would
be made aware of the nature of the study. If there was mistrust or any
other ill effects, I would use my best effort to ensure they are properly
resolved.
Another solution is the use of confederates. We could bring in
individuals belonging to different ethnicities. Then, have them apply for a
job. As they go in for the interview, they would be equipped with a
concealed audio recorder. According to Principle B: Fidelity and
Responsibility, psychologists must clarify participant roles and obligations.
It would be made clear to the confederate that the “wire” would be used
to listen to how the interviewer spoke to them. These confederates would
behave the same way they would if they were not wearing a wire. Any
confederate not comfortable in doing so would not be required to
participate. Abiding by Section 8.04(a) Client/Patient, Student, and
Subordinate Research Participants, there would be no adverse
consequences for those that choose not to participate (American
Psychological Association, 2017). Informed consent from the interviewer is
not an issue either. Section 8.03 Informed Consent for Recording Voices
and Images in Research states, that informed consent can be obtained
during the debriefing process. If by chance, the interviewer does not
consent, his or her data will not be used in the study American
Psychological Association, 2017).
Sincerely,
Reference
