Running head: PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 1
Preventing Medication Errors With Technology: Part 2
Rita Summerlin
Liberty University
NURS 521-B03: Nursing Issue, Informatics and Technology
Dr. Rose Linsky
February 27, 2020
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 2
Preventing Medication Errors With Technology: Part 2
Medication errors, also called adverse drug events (ADEs),can be devastating to the nurse
who administers the wrong medication or the wrong dose of medication. Harmful effects or even
death can be caused by medication errors. One-third of ADEs occur when being prescribed and
another one-third occur when being administered according to a study done by Truitt, Thompson,
Blazey-Martin, NiSai, and Salem (2016). Although the majority of healthcare providers already
use electronic health records (EHRs) or electronic medical records (EMRs), some may or may
not include an electronic medication administration records (eMAR). When the right measures
are used, medication errors are preventable (Bogner, 2018). This paper discusses the
implementation and the benefits of a new EHR with an eMAR.
Implementation of New EHR With BCMA
When making the decision about what to do about medication administration errors,
patient safety and quality research design (PSQRD) was assessed by using Donabedian’s
conceptual framework. Donabedian’s framework model determines quality based on patient
outcomes’ association with organization structures and processes (Dykes & Schnock, 2018).
Medication administration errors are usually be caused by human error and is where the
intervention is most likely to have an effect and the PSQRD supports this (Dykes & Schnock,
2018).
Since the decision has been made to launch a new EHR with BCMA, a go-live plan will
be made. Each planned activity for go-live will be assigned to a specific team or individual
(Meyer, 2018). Critical task such as cross-checking patient census between the old and new
EHRs, loading diagnostic test results and medications from the past few days to the new EHR,
and confirming that all patient orders are in the new EHR (Meyer, 2018). Education and training
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 3
of the new EHR will be conducted by the vendor consultants with the assistance of the hospital
Training and Development department. Different training guides will be developed for all the
disciplines. Some disciplines will required only 2-3 hours of classroom education and nurses will
need 6-8 hours, if not more (Meyer, 2018).
The big bang approach will be used for go-live. This approach is where everything with
the new EHR is implemented all at once (Meyer, 2018). The big bang approach is all less
expensive and time for implementation is shorter (Meyer, 2018). The shorter implementation
time allows for staff to return to normal quicker (Meyer, 2018). On-site support personnel and
vendor consultants will also be available for the initial days of go-live with this approach
(Meyer, 2018).
Quality and Safety Education in Nursing (QSEN)
The challenge of preparing future nurses with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA)
necessary to continuously improve quality and safety of patients in the healthcare system withing
which they work is addressed by QSEN. There are six competencies in QSEN: patient-centered
care, evidence-based practice (EBP), teamwork and collaboration, safety, quality improvement,
and informatics.
Patient-centered care is a relationship between healthcare providers and the patient where
the patient is considered a member of the healthcare team as well as being the center of care
(Okun & Caligtan, 2018). Evidence-based practice is the incorporation of the highest standard of
care (SOC) through research, clinical expertise, and patient/family preference (Sherwood &
Zomorodi, 2014). Electronic health records with eMARs and bar coding medication
administration (BCMA) are the highest SOC for medication administration according to EBP.
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 4
Quality improvement and safety are ongoing in all healthcare settings according to Risor,
Lisby, & Sorensen (2018). Better health information management and improved data integrity is
how quality improvement is related to EHR technology (Seckman, 2018). Mekonnen et al (2018)
states that BCMA implementation may reduce medication administration errors. The facility
where I work has an EHR with an eMAR system built in. However, the nurse has to pull the
medication from an Omnicell (automatic dispensing cabinet) and take the medication to the
patient’s room and administer the medication. Then the nurse goes back to the nurses’ station and
opens the eMAR and clicks on the medication given to document the administration. Medication
administration safety has been shown to improve by use of an eMAR and BCMA combined
because documentation is in real time (Risor et al., 2018). Li et al (2015) conducted a study that
showed that automated detection of medication administration errors via EHR is the best
occurrence reporting system available.
