Research Design on Criminal Justice Education and Policing
This study will utilize secondary data collected during a previous research project
— conducted by W. Drew Davis (Approved IRB #13042201) — to assess how
undergraduate college students in a criminal justice academic program perceive police
misconduct. In addition, this study will seek to determine student perceptions toward the
influence of a college education and, specifically, whether the completion of an
undergraduate criminal justice ethics course influences those perceptions. Differing
analyses will be used to assess the survey (see Appendix A) data in an effort to determine
these factors and test the hypotheses of the study.
Research Questions
The goal of this project is to examine (1) attitudinal perceptions of undergraduate
criminal justice majors toward police misconduct and (2) variables which influence such
behavior. The research goal will be achieved by analyzing variables related to
misconduct, police professionalism, and criminal justice college education. The study is
guided by four research questions:
Research Question 1: Do criminal justice students perceive misconduct as a
growing concern within today’s police department? Mbuba (2010) argues that variations
do exist in such a way that reflects a contrasting view of the police in relation to a non-
student population.
Research Question 2: If criminal justice students do perceive police misconduct
to be a growing concern in law enforcement, to what degree are these perceptions
associated with future implications for policing? Tsoudis (2006) suggests that a college
education in a criminal justice discipline can be an effective means of shaping the future
of the criminal justice system.
Research Question 3: To what extent does a formal ethics course within criminal
justice curricula influence student perceptions about police misconduct? Bjerregaard and
Lord (2004) assert that a single criminal justice ethics course does little to positively
affect future thoughts of college students; however, extended exposure may alter these
findings.
Research Question 4: What are the primary indicators that best explain student
perceptions of police misconduct? Vis (2012) suggests that regression analysis allows for
the isolation of significant independent variables that most closely influence the
dependent variable.
Dependent Variable
The study’s dependent variable (“Police corruption is increasing among today’s
police officers”) was measured using a five-point Likert scale. The scale ranged from
one (strongly disagree) to five (strongly agree). The dependent variable will allow for
examination of student attitudes toward this ethical dilemma. Wolfe and Piquero (2011)
suggest the issue of misconduct and its associated factors have largely remained on the
organizational level. However, this dependent variable aims to detect the factors that
most closely predict student attitudes toward general misconduct and signal the
associated independent factors before the criminal justice student begins a career in law
enforcement.
Independent Variables
While a variety of perception variables in this study aim to determine descriptive
differences among the sample, the respondent’s attitudes toward criminal justice
education were also examined. This will allow the researcher to effectively measure their
perceived level of confidence in the criminal justice degree and its influence on police
behavior. These perception variables included but are not limited to
Community perceptions of unethical decision making
Misconduct and its influence on community policing
Relationship between years of police service and misconduct
Influence of discretionary power in policing and its effect on
unethical behavior
Prevalence of racial profiling
Impact of criminal justice college courses in training officers in ethics
Effect of a college degree in shaping police professionalism and
ethical conduct
In addition, this project incorporated seven demographic variables about the student:
gender, race, cumulative GPA, education classification, completion of a criminal justice
ethics course, major, and familial relationship one may have to law enforcement.
Population
All students enrolled in criminal justice courses at The University of Southern
Mississippi enrolled in two particular semesters served as the population for this study.
The student base included criminal justice majors along with non-criminal justice majors,
including forensic science and others. As a result, this will provide additional value to the
study by allowing for the detection of statistical differences across academic majors.
During the 2013-2014 academic year at The University of Southern Mississippi, the
School of Criminal Justice had a total enrollment of 710 undergraduate students. Of these
students, 168 were enrolled during the summer 2013 semester, while 542 were enrolled
in the fall 2013 semester.
Sampling Frame and Subject Selection Procedure
The sampling frame for this study consisted of a compiled list of all
undergraduate criminal justice courses offered during the two semesters of interest to
this study (the summer and fall 2013 terms). This strategy produced a total of 38 courses.
After compiling the list of courses, convenience sampling was utilized to select 10
criminal justice courses. Peterson and Merunka (2013) suggest that the use of
convenience sampling of college students does pose concerns of generalization to non-
student samples. However, they contend that no empirical research exists that would
refute the conclusions of such research. Likewise, Nesselroade (1986) offer that other
forms of randomized sampling are not without their own respective issues of selection
bias. Thus, it is argued that both convenience sampling and those that aim to safeguard
against selection bias equally raise generalizability concerns in research findings. These
courses were chosen by the researcher in conjunction with the Director of the School of
Criminal Justice. The researcher then requested access to the courses by contacting each
instructor. The selected courses were those typically taken by all student classifications,
including two senior capstone courses. By selecting both lower- and upper-level courses,
this allowed for determining whether descriptive differences exist across the levels of
academic maturation.
Data Collection
The data in this study were collected using the Student Perception Survey (see
Appendix A), which primarily aimed to measure a student’s attitude toward police
misconduct while also gathering demographic information. In order to effectively gather
a representative sample, the researcher distributed the instrument to all students in each
selected undergraduate course. Students were orally instructed regarding how to complete
the survey, and also received an oral explanation regarding its purpose to ensure that
students were fully aware that participation in the survey was voluntary and that no
penalty existed for not participating. Additionally, a confidentiality statement was read to
the class and then signed by the students who participated. Students at that time
completed the survey and placed it face down on a table at the head of the room. If a
participant wished to cease participation or became uncomfortable, the student was
allowed to inform the researcher of their desire to cease participation, and their survey
was excluded from the sample. A non-participating student simply turned in the
incomplete or blank survey with all others. Once all participants had completed the
instrument, the researcher collected the surveys and proceeded to the next selected
course.
Analyses
This study will utilize a variety of statistical techniques, including descriptive
analyses, correlation matrices, and logistical regression models. Regression models will
be constructed to determine the predictor variables which explain the most variance in the
dependent variable. By isolating the variables most closely associated with the
perceptions of criminal justice students, researchers will be able to determine where more
attention should be directed in future studies. Vis (2012) argues that regression analysis
in the social sciences allows for the indication of interaction between multiple variables.
Thus, constructing multiple models allows for the isolation of those variables that share
interaction in order to create a stronger explanation of variance in predicting the
independent variables responsible for explaining the dependent variable. Regression
analysis will also evaluate the previously discussed research questions. The ultimate goal
is to develop a regression model that most closely predicts perceptions of misconduct
among college students entering law enforcement.
In addition to the use of regression models, descriptive analysis and frequencies
will also be used. Due to the nature of this project, these descriptive differences are
essential in order to determine if variations exist in student perceptions across
demographic categories (e.g., age, student classification, etc.). Thus, utilizing a student’s
in conjunction with one way ANOVA will allow this study to determine if such
differences exist.