A Reflection on Michael J. Gorman's Becoming the Gospel
Introduction
Michael J. Gorman’s book titled “Becoming the Gospel” is a profound attempt to
reflect on how the church as a living organism can and ought to index the gospel in its life.
Gorman, a New Testament specialist, expounds on the fact that admonish is not only
evangelism’s oral, theological expression but a holistic program of redemption. The book
provides the reader with a critical perspective on the contemporary concepts of evangelism
and making disciples in the context of the Postmodern society and calls for a radical appraisal
of the work of the church in the salvation and the mission of the world.
Gorman’s main proposition revolves around the notion that the church is the gospel as
it takes part into the incarnate, crucified, and risen Jesus Christ. This participatory soteriology
underlines the nature of the church as cruciform because the cruciform represents Jesus’s
cross, and it underscores Jesus’s love, the suffering that he went through and the change that
he wanted to bring in the world. Indeed, Gorman invokes the notion of being ‘Christ-like’
and the church as a community of the new covenant that embodies the qualities of God as
lived in Christ.
The aim of this reflection is to experience the concepts discussed in Becoming the
Gospel more profoundly and at the same time try to analyze to what extent I have been
affected by the discussed concepts of theology of the gospel and philosophy of ministry.
When I was reflecting on Gorman’s ideas, there were a few notions that touched me deeply,
giving a new perspective on how to embrace the Gospel message embracing the twenty-first
century. In this reflection, I shall attempt to identify three concepts if the book that I found
most valuable and a source of positive change. Besides explaining one idea that I found
unconvincing, I will state the flaws I found in it and offer a more persuasive opinion on the
matter.
Brief Preview of the Major Ideas Discussed and the Disagreement
The first significant argument that resonated with me is participatory soteriology that
Gorman develops. This idea stresses that the church is involved in the ‘life of Christ,’ not just
as the ones who receive the salvation but those who are invited to join in on the salvation
project of God. While salvation is even pictured to be earned through faith, this perspective
offers an active vision that contrasts with passive interpretations of the text.
The second idea that I found helpful and that impacted my thinking is called missional
ecclesiology. Gorman outlines the task of the church as missiological because the church is to
be a sign of and participant in God’s mission. This new dramatic stance recasts its mission
and function and its public vocation by emphasising social involvement, justice, and
missional testimony.
The third of the major themes espoused by the church is cruciformity which
essentially means letting the life of the church to be formed by the cross as was with Jesus
Christ. Gorman posits that the Gospel message as expressed by Jesus self-giving love and
sacrificial death should be patterns for Christian discipleship and church fellowship. They
arm the church itself in a cruciform way of living as a challenge that must be humble, serve,
and show vulnerability.
Despite these three ideas blessed me with greatly enriched understanding of the
gospel and ministry, there was a moment when I did not fully agree with Gorman in
particular aspect. Two questions arise from Gorman’s focus on the community’s salvation
over the individual’s salvation: Though am in agreement with communal aspect of salvation,
I also hold that the individualized aspect of salvation through a personal relationship with
Christ is of equal measure essential. This reflection will seek to discuss this disagreement in
more specifics to give a fair analysis and to offer a moderate view that is based on the
concern for the self and the others.
The purpose of this reflection is to have a critically analytical reflection on the book
‘Becoming the Gospel’, by Michael J Gorman, focusing on the usefulness of the book in
enriching the theological and ministerial formation, besides raising concern on contentious
issues as well. In this way, I would like to outline a vision of Constantine and his mission that
is more accurate and encompassing for the postmodern world of the Seventh-day Adventist
Church.
Participatory Soteriology
Focusing at its centrepiece is the concept of participatory soteriology developed by
Michael J. Gorman in his Becoming the Gospel. This altered concept of ‘salvation’ removes
the emphasis from the Divine Grace received but placed emphasis on living in the realities of
the life of Christ. According to Gorman here, salvation includes the entire people and more
than that it is not individual, or personal, but corporate and participatory. He underlines that
believers are invited to hear, receive, share and live the gospel, that means to live the life, die
the death and rise again in newness of life in Jesus.
