TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
Technology Integration Learning Plan
Andrea Bradley
School of Education, Liberty University
Technology Integration Learning Plan
Technology integration encompasses the purposeful and productive application of
technology tools and resources for improved teaching and learning. Classroom technology
integration means purposefully using technologies; this involves enhancing the curriculum,
helping instructional goals, and, at the same time, ensuring that students are actively participating
and learning. If effectively applied, technology integration will enhance active learning and
collaborative learning, critical thinking, and authentic, real-world applications (Mater et al.,
2020). It is the technology that is not used for technology's sake or merely as a tool to deepen the
understanding of the complexity of the content but the technology that is used to achieve the goal
of comprehension and understanding. The technology integration expertise necessitates strategic
planning, awareness of pedagogical approaches like the SAMR model, and designing learner-
centered, technologically improved lessons that are aligned with learning objectives. Through a
suitable approach, technology can become an instrument for transforming classrooms into ones
with a future-ready learning environment.
Technology Integration Matrix
In this lesson about technological integration, the authentic learning environment of
Authentic Learning and the Transformation level of the Technology Integration Matrix has been
chosen. Authentic Learning includes developing authentic and reliable connections and learning
experiences that are directly relevant and applicable to students' lives outside class (Perusso &
Baaken, 2020). At the Transformation level, technology is used to create learning possibilities
that could not exist without it (Demchenko et al., 2021). Technology allows reorganizing the
learning environment in non-classroom settings and enables students to come up with joint
projects that show new knowledge applied to real situations. This course offers students an
opportunity to use technology resources such as mobile devices, multimedia creation software,
and online collaboration platforms to research and propose solutions to a problem the community
is presently facing. They will collect data from field research, interact with community
stakeholders, and develop a multimedia interactive presentation in which they explain their
inventive ideas and practical solutions to the problem.
The ASSURE Model for Instructional Design
The ASSURE model is an instructional design framework that serves as a structured way
of teaching and learning technology integration into instruction. Developed by Smaldino,
Lowther, and Russell, the ASSURE acronym outlines the key steps educators should follow
when planning technology-enhanced lessons: Analyze learners, State standards and objectives,
Select strategies, technologies, media, and materials; Utilize technology, media, and materials,
Require learner participation, and Evaluate and revise (Bahari & Saleh, 2024). A formal
procedure is used by teachers to evaluate learner characteristics, create lesson plans that are
aligned with standards, include appropriate technology and teaching methods, actively engage
students, and continuously assess and improve instruction. Using the ASSURE model, teachers
can develop a well-structured and technology-driven learning environment that can meet
students' needs and achieve the desired educational goals (Bahari & Saleh, 2024). It is a valuable
tool that helps in thoughtful technology integration aligned with sound pedagogical principles.
Analysis of Learners and Technology in the Local Setting
This technology integration lesson is designed for a 10th-grade English class of 25
students in a suburban high school setting. The learners exhibit a wide range of learning styles,
including visual, auditory, and kinesthetic preferences (Rogowosky et al., 2020). Many students
have strong reading comprehension and written expression skills, scoring at or above grade level
on standardized assessments. However, a subset of learners struggle with higher-order analytical
skills and making real-world connections to literary texts. Students demonstrate a positive
attitude toward learning when topics are engaging and relevant to their lives. Their comfort level
and experience with technology vary. Some are tech-savvy, while others have limited exposure
(Rogowosky et al., 2020). Most learners have access to digital devices like laptops, tablets, or
smartphones and are familiar with using basic productivity tools and social media. However,
fewer students have experience with more specialized multimedia creation or online
collaboration platforms.
The school is reasonably well-equipped in terms of available technology in the local
setting. Each classroom has an interactive whiteboard, projector, and teacher workstation with
basic software like the Microsoft Office suite. Students can access the internet through a district-
provided wireless network, though connectivity can sometimes be spotty. The school also has a
computer lab with 30 desktop workstations with multimedia editing programs like Adobe
Creative Cloud. However, access is limited due to heavy demand. To implement this authentic
learning, transformation-level lessons, additional tools like mobile devices with built-in cameras,
cloud-based storage, online collaboration platforms, and multimedia creation apps would be
ideal (Mayoof et al., 2021). While the school does have class sets of tablets, they are older
models with limited functionality. To fully realize the vision, the teacher may need to apply for
grant funding or work with community partners to secure more up-to-date mobile technologies
that enable immersive multimedia production and seamless collaboration beyond classroom
walls.
