discuss the various types of network organizations and how this can impact the environmental process.
tal areas to consider can be through creating new organizations, technological Some environmen
.changes, ecological processes, and much more
BUSI 735
DISCUSSION BOARD FORUM INSTRUCTIONS
Discussion Board Forums Modules 2, 4, 6, and 8 (130 Points Per DB)
Discussion boards are collaborative learning experiences. Therefore, the student will create a
thread in response to the provided prompt for each forum. Each thread must be 2,100-2,200
words (due by Thursday of each week) and demonstrate course-related knowledge. In addition
to the thread, the student will reply to the threads of at least 2 classmates. Each reply must be
600-700 words (due by the end of the respective module/week). Each initial thread must include
a mínimum of 7 sources in addition to the Bible, and peer replies must include the integration of
at least 3 peer-reviewed source citations and scripture, in current APA format, outlined in each
respective Discussion Board rubric. Each thread and reply must integrate at least 1 biblical
principle.
This course utilizes the Post-First feature in all Discussion Board Forums. This means you will
only be able to read and interact with your classmates’ threads after you have submitted your
thread in response to the provided prompt. For additional information on Post-First,
click here for a tutorial.
Note: Students will not be permitted to attach files within the forum posts, you can copy/paste
from any Word file. Formatting consideration is provided due to the editing feature in
Blackboard, but students must attempt the best APA format as possible.
For Discussion Board Forums 1–3 (Modules 2, 4, and 6), submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET)
on Thursday of the assigned module/week, and submit your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on
Sunday of the same module/week.
For Discussion Board Forum 4 (Module 8), submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday
of Module/Week 8, and submit your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of the same
module/week.
Running Head: MANAGEMENT 1
Management
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
MANAGEMENT 2
Network Organizations
Typically, a network organization refers to units that behave like a separate larger entity,
employing different social mechanisms for coordination and control. It is also conceived as an
organization that is flexible in adapting to any changes occurring in the business environment.
Consequently, the entities that constitute a network organization are usually legally independent
though not always, while others are wholly-owned subsidiaries (Burke, 2017). Moreover, they
can be divisions within the firm but treated as separate firms that sell to outside clients. On the
contrary, environmental processes refer to actions, processes, cycles, and operations that occur
naturally in an environment with any assistance of man. For this assessment, I will discuss the
various types of network organizations that include internal, stable, dynamic, and market and
how they impact the environmental processes.
Internal Network Organization
Mainly, the internal network is a firm that sees its units as separate profit centers. The
organization may encourage its units to vend its items outside the firm as well. The primary
purpose of the firm doing this is as a result of the belief that if its units have to carry out business
operations with the set prices by the market, then they have the incentive to both reduce costs
and improve performance (Husain et al., 2016). Moreover, in an internal network organization,
the corporate headquarters acts as a broker. Furthermore, this kind of network exists in a firm
that bases itself on the basic premise of internal units' exposure to the harsh competitiveness in
the market. The firms will remain innovative and also rise to capture both market and
entrepreneurial benefits without the whole firm engaging much outsourcing. Further, each
internal unit has the power and capacity to negotiate with central units just like any outside
vendor. An excellent example of a firm that has adopted this type of network organization is the
MANAGEMENT 3
General motors. The component business of General Motors maintains independent divisions
that typically specialize in the production of the automotive system. The independent decisions
are encouraged to carry out business operations on the open market, even though they cooperate
with GM's central unit. The net outcome is greater effectiveness for the company as a whole.
Firms using this approach benefit from the provision of unique products and services produced
through specialized processes. The internal network organization greatly affect environmental
processes as described below.
How Internal Network Organization Affects Environmental Processes
Internal network organization plays a crucial role in the environmental processes. Mainly,
the organization establishes the formation of various units to increase the process of selling
products and services outside the company. Therefore, the internal network is applied in creating
new organizations by expanding units in different market ventures through favorable prices. The
creation of new organizational through the internal network is influenced by the rise of
entrepreneurs who formulate new ideas to achieve a competitive advantage in the market
(Husain et al., 2016). Internal network also impacts environmental processes by encouraging
different players to become innovative and use technological advancements to sell new products
and services in the market.
Moreover, internal network organizations influence the technological changes that
employees use to maximize available resources, make them easier in the working environment,
and increase productivity. The organization also impacts the management of assets used in the
environmental process to deliver quality products and services (Husain et al., 2016). Overall,
internal network organization has greatly influenced specialization in the business world. For
example, General Motors Company is one of the prominent global corporations that have
MANAGEMENT 4
benefited from internal network organization via a unique structure that enhances specialization.
In that regard, General Motors has mastered the art of creating automotive products. Thus,
embracing internal network organization is vital in bringing better changes to the environmental
processes.
Stable Network Organization
A stable network consists of a central firm whose role is outsourcing much of its
operations to other firms. For instance, at BMW, the firm outsources sixty-five percent of the
general production cost of a vehicle. Although the company does not own its vendor companies
outright, it ensures that stable relationships with them are maintained and may make financial
investments in these firms where appropriate (Kenis & Raab, 2020). Consequently, the central
organization has a lasting relationship with suppliers. In that regard, the suppliers can gain access
to the firm's computer system, and again, they may attend sessions, especially when the firm is
conducting private planning meetings. Moreover, the company possesses several alliances, long
term contracts, joint ventures, etc. going with various companies. Another example is Dell, that
has a long-lasting relationship with Intel for processers. The stable network organization greatly
affect environmental processes as described below.
How Stable Network Organization Affects Environmental Processes
A stable network organization has affected environmental processes in several ways.
