ETHICS CASE STUDY 1
The #MeToo Movement: Tasking Sexual Harassment Seriously
School of Business, Liberty University
ETHICS CASE STUDY 2
Abstract
Famed Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein sexually harassed and sexually assaulted
members of his staff and film industry actresses for more than four decades. There were 87
women who came forward, and their stories revealed pervasive issues and problems within the
entertainment industry focused on protecting a predator instead of his victims. Weinstein utilized
a cadre of human resources, legal, public relations personnel, and a robust professional network
to silence his accusers and potential whistleblowers by utilizing non-disclosure agreements,
threats, and bullying behaviors. His behavior was egregious, unethical, and immoral; however,
he remained in power because of a strong army of enablers, conformers, and colluders. This
situation prompted the #MeToo movement on Twitter and highlighted systemic workplace
sexual harassment and sexual assault across the globe. Peer-review articles were used as
supporting documentation for this paper to demonstrate how unethical behaviors and unbalanced
power dynamics with no checks and balances can propel deviant workplace behaviors, harming
the organization and its personnel. The Scripture also presented a Christian worldview and
demonstrated God’s expectation that leaders serve ethically and lead by example.
Keywords: bullying, ethical behavior, followership, influence, power, toxic leadership,
unethical behavior, unlawful behavior, and worldview.
ETHICS CASE STUDY 3
The #MeToo Movement: Tasking Sexual Harassment Seriously
Film industry women and reporters exposed renowned Hollywood producer Harvey
Weinstein for perpetual sexual harassment and sexual assault (Johnson, 2018). The situation
exposed the perpetrator and the team of professional enablers who helped Mr. Weinstein cover
up his crimes by orchestrating a series of non-disclosure agreements, financial payouts, and
smear campaigns targeting victims (Rutenberg, 2017). Actress Alyssa Milano encouraged all
women who had ever experienced sexual harassment in the workplace to utilize the hashtag
#MeToo as a status on Twitter to highlight the pervasiveness of the problem (Johnson, 2018).
Milano united survivors during this high-profile social media campaign, leading to a nationwide
reckoning. The film industry was ultimately exposed for its culpability in keeping a predator in a
position of power. Women outside the entertainment world also participated in the campaign to
reveal how prevalent sexual harassment was in their represented industries, leading to companies
taking victim claims seriously and several states' legislative and judicial reforms (Johnson, 2018;
Rutenberg, 2017).
Unethical Behaviors
The Scripture highlights the dangers of enabling unethical, immoral, and illegal behaviors
in Ephesians 5:11, “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them”
(English Standard Version Bible, 2001). The Apostle Paul alerts Christians to their responsibility
to avoid sin by clearly defining acceptable and unacceptable behaviors and committing to hold
those who harm others accountable for their actions. The verse also relays a clear message
focused on how ignoring darkness is not the answer because God instructs his children to be
courageous and fight darkness with light. This case study draws attention to Harvey Weinstein’s
predatory nature and unethical behaviors of toxic leadership, bullying, and engaging in unlawful
ETHICS CASE STUDY 4
conduct. Also, it exposes the lengths his associates took to protect him, inevitably allowing him
to victimize more women over a substantial period without taking accountability.
Toxic Leadership
Johnson (2018) refers to toxic leadership as a series of destructive and dysfunctional
leadership behaviors which harm organizations and personnel. Toxic leaders are also viewed as
abusive, lacking integrity, corrupt, and untrustworthy. Mr. Weinstein demonstrated these
maladaptive and deviant workplace behaviors by sexually harassing and assaulting female
employees and actresses for four decades (Moniuszko & Kelly, 2017). However, it is important
to remember that toxic leaders cannot survive without supportive followers who keep them in
positions of authority. Mergen and Ozbilgin (2020) showcased how followers can benefit from
assisting toxic leaders, relaying that enablers should not be viewed as victims because of their
focus on propelling self-interested behaviors and the lack of concern with how deviant
workplace behaviors negatively affect the organization and its personnel. Weinstein’s followers
who were involved in covering up his sexual deviance were also culpable as they had several
opportunities to quit and report the behaviors to the proper authorities once they were made
aware of the systemic unethical behavior; however, so many chose to enable him by willing
participating or through choosing to do nothing.
Bullying
Weinstein also engaged in bullying behaviors by utilizing forced compliance and
threatened to ruin professional careers if he was reported (Moniuszko & Kelly, 2018). Bullying
is a common form of workforce aggression where leaders threaten, dehumanize, and make the
workplace unsafe for personnel. According to Park et al. (2020), leaders also encourage
colleagues and followers to engage in these deviant workplace behaviors when a whistleblower
ETHICS CASE STUDY 5
emerges and threatens to expose the organization and its personnel for unethical conduct.
Personnel who worked with Weinstein for several years risked being outed and had self-
interested concerns, leading to an “Us versus Them” mindset.