Standards and Objectives
This technology integration lesson is aligned with the Common Core State Standards for
English Language Arts and the ISTE Standards for Students to ensure students gain crucial
literacy skills and develop competencies needed for success in our digital world.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.9-10.7
Examine how a subject or a significant scenario is represented in two distinct art
forms, paying attention to what is highlighted or absent in each (Bonetti, 2021).
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.9-10.6
Use technology, particularly the Internet, to create, publish, and modify
individualized or collaborative literary products, using technology's ability to link to
other resources and show information flexibly and dynamically (Schmoop, 2024).
ISTE Student Standard 7 - Global Collaborator
Students use digital resources to enhance their viewpoints and enhance their
education by interacting with others and performing well in teams both locally and
worldwide (Marwa et al., 2024).
The objectives of this lesson are:
Students will analyze the representation of a key scene from a novel across written
text and visual media such as painting and film, comparing how the subject is
emphasized or missing in each artistic treatment.
Students will collaborate in teams using online tools and multimedia software to
create an interactive digital presentation that explores multiple perspectives on a
real-world issue relevant to the community.
Working with global team members via video conferencing, students will integrate
multimedia components like text, images, audio, and video to produce a shared
multimedia product that thoroughly examines the issue and proposes evidence-based
solutions.
Selection of Strategies, Technology, Media, and Materials
Strategies and Methods Used for Instruction and Engagement
To facilitate an authentic, transformative learning experience, this lesson will employ an
inquiry-based approach using the 5E Instructional Model (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate,
Evaluate) (Thangjai & Worapun, 2022). Students will be engaged through analysis of diverse
artistic representations of a key literary scene, sparking curiosity about different perspectives.
They will then explore a real-world issue relevant to the local community through field
observations, interviewing stakeholders, and online research using mobile devices and web-
based collaboration tools.
In the Explain phase, the teacher will provide direct instruction on multimedia
presentation skills, working with teams to model effective practices (Spatioti et al., 2022).
Students will then elaborate by collaborating globally through video conferencing to gather
additional insights and develop a comprehensive multimedia presentation examining the issue
from multiple vantage points. Key technologies employed will include mobile devices with
cameras for field data collection, cloud storage and sharing via Google Drive, online
collaboration via Google Hangouts/Meet, and multimedia presentation creation using web-based
tools like Google Slides, Prezi, or Adobe Spark (Tavani et al., 2022).
Teachers will use scaffolding techniques like prompting, cueing, questioning, and
modeling to support student learning throughout the process. Cooperative learning strategies will
be utilized as students work in teams, developing skills in digital communication, negotiation,
and co-creating multimedia artifacts representing their authentic understandings (Ivone et al.,
2020). Formative assessment will occur continuously through student discussions, product drafts,
and teacher consultations to monitor progress and provide timely feedback. The culminating
multimedia presentations will be a summative assessment evaluated with a project rubric.
Extended Descriptors for The Learning Environment
According to the Extended Descriptors, in an Authentic Learning environment at the
Transformation level, the learning experiences are not confined to the classroom (Asas et al.,
2021). Technology enables re-designing the learning environment to model real-world situations
and contexts. In this lesson, learning will occur as students use mobile devices to investigate a
local issue first-hand. They will go into the community, observe the problem, interview its
stakeholders, and capture multimedia data to inform their work.
The classroom becomes a collaborative multimedia design studio, with students using
technologies like cloud storage, video conferencing, and open-ended content creation tools to
connect with peers globally. The teacher is a facilitator and coach, providing guidance and
feedback as learners co-construct their knowledge products (Vespone, 2023). Direct instruction
will be limited and used only to help students develop necessary multimedia design and
communication skills. The learners take on the roles of researchers, collaborators, and media
producers/publishers. They will actively engage in the inquiry process - defining the problem,
gathering relevant data and perspectives, analyzing and synthesizing findings, and developing
insightful multimedia presentations that model potential solutions (Haddar et al., 2023). These
artifacts will extend beyond traditional reports, including interactive websites, digital stories,
data visualizations, or other dynamic multimedia incorporating rich images, video, text, and user
data.