First, it has propelled the central organization to establish new businesses. In most cases, a stable
network organization operates through the outsourcing of resources to facilitate the production of
products and services. However, changes in environmental dynamics, an increase in the cost of
outsources, trade barriers, and other underlying factors may limit outsourcing. This issue may
affect organizational performance and business continuity (Kenis & Raab, 2020). In that regard,
MANAGEMENT 5
organizations are forces to establish new organizations within the central organization to provide
products and services that would only be accessed through external outsourcing. Outsourcing is
embraced in a stable network organization, thereby impacting environmental processes by
improving trust between organizations, intrafirm teamwork, and interfirm cooperation.
The network organization impacts how different firms interact through expertise,
information, technology, and asset. Thus, this network affects environmental processes by
empowering various stakeholders to become innovative. Moreover, stable network organization
also impact ecological changes in how organizations operate (Kenis & Raab, 2020). For
example, BMW is a company that has implemented this network to bring positive environmental
changes. Through this network, BMW has manufactured new electric vehicles that do not emit
greenhouse gases. In that regard, this network has positively encouraged organizations to
preserve the ecosystem through innovativeness and flexibility in production processes and
systems. Thus, organizations using this network have recorded remarkable ecological and
technological changes.
Dynamic Network Organization
In this type of network organization, outsourcing is more paramount. Typically, an
integrator company identifies and then brings together assets owned by other firms. An integrator
is a convenient downstream player with core competence in comprehending the market's general
situation. Moreover, less emphasis is placed on discovering companies to service the central
organization only. Again, partnerships with vendors are not often. The central organization also
focuses on contracts for most other functions (Cocieru et al., 2020). For instance, Nike Inc. is an
excellent example of a dynamic network with its only marketing and R & D functions. Again,
this type of network organization is most common in motion pictures, biotech, toys, and fashion
MANAGEMENT 6
industries. Other examples include Reebok, whose primary focus is redesigning strengths and
outsourcing the rest. The main focus of the network organization is retailing strength, and
although it coordinates everything else, it also outsources most of the other operation. The
dynamic network organization greatly affect environmental processes as described below.
How Dynamic Network Organization Affects Environmental Processes
The impact of dynamic network organizations on environmental processes is more potent
than in the stable network organization. Dynamic network organization specialized in
outsourcing by integrating assets of other organizations. This approach has significantly affected
the working environment of various organizations. Therefore, the network organization has
resulted in the organization's transparency of environmental processes (Cocieru et al., 2020). The
components of the stable network have embraced the use of an essential structure that enhances
the engagement of different firms through external schedules, routines, and procedures that
facilitates the entry of new organizations into the industry.
More significantly, the network has impacted the environmental process through a
cooperative model that has influence practices and operations of organizations when outsourcing
products and services. Although dynamic network organization is unexplored and relatively
young, it has impacted technological changes in various sectors such as the military. Thus,
changes in technology via this network organization have influenced control and command of
the operational environment. It has also impacted these processes by creating new dynamic
network-based measures for control and command context.
Besides, the network organization has affected social changes in the environment through
cognitive measures such as social network distance. The network organization has impacted
leadership in the environmental processes by identifying unexpected leaders. For example, it is
MANAGEMENT 7
used in the military to identify leaders such as operational officers, commanders, executive
officers, and intelligence officers. Biotech industries are associated with the preservation of the
ecosystem. In that regard, a dynamic network organization has resulted in changes in the
ecological processes through biotechnology's role (Cocieru et al., 2020). Mainly, the biotech
industry has helped minimize the environmental impact through low carbon dioxide emissions,
conservation of fossil fuels, and the use of low fuel-powered machines. Overall, it has enhanced
sustainability by creating a mutual relationship between people and the environment.
Market Network Organization
This is the fourth type of network organization. In this type of network organization,
there is no lead player to coordinate the others but rather is a collection of various companies
trading in the market fall into a stable pattern of correlation that slowly becomes solidified. In
that regard, members of this kind of network organization may not be cognizant that they have
fallen into this pattern (Liu & Yang, 2019). Such organizations can be termed as natural
subassemblies of the economy. An example of a market network is the Angel List that connects
the Angel investors with individuals searching for jobs in a start-up firm. A good market network
organization should possess the following features:
It should focus on complex services
Typically, clients use market networks to handle complex projects instead of making a
buy-sell transaction. For instance, event planning or house redesign requires an active
engagement as well as a long partnership as compared to buying of new attires in another market
place.
It should increase the transaction speed as well as customer satisfaction
MANAGEMENT 8
Mainly, market networks make it much easier to form alliances by offering the correct
software. In that regard, the instruments enhance the transaction velocity for the two parties,
streamline the payment procedure, and increase the close rate of proposals (Liu & Yang, 2019).
Moreover, the instrument makes the working process more efficient hence leaving no room for
miscommunication.
It should enhance active communication between the service provider and customer
Typically, it is imperative to maintain a close alliance between the client and the service
provider. The projects take a pretty long time to complete, hence taking more time for the two
parties to sort out all the required details.
It should allow free flow of referrals
It is not easy to entrust a corporate party to a specialist. In that regard, the organization
should gather lots of recommendations from other companies to get the right event planner (Liu
& Yang, 2019). Positive feedback from a happy client can bring the organization a free flow of
referrals, thereby allowing the firm to lower its acquisition costs.
It should recognize the significance of each contractor and client
Usually, when it comes to offering multiple services, each customer is unique, and so are
the specialists they associate with. Moreover, contractors have particular requirements, and in
this case, each specialist brings exceptional ideas, experience, and opinions to the table. The
organization must identify what can help in getting additional profits. The market network
organization greatly affect environmental processes as described below.
How Market Network Organization Affects Environmental Processes
Market network organization has also affected the environmental processes in several
ways. First, it has influenced the formation of a new organization because it creates a platform
MANAGEMENT 9
where different stakeholders can send and receive feedback. Therefore, the demand for new
products and services are discussed in the market network organization that encourages new
investors to fill the market gap. It also impacts environmental processes by bringing
technological changes (Pagani & Pardo, 2017). Mainly, the network organization involves a
collection of various organizations that operate in the market.
