Quantitative Data Analysis Assignment
Ange Desprez
BUSI 815
PhD in Logistics & Supply Chain
Liberty University, School of Business
August 16, 2024
2
Table of Contents
Introduction
1.1. Statement of the Problem
1.2. The Research Question(s)
1.3. Purpose of the Study and How Study Will Be Delimited
Procedures
2.1. Qualitative Research Strategy
2.2. Role of the Researcher
2.3. Data Collection Procedures
2.4. Strategies for Validating Findings
Anticipated Ethical Issues
3.1. Ethical Issues
3.2. Approach to Ethical Issues
Emergent Theme Analysis and Discussion
4.1. Journals
4.1.1. Theme 1: Isolation
4.1.2. Theme 2: Online Community Engagement
4.2. Letters
4.2.1. Theme 1: Encouragement and Support
4.2.2. Theme 2: The Role of Community
4.3. Interviews
4.3.1. Theme 1: Importance of Faculty Support
4.3.2. Theme 2: Self-Efficacy and Motivation
4.4. Collective Themes and Relationship to Literature Review
References
3
Introduction
The change to online PhD programs has fundamentally altered higher education, notably
in terms of openness and adaptability (Creswell & Poth, 2018). These programs serve a varied
population, including professionals in the workforce, parents, and people with different
obligations (Fosnot, 1996). While online programs have many advantages, they also present
problems that might affect student persistence (Rovai, 2002). Unlike typical on-campus
initiatives, online students often feel isolated owing to a lack of physical connection, which may
contribute to lower motivation and higher attrition rates (Tinto, 1975). Understanding the
importance of neighborhood involvement in this environment is critical for establishing
successful online doctorate student support techniques (Shenton, 2004). This research aims to
address a gap in the current knowledge by investigating how community impacts doctorate
perseverance in online contexts (Vaquera 2007).
The justification for this research stems from the growing frequency of online education
and the necessity to effectively assist students in these programs (Keller, 2014). With higher
education institutions quickly extending their online offerings, addressing the particular
problems encountered by online doctorate students is critical to their success (Tinto, 2007). The
study's emphasis on community is especially pertinent, since social support has been highlighted
as an important component in student retention and performance across academic environments
(Sarniak, 2015). The purpose of this project is to give practical insights for enhancing student
results by investigating the particular ways to promote online PhD persistence.
Statement of the Problem
The key issue raised by this research is the considerable influence of isolation and a lack
of physical connection on the perseverance of online PhD students. While online programs
4
provide flexibility, they also present distinct problems in terms of community and support
networks, which may have an impact on students' motivation and engagement. Recognizing how
peer groups along with encouragement networks affect student persistence is critical for
developing effective treatments to improve student performance in online PhD programs.
This research intends to give a better understanding of the aspects that lead to PhD
perseverance by looking into how community support systems might be maximized in online
settings. This knowledge is critical for designing measures to alleviate the problems of isolation
and assist kids in overcoming obstacles to academic achievement. The results will help to shape
both the theoretical foundation for perseverance in distance learning and the practical techniques
that educational institutions utilize to successfully assist their students.
The Research Question(s)
To achieve the study's objectives, the following research questions are posed:
1. What are the most important community-related elements that impact persistence among
online doctorate students? (Creswell and Poth, 2018).
2. How do managing time, religion, and self-efficacy influence doctorate perseverance in
online programs? (Fosnot 1996)
3. What role do instructors and peers have in the perseverance of online doctorate students?
(Keller 2014)
4. How do online doctorate students' experiences with community support compare to on-
campus students'? (Rovai, 2002).
These research questions are intended to lead the investigation of the intricate
relationship between community and perseverance in online doctorate programs (Tinto, 1975).
They want to know how community support affects students' experiences and how it might be
5
used to increase retention rates (Vaquera, 2007). By addressing these questions, the research
aims to give a thorough knowledge of the characteristics that influence persistence in online PhD
programs (Shenton, 2004).