The learning products represent a re-thinking of how knowledge is constructed,
consumed, and shared in today's digital landscape (Haddar et al., 2023). Students become active
creators rather than passive information consumers, using technology as a catalyst for generating
new understandings applied to relevant real-world contexts that transcend classroom boundaries.
Utilization of Materials
The pre-lesson setup involves the teacher creating accounts and tutorials for students on
tools like Google Drive, Google Hangouts/Meet, and a multimedia presentation tool like Google
Slides or Adobe Spark (Tavani et al., 2022). The teacher will form student teams of 4-5 members
each and have them join shared team folders in Google Drive. Additionally, the teacher must
identify the local real-world issue or problem students will investigate, such as environmental
pollution or access to healthy foods. During the Engage and Explore phases, students will use
mobile devices like tablets or smartphones to take photos and videos documenting evidence of
the local issue (Tavani et al., 2022). They will interview community members and stakeholders
affected by the issue, recording audio notes. All multimedia data collected will be uploaded to
team folders in Google Drive for shared access.
In the Explain phase, the teacher will direct instruction on multimedia presentation design
principles and tools (Tavani et al., 2022). Students will practice creating sample presentations
incorporating text, images, videos, and other multimedia elements to develop necessary skills.
The Elaborate phase involves global collaboration and multimedia production (Tavani et al.,
2022). Student teams will connect via video conferencing with partner teams from other schools
or locations. They will share multimedia data, exchange insights, and collaboratively brainstorm
comprehensive solutions addressing multiple perspectives. Using their compiled resources,
teams will then co-create an interactive multimedia presentation, such as a website, Prezi, or
multimedia report, to showcase their work.
During the evaluation phase, student teams will take turns presenting their final
multimedia products to the class (Halabi, 2020). A rubric will be used to evaluate components
like content understanding, design quality, evidence of collaboration, and more. Students will
also provide peer feedback on each other's presentations. Finally, based on rubric evaluations and
peer feedback, teams will revise and improve their multimedia presentations. A reflective class
discussion about the authentic learning experience and how technology transformed the learning
environment and products will be held.
Requirement of Learner Participation
To engage learners at the start of the lesson, the teacher will use guiding questions to
spark curiosity and activate prior knowledge about the focus literary text and its key
scenes/subjects. Sample questions include: "What scene or moment from the novel had the
biggest impact on you as a reader? Why?" and "How might the same scene be portrayed
differently through another artistic medium like painting or film?"
As students explore the real-world issue through multimedia data collection, they will be
prompted to think critically with questions like "What evidence of this issue do you notice in our
community? Who seems most affected by it?" and "How might different groups of people
perceive and be impacted by this issue differently based on their circumstances?" Such questions
will push learners to examine multiple vantage points.
During the multimedia presentation creation phase, formative questions from the teacher
will foster elaboration and knowledge transfer, such as "How does including this video clip or
data visualization component strengthen your argument?" and "What additional perspectives do
you need to incorporate to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue?"
When students collaborate globally, the teacher will guide them to connect across
contexts with questions like "How are the manifestations of this issue similar or different in the
two communities? What can we learn from each other?" Learners will also be prompted to
consider lasting implications: "How might the solutions you're proposing create positive change
now and for future generations?"
Throughout the process, students will engage in self and peer evaluations by providing
constructive feedback on each other's work using criteria like the multimedia presentation rubric.
The teacher will circulate and conference with teams and individuals, asking probing questions
to clarify understandings and push their thinking further.
Evaluation and Revisions
Data Collection Methods and How Data Will Impact Future Revisions
To comprehensively assess student learning in this technology-integrated lesson, multiple
data collection methods spanning formative and summative assessments will be employed
(Ingram, 2023). Formative data will come from observing students during class discussions,
questioning their thought processes, and providing feedback on draft work as it progresses. This
will allow the teacher to continually monitor students' developing understandings and identify
gaps or misconceptions to address through additional support or re-teaching. The culminating
multimedia presentations will be a rich summative assessment, evaluated using a detailed rubric
that looks at content mastery, design quality, evidence of collaboration, real-world connections,
and other key dimensions (Eick, 2022). Analyzing the final products will reveal students' levels
of achievement on core learning goals.
