1 / 11100%
HLTH 252
Page 1 of 2
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS GRADING RUBRIC
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Points Earned
Summary of
Issues
8 points
A summary of the issues is
thoroughly discussed.
6 to 7 points
Most but not all of the issues are
summarized in the discussion.
1 to 5 points
Few of the issues are summarized
and discussed.
0 points
Health
Implications
8 points
At least five physical and/or mental
health issues relating to use of the
specific drug are discussed.
6 to 7 points
Two to four physical and/or
mental health issues are discussed
relating to use of the specific
drug.
1 to 5 points
Less than two physical and/or
mental health issues are discussed
relating to use of the specific
drug.
0 points
Moral, Biblical
Implications as
a Christian
Worldview
8 points
Moral and biblical conclusions
and/or opinions are logical.
Adequate Christian integration and
biblical support is provided.
6 to 7 points
Moral and biblical conclusions
and/or opinions are proficient.
Moderate Christian integration
and biblical support is provided.
1 to 5 points
Moral and biblical conclusions
and/or opinions are developing.
Minimal Christian integration and
biblical support is provided.
0 points
Societal Issues
8 points
At least three societal issues
relating to use of the specific drug
are discussed.
6 to 7 points
Two societal issues relating to use
of the specific drug are discussed.
1 to 5 points
One societal issue relating to use
of the specific drug is discussed.
0 points
Public Health
Intervention
and Education
Sections
15 to 17 points
Evidence to based interventions and
how to best prevent people from
using drugs are thoroughly
presented.
12 to 14 points
Evidence to based interventions
and how to best prevent people
from using drugs are somewhat
presented.
1 to 11 points
Evidence to based interventions
and how to best prevent people
from using drugs is minimally
presented.
0 points
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Points Earned
Spelling and
Grammar
7 points
Content is well organized, with
logical thought process using proper
grammar and punctuation. Minimal
to no spelling errors.
5 to 6 points
Content is somewhat organized,
with some logical thought process
using some proper grammar and
punctuation. Some spelling
errors.
1 to 4 points
Content is not organized, with
little logical thought and several
grammatical and punctuation
errors. Many spelling errors.
0 points
References and
APA Format
7 points
Paper contains at least two
scholarly references and references
are in current APA format with 0 to
2 errors.
5 to 6 points
Paper contains one to two
scholarly or website references
and references are in current APA
format with some errors.
1 to 4 points
Paper contains one scholarly or
website reference and reference is
in current APA format with many
errors.
0 points
HLTH 252
Page 2 of 2
Writing and
Assignment
Requirements
7 points
Writing is fluid and advanced.
Paper is double to spaced with 1 to
inch margins and 12 pt. Times New
Roman font and meets length
requirements.
5 to 6 points
Content is somewhat organized.
Paper has some format errors in
spacing, margins, and font size
and style and is below length
requirements.
1 to 4 points
Content is not organized.
Paper has many format errors in
spacing, margins, and font size
and style and is well below length
requirements.
0 points
Total Points
/70
Instructor’s Comments:
Juuling and Substance Abuse
The Issues
Summary of the issue of Juuling
Health implication
Moral/biblical implications
Public Health Intervention and Education
Scholarly Journal about Juuling/vaping
Interventions about prevention of smoking/vaping/Juuling
References
Armstrong, K., Silveira, B. K. R., & Doyle-Campbell, C. (2020, May). Attitudes and
Perspectives of Pharmacy Students toward Smoking and “JUULing”. In ACCP
Virtual Poster Symposium, May 26 and 27, 2020. American College of Clinical
Pharmacy.
Czaplicki, L., Tulsiani, S., Kostygina, G., Feng, M., Kim, Y., & Perks, S. et al. (2020).
#toolittletoolate: JUUL-related content on Instagram before and after self-regulatory
action. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0233419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233419
Healthychildren. (2021). Pod-based E-cigarette Devices: Get the Facts. Retrieved 26
September 2021, from https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-
issues/conditions/tobacco/Pages/Juuling-Get-the-Facts.aspx
Linda M Gibson-Young, F., & Mary Martinasek, R. (2018). JUULING: What kids don’t
know will hurt them. Retrieved 26 September 2021, from
https://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/view/juuling-what-kids-dont-know-will-
hurt-them
Teesson, M., Newton, N., Slade, T., Chapman, C., Birrell, L., & Mewton, L. et al. (2020).
Combined prevention for substance use, depression, and anxiety in adolescence: a
cluster-randomised controlled trial of a digital online intervention. The Lancet Digital
Health, 2(2), e74-e84. doi: 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30213-4
Turner, T. (2021). How Juul Created a Teen Vaping Epidemic. Retrieved 26 September 2021,
from https://www.drugwatch.com/feature
Students also viewed