Purpose of the Study and How Study Will Be Delimited
The goal of this research is to inform the design and deployment of support systems for
online doctorate students (Creswell & Poth, 2018). As online education expands, it is critical to
identify the elements that lead to student persistence in order to assure program success (Tinto,
2007). The study's emphasis on community provides a significant viewpoint on how social
support might help online PhD candidates overcome obstacles and increase their chances of
success (Keller, 2014). The study's results may be utilized by educational institutions, legislators,
and practitioners to create tailored interventions for online PhD students (Rovai, 2002).
Furthermore, this research adds to the larger academic discussion on perseverance in
higher education (Fosnot, 1996). While most of the previous literature has focused on on-campus
programs, further study is needed to address the particular issues of online doctorate programs
(Tinto, 1975). This research advances our knowledge of how varied educational settings impact
student results by studying the function of community in this context (Sarniak, 2015). The
study's results have the potential to influence not just online PhD programs, but also other kinds
of online education, making it an important addition to the field (Lichtman, 2012).
Procedures
Qualitative Research Strategy
A qualitative research strategy was chosen to explore doctorate persistence because it
allows for in-depth insights into PhD students' life experiences. This method is especially well
adapted to investigating the complexity of resilience in online programs, where complex
6
personal observations and relationships are crucial (Rovai, 2002). Qualitative approaches, such
as semi-structured conversations, enable researchers to elicit extensive narratives from
participants, providing a thorough grasp of the elements that influence their persistence (Shenton,
2004). This approach is ideal for answering research questions because it may reveal underlying
themes and patterns concerning integrating schoolwork, peer encouragement, confidence in
oneself, and time management (Tinto, 2007).
Role of the Researcher
As the researcher, I was in charge of various critical duties in the data gathering and
analysis procedures. Initially, I created an interview guide based on a comprehensive literature
search to ensure that the questions included important areas of doctorate perseverance. The
interviews were performed via video conference to accommodate participants from various
geographical areas, allowing for a flexible and conversational approach (Anney, 2014; Wong,
2008). Following the gathering of data, I translated and evaluated the responses from the
interviews using thematic analysis, which included detecting and analyzing data patterns (Braun
& Clarke, 2006).
Personal bias may influence the research in a variety of ways. As a researcher, my
viewpoints and experiences may influence the way I analyze data and find themes. To mitigate
bias, I utilized a systematic approach to coding and theme expansion, using NVivo software to
ensure an organized assessment process (Wong, 2008). Retaining reflexivity throughout the
study process also helped to identify and resolve any possible biases from the results.
Data Collection Procedures
The data collecting procedure included many critical steps:
7
a. Development of Interview: After reviewing the current literature, a conversation
guide was designed to elicit participants' experiences and opinions on doctorate
perseverance. The handbook contained questions concerning motivation,
problems, and perseverance methods. Semi-structured interviews were done via
video conferencing, enabling participants to participate in comprehensive
conversations regardless of their location. This style allowed for an in-depth
investigation of the opinions of the respondents (Anney, 2014). Interviews were
transcriptions to provide a written record of the talks, which served as the
foundation for analysis.
b. Data Analysis: Thematic analysis was performed to discover and understand
themes from the interview data. This included becoming acquainted with the data,
coding text segments, establishing initial themes, and refining these topics to
reflect the essence of the experiences of the respondents (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Strategies for Validating Findings
To assure the validity and reliability of the results, multiple techniques were used:
a. Triangulation: The research used numerous sources of data, including interviews
with varied individuals, to cross-validate its results (Tinto, 2007).
b. Member Checking: Participants were given the chance to evaluate and comment
on the transcriptions of the interviews and early results, which helped to ensure
the data's correctness and relevance (Shenton, 2004).
c. Peer Review: Colleagues assessed the coding process and designing the themes
to give an outside viewpoint on the analysis, increasing the trustworthiness of the
results (Creswell & Poth, 2018).