Geographical distance has been addressed through technological processes such as E-
marketing and E-commerce that have been empowered through a market network organization.
For example, it is easy to order a product overseas and complete the entire transaction using
technological processes created through a market network organization. The collection of
organizations through the network organization impacts ecological processes through corporate
social responsibility (Stewart & Tyler, 2019). Thus, organizations would integrate their strategies
to bring changes in society through the provision of water, electricity, education, and other
aspects of corporate social responsibility. The network organization has also resulted in
globalization, deregulation, and market competition.
MANAGEMENT 10
References
Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Cocieru, O. C., Katz, M., & McDonald, M. A. (2020). Understanding Interactions in a
Classroom-As-Organization Using Dynamic Network Analysis. Journal of Experiential
Education, 43(1), 5-20.
Husain, Z., Dayan, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2016). The impact of networking on
competitiveness via organizational learning, employee innovativeness, and innovation
process: A mediation model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40,
15-28.
Kenis, P., & Raab, J. (2020). Back to the future: Using organization design theory for effective
organizational networks. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(2),
109-123.
Liu, H. M., & Yang, H. F. (2019). Managing network resource and organizational capabilities to
create competitive advantage for SMEs in a volatile environment. Journal of Small
Business Management, 57(sup2), 155-171.
Pagani, M., & Pardo, C. (2017). The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business
network. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 185-192.
Stewart, J., & Tyler, M. E. (2019). Bridging organizations and strategic bridging functions in
environmental governance and management. International Journal of Water Resources
Development, 35(1), 71-94.
25 minutes ago
Stacie Hawley
DB 6
CO LL AP SE
The term network can be used in a multitude of ways, each with a distinct meaning. In its
simplest form, a network is a series of nodes or ties and the relationships between them (Scott &
Davis, 2015). In reality, a network is much more complex and can be used to describe the
relationships between a multitude of things, such as organizations, computer systems, social
websites and terrorist organizations. While similar to an open system in that it may either rely on
outside elements or assume some of their characteristics a network is not a stand-alone entity.
Network Analysis
As in any organization, networks have levels that should be considered to understand
how the it fits into the organization and considers other members. There are common threads
between the sociological and psychological theory in looking at network theory. The ego
network considers the individual and their direct contacts, such as your immediate family (Scott
& Davis, 2015). Direct contact with individuals can shape who we are and how we interact with
others outside of our immediate social circle, especially when contact can include in person and
online communications. A recent study conducted looked at the ego network of academics
reviewing in person and online contacts. The professor’s specific area of study was a
differentiating factor in the study, where social science professors had larger networks with a
higher percentage of reciprocity of contacts and exchange of data (Jordan, 2019). Academics
that focus on the study of humanities are more likely to be open to exchanging information and
furthering discussions than those that focused on engineering or similar disciplines.
The overall network considers all the participants in the life of an individual, from the
immediate close contacts to the random people they encounter on a daily basis, showing how
dense and diverse a person’s social circle really is (Scott & Davis, 2015). The final phase
considers the individual’s overall position within the network. In other words, is the individual
the center of their social circle or are they on the periphery. A study of high-tech companies
found that those in the center of the social network were often more innovative and
technologically advanced (Li, et al., 2019). As in life, the closer you are to the center of the
social circle the more influence you have on other members and those around you.
The Ties that Bind
The world is interconnected in both tangible and intangible ways. As Christians, we are
tied through our faith in God and dedication to living a Christian lifestyle. This can provide a
comfort in a storm, especially during times of stress and confusion. Networks can tie members
together, through formal memberships in organizations, such as your church or other religious
group, providing a tangible link to others of similar beliefs. Our faith in God may be an
intangible tie but can often manifest in tangible ways as we show our love and support to those in
our area, demonstrating God’s desire for us to share his word and love with others. Close friends
who attend the same congregation are more likely to frequently attend services as they can share
time with close friends and family, while strengthening faith (Todd, et al., 2020).
Ties strengthen organizations and build relationships. As we read 1Kings 7:18 “And he
made the pillars, and two rows round about upon one network, to cover the chapiters that were
upon the top, with pomegranates; and so did he for the other chapiter ( King James Bible,
1769/2017, 1 Kings 7:18). Like the pillars of a building or our faith the stronger the ties
that bind us to our congregation, family or faith, the stronger the organization is (Merida,
2105). Christians that can be strong in their faith can build up other members of the
community and the world around them, sharing the love of the lord as they go.
Environmental Changes to Organizations
The world does not exist in a vacuum. We interact with people, organizations and
networks of every type in every interaction we engage in. Working with others has allowed
organizations to become more productive, as we can exchange information with others which
allows consideration of new perspectives and points of view. As relationships develop between
individuals or other organizations trust in each other is built, laying the groundwork for existing
organizations and relationships to grow and change (Tobia-Miersch, 2017). Change is essential
to relationships and encourages learning and growth. As our environments change and we are
exposed to new thoughts and ideas, growth and change is inevitable.
Personal Perspectives
The last few weeks have been difficult for my family, and I have learned how important
faith, trust and networks are to survival and maintaining sanity, especially as we navigate the
current situation in the world. My youngest nephew recently had a liver transplant, which would
not have been possible without the fund raising efforts of our town, strength of my family as we
rallied together to make sure Reed and my sister in law (his living donor ) had everything they
needed to focus on his care and simply getting better. As with any major surgery, there were
minor setbacks, unexpected infections and the like, but Reed has finally turned a corner, and he
is expected to get out the pediatric ICU early next week and leave the hospital later in the
week. We are praying he won’t spend his fourth birthday in a hospital.