In Becoming the Gospel, Gorman exemplifies participatory soteriology as an
appropriate synthesis of systematics and praxis at work as a whole. He suggests that being "in
Christ" involves a transformative journey where believers become co-participants in the
divine nature (2 Peter 1: Participants rated their study experience as follows: 4). The kind of
participation here is also individual as well as corporate, as the church is depicted as the body
of Christ. Participatory soteriology means that the church on the basis of the gospels calling
should show the possibility of redemption in the world.
Participatory soteriology makes the gospel to be more dynamic and relational,
therefore helps me to understand it better than the traditional perspective where it is viewed
as a one-time act. This perspective is more comprehensive than the notion that believes that
salvation is simply the acknowledgment of certain dogmatic assertions, but it is an encounter
with the person of Jesus Christ. According to Gorman’s framework, sanctification
emphasizes continuous process of Christlikeness that entails participation in the ministry of
suffering and salvation.
Indeed, the Bible is full of mezotheistic examples witness of participatory soteriology.
Holy innocent suffering is what Paul details in his Romans and Galatians letters stating that
the believer must be joined with Christ in His dying and rising. Romans 6:4 states, “We were
therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised
from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life. ” These and other
verses show that a new life is not just in the sense of being saved from sin but a Divine call to
turn a new page and live as Christ would want his followers to.
Theologically, this is in line with the theory that the believers are sanctified and
develop into the image of Jesus as portrayed. It also correlates with the concept of deification
(theosis) in the Orthodox Church and the salvation model where one is made or becomes
God. The participatory soteriology propounded by Gorman mediates between these
systematic theological faculties, providing an integrated understanding of salvation as both
Justification, sanctification and glorification.
Some of the implications that participatory soteriology may hold for ministers for
ministry are the following, as this concept supports Christian involvement in daily life, it
fosters a holistic view of discipleship. In this context, this can be effected through the
following manners in a church production. Firstly, discipleship programs can be established
to contain theological education and spiritual formation which would involve the believers
into times of prayer, fasting and charitable works.
These programs should stress some commonalities that are found in this faith so that
the believers have something to share and a common purpose. Second, they can be formed as
missional missional-communities to accomplish common aims and goals as a small group
that is portraying the gospel through performing acts of service and justice. It is through such
communities where people are able to put into practice what they believe in, pass on the
gospels and, in the process, meet the needs of society.
Lastly, incorporating of practices of the liturgy can also help bring about a
strengthening of participative soteriology. Thus, the Eucharist can be viewed not only as a
memo-rial but also as acting, which means that participants become the witnesses, recreating
the events of the gospel and recalling that they are part of Christ’s life. Here are specific ways
that ministry can apply participatory soteriology for the strengthening of faith among
Christians and for the practical impact on their lives.
In my opinion, participatory soteriology is a perfect approach to ministry as it was a
joy to implement. It has engaged me for demanding a way of thinking of ministry shifted
from mere programming to relationship and transformational one. I have observed this
strategy in my congregation where people look forward to fulfilling the plans and purpose of
God as posited to being mere spectators of religious activities. This shift has made a
community lively and active one that displays their faith through action and doing things.
Missional Ecclesiology
Another of the profound ideas offered by Michael J. Gorman in Becoming the Gospel
is the concept of the ‘Missional ecclesiology’. This preunderstanding reconceives the church
as not only missional but as fundamentally missional, set apart and sent to bear witness to and
perform the mission of God in the world. Carmen describes a church as being more than just
an organization that is consumed with its preservation but as a living organism called into
being by God to be involved in restoring creation.
