1 / 11100%
Running head: FINAL PAPER 1
`
Final Paper
Shana Alexander
Liberty University
Running head: FINAL PAPER 2
Final Paper
Introduction
The teaching and learning in schools have transformed throughout history to meet the
needs of equality and innovations in education. Schools are for learning and teachers are
imparted with the task of promoting the learning needed. I believe that learning starts from birth
in a family setting and educators are essentially responsible for growth of knowledge outside of
the family setting. As educators we must ensure that students learn academic, social, emotional,
mental and physical skills. The curriculum provides teachers with standards and content that is
necessary for students to be college and career ready. Also, as educators we must provide these
skills and knowledge with fidelity, patience, love and strength for all parties involved. Strong
leadership is a necessity to promoting learning in the educational setting.
In my recent course studies, I have gained a plethora of knowledge about diversity within
the educational setting. I have utilized my knowledge of theories to better prepare myself and
others in education of my philosophy of teaching ALL students. It is vital for all students to have
academic, social, Christ-like and character educational experiences to connect with real-world
situations. According to Brummelen (2009) state “The key point is that teaching and learning
points to God as the Creator and Sustainer of all of reality, including the norms of human life” (p.
13). I believe students should be actively involved in their learning. They need modeling and
practice of concepts to gain knowledge to be successful. Constructivism is one of the most
common alternatives to a traditional approach of teaching where students are active participants.
“Constructivism uses pedagogical strategies that actively involve students and gives them a
considerable voice in their own learning.” (Brummelen, 2009, p.69).
Running head: FINAL PAPER 3
Learning Theory and Its Importance
There are a variety of learning theories that aid in the development of student success in
education. Researchers such as Piaget, Kohlberg, Vygotsky, Turiel and Bandura has aided in the
beliefs of how students learn cognitively, behavior and socially. All theories have guided my
thoughts in why it is important to consider the environment, development stages, social and
economics as factors when students learn and interact with their family, peers and teachers.
Piaget focused mainly on cognitive abilities as pertains to constructivism while Vygotsky
focused on the social aspect.
Jean Piaget was a Swiss psychologist theory of moral development is categorized by
transitioning through two stages: Heteronomous and Autonomous moral thinking. Heteronomous
moral thinking is subject to external law, rule, or authority and generally based on ages birth to
nine years old. Autonomous moral thinking is independent in mind, rational or cooperation and
based on ages after ten years old. There are three stages that takes place when transitioning from
heteronomous to autonomous moral thinking. They are Pre-moral, ages birth to five, moral
realism, ages five to ten and moral relativism; ages ten and up. However, Lawrence Kohlberg, an
American psychologist developed the theory of moral development. He was inspired by Piaget.
Kohlberg has three levels with six stages (two stages per level) that was very similar to Piaget.
Turiel is an American psychologist who believed in the development of moral reasoning and
children’s understanding of authority, rules, cultures and society. His research brought about the
Moral Domain Theory, which has three stages in a linear/parallel fashion. The three stages are
Moral, Social and Psychological. He believed that children as young as three understandings
right from wrong. Children transitions from understanding the views of themselves to that of
others. The views of Piaget’s and Kohlberg’s theory compare with that of the biblical world view
Running head: FINAL PAPER 4
in the understanding of obedience, punishment and the development of stability. “As obedient
children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance: But as he
which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation” (1 Peter 1:14-15,
King James Version). Peter encourages obedience, courage and learning in this scripture to be
more Christian and live a holy life.
It is essential to instill a sense of right and wrong in children from a biblical perspective
because everything good starts with a solid foundation. Jesus is considered a Master Teacher and
through him we gain foundational skills and knowledge to survive. Brummelen (2009), state
“Promoting righteousness and justice is part of obeying Christ’s commands and must be an
integral part of schooling” (p.10). The classroom must help children through modeling and
interactions to understand right and wrong. Teachers have a purpose to nurture and shape
attitudes, values, obedience and encourage learning. We must ensure we are upholding our
promise to the Lord to lead and guide the future leaders of our society with faith and teachings of
the word”.
Bandura, a Canadian psychologist believed that child internalize and experiment
with learned behavior. He believed that children learn through social contracts and adults are
modeling for children all the time. He invented the Social Learning Theory. Social Learning
Theory is a major behavioral learning theory that emphasized the phenomena of modeling or the
imitation of other behaviors and of vicarious experience. Social Cognitive Theory stresses the
idea that human learning occurs in social environment. The environment controls how humans
behave. Triadic reciprocal causation is a theory by Albert Bandura that suggests a three-way
interplay of personal, behavior and environmental influences on a person’s learning. Slavin &
Schunk, 2017, states “Triadic reciprocal causation is a reciprocal interaction among behaviors,
Running head: FINAL PAPER 5
environmental variables and personal factors such as cognitions” and “At any given time, one
factor may predominate” (p.95). As an educator, I related to Vygotsky’s theory the most as it
pertains to my students and challenges with learning new concepts.
