EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 1
Expectancy Theory: Motivation and Ethicality
Name
School of Business, Liberty University
BMAL 703: Managing the Contemporary Organization
Professor
Date
Author Notes
By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not
that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for
knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines.
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to:
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 2
Abstract
Expectancy theory illustrates how motivation influences organizational success by connecting
effort, performance, and rewards. Its components—expectancy, instrumentality, and valence—
show how it matches employee aspirations with business goals through measurable results and
transparent communication. The idea is an effective management tool because of its adaptability
and capacity to promote justice and responsibility in the workplace. However, it implies logical
decision-making, which may miss emotional and cultural influences on motivation and intrinsic
characteristics that are important for long-term involvement. Ethical management frameworks
improve their use by linking motivational methods to ethical and corporate objectives.
Expectancy theory promotes trust and integrity in motivating systems by embracing ethics,
justice, and stewardship. This alignment ensures that employees understand how their activities
contribute to desired goals, which boosts engagement and performance. With its structured and
principled approach, expectancy theory gives managers tools to increase motivation, drive
corporate goals, and retain accountability while balancing ethical and practical management
tactics.
Keywords: Expectancy theory, motivation, biblical stewardship, management.
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 3
Expectancy Theory: Motivation and Ethics
Motivation is critical for attaining organizational goals, yet many managers fail to link
staff efforts with intended results. Expectancy theory offers a paradigm for resolving this issue
by connecting effort, performance, and rewards. It highlights the value of clear communication,
quantifiable goals, and fairness in inspiring employees to perform at their best. The theory's
emphasis on the effort-performance-reward relationship gives managers valuable tools for
increasing engagement and accountability (Jones & George, 2023). Ethical management
frameworks increase their use by ensuring motivational techniques are consistent with ethical
and organizational ideals (Huhtala et al., 2020). This analysis assesses expectancy theory's
components, strengths, shortcomings, and compatibility with biblical principles, demonstrating
its usefulness as a practical and ethical management tool.
Definition of the Theory
The expectancy theory posits that people are motivated when there is a link between what
they do, how well they do it, and the prospect of receiving desirable rewards. The theory focuses
on three interconnected components: expectancy (confidence in effort-doing), instrumentality
(faith in performance-reward), and valence (worthiness of payoffs) and how these concepts can
enhance employee motivation (Miao et al., 2022). These provide a foundation for understanding
how perspectives influence motivation and decision-making, particularly in formal settings like
the workplace. Humans will be more productive on a project if they believe it will lead to
promotion or compensation. For example, the expectancy theory incorporates people's
aspirations and wishes into business objectives to promote engagement and efficiency (GreggU,
2019). By focusing on these psychological elements, managers gain significant information
about design motivators in real-time.
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 4
Purpose of Expectancy Theory
Employer efforts and company goals can be aligned using expectancy theory to provide a
path from work to reward. The objective is to focus on measurable outcomes to increase
efficiency and participation and ensure that employees see a clear link between their actions and
their expected benefits (Nagle, 2021). This is straightforward and motivating since there is an
immediate observable correlation between performance and rewards. Management, for example,
may establish a compensation structure based on hitting specific sales targets, ensuring that
employees see the tangible benefits of their efforts. Gupta et al. (2024) empirically validate
procedural justice in pay-for-performance systems, showing how ethical management practices
align rewards with employee expectations to foster trust and motivation. By emphasizing the
alignment of individual motivations with organizational goals, the expectancy theory offers a
practical strategy for promoting engagement and productivity (Kuhn et al., 2022).E
Strengths of the Theory
Expectancy theory provides a framework for understanding how individual motivation is
influenced by the perceived connection between effort, performance, and reward; this offers
invaluable insights into workplace environments (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020). The theory's
emphasis on measurable outcomes linking task performance to rewards promotes accountability
by enabling managers to establish transparent settings where employees can understand how
their efforts contribute to rewards (Maio et al., 2022). A measurable performance incentive
program tied to measures such as project completion rates improves compensation fairness. To
reinforce motivations and metrics in incentive development, ethical practices must be observed
to foster trust and accountability, ensuring that motivational strategies align with ethical
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 5
standards (Huhtala et al., 2020). These advantages make expectancy theory an indispensable tool
for managers seeking to improve performance, though it also has notable limitations.E
Weaknesses of the Theory
The theoretical assumption of reasoned choice within expectancy theory may fail to
account for the influence of emotions and cultural aspects of motivation. While expectancy
theory provides a road map, it overlooks intrinsic motivators such as self-improvement or
passion for work, which are critical to long-term retention and pleasure (Urhahne & Wijnia,
2023). For example, when inherent motivation is the primary drive motivator for an activity, this
restriction might lead to decreased external reward effectiveness. Furthermore, communication
breakdowns might undermine the notion that performance and compensation are inextricably
linked, leaving employees unsure of the relationship and less motivated (Nagle, 2021).