The nurse informaticist assists with technological progress and development in the
healthcare field. Nursing informatics integrates nursing, knowledge, information, and
communication technology to promote health worldwide. Vasuki (2016) states that nurses are
engaged with digital tools and information systems in clinical practice as a foundation for
evidence-based care, decision support, and EHR. McGonigle & Mastrian (2018) says that nurses
must not only be able to perform their duties as a nurse physically, cognitively, and emotionally;
they must also have the technological skills to manage technological equipment.
Communication is key to collaboration and teamwork in the healthcare field. The
patient/family should also be included in the collaboration of their care as an active participant of
the healthcare team (Sherwood & Zomorodi, 2014). Communication is an essential component
of the EHR and is a medium between healthcare providers and patients (Seckman, 2018). Email,
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 5
mobile devices, texting, telemedicine, and integrated health records are all examples of ways to
communicate in the healthcare field (Seckman, 2018).
Health Information Technology Policies
In 2004, Executive Order 13335 was signed into law by President Bush which gave
healthcare providers incentives to implement and use health information technology (HIT) in the
form of EHRs/EMRs (Madison, 2018). This initiative has eight key components, two of which
involve medication errors: 1) improve healthcare quality, decrease medication errors, and
advanced delivery of appropriate evidence-based medical care; and 2) decrease healthcare costs
resulting from inefficiency, medication errors, inappropriate care, and incomplete information
(Madison, 2018). The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has linked HIT to the improvement of
healthcare in various reports since 1999 (Manos, Conners, Warren, & Stenner, 2018). To Err is
Human was the first IOM report concluding that the majority of medical errors were caused by
faulty processes and conditions that did not prevent people from making mistakes (Manos et al.,
2018).
Ethical Considerations
In 1982, Mark Siegler stated that confidentiality was already a “decrepit concept”.
Somewhere between 25-100 healthcare workers and administrative personnel accessed patient
records in the hospital according to Siegler (1982). With EHR use far more information can be
stored and accessed by substantially more personnel. The effect on quality of care through EHR
use still remains unclear although this technology has been used for many years (Campanella et
al., 2016). Although patient satisfaction has not been negatively affected by EHR use, the
patient-doctor relationship and EHR use needs more research (Moerenbout et al., 2020). The
EHR is a “medicine with side effects” according to primary care physicians (PCPs) in a study
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 6
done by Moerenbout et al (2020). Although everything is in real-time in EHRs, one side effect is
that time with the patient is taken away (Moerenbout et al, 2020). This study also implicated
ethical questions related to autonomy and trust. For example, the EHR allows patients to see
laboratory results before the PCP has a chance to review them at times. Then the patient calls the
PCP freaking out because they have looked up the results on the internet and have found disease
possibilities. Sometimes patients also give different medical and social histories to different
physicians and the current/consulting physician does not know whether to believe the patient or
the patient records they have received from other physicians. Patients may also believe that
anyone can see their medical information if it is in an EHR because it is on a computer.
Benefits of BCMA
An ADE is any error that has occurred as a result of delivering a drug to a patient.
Adverse drug events are one of the most common medical errors occurring in hospitals today and
affect about half of all hospitalized patients in the United States (Truitt et al., 2016). Eighteen
percent of patients affected by ADEs are affected by serious ADEs (Truitt et al., 2016).
According to Truitt et al (2016) the cost for ADEs in the United States is approximately $3.5
billion yearly. Medication administration errors have been reduced by 49% to 51% by
implementing BCMA according to some studies (Larson & Lo, 2019). Annual savings of $2.2
million from time-saving have been generated by implementing BCMA per research (Larson &
Lo, 2019).
Conclusion
Medication administration errors are a huge financial burden in healthcare. Studies have
shown that nursing informatics integrates nursing science, computer science, and nursing
knowledge to facilitate BCMA implementation. Patient safety has been improved and medication
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 7
administration errors have been reduced with the implementation of BCMA. Costs savings
through being able to control stock and waste reduction have been decreased with BCMA
implementation because medication administration errors have been reduced.