God reminds victims of unethical and immoral behavior that he will judge and hold
perpetrators who do not repent or atone for their sins accountable for their actions. “But as for
the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murdered, the sexually immoral, sorcerers,
idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with first and sulfur, which is
the second death” (English Standard Version Bible, 2001, Revelation 21:8). Notably, this Bible
verse also calls attention to cowards and liars, putting them in the same category as the sexually
immoral. God sees the victimizer, enablers, and those who turn their heads to ignore the situation
as all having a level of culpability.
Unlawful conduct
Workplace sexual harassment and sexual assault are unlawful. Victims of workplace
sexual harassment have rights under the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. They
can also pursue a criminal case dependent on the circumstance alongside sexual assault charges
and prosecution. Weinstein was convicted of multiple counts of rape, sexual assault, sexual
penetration by a foreign object, and forcible oral copulation in California and New York, and
more than 87 women have come forward to tell their stories (Francescani & Katersky, 2020;
Moniuszko & Kelly, 2018; Salahieh & Mossburg, 2022). Weinstein and his allies had previously
silenced these women by making them sign non-disclosure agreements. Collectively, opposing
parties threatened professional ruin and legal action if victims attempted to break the legally
binding document. This was the preferred method to silence accusers and provided Mr.
Weinstein with the legal cover he needed to continue his workforce abuse. According to Barmes
ETHICS CASE STUDY 6
(2023), non-disclosures have been routinely used as an unethical practice to silence victims of
workplace sexual harassment and make it difficult for organizations and personnel to combat the
behavior because of the lack of transparency and accountability.
Power and Influence
Mr. Weinstein co-founded Miramax Films and later founded The Weinstein Company,
allowing him to exercise all five power bases: coercive, reward, legitimate, expert, and referent
power. The abundance of power also connects to why he was able to avoid facing criminal and
civil charges for so long. Weinstein’s legitimate and expert power as a chief executive officer
also provided him the opportunity, authority, and influence to set organizational policies and
procedures (Johnson, 2018). According to Hegtvedt et al. (2022) and Issac et al. (2022), leaders
with legitimized and expert authority and control are widely accepted, build trust, and train
employees to comply with requests. Weinstein’s used this to solicit help from his company’s
human resources, legal, and public relations teams to silence victims and advocates because it
was within their responsibilities to protect the company (Rutenberg, 2017).
According to Johnson (2018), the leader’s referent power also earns follower admiration,
reward power provides value to employees, and coercive power gives leaders the authority to
penalize and punish. Weinstein used these powers to give bonuses to loyal employees while
simultaneously punishing, firing, and ruining the reputation of those who spoke out, all while
continuing to grow his business and earning the respect of one of Hollywood’s top producers.
Asad et al. (2020) refer to this as “narcissism based on power,” which contributes to a false sense
of security, maladaptive behaviors, and a charismatic persona leading to unethical, illegal, and
immoral organizational influence. Weinstein was a powerful, prestigious, and wealthy executive
ETHICS CASE STUDY 7
with unlimited resources, giving him the false illusion of being untouchable for several decades
until his eventual arrest and conviction.
Followership Challenges
Harvey Weinstein led thousands of people during his co-founder and chief executive
officer tenure within the entertainment industry. As previously addressed, he was a toxic leader,
and a bully, committed unlawful acts, and used his power to reward personnel who gave his
allegiance and punished those who went against him. Weinstein had control over his personnel’s
livelihood within the film industry, and they were given choices to leave with a non-disclosure
agreement, conform, or collude (Goodyear, 2017). According to Johnson (2018), conformers are
easy to influence and submit out of a sense of obligation and loyalty. In contrast, colluders are
opportunists with something to gain or acolytes who believe in the leader’s vision and share
similar ethics, values, and morals. According to Vriend et al. (2020), unethical, pro-leader
unethical follower behavior is also linked to reciprocity and wanting to maintain strong working
relationships out of loyalty and, in many cases, fear. The leader may set the tone for the entire
organization; however, this does not absolve followers from their own unethical, illegal, and
immoral behavior.
Johnson (2018) provides examples of what personnel can do when faced with unethical
leadership behaviors and recommends courageous followership and whistleblowing as viable
alternatives. However, followers may feel conflicted about what to do when their leaders make
unethical decisions. They may also feel like they are betraying the organization and colleagues
by bringing internal issues to external sources for assistance. Standing up to these unethical
leaders requires moral judgment and personal courage, which is not an easy feat. According to
Park et al. (2020), whistleblowers can gain internal and external support by collecting
ETHICS CASE STUDY 8
information, uniting colleagues towards a common goal, planning an exit strategy, and seeking
employment with another organization before submitting a complaint. Unfortunately, ethical
followers cannot stay in unethical situations long-term because they risk unintentionally enabling
deviant workplace behaviors by failing to report or choosing to leave a toxic organization and
become part of the problem.