Description of an Effective Teacher
An effective teacher is intentional and reflects after every lesson. “Intentional teachers are
leaders in their classrooms who take responsibility for managing time, activities, and behaviors”
(Slavin & Schunk, 2017) Educators must be intentional and understand the importance of social
interactions within the class to promote independence with communication for life. It will take
modeling, reinforcing good strategies and promoting good communication skills for all student’s
success socially. Most often it will take the educators knowing when to scaffold and explicitly
teach communication and social interactions skills.
As a teacher that works with students in elementary school, it makes me very open-
minded about the importance of differentiated instruction and character education. I consider
myself to be an intentional teacher that reflects on ways to improve instruction for those students
with learning challenges and disabilities. Time is an important factor that I plan carefully with
fidelity to improve students’ academic and social performance. According to Brummelen (2009)
state “Teachers, therefore, are much more that facilitators. They are guides who at times instruct
directly, who at times share and discuss insights, who at times allow students to explore and
create, and who constantly stimulate students to use their insights and abilities in responsive and
responsible ways” (p.37).
Description of an Effective Learning Environment
The most effective and efficient way to teach students is to present information in an
explicit and direct fashion. Direct instruction is a set of stages for teaching concepts to students
Running head: FINAL PAPER 6
using modeling, engagement, monitoring, guided and independent practice. According to Slavin
& Schunk (2017), “Direct instruction is used to describe lessons in which you transmit
information directly to students, structuring class time to reach a clearly defined set of objectives
as efficiently as possible”. Small group instruction is a means for guided practice of review
skills, technology opportunities and new concepts. Small group instruction can benefit many
students, especially those with learning disabilities. “It can improve time on task and develop
social skills that not only enhance community but that are increasingly important in the
workplace” (Brummelen, 2009).
As an educator, in order to have an effective learning environment, you must exhibit
positive, motivating, culturally responsive, student-centered and productive classroom
management skill. You must be consistent and model good behavior during routines and
procedures daily. The classroom must be engaging with high expectations of all learners.
According to Slavin & Schunk (2017), “Students who are participating in well-structured
activities that engage their interests, who are highly motivated to learn, and who are working on
tasks that are challenging yet within their capabilities rarely pose any serious management
problems”. As an educator, you must be timely and plan for any transitions, interruptions or lapse
in times at the start of the year. The first day of school is critical in establishing classroom order
for the entire year.
Actively Including and Engaging Learners with Diverse Needs and Exceptionalities
According to Slavin & Schunk (2017) “Teachers in inclusive classrooms can help their
students with disabilities succeed by adapting instruction and modifying materials, teaching
students specific learning strategies, and providing tutoring and computer practice”.
Running head: FINAL PAPER 7
Differentiated instruction and Repose to Intervention (RTI) are strategies utilized as means of
reaching all students learning in the classroom. This brings me to the unethical and disheartening
video about Pennhurst.
This was a very disheartening documentary to watch. As an educator, it was a lot I
learned from watching this video. Also, it gave me clarifications for why the vocabulary has
changed over the years and how much it affects a person depending on the labels they are given.
This enlightened my thoughts on the power of language. The changes throughout history since
1968 has benefitted children and adults with disabilities. In the video, Doctor Jessie Fear states
how he handles problem behaviors at Pennhurst. He stated he “it is quite effective to downgrade
him a little bit”. (Reed, 2015) I found what he stated in the video was very unethical, inhumane
and disrespectful. Just viewing this video provides a deeper understanding as to why laws have
been created throughout history to support ethical practices and to cultivate effective learning
opportunities for all individuals.
Welcoming, nurturing, and educating learners with diverse needs or exceptionalities must
have a biblical approach in order to achieve success. "But even the very hairs of your head are all
numbered. Fear not therefore: ye are of more value than many sparrows" (Luke 12:7, King James
Version). Fear, I believe was the reasoning behind the Pennhurst institution. People were
uneducated about the many disabilities and created a jail-like hospital for those who were
different. The biblical approach requires us to reflect on creating a learning environment with
self-worth and self-efficacy at the forefront of teaching and learning. All students should feel
important, valuable and respected.
