1 / 10100%
Running head: MARKET STRUCTURES 1
Market Structures
Laura Coplai
Liberty University
BUSI 620-B01 LUO
February 28, 2015
MARKET STRUCTURES 2
Abstract
Market structures are either imperfect competition or perfect competition, referring to the
environment in which a firm competes in. These are monopolies, oligopolies,
monopolistic competitions, and perfect competitions. A monopoly is one market in
which there are no substitutes and entry is difficult into the market. There are four
variables for a monopoly to occur. An oligopoly is a market structure that has only a few
sellers but the products are either differentiated or homogeneous. Monopolistic
competition has elements of both a monopoly and a perfect competitor. With multiple
sellers and differentiated products, a monopolistic competitor is able to produce with
these advantages of both market structures. The final market structure is perfect
competition. Perfect competition occurs when there are many sellers and buyers,
identical products, mobility of resources, and complete knowledge of the market.
Overall, a firm must decide which market structure is best to involve themselves in. A
pure monopoly is not legal in the United States, but a natural monopoly or one enabled
by the government is. An oligopoly is uncertain in the long run analysis. A monopolistic
competitor must make sure it’s price strategy is suitable for the industry or they will stand
to lose profit. Perfect competition, however, “has never really existed” (Salvatore, 2012,
p. 374). Therefore, a firm faces a difficult task in deciding which market structure to
produce in and must base it on not only the possible consumer demand curves, but the
short and long run analysis of the market as well.
Keywords: market structures, monopoly, oligopoly, perfect competition, monopolistic
competition
MARKET STRUCTURES 3
Market Structures
Market structures are prevalent in today’s economies. These market structures are
imperfect competitions, which include monopolies, oligopolies, monopolistic
competitions, and perfect competitions. “These types of market structures or
organizations are defined in terms of the number and size of the buyers and sellers of the
product, the type of product bought and sold, the degree of mobility of resources, and the
degree of knowledge that economic agents have of prices and costs, and demand and
supply conditions” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 373). The short-run and long-run analyses are
examined to determine the equilibrium prices and quantities for all market structures.
With any economy, a firm must determine which market structure is the best to produce
in and where to earn the most profit.
Monopoly
Definition
A monopoly occurs when there is “exclusive possession of a market by a supplier
of a product or service for which there is no substitute” (Monopoly, 2012). With no close
substitutes, there must be barrier to entry of competing firms. The dominant firm effect
takes place when a monopoly is established. Based upon the early entry, cost advantages,
efficiency, and the barriers to entry, a monopoly market structure may be formed. If
smaller firms try to enter and are able to decrease the concentration between the dominant
firm and the market, this will reduce monopoly power. However, “if the dominant firms
are strengthened, then concentration and monopoly power will be increased” (Corden,
1997, p. 11).
Sources
MARKET STRUCTURES 4
Monopolies exist when four situations occur. “First, the firm may control the
entire supply of raw materials required to produce the product” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 389).
This can occur when a monopoly can control a source of raw materials, such as gas, oil,
or minerals. Secondly, the firm may use patents, copyrights, or obtain other rights that
ensure other firms will not use the production process or produce the same product.
Patents, copyrights, and trademarks all provide firms with expectations of earning a
higher return than other firms due to the innovation. “The returns that can be attributed
to innovations are the difference between the competitive and the monopoly returns
actually earned” (Meiners & Staaf, 1990). Third, a natural monopoly may occur. Natural
monopolies occur with economies of scale. An example of natural monopolies are public
utilities. When more than one firm in an industry would lead to higher costs and a
duplicate product or service, many “local governments allow a single firm to operate in
the market but regulate the price of the services provided, so as to allow the firm only a
normal return on investment” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 390). Finally, the government may
enable a monopoly. When this is done, a firm is set up as a sole distributor of a product
with regulation by the government. The government may require certain businesses to
carry licenses. Licenses for specific businesses ensure minimum standards, but also
restrict competition to only those with licenses.
