lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 22, 2020
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five: Economic Consequences of Immigration
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) shares one in
four Americans can claim first, or second, generation immigrant status (Coppel, Dumont, &
Visco, 2001). Considering this, it is interesting that there is such a stronghold of negative
viewpoints on immigration policy in the United States. This week’s discussion board post
requires contemplation of the charge that immigrants flood the labor market and drive down
wages in the U.S. This is a relevant topic as current events often involve discussions on
increasing protectionist policies in the United States.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) argue the long-term consequences of immigration on
employment and wages in the United States are minimal. The researchers share data that
suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on the labor market
and wages. Furthermore, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) emphasize that while firstgeneration
immigrants are more costly than native-born citizens, second-generation immigrants (and
immigrant populations) bolster high economic contributions. The 2001 study supports the claim
that immigration into the United States helps to drive economic growth.
Additionally, Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) highlight there is no statistically
significant relationship between immigration and unemployment. However, the authors posit any
effect, or impact, on the labor market “depends on how the skills of immigrants compare with
those of nationals in the host country” (p. 14). Other attributes, or skills, that must be considered
are the “volume of the migrant population, settlement patterns…age, sex, country of origin, and
labor market experience” (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001, p. 15). Due to the complexities of
immigration, it is difficult to argue that it is a key indicator in the long run for increased
unemployment and low wages. On the contrary, in a market with a reasonable set minimum
wage, free of excessive labor protectionism; immigration creates a demand for goods and
services and a cushion in the workforce where there may be deficits.
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
References
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Natasha Noel
Liberty University
Global Economic Environment BUSI 620
Dr. Edginton
September 26, 2020
Discussion Board Forum Five Response: Economic Consequences of Immigration
Hello John,
Thank you for your discussion board post on the economic consequences of immigration.
It was interesting to read your perspective on the theoretical arguments of the Borjas (2003)
study. It inspired me to research more about the author and his background. A few factors stood
out to me. First, he seems to provide data to peddle politically tinged tropes. Secondly, most
well-known for his staunch critique on immigration, the studies have been widely criticized and
debunked; he is now a fulltime blogger (Lowenstein, 2006; Card, 2012; Caplan, n.d.). However,
once reading the 2003 study, for myself, there are certain theoretical privileges that are taken by
the author. The most obvious is the underlying assumption that immigration has to lower the
wages of host the country (Card, 2012). Card (2012) states “in a well-functioning economy…
increases in population [immigration] do not cause falling wages” (p. 211). In fact, current
literature supports the argument made by Coppel, Dumont, and Visco (2001) that the long-term
consequences of immigration on employment and wages in the United States are minimal.
Additionally, the authors highlight there is no statistically significant relationship between
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
immigration and unemployment. Quite oppositely, there are net gains in demand and the creation
of a reserve labor force.
References
Caplan, D. (n.d.) Borjas: What’s his problem. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved
from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2007/05/borjas_whats_hi.html
Card, D. (2003). Comment: The elusive search for negative wage impacts of immigration.
Retrieved from https://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/jeea2012.pdf
Coppel, J., Dumont, J., and Visco, I. (2001). Trends in immigration and economic consequences.
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 284, 1-32. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/553515678780.pdf?
expires=1600916194&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=EDB1A2A692F99A89E2C55
AF367A5DB3C
Lowenstein, R. (2006). The immigration equation. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/the-immigration-equation.html
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate you highlighting the difference between documented
and undocumented, it is interesting the types of jobs that are usually enumerated when there is a
discussion on immigration. In keeping with the tone, let's consider how many Gen X to
Gen Z's are clamoring for a job at a textile factory, farm, or seasonal cropping? Why is
McDonald's claiming a shortage in their workforce? The driving force may very well be the shift
from industry to service-based outputs in this country, but if you ask a 'boomer' it is direct result
of societal changes in work ethic (in an effort to remain concise I am going to stay away from the
lOMoARcPSD|62286029
latter theory). But the fact is, native-born Americans are leaving a void in the underlined sectors
causing an increase in the labor demand; which immigration is filling. Furthermore, researchers
share data that suggests non-immigrant high school dropouts have a larger, negative impact on
the labor market and wages (Coppel, Dumont, & Visco, 2001). Coppel, Dumont, and Visco
(2001) emphasize that while first-generation immigrants are more costly than nativeborn
citizens, second-generation immigrants (and immigrant populations) bolster high economic
contributions. As a first generation American active-duty family that has traveled the world to
include the Vatican, I respectfully believe the argument may be slightly one dimensional to
assume there is no functionality in American society that causes fluctuation or depression in
employment and wages. Some may argue, the systemic inequities that keep both nationals and
immigrants relegated to entry level jobs versus promotion to skilled employment (with higher
income) to be the larger concern.
Nevertheless, I appreciate the dialogue and your time.
Sincerely,
Natasha