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 8
References
Campanella, P., Lovato, E., Marone, C., Fallacara, L., Mancuso, A., Ricciardi, W., & Specchia,
M. L. (2016). The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 26, 60–64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv122.
Gann, M. (2015). How informatics nurses use bar code technology to reduce medication errors.
Nursing, 45(3), 60–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000458923.18468.37.
Larson, K. & Lo, C. (2019). Potential cost savings and reduction of medication errors due to
implementation of computerized provider order entry and bar-coded medication
administration in the Fraser Health Authority. UBC Medical Journal, 10(2), 45–46.
Retrieved from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=ip.shib&db=a9h&AN=136006380&site=eds-live.
Li, Q., Kirkendall, E. S., Hall, E. S., Ni, Y., Lingren, T., Kaiser, M., ... Imre, S. (2015).
Automated detection of medication administration errors in neonatal intensive care.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 57, 124–133. Retrieved from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.07.012.
Madison, M. P. (2018). The health information technology for education and clinical health act,
meaningful use, and Medicare access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015. In R.
Nelson & N. Staggers (Eds.), Health informatics: An interprofessional approach. (2nd
ed., pp. 455–473). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Manias, E., Kinney, S., & Williams, A. (2014). Medication errors in hospitalized children.
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 50(1), 71–77. Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12412.
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 9
Manos, E. L., Connors, H. B., Warren, J. J., & Stenner, T. (2018). Informatics in the curriculum
for healthcare professionals. In R. Nelson & N. Staggers (Eds.), Health informatics: An
interprofessional approach (2nd ed., pp. 499–515). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
McGonigle, D.& Mastrian, K. G. (Eds.). (2018). Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of
Knowledge. (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Mekonnen, A. B., McLachlan, A. J., & Brien, J. A. E. (2016). Pharmacy-led medication
reconciliation programs at hospital transitions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 41(2), 128–144.
DOI:10.1111/jcpt.12364.
Meyer, C. D. (2018). Implementing and upgrading an information system. In R. Nelson & N.
Staggers (Eds.), Health informatics: An interprofessional approach. (2nd ed., pp. 204–
219). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Okun, S. & Caligtan, C. A. (2018). The engaged ePatient. In R. Nelson & N. Staggers (Eds.),
Health informatics: An interprofessional approach. (2nd ed., pp. 204–219). St Louis,
MO: Elsevier.
Rahurkar, S., Vest, J. R., & Menachemi, N. (2015). Despite the spread of health information
exchange, there is little evidence of its impact on cost, use, and quality of care. Health
Affects, 34(3), 477–483.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0729.
Risor, B. W., Lisby, M., & Sorensen, J. (2018). Complex automated medication systems reduce
medication administration error in a Danish acute medical unit. International Journal for
Quality in Health Care, 30(6), 457–465. http://dx.doi.org/10/1093/omtqjc/mzy042.
PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS 2 10
Seckman, C. A. (2018). Electronic health records and applications for managing patient care. In
R. Nelson & N. Staggers (Eds.), Health informatics: An interprofessional approach. (2nd
ed., pp. 90–110). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Sherwood, G. & Zomorodi, M. (2014). A new mindset for quality and safety: The QSEN
competencies redefining nurses’ roles in practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration,
44(10), S10–S18. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1097/NNA.00000000000000124.
Truitt, E., Thompson, M. S., Blazey-Martin, D., NiSai, D., & Salem, D. (2016). Effect of the
implementation of barcode technology and an electronic medication administration
record on adverse drug events. Hospital Pharmacy, 51(6)
https://doi.org/10.1310/hpj5106-474.
Vasuki, R. (2016). The importance and impact of nursing informatics competencies for
baccalaureate nursing students and registered nurses. Journal of Nursing and health
Science, 5(1), 20–25. Retrieved from:
https://rg/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e22a/ea050f2c65ec29e43c7e20b759c78913d9e
.pdf.