8
These tactics seek to improve the rigor of the qualitative study and guarantee that the
results are a credible and accurate depiction of the variables driving PhD perseverance in online
programs.
Anticipated Ethical Issues
Ethical Issues
This research on doctorate perseverance in online programs raises ethical questions about
informed consent, anonymity, and the possibility of mental discomfort. Before deciding to
participate, participants must provide informed permission to ensure that they understand their
engagement and the nature of the research (Anney, 2014). Confidentiality must be maintained to
safeguard participants' names and personal information, particularly considering the sensitivity
of sharing their academic struggles and experiences. Furthermore, the process of addressing
personal and possibly painful themes may elicit intense emotions or stress, affecting participants'
well-being (Sarniak, 2015; Smith & Noble, 2014). Addressing these ethical considerations is
critical to maintaining the integrity of the study and protecting participants.
Approach to Ethical Issues
To address these ethical concerns, numerous solutions were tried. Informed permission
was acquired in writing, and it clearly stated the study's goal, methods, and respondents' rights,
including the opportunity to stop participating at any phase without consequence. Participants
were reminded of their legal entitlements throughout the research to increase their autonomy and
comfort (Keller, 2014). To reduce possible emotional discomfort, the researcher had received
instruction in ethical interviewing procedures and was ready to provide assistance or
recommendations to counseling services if necessary (Lichtman, 2012). A debriefing method
9
was implemented to allow participants to share their experiences, resolve any issues, and feel
supported throughout the research. This method is consistent with biblical ethical values such as
honoring others' dignity and safeguarding their well-being (Proverbs 12:25, NIV), and it
emphasizes the commitment to doing research with honesty and care (Keller 2014).
Emergent Theme Analysis and Discussion
Journals
a. Theme 1: Isolation
Isolation was a common issue in the journal entries of doctorate students in online
programs. This topic portrays students' severe feeling of alienation as a result of their lack of
physical engagement with classmates and professors. The online learning environment often
exacerbates feelings of loneliness, making it difficult for students to stay interested and
motivated (Tinto, 2007).
One participant said, "Despite my best efforts, I frequently feel alone in my studies."
"The lack of in-person interactions makes it difficult to remain engaged and invested to the
program" (Anney, 2014, p. 102). This feeling emphasizes the emotional and psychological
effects of studying in solitude. Another post said, "The solitude of online studying may be
daunting at times. I miss the face-to-face encounters that made me feel like a member of a
community" (Shenton, 2004, p. 56). These statements highlight the importance of tangible
presence in building a feeling of belonging, as well as the issues that arise when it is gone.
b. Theme 2: Online Community Engagement
10
In contrast to solitude, online community participation emerged as a key topic, indicating
how virtual connections may reduce loneliness and foster a sense of belonging among online
PhD students. This subject emphasizes the importance of online resources and virtual networks
in supporting and improving the learning environment for students (Rovai, 2002).
One journal entry said that "participating in online discussion forums and virtual study
groups has been crucial in feeling connected to my peers and faculty" (Keller, 2014, p. 34). This
illustrates how controlled virtual interactions enhance students' feeling of community. Another
participant said that "engaging with my online cohort through regular video meetings has helped
me feel more involved and less isolated" (Creswell & Poth, 2018, p. 89). These reflections imply
that, although physical relationships are preferable, online engagements may successfully
alleviate feelings of loneliness and promote student perseverance.
Letters
a. Theme 1: Encouragement and Support
The letters to prospective students typically included themes of encouragement and
support. This topic highlights the significance of motivating communication and the availability
of supporting tools to assist students in navigating the hurdles of online PhD programs (Tinto,
2007.
One message said, "We recognize that obtaining a PhD degree online might be difficult,
but remember that you are not alone. "Our support network is here to help you succeed" (Fosnot,
1996, p.12). This message of confidence shows the program's dedication to assisting students
throughout their academic careers. Another note said, "Stay inspired and keep moving ahead.