Additionally, students will complete reflective writing prompts about their authentic
learning experience. Open-ended questions like "How did investigating this real-world issue and
creating the multimedia presentation impact your understanding?" can provide powerful insights
into their cognitive and emotional engagement levels. The resulting data from observations,
product evaluations, and reflections can then be systematically analyzed to pinpoint strengths,
areas for improvement, and possible reasons for successes or shortcomings. If observations show
struggles with deeper questioning or collaborative skills, the teacher may need to model those
more explicitly next time. Rubric scores revealing design flaws could indicate that more time is
allocated for multimedia training. Reflections suggesting motivation challenges may prompt
using higher-interest issues or locations. This comprehensive evidence can directly inform
targeted revisions to learning activities, scaffolding techniques, pacing, and materials to better
facilitate the authentic, transformative experience in subsequent lessons. An iterative cycle of
implementing, evaluating, and refining based on student performance data is key for continuous
improvement.
Plan for Evaluating Technology’s Effectiveness
To evaluate the effectiveness of the technology integration, an instructional coach or peer
can be invited to observe and critically analyze whether the stated objectives were achieved
through the thoughtful use of tools like mobile devices, online collaboration platforms,
multimedia creation apps, and more (Ismajili et al., 2020). The coach might ask some guiding
questions: "Did utilizing technology like mobile devices for field data collection and
collaborative multimedia design successfully transform the learning environment as intended? Or
did classroom management and technical difficulties overshadow the intended purpose?" This
determines whether the technologies enabled the authentic, real-world modeling and analysis
envisioned.
The teacher may also inquire: "Were the specific technologies well-matched to facilitate
achieving the deeper learning goals around analyzing perspectives, synthesizing solutions, and
constructing new multimedia-rich understandings? Could different tools have better supported
those higher-order skills?" This line of questioning evaluates if appropriate tech selections were
made and aligned with the pedagogical aims. Further probing could include: "How did students'
work samples, engagement levels, discussions, and peer feedback indicate the extent to which
the technologies enhanced or constrained developing the intended understandings about the real-
world issue?" This source provides valuable student evidence to judge technological impact.
By considering all observations, student artifacts, and whether learning goals were fully
realized, the coach and teacher can discuss what worked well, what could be improved, and
whether introducing alternative technologies may have been more effective for an authentic,
transformative experience.
Evaluating lessons according to the Triple E Evaluation Rubric.
After evaluating the planned lesson using the Triple E Rubric, it scores 16 out of 18
points.
Engagement: 6/6
Using technologies like mobile devices for multimedia data collection, online
collaboration for global team meetings, multimedia creation tools for interactive presentations,
and more enables active, social learning experiences beyond passive information consumption.
These tools are highly engaging and facilitate the intended behavior shifts.
Enhancement: 6/6
The technologies provide scaffolds that make it easier for students to analyze diverse
perspectives on real-world issues through photo/video artifacts and global peer insights.
Multimedia composition allows sophisticated demonstration of synthesized understandings in
ways exceeding traditional capabilities. Students can apply higher-order skills throughout.
Extension: 4/6
The authentic investigation of a local community issue and connection to global partners
via video conferencing extends learning moderately beyond classroom walls into relevant
contexts. However, more direct applicability to students' lives could further bridge that
school/life divide.
With 16 points, this exemplary score indicates that thoughtful technology integration
shows exceptional potential for engaging students, enhancing their mastery of learning goals, and
extending relevance beyond school. However, opportunities remain for even tighter real-world
connections. Overall, the Triple E evaluation validates the strong pedagogical underpinnings of
the lesson design and the technology's capacity to facilitate an authentic, transformative
educational experience. By continuing to iterate and optimize based on student data,
observational insights, and self-assessment frameworks like this rubric, powerful learning
opportunities for students can continue to be refined.
