1 / 7100%
JOINT SECTOR AND COOPERATIVE SECTOR IN BUSINESS
Joint Sector
Introduction
The joint sector refers to enterprises that are jointly owned and managed
by the private sector and the government or public sector undertakings. It
is a unique model that combines the managerial expertise and efficiencies
of the private sector with the financial resources and social orientation of
the public sector. The joint sector brings together the best of both worlds.
Formation of Joint Sector Enterprises
There are several ways in which joint sector enterprises may be
established:
The central government and private entrepreneurs can jointly set up
new enterprises from scratch. Sometimes the central government
along with one or more state governments can also partner with
private players to establish joint sector companies.
State governments through their industrial development
corporations can float new joint venture companies by taking equity
stakes along with private partners.
Public financial institutions like IDBI, ICICI etc. can convert part of
their loans and debentures in existing private companies into equity
and thereby transform them into joint sector enterprises.
The government or public sector undertakings can directly acquire
part of the equity in existing private enterprises and convert them
into joint sector companies.
Existing public sector undertakings can sell a portion of their equity
to private entrepreneurs or the general public and get transformed
into joint sector entities.
Rationale behind the Joint Sector
The main objectives and advantages sought to be achieved through the
joint sector model are:
Curbing the concentration of economic power in the hands of large
business houses by allowing joint ownership between state and
private players.
Giving a social orientation and public accountability to the
management of industries by having government participation in
equity and the board.
Accelerating the pace of economic development by harnessing the
combined resources of the state and the private sector.
Promoting the mixed economy model by combining the strengths of
both the public and private sectors.
Broadbasing entrepreneurship by enabling small entrepreneurs with
limited means to participate in large ventures.
Evolution of Government Policy
The idea of the joint sector was implicitly accepted in the Industrial
Policy Resolutions of 1948 and 1956.
Some early Five Year Plans also made references to the joint sector
concept.
The Companies Act, 1956 recognized the possibility of joint state-
private ownership.
The Dutt Committee Report (1969) strongly advocated the joint
sector to curb economic concentration.
Guidelines were issued in 1970 for the joint sector to be utilized in
core and heavy industries.
Public financial institutions were allowed to convert debt into equity
to bring in joint ownership.
Recent disinvestments have transformed some PSUs into joint
sector enterprises.
Cooperative Sector
Introduction
The cooperative sector has been assigned an important role in India's
economic development across agriculture, rural industries, distribution
etc.
Objectives
Some key objectives behind the promotion of the cooperative sector are:
Preventing concentration of economic power in the hands of a few
Enabling wider dispersal of ownership of productive resources
Actively involving people in the process of development
Augmenting productive resources, skills and capacities
Generating employment opportunities and alleviating poverty
Ways in which the State Supports Cooperatives
Equity participation in cooperatives
Providing loans, subsidies and grants
Guarantees and contributions to risk funds
Tax concessions and legal sanctions
Training programs and educational initiatives
Deputing government officers
Major Segments of the Cooperative Sector
Agricultural credit cooperatives form the largest share
Processing cooperatives in sugar, textiles, rice milling etc.
Marketing and distribution cooperatives for farm produce
Functional cooperatives in dairy, fishery, housing etc.
Multipurpose cooperatives in tribal areas
National Level Cooperative Federations
Some important national federations are:
National Cooperative Union of India
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation
National Cooperative Development Corporation
National Dairy Development Board
Key Problems
Regional disparities exist in the spread of cooperatives
Political interference and control over cooperatives
GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENTARY CONTROLS OVER PUBLIC
ENTERPRISES
Introduction
Public enterprises need autonomy for efficient functioning but also public
accountability as they utilize public funds. Government exercises control
through guidelines, board appointments, investment approvals,
performance reviews etc. Parliamentary oversight is through debates,
questions, committees like Committee on Public Undertakings (CPU).
Government Controls
Appointments of top executives and board directors
Approval of major investments and plans
Issuing guidelines on policies and performance
Calling for reports and accounts
Directions in public interest
Scrutiny by ministries through performance reviews
Investments above limit need Public Investment Board approval
Appraisal by Planning Commission and Department of Public
Enterprises
Parliamentary Controls
Debates, discussions and resolutions
Interpellations and questions
Examination by Committees like CPU
CPU studies working of enterprises and gives recommendations
Follow up action on CPU recommendations
Audit by CAG and laying of reports before Parliament
Annual reports of PSUs tabled in Parliament
Department of Public Enterprises
Nodal agency for policy formulation and coordination
Lays down guidelines on performance, finance, HR etc.
Monitors and evaluates PSU performance
Advises on PSU establishment and functioning
Coordinates training programs
Settles disputes
PRICING POLICY IN PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
Introduction
The pricing policy of public enterprises has been extensively debated.
Issues include whether they should earn profits, the appropriate level,
exploiting market power versus social concerns, and pricing approaches
like marginal cost, average cost or no profit-no loss.
Theories of Pricing
Marginal Cost Pricing
Price equals marginal cost of production. Helps consumers under
decreasing costs.
Deficit covered by taxing the rich. Increases welfare.
Practical difficulties in calculating marginal costs. Fluctuating prices.
Average Cost Pricing
Price equals average cost including normal profit. Ensures recovery
of full costs.
Fair as consumers pay for what they consume. Useful where
marginal cost hard to calculate.
No Profit-No Loss Pricing
Price equals total cost without profit. No need for subsidy or cross-
subsidization.
Consumers pay actual costs. No extra burden on non-consumers.
Profit-making Pricing
Price provides surplus over costs. Needed to finance investments in
developing countries.
Indian Public Sector and Profit Objective
Public sector expected to generate surpluses for development.
12% return considered reasonable. Higher for commercial
undertakings.
Pricing should promote growth and investment per experts.
Influences and Guidelines on Pricing
Nature of business, market situation etc affect pricing.
Guidelines by Administrative Reforms Commission and Bureau of
Public Enterprises.
Competitive conditions critical.
Pricing Practices
Administered prices, no profit-no loss prices, cost-plus pricing,
competitive prices, parity pricing, subsidized prices etc followed.
GROWTH OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
Public sector assigned a key role in industrialization even before
planning era as per Industrial Policy Resolution 1948.
Phenomenal growth seen after commencement of planning.
Investment in Central PSEs grew from Rs 29 crore in 1951 to over Rs
10 lakh crore by 2015.
Massive growth in sectors like steel, coal, power, petroleum.
Dominant position attained in several core industries.
Growth driven by setting up new units and nationalization of some
private units.
Performance
Played crucial role in developing economy lacking capital and skills.
But performance of many PSEs unsatisfactory.
Problems like cost and time overruns, irrational product mix, lack of
autonomy etc affected efficiency.
Many PSEs incurred huge losses, while profits came from
monopolies.
Inadequate internal resource generation due to pricing constraints,
long gestation periods etc.
Needed redefinition of role in tune with liberalization.
Policy Changes Since 1991
Pruning of industries reserved for public sector. Now only 2 left.
Withdrawal from non-priority sectors lacking public purpose.
Grant of autonomy to profitable PSUs (Navratnas, Miniratnas).
Disinvestment and strategic sale of non-strategic PSUs.
Closure of non-viable sick PSUs.
Ensure PSUs run on business lines.
Forms of Public Enterprises
Ministry (Railways)
Departmental Undertakings
Government Companies
Statutory Corporations
Conclusion
Public sector played important developmental role.
But reforms needed to improve efficiency and competitiveness.
Changes since 1991 have aimed at more commercial orientation.
Students also viewed