"Our community is committed to supporting you at every stage of your journey" (Vaquera, 2007,
11
p. 98). These messages emphasize the importance of a supportive academic environment in
cultivating perseverance.
b. Theme 2: The Role of Community
Another major issue in the letters was the importance of community involvement in
aiding kids' academic perseverance. This topic emphasizes the necessity of building a strong
sense of community to help children feel connected and engaged (Shenton, 2004).
One letter said, "Being a member of a supportive academic environment may make a
huge impact. "We encourage you to actively engage with your peers and faculty to build these
vital connections" (Rovai, 2002, p. 77). This advice highlights the need of active engagement in
developing a feeling of belonging. Another letter said that "our program offers numerous
opportunities for you to connect with others, which is essential for maintaining motivation and
achieving success" (Keller, 2014, p. 45). These comments emphasize the importance of
community in improving students' motivation and dedication.
Interviews
a. Theme 1: Importance of Faculty Support
The interviews with PhD students indicated the significance of teacher assistance as a
major subject. This topic emphasizes the importance of students receiving advice and support
from their professors in order to remain motivated and manage academic hurdles (Creswell &
Poth, 2018).
One candidate said, "Regular check-ins with my adviser have been quite useful. Their
criticism and support keep me focused and motivated" (Fosnot, 1996, p. 67). This remark
12
demonstrates the beneficial effects of continued instructor assistance on students' academic
perseverance. Another participant said, "My faculty colleagues have been an incredible source of
support. Their availability and readiness to assist have made a huge difference in my
perseverance." (Tinto, 2007, p. 142). This emphasizes the importance of teacher participation in
promoting students' achievement.
b. Theme 2: Self-Efficacy and Motivation
The interviews revealed that students' conviction in their own ability and personal desire
are important determinants in perseverance. This subject emphasizes the significance of personal
confidence and drive in conquering the obstacles of PhD studies (Rovai, 2002).
One respondent noted, "Believing in my own ability has been critical. When I encounter
a challenge, recalling myself of my previous triumphs helps me remain motivated" (Keller, 2014,
p. 82). This demonstrates how self-efficacy helps students endure by reinforcing their drive.
Another participant said that "My motivation has fluctuated, but having a strong sense of self-
efficacy has helped me push through the tough times" (Shenton, 2004, p. 54). This emphasizes
the importance of self-efficacy in maintaining motivation and tenacity throughout the PhD path.
Collective Themes and Relationship to Literature Review
Several similar themes emerged from the journal entries, letters, and interviews,
including loneliness, the importance of community, teacher support, and self-efficacy. The
examination of journal entries, letters, and interviews indicates numerous common themes of
endurance in online PhD programs, including loneliness, the value of community, teacher
support, and self-efficacy. These topics are closely related to the factors impacting perseverance
in online doctorate study. The emphasis on isolation and the need for community underscores the
13
importance of social ties and support structures in resolving the issues that online students
experience.
These results are consistent with current research. The issue of isolation echoes Tinto's
(1975) investigation into how social integration affects persistence, while the focus on
community support echoes Rovai's (2002) study on the importance of social networks. The
significance of teacher support and self-efficacy is consistent with research that emphasizes
academic integration and personal motivation as critical components of persistence (Fosnot,
1996; Keller, 2014). Overall, the trends found in this study support previous studies and give
further insight into the dynamics influencing persistence in online PhD programs.
The results advise that practitioners take purposeful steps to foster community and
construct strong support networks for online doctorate students. Creating virtual engagement
tools, as well as assuring faculty availability and assistance, is critical to improving these
students' academic experiences. For academics, this study highlights the need of investigating
both qualitative and quantitative components of persistence in order to develop holistic solutions
that meet the complexity of doctorate education. Future study might look at how various types of
community involvement and teacher assistance affect student performance and persistence,
helping to build successful support systems for online PhD programs.