The Scripture also identifies why calling out bad behavior is not always enough and
instructs followers on their responsibility to give justice to those who have been victims or have
had their voices muted by more powerful entities. Psalm 82:3-4 says, “Give justice to the weak
and fatherless; maintain the rights of the afflicted and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the
needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked” (English Standard Version Bible, 2001). This
means that people with knowledge of Harvey Weinstein’s crimes should have helped his victims
escape the toxic situation, assisted them in getting justice, and stopped unethical behavior before
more people were harmed. God does not view fear or lack of courage as a reason to contribute to
or fail to stop evil and expects followers to trust in him to give them strength.
Worldview
An individual’s worldview can affect how someone views ethical and value-based
behaviors and the importance they put on them. Harvey Weinstein is a practicing Jew with a
theistic worldview focused on an all-powerful, just God who created the world and links ethics
and morality to God’s character (Mawson, 2021). However, his actions were not aligned with
Judaism-taught morals, beliefs, or acceptable behaviors and represented cognitive dissonance
resulting from conflicting views. The Scripture addresses this concept in 1 Corinthians 10:21,
“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of
the Lord and the table of demons” (English Standard Version Bible, 2001) meaning Weinstein
ETHICS CASE STUDY 9
could not be a genuine practitioner of his faith while simultaneously and continuously sexually
harassing and assaulting women in the workplace and using his money and influence to cover up
his crimes.
Conclusion
Unethical leaders feel a sense of grandiosity and often believe that the rules apply to
everyone else. They have an inordinate amount of power and wield it to make the rules, reward
those who show loyalty and punish those who reject illegal and immoral requests. These leaders
also demonstrate maladaptive workplace behaviors and narcissistic tendencies, which harm the
organization, group, and individuals. However, the seemingly all-powerful unethical leader could
be stopped if their personnel had the moral courage to expose unethical, illegal, and immoral
workforce behaviors, refused to participate, and stopped following the toxic leader. Ethical
followers are vital in ending an unethical leader’s reign because one cannot lead without a group
of faithful followers. It only takes a solid commitment to ending toxic workforce behaviors and a
promise to help those harmed and victimized. The Scripture also relays this message in Galatians
6:1-2, “Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore
him in the spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself; let you, too, be tempted. Bear one
another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (English Standard Version Bible, 2001).
ETHICS CASE STUDY 10
References
Asad, S., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2020). Differentiating leader hubris and narcissism on the basis of
power. Leadership, 16(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019885763
Barmes, L. (2023). Silencing at work: Sexual harassment, workplace misconduct, and NDAs.
Industrial Law Journal (London), 52(1), 68-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac007
English Standard Version Bible. (2001). ESV Online. https://esv.literalword.com/
Francescani, C. & Katersky, A. (2020, March 11). Harvey Weinstein sentenced to 23 years on
sex crime convictions. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/harvey-weinstein-
despondent-faces-sentencing-york/story?id=69516249
Goodyear, D. (2017, October 19). Harvey Weinstein’s former employees reckon with what they
knew and what they didn’t. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-
desk/harvey-weinsteins-former-employees-reckon-with-what-they-knew-and-what-they-
didnt
Hegtvedt, K. A., Johnson, C., Gibson, R., Hawks, K., & Hayward, J. L. (2022). Power and
procedure: Gaining legitimacy in the workplace. Social Forces, 101(1), 176-201.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab103
Issac, A. C., Bednall, T. C., Baral, R., Magliocca, P., & Dhir, A. (2022). The effects of expert
power and referent power on knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding. Journal of
Knowledge Management, 27(2).
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0750/full/html
Johnson, C.E. (2018). Organizational ethics: A practical approach. SAGE Publications. (5th
ed.). https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781544395371/epubcfi
ETHICS CASE STUDY 11
Mawson, T. J. (2021). Does anything we do matter forever? Religious Studies, 57(1), 83-100.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000039
Mergen, A., & Ozbilgin, M. F. (2021). Understanding the followers of toxic leaders: Toxic
illusion and personal uncertainty. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1),
45-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12240
Moniuszko, S.M. & Kelly, C. (2018, June 1). Harvey Weinstein scandal: A complete list of 87
accusers. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2017/10/27/weinstein-
scandal-complete-list-accusers/804663001/
Park, H., Bjørkelo, B., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2020). External whistleblowers’ experiences of
workplace bullying by superiors and colleagues. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 591-
601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3936-9
Rutenberg, J. (2017, October 6). Harvey Weinstein’s media enablers. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/business/media/harvey-weinsteins-media-
enablers.html
Salahieh, N. & Mossburg, C. (2022, December 20). Harvey Weinstein is convicted of 3 of 7
charges, including rape, in his Los Angeles sexual assault trial. CNN.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/19/us/harvey-weinstein-trial-deliberations-los-angeles-
monday/index.html
Vriend, T., Said, R., Janssen, O., & Jordan, J. (2020). The dark side of relational leadership:
Positive and negative reciprocity as fundamental drivers of follower's intended pro-leader
and pro-self-unethical behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1473-1473.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01473