American National Style Assignment
Essay: Source of American National Style Assignment
Introduction
Due to America’s reputation within foreign relations being the most influential
country; the country has created their own American National Style when
dealing with foreign policies and affairs. Through the American National Style
there is an influential response following ideologies of America regarding
foreign policy strategies. The American National Style better helps policy
makers understand what is needed to fulfill the standard of America responses
within foreign affairs. With the American National Style representing the
standard of responses of foreign affairs; the American National Style has the
mission to attempt to establish order and protection of common interests and
common values. “The American National Style has the goal to preserve
common values while protecting common interests” ( Hastedt 2020) The
presence of the American National Style is represented through the American
response to the Russian and Ukrainian War. Millions of aid was given to
Ukraine in efforts to help Ukraine win the war against Russia. This support
comes from The American National Style due to Ukraine being an ally(value)
along with the concern of Russia concurring Ukraine creating a bigger power
for the United Nations and The American National Style to respond
to.(common interest) The American National Style aims to gain meaningful
military experience, geological strategies, provide and protect resources along
with gain political influences and relevance worldwide. Over the development
American National Style Assignment
of American society there has become an adaptation of American National
Style when responding to foreign affairs. This can be understood through the
many edits made over the years due to differential policy makers creating
different solutions to model as a system of influence within foreign policies.
Providing pragmatism and experience to the development of the American
National Style it is likely a developed effective system to better represent the
values and interests of the American people effectively within foreign
relations.
The American National Style in Foreign Policy
The American National Style response is separated into three different
categories to better understand the process within foreign policy. “There are
three categories; the past, the principles, and pragmatism.” (Hoofman 1968)
The past category within the American National Style consists of the historic
representation of American in pervious foreign affairs. Along with this the past
also identifies pervious policies created by the American National Style and
how to improve along with what can be learned from these previous policies.
Through different principles in the American National Style there is a linear
response to success within addressing foreign affairs. One of principles that is
most represented within the American National Style is the use of political
pluralism. Political pluralism is defined as promoting diversity and permit
peaceful coexisting. This concept further helps the interactions of foreign
policy with American values, experiences and challenges. Finishing the
American National Style Assignment
American National Style concepts, there is pragmatism. Pragmatism is seen as
the duty to protect human rights around the world along with the promotion of
democracy and freedom. This concept is most represented with in the
American National Style due to America’s representation and influences
through involvement in foreign affairs. The freedoms represented by American
policies in the American National Style include land of the free, protection of
human rights, promotion of governmental systems to provide freedoms.
Ensuring democracy and human rights freedoms is the common mission of the
National American Style however ensuring the representation of the three
principles creates a heighten in the power along with influence of the
American National Style within foreign affairs.
How has the American National Style helped Policymakers learn for the
Past?
Since the beginning of America’s independence, America has been very
involved and influential within foreign policies and or affairs. Through failures
and successes there is a vast amount of knowledge to learn from the American
response to foreign affairs in the past along within modern day. Through Wars,
Proxy Wars, and proving resources; wither this is military or humanitarian aid.
The American National Style has always offered a responses to foreign affair;
not only on the behalf of the country of America but also American allies. One
of the pieces of knowledge gained from America’s past is the Vietnam-Nixon
Doctrine. The Vietnam-Nixon Doctrine was in aim to prevent the involvement
American National Style Assignment
of the American Military for proxy war. However, still provided the resources
and geological solutions to the country in need. In other words, after Vietnam
war and the Pairs Peace Accord was signed in 1973; Nixon created this
doctrine to ensure America did not send troops over to wars that wherein result
of a proxy-war. However, America could and still would provide the necessary
resources needed to aid in their ally succeeding through the war. President
Dixon was successful in creating a doctrine to provide the resources necessary
(weapons and aid) the help allies counter suffrage from war distress, however,
decreases the involvement of ‘boots on the ground’. This doctrine was highly
supported by the common interests of the American people due to the damages
left after the Vietnam war. Through American policymakers and citizens
having the common interest to support less involvement ‘boots’ wise, this
doctrine was enacted into law shortly after proposal. However, there was
something learned following the passing of this doctrine. While many where
disapproved of the American National Style continuing the production and
distribution of war materials, there was the benefit of moral due to troops not
being deployed along with other deviances created by war time domestic
complications decreasing significantly. An example of what can be learned
from a failure of the past regarding the American National Style can be seen in
Obama’s presidency through the “leading from behind” initiative. Through this
initiative in 2011 President Obama created a solution to the role of the
American National Style in Iraq by removing American military influences in
Iraq and Afghanistan. With a drastic military budget cut within Obamas
American National Style Assignment
presidency, Obama proposed a smaller group of trained military individuals to
handle situations rather than an entire military. Obama focused on these
smaller military groups like SEALS to conduct missions from behind the war
zone instead of a full military presence. In the first ‘test’ of his incitive was in
Libya. The American military group was in efforts with the French and British
to end terrorism in Libya and restore peace. This mission however resulted in
the death of one American military personal along with the collapse of the
Libya Government. (Rothkopf 2014) This initiative was seen throughout
Obama’s presidency as the worse mistake of his career resulting in critiques
like “ill-American and always bound to fail.” (Hastedt 2020) Negative or
positive there is always something to be learned through the analyses of the
American National Style past.
Does the American National Style Support CWW?
While the American National Style does promote the Christian Worldview
ideologies through pragmatism it also cannot be in support of the Christian
Worldview due to its active and undeniable support and or funding of wars.
The American National Style does represent a factor of the Christian
Worldview through pragmatism or the representation and protection of human
rights. The American National Style is to deviant to represent the Christian
Worldview regardless of one similarity. The direct violation of human rights
through production of wars with the support of the American National Style it
is not plausible to be represented as Christian Worldview.
American National Style Assignment
Conclusion
Through the changes of society there have been differential approaches the
American National Style. Through influences and values changing within
American Policymakers and citizens there was a need for the American
National Style to represent this flexibility. There is knowledge within looking
into the American National Styles core categories that represent the
foundational of the style. Through the styles past, principles and representation
of pragmatism one can interpret how the American National style conducts
foreign affairs through its policymakers. However, one can also interpret the
lack of representation when it comes to the Christian Worldview other than the
common similarity of pragmatism. All in all, it is important to understand the
National American Style to understand how policymakers are going to
represent America within foreign affairs.
American National Style Assignment
References
Gray, C, S. (1981) National Style in Strategy: The American Style. International Security, 6(2)
2147 https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/6/article/446680/summary?casa_token=O1U4wc1ouE0AAA
AA:fZyQq
Hastedt, Glenn P. American Foreign Policy: Past, Present, and Future. 12th ed. Lanham:
Rowman & Littlefield, 2020. ISBN: 9781538136126 Pg.51
Hoffmann, S. (1968). The American Style: Our Past and Our Principles. Foreign Affairs, 46(2),
362–376.
Rothkopf, D.(2014) How President Obama’s Drone Warfare, Defense Cuts, and Military
Amateurism Have Imperiled America American Leadership in an Age of Fear (New York:
PublicAffairs, 2014)
English Standard Version Bible. (2001). ESV Online. https://esv.literalword.com/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