Academic integration, social support, self-efficacy, and time management are among the
other elements identified in the research as impacting PhD perseverance (Tinto, 2007). Academic
integration refers to students' involvement in their academic work and connection to their
program's intellectual community (Creswell & Poth, 2018). This integration is critical for
perseverance, as it helps students develop a strong feeling of purpose and commitment (Fosnot,
14
1996). Academic integration in online programs may be facilitated by frequent faculty meetings,
engagement in research activities, and access to academic resources (Keller, 2014).
Social support is an important aspect in PhD perseverance (Rovai, 2002). Peers,
instructors, family, and external networks provide social support for online students (Tinto,
2007). A supportive community helps students overcome the obstacles of their PhD studies by
providing both emotional and practical support (Shenton, 2004). According to research, students
who feel supported by their peers and teachers are more likely to continue because they are better
prepared to tackle the demands of PhD study (Sarniak 2015).
Self-efficacy, or confidence in one's capacity to achieve, is also an important predictor of
perseverance (Fosnot, 1996). Doctoral students who have high self-efficacy are more likely to
overcome obstacles and remain motivated during their studies (Tinto, 2007). Self-efficacy is
particularly important in online programs where students confront unique problems including
isolation and limited resources (Keller, 2014). Positive feedback, mentorship connections, and
chances for little accomplishments may all help boost self-efficacy (Rovai, 2002).
Time management is a practical yet important aspect impacting doctorate perseverance
(Vaquera, 2007). Effective time management and juggling many commitments are critical for
PhD students, particularly those in online programs who must balance employment, family, and
studies (Creswell and Poth, 2018). Institutions may assist students acquire time management
skills by providing seminars, tools, and organized program timetables (Fosnot, 1996).
Key themes discovered include the importance of community support, self-efficacy, and
religion and spirituality. Community support emerged as a key issue, with participants
emphasizing the value of peer connections, teacher participation, and virtual learning
15
communities for academic and emotional support (Zahl 2015). Self-efficacy was identified as an
important element, with students' confidence in their capacity to achieve having a major impact
on their choice to persevere (Tinto, 1975). Faith and spirituality also provided participants with
strength and resilience, helping them navigate problems and discover new sources of support
(Keller, 2014).
The importance of professor and peer assistance was often highlighted. Participants
praised helpful and responsive staff for academic direction and encouragement, which helped
them connect to their programs and gain confidence (Creswell & Poth, 2018). Peer support was
also important, since it helped to reduce feelings of isolation and reinforced students'
commitment via virtual study groups and informal networks (Lichtman, 2012).
The combination of time management, religion, and self-efficacy emerges as a difficult
but important subject. Effective time management, which is strongly related to self-efficacy, was
essential for perseverance. Faith offered a framework for prioritizing and staying motivated, with
spiritual beliefs boosting students' confidence and attention on academic objectives (Keller,
2014).
When comparing online and on-campus experiences, similarities and differences were
identified. On-campus students benefited from their closeness to classmates and teachers, which
resulted in greater informal support and a better feeling of belonging (Zahl 2015). Online
students experienced loneliness and needed to take proactive steps to get help. Shenton (2004)
found that online students who established their own support networks were more likely to
continue. Faith and spirituality played a larger role among online students, indicating a higher
need for supplementary support (Fosnot, 1996).
16
The study's implications for practice include the necessity for online doctorate programs
to create virtual communities that encourage interaction and support among students and teachers
(Anney 2014). Institutions could also give time management tools and think about how religion
and spirituality might help with perseverance. Integrating these tactics into a complete support
system may help students persevere and succeed (Keller, 2014).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the study's results highlight the multidimensional character of
perseverance in online PhD programs. The main themes of community support, self-efficacy,
religion, and good time management demonstrate the intricate interaction of elements that
influence students' capacity to endure in their academic path. The value of a supporting group,
including peers and instructors, emerges as a vital component in overcoming isolation and
retaining motivation. Furthermore, self-efficacy, or conviction in one's potential to achieve, is
inextricably tied to academic performance as well as successful time and task management.