References
Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual reality as a pedagogical
tool to enhance experiential learning: a systematic literature review. Education Research
International,I2021, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623
Bahari, F. A. Z., & Saleh, S. (2024). Leveraging the ASSURE Model: The Integrated STEAM
Module Development for Year Four Geometry Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan
Sains dan Matematik Malaysia,I14(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.1.1.2024
Bonetti, J. (2021).IEngaging Secondary Students: The Beneficial Intersection of Young Adult and
Classic LiteratureI(Doctoral dissertation, Northern Michigan University).
https://commons.nmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1709&context=theses
Demchenko, M. V., Gulieva, M. E., Larina, T. V., & Simaeva, E. P. (2021). Digital
Transformation of Legal Education: Problems, Risks and Prospects.IEuropean Journal of
Contemporary Education,I10(2), 297-307. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2021.2.297
Eick, J. (2022). Leveling the Playing Field: A Proposal for a Portfolio Summative Assessment
for a Task-Based Adult ESL Course to Address the Needs of Students with Limited or
Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE).
https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1772&context=hse_cp
HADDAR, A. G., Hendriyanto, D., Munandar, H., Kelibia, M. U., & Muhammadiyah, M. U.
(2023). ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT STEAM-BASED
LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS.
https://repository.unibos.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/9874/21559-Article
%20Text-68930-1-10-20231123%20%281%29.pdf.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Halabi, O. (2020). Immersive virtual reality to enforce teaching in engineering
education.IMultimedia Tools and Applications,I79(3), 2987-3004.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08214-8
Ingram, P. E. (2023).IExploring Teachers’ Use of Instructional Technology During Reading for
English Language LearnersI(Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=13671&context=dissertations
Ismajli, H., Bytyqi-Damoni, A., Shatri, K., & Ozogul, G. (2020). Coaching teachers to integrate
technology: The effects of technology integration on student performance and critical
thinking.IIlkogretim Online,I19(3). doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2020.728584
Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together:
Cooperative learning in online education.IStudies in English language and
education,I7(2), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17285
Marwa, M., Saputra, W., & Herlinawati, H. (2024). International Society for Technology in
Education (ISTE) Standards For EFL Students as 21st Century Skills.IELT-
Lectura,I11(1), 1-12.
https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/ELT-Lectura/article/download/17244/6058
Mater, N. R., Haj Hussein, M. J., Salha, S. H., Draidi, F. R., Shaqour, A. Z., Qatanani, N., &
Affouneh, S. (2022). The effect of the integration of STEM on critical thinking and
technology acceptance model.IEducational Studies,I48(5), 642-658.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793736
Mayoof, S., Alaswad, H., Aljeshi, S., Tarafa, A., & Elmedany, W. (2021). A hybrid circuits-
cloud: Development of a low-cost, secure cloud-based collaborative platform for A/D
circuits in virtual hardware E-lab.IAin Shams Engineering Journal,I12(2), 1197-1209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.09.012
Perusso, A., & Baaken, T. (2020). Assessing the authenticity of cases, internships and problem-
based learning as managerial learning experiences: Concepts, methods, and lessons for
practice. The International Journal of Management Education,I18(3), 100425.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100425
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2020). Providing instruction based on students’
learning style preferences does not improve learning.IFrontiers in Psychology,I11,
511773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00164
Schmoop. (2024). Common Core Standards. https://www.shmoop.com/common-core-
standards/ccss-ela-literacy-w-9-10-6.html
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the ADDIE
instructional design model in distance education.IInformation,I13(9), 402.
https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Tavani, S., Billi, A., Corradetti, A., Mercuri, M., Bosman, A., Cuffaro, M., ... & Carminati, E.
(2022). Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience
fieldwork using LiDAR-equipped iPhones.IEarth-Science Reviews,I227, 103969.
https://iris.uniroma1.it/bitstream/11573/1638124/4/Tavani_Smartphone_2022_postprint.p
df
Thangjai, N., & Worapun, W. (2022). Developing Inquiry Learning Characteristics of Grade 7
Students Using Integrated 5E's of Inquiry-Based Learning and Game-Based
Learning.IJournal of Educational Issues,I8(1), 137-150.
https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19547
Vespone, B. (2023). Co-constructing teaching and learning in higher education: a literature
review of practices and implications.IJournal of Learning Development in Higher
Education, (27). https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/download/997/735
Wu, L., Liu, Y., How, M. L., & He, S. (2023). Investigating Student-Generated Questioning in a
Technology-Enabled Elementary Science Classroom: A Case Study.IEducation
Sciences,I13(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020158