One final test of faith and sanity is how quickly friends, family and virtual strangers rally
is when you are faced with a fire in your home. Early Tuesday morning, we awoken by a loud
knock on our door that the apartment below ours was on fire and everyone had to evacuate. As
we stood on the front steps, watching the lights of the fire trucks and rescue vehicles bounce off
of cars, I was reminded how lucky we were that we got out and had time to grab our pets and
some essential personal items. God answered our prayers that everyone got out of the building,
including pets and while one apartment was destroyed, most only experienced smoke
damage. My in-laws provided us with a place to stay for the night (and still continue to do so)
and as we surveyed the damage in the aftermath, we are incredibly lucky. Faith in God provided
answered prayers for health and strength as we navigate the aftermath of replacing our
belongings, which considering the alternative, isn’t a bad case to be in.
References:
Jordan, K. (2019). Separating and Merging Professional and Personal Selves Online: The
Structure and Processes that Shape Academics’ Ego-Networks on Academic Social
Networking Sites and Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science
and Technology, 70(8), 830-842. doi:10.1002/asi.24170
King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/
(Original work published 1769)
Li, M., Xiao, F., Cheng, Y., Xie, B., Liu, C., & Xu, B. (2019). Exploring the Relationship
Between Network Position and Innovation Performance: Evidence From a Social
Network Analysis of High and New Tech Companies From a Less-Developed Area in
China. Chinese Management Studies, 14(1), 93-111. doi:10.1108/CMS-10-2018-0717
Merida, T. (2015). Christ-centered exposition: Exalting Jesus in 1 & 2 Kings. Nashville, TN:
B&H Publishing Group.
Scott, W. R. Davis, G.F (2015). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open
Systems Perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
Tobia-Miersch, Y. (2017). Beyond Trust: Towards a Practice-based Understanding of
Governing “Network Organizations”. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(2),
437-498. doi:10.1007/s10997-016-9351
Todd, N.R., Blevins, E.j, & Yi, J. (2020). A Social Network Analysis of Friendship and
Spiritual Support in a Religious Congregation. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 65(1-2), 107-124. doi:10.1002.ajcp.12359
2 days ago
Douglas Allen
Allen_D-BUSI735_Module_6-forum3disc COLLAPSE
Organizing the Environment – Networking – DB Forum 3
Douglas R. Allen
Doctor of Business Administration, Liberty University
BUSI 735-B01: Understanding the Organization
Dr. Patrick Cline
16 June 2020
Organizing the Environment - Networking
Organizations represent all aspects of society, from businesses working for profit, social groups
working to make the world a better place, professional and trade associations, churches, universities, sports
clubs, health management, governments, and a host of other entities gathered together particular purpose.
Due to the large volume of organizations in society, a better description of a population may come from the
organizations within the population instead of the individuals (Ahrne, Brunsson, & Seidi, 2016). Since
organizations represent society, it makes sense to study the organization as a unit, understanding the origin,
the survival, the relationships with other organizations, and the demise.
Another topic addressed in the discussion of understanding organizations is networking. Networking
in organizations explains the relationships between different entities, to accomplish objectives. Just as people
make personal connections to advance careers of for purposes of social prowess, organizations make similar
type connections. In some cases, networks lead to alliances, which establish strategic relationships. The
discussion of networks includes a cursory overview of networking as a concept and then proceeds to
illustrate how networking applies to organizations.
Organizations and Populations
Studying of organizations varies significantly based on the specialist conducting the research. For
example, economists, sociologists, and psychologists all view organizations from a different perspective and
account for what they do accordingly. The economist explains organizations with the framework of
supply/demand, whereas the sociologist focus is on the cultural or social aspects of the organization, and the
psychologist focuses on the individual. Each perspective explains one subset of an organization, whereas an
ecological approach studies all members of the population and evaluates periods of information versus a
single time (Scott & Davis, 2016). The ecological perspective groups organizations together to explain origins,
survival, and death.
The Origin of Organizations
All organizations share similarities, such as beginning with a purpose or common objective attracting
people. The objectives may range from selfish motives, such as profits, or for more just causes like a charity,
but either way, there is purpose. The depiction of an organization beginning in modern times seems like a
Hollywood production with the lead actor, or entrepreneur creating an idea that both makes money and
serves a cause. Unlike psychology, ecology accepts the importance of the individual, but it recognizes other
advantages or leverages such as networks, knowledge, and resources in the establishment of an organization
(Scott & Davis, 2016).
Networks
Organizations start with crucial networks. Networking seems like a modern concept, but consider an
organization started in 1903 by a man named Henry Ford. With an eighth-grade education, Henry Ford joined
Edison Illuminating Company and quickly became personal friends with names such as Edison, Firestone,
Harding, Burbank, and Burroughs (Marilyn, 2016). Those names represent some of the most famous people
of the early 1900s, and all of them personally connected with Henry Ford. The Ford Motor Company exists
today as a premier organization started by an individual with a little help from some big names.
Knowledge
When a business begins, the assumption is that the entrepreneur possesses some extraordinary
technical knowledge. However, in reality, the knowledge necessary to start an organization includes
understanding business and people, and what is required to survive, and the ability to manage the available
resources. The knowledge necessary to start an organization includes the skills and information to bring the
networking, the business, and the people together to create a product or deliver a service (Siemienaiak &
Rembiasz, 2019). Steve Jobs, a name familiar to most, founded the computer company Apple, and to date, is
one of the most profitable businesses on the market. Steve Jobs knowledge profoundly impacted society, not
due to technology, but rather the knowledge of understanding how to motivate people such as a not so
familiar name, Stephen Wozniak. Jobs put the right people in play and raised capital to create the Apple
Organization (Toma & Marinescu, 2013).