Furthermore, leaders who are not ethical agents may utilize rewards to get ahead of the results,
disturbing fairness and raising ethical concerns; for example, impaired promotions or ambiguous
bonus criteria might undermine trust in the system (Huhtala et al., 2020). These shortcomings,
specifically the lack of emphasis on intrinsic motivation and potential ethical challenges,
underscore the importance of integrating biblical principles to address these gaps.
Theory Evaluation from Scripture/Christian Literature
Expectancy theory emphasizes accountability and clear communication, consistent with
biblical stewardship, justice, and transparency. These values are represented by Solomon's
leadership, in which his wisdom secured justice and fairness through transparent decision-
making processes (Merida et al., 2015). For example, modern managers might mimic Solomon
by implementing equitable incentive schemes that link employee contributions with business
goals. Similarly, Proverbs 16:9 emphasizes the significance of combining human planning with
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 6
God's sovereignty, consistent with expectation theory's planned and intentional approach
(English Standard Version Bible [ESV], 2001). This verse tells managers that while planning and
goal-setting are essential, they must act humbly and with integrity, relying on God's guidance.
Biblical teachings also address flaws in expectancy theory, such as its emphasis on
intrinsic motivation and the possibility of ethical difficulties. For example, Colossians 3:23
advises employees to "work heartily, as for the Lord," putting internal drive and spiritual
accountability ahead of extrinsic rewards (ESV, 2001). Managers who incorporate this notion
might motivate staff to find a deeper purpose in their jobs beyond tangible rewards. Huhtala et al.
(2020) support this by demonstrating how ethical management promotes trust and fairness while
connecting motivational techniques with Christian beliefs. These values, taken together, form a
paradigm for applying expectancy theory as a God-honoring approach to motivating and
balancing accountability with spiritual and ethical leadership.
Conclusion
Expectancy theory offers a practical and ethically centered approach to understanding
and improving motivation consistent with management and biblical concepts. Regarding ethical
and strategic application, the theory's merits, such as its adaptability to various organizational
settings and emphasis on clarity, far outweigh its weaknesses. Managers can utilize expectancy
theory to improve staff performance towards organizational goals by emphasizing motivators
and communication. Adding ethical management and biblical teaching strengthens the theory's
ability to energize employees and establish a company culture of integrity and stewardship. This
strategy improves performance while upholding the ethical and spiritual values of management.
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 7
References
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value
theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on
motivation.EContemporary Educational Psychology, 61,101859.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
English Standard Version Bible. (2001).EESV Bible Online. https://www.esv.org/
GreggU. (2019, April 4).ETheories of motivationE[Video].
YouTube.Ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azs9Wv7sorU
Gupta, A., Goyal, S., & Verma, P. (2024). The role of procedural justice in enhancing pay-for-
performance effectiveness: A study on organizational citizenship behavior.EPersonnel
Review, 53(1), 120–137.Ehttps://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2021-0782
Huhtala, M., Fadjukoff, P., & Kroger, J. (2020). Managers as ethical leaders: Ethical identity
processes in the context of work.EJournal of Business Ethics, 172(4), 639–
652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04500-w
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2023).EEssentials of contemporary managementE(10th ed.).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin. ISBN: 9781265450892.
Kuhn, C., Hagenauer, G., & Gröschner, A. (2022). Because you always learn something new
yourself! An expectancy-value-theory perspective on mentor teachers’ initial
motivations.ETeaching and Teacher Education, 113,103659.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103659
Miao, L., Zhang, D., & Chen, L. (2022). Motivating public sector employees: Applying the
valence-instrumentality-expectancy model to bridge motivation and performance.
EXPECTANCY THEORY: MOTIVATION AND ETHICALITY 8
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2), 295–310.
https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_010.02_L001
Merida, T., Platt, D., & Akin, D. (2015).EExalting Jesus in 1 & 2 Kings.EB&H Publishing Group.
ISBN: 9780805496775
Nagle, C. (2021). Using Expectancy Value Theory to understand motivation, persistence, and
achievement in university‐level foreign language learning.EForeign Language Annals,
54(4), 1238–1256.Ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12569
Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative
framework.EEducational Psychology Review, 35(2).Ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-
09767-9
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