Market Analysis
In order for a firm to determine if a monopoly market structure is the best
decision, the short-run and long-run demand would need to be determined. A
monopolistic firm is not a price taker, as they set the prices. The firm will face a
negatively sloped demand curve for the product they are selling. “This means that the
MARKET STRUCTURES 5
monopolist can sell more units of the product only by lowering its price” (Salvatore,
2012, p. 390). In the short run, a monopolist is also able to incur losses or break even,
depending on the level of the average total costs at the best level of output. The
monopolistic firm should aim to maximize profits and minimize losses. Overall, a
monopoly will act as a perfect competitor in the short run.
A firm is more concerned about the long run equilibrium, regardless of market
structure. By examining the long run of a monopolistic firm, the best level of output is
where the marginal revenue curve equals the long-run marginal curve. The firm will also
not product at the lowest point on the long-run average cost curve. The barriers to entry
give rise to a monopoly earning economic profits in the long run. This is only true as
long as the demand and cost curves do not change.
Oligopoly
Definition
An oligopoly is variant upon whether there are heterogeneous or homogeneous
products. The market structure, however, only has few sellers. “Barriers to entry in the
form of information costs, economies of scale, franchises, and patents appear to be
sufficient to keep out enough new competitors” (Ruffin, 2009). Oligopolists usually have
a characteristic to work interdependently, as each decision made will affect the other
firms in the industry. The high rivalry of this market structure causes a firm to think
about the pricing strategies and product differentiation.
Sources
Oligopolists have the relatively same sources as monopolies. These include
economies of scale, large capital investments, patents, loyal customers, control of the
MARKET STRUCTURES 6
entire supply of raw materials, and the government may allow only a few firms to operate
in the market. “Oligopoly power is the power to restrain competition” (Scitovsky, 1950,
p. 48). The sources of this market structure are also indicative of barriers to entry. If a
firm has the ability to operate in economies of scale, collusion is created by keeping the
number of firms in the market small. The main objective of a firm in an oligopolist
market is the ability to compete with advertising and differentiation. When consumers
are unable to judge the products, they are forced to judge the firms of the industry and
buy from the firm with the better advertising. As Scitovsky states, buyers will fall “prey
to the emotional suggestion of advertising” (1950, p. 49). This ignorance also creates a
source of power in the oligopoly market structure by fostering collusion, limiting price
competition, and creating a barrier to entry.
Market Analysis
In an oligopolist industry, the market profitability and competition in the short run
will be substantiated by five structural determinants of Porters strategic framework.
These determinants are “(1) the threat from substitute products, (2) the threat of entry, (3)
the bargaining power of buyers, (4) the bargaining power of suppliers, and (5) the
intensity of rivalry among existing competitors” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 425). In the short-
run, when these five forces are considered, an oligopolist firm will be able to earn a
profit, break even, or incur a loss. In the long run, the firm will leave the industry unless
it earns profits or breaks even. However, in the long run it is more difficult to determine
the best level of output for an oligopoly.
Monopolistic Competition
Definition and Importance
MARKET STRUCTURES 7
Monopolistic competition occurs when there are many sellers with a differentiated
product. “However, when the private good is supplied by a monopolistically competitive
industry and comes in a range of different varieties, consumers have a preference for both
quantity and variety” (Mondal, 2013, p. 394). The product differentiation can be based
on a multitude of reasons for consumers. Monopolistic competition is considered
imperfect competition due to the monopoly element of the market structure. This occurs
because the products are heterogeneous, but the power is limited with close substitutes.
However, there is some perfect competition element to the market structure as well.
There are many sellers of the heterogeneous products that are too small to affect the
others when prices are changed.
Market Analysis
A monopolistic competitor faces a highly price elastic demand curve, which
indicates the demand curve is negatively sloped. “The price elasticity of demand is
higher the smaller is the degree of product differentiation” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 397).
With a large amount of variety in the market, private firms will be able to succeed. When
the population increase, the number of differentiated products will increase. This is
because the “marginal utility of income is inversely related to the aggregate expenditure
made on the private goods,” so it will lower the marginal utility of income (Mondal,
2013, p. 379). As with other market structures, the optimal level of output is where the
marginal revenue equals the marginal cost. In the short-run, a monopolistic firm can
achieve profit, loss, and break-even.