Addressing Behavior and Character Development
Running head: FINAL PAPER 8
The need to address behavior and character development is essential for an educator to
know their students and communicate with their parents. Parental Involvement is a huge aspect
to allow an educator to instill good behaviors and character education to all students. As an
educator, I want to develop students academically and socially and emotionally healthy. By
communicating with parents my expectations and consequences, students are developing the
good social and emotional skills needed to succeed in and out of school. Promoting self-esteem
and self-efficacy are huge qualities of this development. Felber (2003) states, “Installing the
highest ideals in children is crucial for the survival of our country.” I believe that by
implementing character education consistently and with fidelity school and district-wide will
benefit parent involvement and student behavior concerns. Erikson suggest that as people grow,
they face a series of psychosocial crises that shape personality and involves the person’s
relationship with others. I believe if students learn through modeling of acceptable behaviors,
peer relationships, problem solving skills and character traits. Also, when they are awarded for
the positive behavior; the educational character development practice will become more evident
and an expectation school-wide. Brummelen (2009), states, “Scripture also makes clear that
knowledge involves our whole being, not just our intellect.” (p.73) Character education is an
important program within a classroom and school to involve the learning of “our whole being.”
Engaging Students in Learning, Building Self-Efficacy and Motivation
Self-efficacy is the foundation of human motivations and accomplishments. It is a
person’s belief in their ability to produce desired results are by their own actions. According to,
Slavin & Schunk; 2017, “self-efficacy is belief concerning one’s capabilities to organize and
implement actions necessary to learn or perform behaviors at designated levels (Bandura, 1982b,
1986, 1997)” (p.96). I can help build a stronger sense of self-efficacy in students through
Running head: FINAL PAPER 9
modeling acceptable behavior and decision-making. Through use of mastery experiences,
vicarious experience, socially verbal persuasion and emotional feedback, I can build a strong
sense of self-efficacy in my students. Mastery experience: I can give boosts when they master an
idea learned and encourage them to be diligent at failures through reteaching so, students “learn
from their mistakes”. Vicarious experience: I can promote observations of students achieving a
goal so that encourages the student to have a strong sense of self-efficacy. Socially Verbal
persuasion: I can verbally persuade through modeling and guided practice of an idea or task for
them to do their very best at mastering. Lastly, Emotional feedback: I can give positive
motivational feedback to eliminate anxiety of learning new ideas. It is important for me as a
teach students to be an effective role-model because self-efficacy is the foundation to human
motivations and accomplishments in life. The choices people make are turning points in their
lives.
Personal Reflections/Conclusion
As an educator, it is vital to shape yourself into an intentional and effective leader of your
classroom. Also, it is important to know your teaching style and learning theory to adjust an
effective classroom environment. Gaining wisdom about the variety of theories shapes the
knowledge of how students learn, and variety of ways teachers teach is a valuable concept to aid
in the type of teacher you want or can be. I can relate to my students better when teaching
different strategies to learn academically, socially and emotionally. Interactions are important to
student learning. Bandura state, experiences are a leading factor in students outlook on education
and it is up to me, as an educator to change their perspective by making effective lessons,
differentiating and having an effective learning environment. I want to engage students to be
self-motivated, respectful, students that take responsibility for learning. Luke 12:7, God tell us
Running head: FINAL PAPER 10
no matter how valuable and loved we are to him thus as educators we must follow him. As an
educator, we must lead without fear and with appreciation of others.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2004). Research-Based Character Education. The Annals of
the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, p. 72-85
Brummelen, H. V. (2009). Walking with God in the classroom: Christian approaches to learning
and teaching. (3rd ed.) Colorado Springs, CO: Purposeful Design Publications. ISBN:
9781583310984
Cetin-Dinder, A. (2015). Student Motivation in Constructivist Learning Environment. EURASIA
Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, pp. 233-247.
doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1399a
Felber, K. K. (2003). Building Better Citizens Through the Integration of Social Studies,
Language Arts, and Character Education. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 69(3), p. 11–14.
Retrieved from http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?
url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=ofm&AN=507823400&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Frambach, J. M., Driessen, E. W., Beh, P., & Vleuten, C. P. (2014). Quiet or questioning?
Students discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures. Studies in
Higher Education,39(6), pp. 1001-1021. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.754865
Ryan, K. O. (Producer). (2011). A Child's Mind: How Kids Learn Right & Wrong [Video file].
Learning Seed. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from Education in Video: Volume I.
Running head: FINAL PAPER 11
Slavin, R. E. & Schunk, D. H. (2017) Learning Theories: EDUC 500. Print Offer. (1st ed.).
Boston, MA: Pearson
Students also viewed