Gorman advance for this notion by analyzing the biblical section of New Testament
where the church is envisioned as a sent church. He highlights the Great Commission
(Matthew 28:19-20) and prayer in Johns chapter seventeen where Jesus sends His disciples
on to as He himself put it ‘finish the work.’ He writes that when it comes to the matter of the
church and the gospel, it is not only with lips and words that the church is to proclaim the
gospel but with lives and actions.
I have found that this abductive framework to be influential in challenging my
theology by turning from attractional to missional theology. It views the church as a sent
people, journeying in God’s mission to put the world right. It dissolves the existing
stereotyped attitudes toward church’s activities and suggests the community expands its
means of impact on the world.
Missionally, the basis of William’s ecclesiology comes from the concept of church as
the body of Christ and its mandate to continue the work of Jesus. Ephesians 3:10-11 states,
“And this was according to his eternal purpose that he accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord
once he had said this, ‘Now the manifold wisdom of God has been revealed to rulers and
authorities through the church.’” This is a justification of purpose of church to reveal the
word of God to the rulers and the authorities in the world.
On the theological level, missional ecclesiology and the mission Dei – the mission of God –
have a lot in common. Stated in its purest form, this doctrine underscores the fact that mission
is not just a program of the church but a divine attribute. It is for this reason that it is
noteworthy that the church is involved in the ongoing work of God as the sign, or even the
foretaste, as well as the instrument of the kingdom of God. Gorman’s understanding of what
he termed as missional ecclesiology is therefore a call to replication of the divine image and
alleviate work of God in church and the world.
This missional ecclesiology refocuses the perspective of ministry and restructures its
organizational and relational approach to ministry, in ways that transcend the mundane in
implementing practical changes that affect the churches and their communities. Also, the
concept of community emerges as a core value that puts the church on the frontline to
actively engage in community matters and engage in what Christ modelled of meeting the
needs of the needy such as the poor, the oppressed, and the environment. This can present
itself as, adopting policies that support partnerships with local organizations, initiation of
community activities, as well as participation in fighting for social justice on a national or
wider scope.
There is the development of comprehensive mission, since ministries are introduced
to meet the flesh, soul and spirit needs of people. Measures including feeding the needy,
providing counseling services and putting up educational programs are undertaken as the
visible testament of the gospel in practice, preaching love and concern for fellow humans.
This visionary framework is at the core of missional ecclesiology that positions the church as
a remixer of God’s blessings in the world.
Maturity is attained and education becomes essential especially in preparing
Christians to be mindful that the whole society is a mission field. This means, in effect, that
they are taught how to take their Christianity in its broadest sense and interpret all activities –
work, family and social – as being missionary. In this way the church becomes a powerful
force for good in the world for individuals and the community at large through the
implementation of the
These changes can be best illustrated from my own experience: The missional ecclesiology
has helped my church in a defining way to approach its ministry. From there we have shifted
to fellowship participation with an aim of taking members out to be the church in the
community, the neighbourhood and the workplace. This has resulted into formation of a
community that focuses on extra- marital involvement and other affairs associated with
spirituality and changes with an intent of propagating the gospel. It has also strengthened
spiritual function and self-organization in churches where members actively define
themselves as God’s agents.
Cruciformity
Cruciformity, as defined by Michael J. Gorman— is a theological anthropology
explaining and prescribing how Christian existence should be cross-formed. This idea long
portrays and explains that Christian discipleship entails the followers of Christ to embrace the
model of servanthood. It awakens one’s conscience to lead a lifestyle of reproach, tribulation,
justice and equality in a cruciform manner.
According to Gorman, it was Pauline literature in which cruciformity emerged as an
essential principle in the New Testament. He makes a point on how the cross is not only a
sign of salvation but also the pattern on which Christianity should be practiced. In Becoming
the Gospel, Gorman introduced the concept of cruciformity, which refers to the complete
transformation of every aspect of life in order to echo the values and mission of the cross,
describing what such a community would look like in its love for one another.