In the long run, more firms may enter the market if firms are earning profits in the
short run. There are no barriers to entry and exit into the industries in the long run.
MARKET STRUCTURES 8
Shifting the demand curve to be more price elastic than in the short run, “each
monopolistic competitor is left with a smaller share of the market…because of the greater
range of competition that becomes available in the long run” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 399).
This may cause the firm to break even at the optimal point and incur losses at any other
point.
Perfect Competition
Definition
There are four characteristics of a perfect competition to occur as a market
structure. These include the production of homogeneous products, many buyers and
sellers, perfect mobility of resources, and the knowledge of the market conditions are
known by all agents of the market (Salvatore, 2012, p. 373). The amount of buyers and
sellers are too great to affect the prices of the products and neutralizes any conflict. With
identical products across the market, buyers are indifferent from the firms in the market.
“Perfect information is supposed to guarantee that the price is unique, while homogeneity
is supposed to ensure that this price is the only signal required for individual choices”
(Berta, Julien, & Tricou, 2012, p.11).
Market Analysis
In the short run of the market structure of perfect competition, the firm will stay
in business even if losses are incurred. This is because “the best level of output of the
firm in the short run is the one at which the firm maximizes profits or minimizes losses”
(Salvatore, 2012, p. 378). The losses, however, must not be greater than the fixed costs.
This usually occurs where the marginal cost equals the marginal revenue. In the short-
run, however, the perfectly competitive firm will have an infinitely inelastic demand
MARKET STRUCTURES 9
curve. This is because the firm is a price taker, indicating that they cannot change the
market price or they will lose customers. Therefore, the optimal point for a perfectly
competitive firm is where the demand, which equals the marginal revenue and price,
equals the marginal costs.
In the long-run, a perfectly competitive firm will produce where the price and
demand equals the marginal revenue, which equals the marginal costs. This did not
change from the short-run. However, if firms in the short run earn profits, there will be
more firms that enter because of the easy entry. While all inputs and costs are variable in
the long run, the new firms entering the market can diminish all profits from the market.
When this occurs, firms will break even and earn zero economic profits. “When a
competitive market is in long-run equilibrium, all firms produce at the lowest point on
their long-run average cost curve and break even” (Salvatore, 2012, p. 381).
Conclusion
Overall, a firm has the opportunity to be in a market structure of a monopoly,
oligopoly, monopolistic competition, or a perfect competition. There are advantages to
each market structure, but there are also disadvantages to each. If a firm believes the
government will grant the ability to be a monopoly in the United States, they should
decide to produce in that market structure. An example of a monopoly currently in force
is that of the taxi industry in New York City, where licenses are required to operate. An
oligopoly is a better decision, however, it is hard for a firm to analyze the long run.
Monopolistic competition is common in the retail and service sectors, while perfect
competition has never really existed. Therefore, it is up to a firm and their pricing
strategies to determine in which market they should produce in.
MARKET STRUCTURES 10
References
Berta, N., Julien, L. A., & Tricou, F. (2012). On perfect competition: Definitions, usages
and foundations. Cahiers d'Économie Politique, 63, 7-24. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1448818962?accountid=12085
Corden, W. M. (1997). Monopoly, market structure, and economies of scale. Trade Policy
and Economic Welfare, 1-33. doi:10.1093/0198775342.003.0007
Meiners, R. E., & Staaf, R. J. (1990). Patents, copyrights, and trademarks: Property or
monopoly?. Harvard Journal Of Law & Public Policy, 13(3), 911.
Mondal, D. (2013). Public good provision under monopolistic competition. Journal of
Public Economic Theory, 15(3), 378-396. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1373418483?accountid=12085
Monopoly. (2012). In Britannica concise encyclopedia. Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia
Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.liberty.edu:2048/login?
url=http://literati.credoreference.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu:2048/content/entry/ebco
ncise/monopoly/0
Ruffin, R. J. (2009). Oligopoly. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/189251609?accountid=12085
Salvatore, D. (2012). Managerial economics in a global economy (7th ed.). New York,
NY: Oxford University Press.
Scitovsky, T. (1950). Ignorance as a source of oligopoly power. The American Economic
Review, 40(2), 48-53. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818022
Students also viewed