Resources
Access is not a common word when thinking of starting an organization, but it is absolutely a
necessity. Access to capital, labor, equipment, and other resources is a necessity for beginning not only an
organization, but also sustainment. Access may come from the network connections providing capital, or the
knowledge of the entrepreneur may find other sources to provide access to the crucial elements to begin an
organization.
The origin of an organization combines both tangible and intangible skills to become operational.
Organizations also start as duplicates of existing organizations, which requires tapping into an existing
population, leaning on existing structures, and building a newer version of an old model. The second type of
organizational startup is an innovative idea that introduces new knowledge or technology and creates a new
population. Innovation disrupts current organizational models and, in many cases, leads to the demise of
existing operations. The following sections address these concerns as it relates to survival and death of
existing organizations.
Survival and Death of Organizations
The principles for understanding organizations through ecology comes from the natural selection
theories of Charles Darwin (Scott & Davis, 2016). Natural selection addresses organism’s response to the
external environment, leading to another theory of Darwin’s, survival of the fittest. If an organism does not
respond appropriately to a change in the environment or evolve, the chance of survival diminishes. If an
organization fails to respond appropriately to changes in the environment, or more commonly, fails to
recognize the need to respond, death is imminent. The following paragraphs present what organizations must
implement to remain a going concern.
Past Success is the Enemy of Future Success
Contentment, or commitment to an existing business model because of past success, is the first step
toward reducing the capability of an organization to survive. In retail, depending on an older business model
is the primary reason new businesses remove existing companies from the game (Kallmann, 1989). Large
retailers keep failing, Sears, Kmart, JC Penny, Montgomery Ward, established retailers with phenomenal
balance sheets gone, forever. These firms and a host of others in various industries either ignored changes or
waited to react after new competition such as Amazon and Walmart began.
Imprinting explains the stubbornness of companies to modify old models. The idea is established
operations tend to resist changing from the model that began the organization (Scott & Davis, 2016). Instead
of innovating and leading the industry, companies resist the change and rest on the model or concepts that
brought the initial success. Imprinting is not specific to established business, but also newer organizations; it
is best defined as a resistance to change, which is a difficult proposition for humans and organizations.
Adaptation – The Ability to Pivot
An organization's ability to survive is in direct relation to organizational adaptability (Boin, Kuipers,
& Steenbergen, 2010). Technology provides a continuous test of organizations' ability to pivot or adapt to
changes. New technology is a two-edged sword, developing new businesses while rendering other businesses
useless (Scott & Davis, 2016). In manufacturing, technology is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a
standard operating tool required to compete globally (Tyre & Hauptman, 1992). Technology changes rapidly,
resulting in organizations resisting upgrading or understanding the accounting concept of relevant cost when
deciding to upgrade or change to the latest modification. The adaptation is not only about change, but the
management's ability to recognize changes that may impact the strategic position of the organization or its
position in comparison to the competition.
Unfortunately, the market quickly renders judgment on organizations that respond incorrectly to the
environment. Not adapting to change quickly enough or failing to alter a business model to reflect the current
environment leads to the death of an organization.
Networking
Networking plays a crucial role in the success of organizations assisting with obtaining objectives by
“creating, cultivating, and utilizing relationships” (Gibson, Hardy, & Buckley, 2014, p. 144). Supply chains
provide a realistic illustration of networking within an organization as the various companies work together,
sharing information, working for the same customer, and depending on each node within the network to
perform. The mutual dependence points to the necessity of networks within organizations.
Overview of a Network
A network represents nodes connected via lines or relationships. A person connecting with another
establishes a network as each node is connected. As the network grows through connections, organizations
posture to establish prominence or status within the network opening more opportunities for creating new
networks. An organization searching for resources may join a network with the intent of connecting to a
specific supplier or connecting and working to gain leverage in another relationship. Networks provide
endless opportunities for organizations to expand, determine more efficient manners of operation, and
develop strategic alliances.
Expansion and Operations
Networking is another tool employed by organizations in the battle of survival. Business networks
create opportunities for organizations to learn or acquire other businesses, which may add value to a process,
or open up doors for new business (Shcoonjans, Cauwenberge, & Bauwhede, 2013). As the network ties grow
stronger, the ability to leverage relationships enables organizations to not only look to networks to growth,
but also for strategic information related to trends and in certain situations competitors. Management of
networks enhances performance of organizations at all levels of operations and is becoming a primary source
of operational intelligence for firms (Shcoonjans, Cauwenberge, & Bauwhede, 2013).
Strategic Alliances
Organizations find it difficult to efficiently manage all aspects of an operation, despite the demand for
excellence from customers. The billing process, information technology, logistics, manufacturing, accounting,
and a host of other previously internal components of operations continue to increase in complexity, while
customer expectations demand performance. The environment leaves organizations struggling to perform,
but through strategic alliances, organizations can manage customer expectations and remain
profitable. Networking allows firms to reduce transaction costs by identifying critical suppliers, gaining
competitive advantage through relationships from networking, and learning or gaining knowledge about
industry and competition (Gulati, 1998).
Christian Worldview
Organizations from an ecological perspective must adapt to changes within an environment to remain
viable. The idea seems logical, practical, and the organization's position is a reasonable approach to ensure
survival. God does not seem to concur with the logic when speaking to His children, explicitly advising
against conformance, "and be not conformed to this world, but be ye transformed by the renewing of your
mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God" (Romans 12:2, King James
Version).
God says, "And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard,
Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts" (Mark 4:15, KJV). Jesus
uses a parable about seed to explain His word, and how Satan removes His word, not letting it establish roots.
Today, Satan succeeds by removing God and His word from all of society. God's word is relevant, compelling,
and applicable in all situations, business, and personal. As Christians, God's word must provide direction even
in the professional environment. Christians must honor God in every aspect of life.