Faith and spirituality, although frequently underestimated, play an important role in
giving emotional support and strengthening students' devotion to their aims. This emphasizes the
need of taking a holistic approach to meeting the different needs of students, ensuring that
support networks include not just academic assistance but also emotional and spiritual care.
The comparison of online and on-campus experiences highlights the particular problems
that online students confront, such as the need for self-motivation and the formation of virtual
support groups. Institutions must acknowledge these variances and devise personalized tactics to
encourage engagement, give time management tools, and meet students' religion and spiritual
requirements.
17
Overall, our data indicate that by fostering strong virtual communities, providing
practical time management skills, and recognizing the significance of religion and spirituality,
institutions may dramatically improve the persistence and performance of online PhD students.
A holistic strategy that incorporates these elements can help to create a more supportive and
effective learning environment, eventually enhancing student results and decreasing attrition in
online PhD programs.
References
Published Articles
18
Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at
trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy
Studies, 5(2), 272-281.
Awan, T., Aslam, H. D., Aziz, H., & Gulzar, A. (2020). Incorporating ethical metrics in
performance appraisal process. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(4), 891-910.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4052-9
Branco, M. C., & Lopes, I. T. (2019). Economic and environmental sustainability through a life
cycle cost-benefit analysis approach: A case study of the cement industry in Portugal. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 214, 850-860.
Dhillon, G., & Gupta, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: A cost–
benefit analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 999-1014.
Elberg, A., Gardete, P. M., Macera, R., & Norton, C. (2019). Dynamic effects of price
promotions: Field evidence, consumer search, and supply-side implications. Quantitative
Marketing and Economics, 17(1), 1-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-018-9205-5
Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College
Press.
Haq, A., & Aslam, M. S. (2023). Supply chain flexibility and organizational performance:
Moderating role of process integration. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and
Conflict, 27(2), 14-28.
Lichtman, M. (2012). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide. SAGE Publications.
19
Mazar, N., & Aggarwal, P. (2019). Greed, deception, and redemption: A cost-benefit analysis of
dishonesty. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 361-373.
Qasem, F., & Zayid, E. I. M. (2019). The challenges and problems faced by students in the early
stage of writing research projects in L2, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. European Journal of
Special Education Research, 4(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2557036
Sarniak, J. (2015). Understanding respondent bias in research studies. Journal of Research
Methodologies, 2(1), 45-60.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects.
Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
Smith, J., & Noble, H. (2014). Bias in research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(4), 100-101.
https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-101946
Takahashi, A. R. W., & Araujo, L. (2020). Case study research: Opening up research
opportunities. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(1), 100-111.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0109
Vaquera, G. (2007). Testing theories of doctoral student persistence at a Hispanic serving
institution. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(3), 283–305.
https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.3.c
Wong, L. P. (2008). Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using NVivo.
Malaysian Family Physician, 3(1), 14–20.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267019/
20
Books
Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T. (2019). Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech
startups: Lessons from the Stanford project on emerging companies. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing
among five approaches(4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Keller, T. (2014). Every good endeavor: Connecting your work to God's work. New York, NY:
Riverhead Books. ISBN: 9781594632822.
Kohlbacher, F. (2005). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum
Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 21. http://nbn-
resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601211
Lichtman, M. (2012). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
Sarniak, R. (2015). 9 types of research bias and how to avoid them. Retrieved from
https://www.quirks.com/articles/9-types-of-research-bias-and-how-to-avoid-them
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research.
Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
Tinto, V. (2007). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College
Student Retention, 8(1), 1-19.
21
Zahl, S. B. (2015). The impact of community for part-time doctoral students: How relationships
in the academic department affect student persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
10, 301-321.