With that said, how does one balance the non-conformity God speaks of and the logical ecological
approaches organizations implement for survival? As a Christian professional owning, consulting or
managing a business, how does one merge or balance a worldview that openly defies God and His Word, but
still operate a business that survives? As always, God provides the answer in His word, "Finally, brethren,
whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are
pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report, if there be any virtue, and if there
be any praise, think on these things" (Philippians 4:8, KJV). The final words of the verse, "think on these
things, " come after Paul admonishes the Philippians on spending careful prayer and searching for God's
answer and direction. The answer to the balance comes from not looking at one situation and deciding if
conformance is the right answer, but instead living a life of prayer and devotion, which enables Christians to
then, "think on these things."
Businesses all across the county in the name of organizational success adapt, accept, and encourage
direct defiance of God's word. The job of the Christian within the business is not to conform, but rather make
decisions ("think on these things") based on the relationship shared with God. The balance comes in the form
of doing everything, including operating a business with one objective, "whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or
whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God" (I Corinthians 10:31, KJV).
References
Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidi, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond
organizations. European Management Journal , 34 (2) 93-101.
Boin, A., Kuipers, S., & Steenbergen, M. (2010). The life and death of public organizations: A question of
institutional design? Goverance, 23 (3) 385-410.
Gibson, C., Hardy, J., & Buckley, R. (2014). Understanding the role of networking in organizations. Career
Development International, 19 (2) 146-161.
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (4) 293-317.
Kallmann, E. (1989). Reasons for failure fo some established business. Gifts & Decorative Accessories,
90 (5) 42.
Marilyn, D. (2016). The case of Ford Motor Company . A Journal of Engineering Technology, 33 (1) 10-21.
Merida, T. (2015). Christ centered exposition commentary: Exalting Jesus in Kings 1 & 2. Nashville, TN:
B&H Publishing .
Scott, R. W., & Davis, G. F. (2016). Organizations and organizing . New York, NY: Routledge.
Shcoonjans, B., Cauwenberge, P., & Bauwhede, H. (2013). Formal business networking and SME growth. Small
Business Economics, 41 (1) 169-181.
Siemienaiak, P., & Rembiasz, M. (2019). Importance of knowledge in the process of shaping the
entreprenueurial attitudes of young people. MSE, 290 (13010) 2-6.
Toma, S.-G., & Marinescu, P. (2013). Steve Jobs and modern leadership . Change and Leadership , 17 260-
269.
Tyre, M., & Hauptman, O. (1992). Effectiveness of organizational responses to technological change in the
production process. Organization Science, 3 (3) 301-320.
Running Head: COMPUTER SCIENCE 1
Computer Science
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
COMPUTER SCIENCE 2
Response to Douglas Allen
I agree that organizations represent every aspect of a society ranging from various
businesses operating to gain profit, social groups working to make the world a better place for
professionals, government, etc. I concur with the view on the definition of a population which
comes from organizations within a community. The meaning of networking has also been
explained well with a purpose that shows its role in linking different entities to accomplish set
objectives. I also concur with the fact that networks lead to alliances that lead to the formation of
strategic relationships.
I agree with the view that studying organizations differ mainly from specialist research
since every specialist, be it sociologist or psychologist, views organizations from a different
perspective. Moreover, every aspect explains a single subset of the organization. I also concur
with the view that the ecological approach is concerned with the study of a population and assess
periods of information versus a single time. The environmental perspective plays a crucial role in
explaining the origin of a community, survival, and death.
More importantly, I agree that organizations start with crucial networks and that
networking is not a modern concept. This is because some organizations began many years back;
for instance, one started by Henry Ford in 1903 and joined the Edison illuminating firm
connecting with various individuals such as Firestone and Edison. This critically shows that
networking started a long time ago.
Conversely, I agree that when a business starts, there is an assumption in which an
entrepreneur possesses some technical knowledge. In that regard, knowledge is essential as it
assists the entrepreneur or, preferably, a company to comprehend business and people.
Consequently, I agree access to resources such as capital, labor, and equipment is imperative
COMPUTER SCIENCE 3
when starting an organization. Accessing such resources may require networking as the
organization may acquire knowledge on how to access the funds.
Moreover, I agree that the origin of an organization requires both tangible and intangible
skills to become operational. Again, every organization must implement various aspects to keep
them going. In that regard, a good example is a natural selection by Charles Darwin that
addresses the response of an organism to the external environment. In such a case, it has to
develop some survival tactics to survive. Hence organizations should acknowledge that past
success is the enemy of future success. Organizations should not resist changes or any model that
brought initial success. Also, an organization should have a direct connection to organizational
adaptability. As such, technology plays an imperative role in providing a continuous test for a
firm’s ability to adapt to new changes. Failure to modify to a change quickly or alter a business
model results in the death of an organization.
I also agree that networking plays a significant role in achieving success in an
organization. The supply chain is a good example that illustrates networking within an
organization as different firms work together, working for the same clients as well as sharing of
information. The mutual dependence among organizations points to the necessity of networks
within companies. Networking also aids firms in the battle of survival and is seen when business
networks create opportunities for companies to learn and acquire business ideas that may not
only add value to starting other businesses but also open doors for successful companies. I also
concur that organizations find it is challenging to manage all aspects of their business operations
efficiently. As such, they should embrace networking as it enables it to gain a competitive
advantage as well as reduce transaction costs by identifying critical suppliers. I agree with the
COMPUTER SCIENCE 4
bible verse Romans 12:2 that attributes the significance of networking by not being confirmed by
the world but be transformed by renewing their minds.
Running Head: COMPUTER SCIENCE 1
Computer Science
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
COMPUTER SCIENCE 2
Response to Stacie Hawley
I agree that a network is a vital component in the organization because it is highly
applicable in various areas. Mainly, a network consists of the relationship between ties or nodes.
It is a critical attribute in the conventional world, especially in terrorist organizations. I also
agree that a network can be integrated into social websites, computer systems, and organizations.
This study has also enlightened me that a network can be compared to an open system that
utilizes external elements and other characteristics. Thus, the study attempts to explain how a
network can be categorized as an internal network organization that operates through an internal
network structure.
I also acknowledge the research on network analysis on how organizations use networks
to determine processes. I agree that every organization uses a specific network organization
structure that fits the organization and integrates the relationship with other members. Therefore,
a belief that the study aims to demonstrate how companies use stable network organizations to
perform their operations through outsourcing. Organizations integrated through networks use
common threads that empower a network theory through psychological and sociological theory.
Moreover, I agree with the approach of how the author has demonstrated network analysis in
terms of participants. However, It would be better to identify how the overall network affects the
participants in different processes such as technology, business, and the environment. Thus, the
impact of networks on individuals is in the center of the social network, which results in
innovation and technological advancements.
More importantly, I agree that religion plays a crucial role in determining a network
organization. Thus, the tangible and intangible approaches make the world an interconnected
feature through religious beliefs such as Christianity. The author has used concrete examples to
COMPUTER SCIENCE 3
demonstrate the ties that bind. For instance, I agree that Christians are tied through faith in God,
a form of a network between God and His people. Therefore, a network can impact human
psychological processes because the network between God and Christian can eliminate
confusion and stress during trying times. Besides, the approach used by the author to
demonstrate how religious groups are linked with their faith in an excellent example of how a
network operates in organizations.
The choice of Biblical reading used in the study is also excellent. Quoting 1Kings 7:18 to
demonstrate how network nodes or ties strengthen organizations and relationships is a perfect
example of how the Bible recommends networking. The Bible has used words such as pillars to
demonstrate that a network is a pillar of society. For Christians, I believe a network organization
is like a pillar the builds a strong relationship between God and people. Thus, Christian who
choose the best network has stronger ties that bind them with God, family, friends, and other
stakeholders in society.
Furthermore, I acknowledge that a network organization brings environmental changes
that enhance interaction between different networks, people, and organizations. I agree that a
network is an essential tool used by organizations to improve employee productivity and
relationships. The author has also mentioned a crucial point on how a network facilitates the
exchange of information among stakeholders, thereby resulting in trust, teamwork, innovation,
and transparency. Therefore, I agree that change is integral, and a network is a primary pillar that
empowers people to develop new ideas and thoughts to bring positive change and growth.
Lastly, I can relate to how the author felt when the family was having a difficult time.
Therefore, I am happy because the author has mentioned the roled by faith, trust, and networks to
strengthen the family by overcoming challenges facing the family. Therefore, I agree that a
COMPUTER SCIENCE 4
network is paramount not only within the organization but also in families. A network can bring
people together to navigate health problems.
Running Head: BUSINESS 1
Business
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
BUSINESS 2
Response to Douglas Allen
I agree that organizations represent every aspect of a society ranging from various
businesses operating to gain profit, social groups working to make the world a better place for
professionals, government, etc. I concur with the view on the definition of a population which
comes from organizations within a community (Ahrne et al., 2016). The meaning of networking
has also been explained well with a purpose that shows its role in linking different entities to
accomplish set objectives. I also concur with the fact that networks lead to alliances that lead to
the formation of strategic relationships.
I agree with the view that studying organizations differ mainly from specialist research
since every specialist, be it sociologist or psychologist, views organizations from a different
perspective. Moreover, every aspect explains a single subset of the organization. I also concur
with the view that the ecological approach is concerned with the study of a population and assess
periods of information versus a single time (Boin et al., 2010). The environmental perspective
plays a crucial role in explaining the origin of a community, survival, and death.
More importantly, I agree that organizations start with crucial networks and that
networking is not a modern concept (Gibson et al., 2014). This is because some organizations
began many years back; for instance, one started by Henry Ford in 1903 and joined the Edison
illuminating firm connecting with various individuals such as Firestone and Edison. This
critically shows that networking started a long time ago.
Conversely, I agree that when a business starts, there is an assumption in which an
entrepreneur possesses some technical knowledge. In that regard, knowledge is essential as it
assists the entrepreneur or, preferably, a company to comprehend business and people (Marilyn,
2016). Consequently, I agree access to resources such as capital, labor, and equipment is
BUSINESS 3
imperative when starting an organization. Accessing such resources may require networking as
the organization may acquire knowledge on how to access the funds.
Moreover, I agree that the origin of an organization requires both tangible and intangible
skills to become operational. Again, every organization must implement various aspects to keep
them going. In that regard, a good example is a natural selection by Charles Darwin that
addresses the response of an organism to the external environment. In such a case, it has to
develop some survival tactics to survive (Siemienaiak & Rembiasz, 2019). Hence organizations
should acknowledge that past success is the enemy of future success. Organizations should not
resist changes or any model that brought initial success. Also, an organization should have a
direct connection to organizational adaptability (Shcoonjans et al., 2013). As such, technology
plays an imperative role in providing a continuous test for a firm’s ability to adapt to new
changes. Failure to modify to a change quickly or alter a business model results in the death of
an organization.
I also agree that networking plays a significant role in achieving success in an
organization. The supply chain is a good example that illustrates networking within an
organization as different firms work together, working for the same clients as well as sharing of
information. The mutual dependence among organizations points to the necessity of networks
within companies (Scott & Davis, 2016). Networking also aids firms in the battle of survival and
is seen when business networks create opportunities for companies to learn and acquire business
ideas that may not only add value to starting other businesses but also open doors for successful
companies.
I also concur that organizations find it is challenging to manage all aspects of their
business operations efficiently. As such, they should embrace networking as it enables it to gain
BUSINESS 4
a competitive advantage as well as reduce transaction costs by identifying critical suppliers. I
agree with the bible verse Romans 12:2 that attributes the significance of networking by not
being confirmed by the world but be transformed by renewing their minds (Merida, 2015).
BUSINESS 5
References
Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidi, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond
organizations. European Management Journal, 34 (2) 93-101.
Boin, A., Kuipers, S., & Steenbergen, M. (2010). The life and death of public organizations: A
question of institutional design? Governance, 23 (3) 385-410.
Gibson, C., Hardy, J., & Buckley, R. (2014). Understanding the role of networking in
organizations. Career Development International, 19 (2) 146-161.
Marilyn, D. (2016). The case of Ford Motor Company. A Journal of Engineering Technology,
33 (1) 10-21.
Merida, T. (2015). Christ centered exposition commentary: Exalting Jesus in Kings 1 &
2. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing.
Scott, R. W., & Davis, G. F. (2016). Organizations and organizing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Shcoonjans, B., Cauwenberge, P., & Bauwhede, H. (2013). Formal business networking and
SME growth. Small Business Economics, 41 (1) 169-181.
Siemienaiak, P., & Rembiasz, M. (2019). Importance of knowledge in the process of shaping the
entrepreneurial attitudes of young people. MSE, 290 (13010) 2-6.
Running Head: BUSINESS 1
Business
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
BUSINESS 2
Response to Stacie Hawley
I agree that a network is a vital component in the organization because it is highly
applicable in various areas. Mainly, a network consists of the relationship between ties or nodes.
It is a critical attribute in the conventional world, especially in terrorist organizations. I also
agree that a network can be integrated into social websites, computer systems, and organizations
(Jordan, 2019). This study has also enlightened me that a network can be compared to an open
system that utilizes external elements and other characteristics. Thus, the study attempts to
explain how a network can be categorized as an internal network organization that operates
through an internal network structure.
I also acknowledge the research on network analysis on how organizations use networks
to determine processes. I agree that every organization uses a specific network organization
structure that fits the organization and integrates the relationship with other members. Therefore,
a belief that the study aims to demonstrate how companies use stable network organizations to
perform their operations through outsourcing. Organizations integrated through networks use
common threads that empower a network theory through psychological and sociological theory
(Li et al., 2019). Moreover, I agree with the approach of how the author has demonstrated
network analysis in terms of participants. However, It would be better to identify how the overall
network affects the participants in different processes such as technology, business, and the
environment. Thus, the impact of networks on individuals is in the center of the social network,
which results in innovation and technological advancements.
More importantly, I agree that religion plays a crucial role in determining a network
organization (Tobia-Miersch, 2017). Thus, the tangible and intangible approaches make the
world an interconnected feature through religious beliefs such as Christianity. The author has
BUSINESS 3
used concrete examples to demonstrate the ties that bind. For instance, I agree that Christians are
tied through faith in God, a form of a network between God and His people. Therefore, a
network can impact human psychological processes because the network between God and
Christian can eliminate confusion and stress during trying times (Todd et al., 2020). Besides, the
approach used by the author to demonstrate how religious groups are linked with their faith in an
excellent example of how a network operates in organizations.
The choice of Biblical reading used in the study is also excellent. Quoting 1Kings 7:18 to
demonstrate how network nodes or ties strengthen organizations and relationships is a perfect
example of how the Bible recommends networking (King James Bible, 2017). The Bible has
used words such as pillars to demonstrate that a network is a pillar of society. For Christians, I
believe a network organization is like a pillar the builds a strong relationship between God and
people (Merida, 2015). Thus, Christian who choose the best network has stronger ties that bind
them with God, family, friends, and other stakeholders in society.
Furthermore, I acknowledge that a network organization brings environmental changes
that enhance interaction between different networks, people, and organizations (Scott & Davis,
2015). I agree that a network is an essential tool used by organizations to improve employee
productivity and relationships. The author has also mentioned a crucial point on how a network
facilitates the exchange of information among stakeholders, thereby resulting in trust, teamwork,
innovation, and transparency. Therefore, I agree that change is integral, and a network is a
primary pillar that empowers people to develop new ideas and thoughts to bring positive change
and growth.
Lastly, I can relate to how the author felt when the family was having a difficult time.
Therefore, I am happy because the author has mentioned the roled by faith, trust, and networks to
BUSINESS 4
strengthen the family by overcoming challenges facing the family. Therefore, I agree that a
network is paramount not only within the organization but also in families. A network can bring
people together to navigate health problems.
BUSINESS 5
References
Jordan, K. (2019). Separating and Merging Professional and Personal Selves Online: The
Structure and Processes that Shape Academics’ Ego-Networks on Academic Social
Networking Sites and Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 70(8), 830-842.doi:10.1002/asi.24170
King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/
(Original work published 1769)
Li, M., Xiao, F., Cheng, Y., Xie, B., Liu, C., & Xu, B. (2019). Exploring the Relationship
Between Network Position and Innovation Performance: Evidence From a Social
Network Analysis of High and New Tech Companies from a Less-Developed Area in
China. Chinese Management Studies, 14(1), 93-111. Doi: 10.1108/CMS-10-2018-0717
Merida, T. (2015). Christ-centered exposition: Exalting Jesus in 1 & 2 Kings. Nashville, TN:
B&H Publishing Group.
Scott, W. R. & Davis, G.F (2015). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open
Systems Perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
Tobia-Miersch, Y. (2017). Beyond Trust: Towards a Practice-based Understanding of
Governing “Network Organizations”. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(2),
437-498. Doi: 10.1007/s10997-016-9351
Todd, N.R., Blevins, E.j, & Yi, J. (2020). A Social Network Analysis of Friendship and
Spiritual Support in a Religious Congregation. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 65(1-2), 107-124. Doi: 10.1002.ajcp.12359