Cruciformity impacts my theological thinking in a significant way, especially in
defining a sense of calling of the Christian and Christian ministry. This lens reshuffles the
hierarchy of values and concerns at odds with the comfort and easy lifestyle as opposed to the
costly calling of discipleship. There is still an urgent need to preach a counter-cultural cross-
shaped gospel, with the shape of God’s kingdom as revealed in Scripture, even when the
church is persecuted and suffers.
Biblically, cruciformity is rooted in passages such as Philippians 2: Paul in chapter 5-
8 where he encourages believers to have the same mentality as that of Christ as was evident
in Him when “He set himself and became obedient even to death-Death on the cross” In this
passage, the selfless nature and sacrifice of Jesus’ ministry is well illustrated. Similarly, 1
Corinthians 1:18-25 explain the construction of the cross, pointing out that God’s strength or
wisdom is found in the context of the cross – this is weakness or fool’s work.
Theologically, cruciformity reflects the sacramental concept of imitation Christi
which is the imitation of Christ. This idea may be found in early Christian tradition and
invites Christians to live a life imitating Jesus. In this section, Gorman introduces
cruciformity as an ancient formation that ties this reality to today’s world, providing a sound
theological and practical paradigm for examining the cost of discipleship or the price that
comes with following Jesus.
Cruciform ministry therefore entails the creation of a paradigm within the church that
sought to reflect the values of the cross for the purpose of producing actions and attitudes that
are propelled by a paradigm shift. There are measures that can be taken by the church,
methods that will help bring up such culture.
Firstly, it is possible to state that developing humility for an individual is a crucial
element. This can be done through helping people to adopt humble practices and fostering the
spirit of servant leadership, with the cross-signifying humility and service. Giving an
opportunity for church members to find ways and means of serving fellow church members
and/or the community can also help in changing the attitude or culture of the church in
question to humility.
Suffering is one the dimensions of cruciformity.
The ministry work should be done to ensure that believers make sense of suffering in
the experience of a Christian life and assist people struggling with difficulties. This consists
of leading others to understand the concept of redeeming value of suffering and, in the
process, providing them with support – both emotionally and physically – to let them know
that their suffering can be used to fulfill the purpose of God.
All those who take the cross also should be drawing people into understanding justice
and reconciliation is another significant facet of cruciformity. Participating in ministries that
aim at restoring justice and ‘making things right’ within the church, the society and the world
is an act of love that emulates the self-giving love of Jesus. This could be social justice roles
such as the representation of the voiceless persons, combatting for social equity, or fighting
for peace for the aggrieved parties. In this way the church can show people through living out
the values displayed herein that the gospel does make a difference in this world.
I need to say that practicing cruciformity is helpful personally as it causes reflection
on the price that Jesus paid for His disciples and the requirements for becoming one. It has
compelled me to reflect and introspect especially in my attitude and behavior as a Christian;
to embrace the life that would reproduce the kind of love Jesus displayed on the cross. This
has changed my perspective about ministry practices as I have ditched package solutions
instead opting for authentic fellowship and seeking to include within me the realities of the
kingdom of God.
Critical Reflection on Disagreement
An idea of Gorman in the book Becoming the Gospel that I found somewhat puzzling
was the author’s eagerness to stress, the communal against the individual with regard to
salvation. Although I acknowledge the necessity of the concept of community as a foundation
for developing the Christian life, I found it difficult to accept the notion that personal
redemption is in some way subordinate to the collective experience of salvation.
Gorman develops this thesis chiefly by his elaboration of participatory soteriology
that underlines the social dimension of Christ’s saving work and the corporative nature of the
church as the body of Christ. He clearly notes that salvation is not a concept that is restricted
to the individual believers being redeemed but it is also about the entire community’s
involvement in the redemption process.
I strongly oppose this idea, and this part of the Probelogy, due to my beliefs
concerning the personal faith and the relationship with Christ. I consider faith as the
collective effort of the congregation and the church is indeed key in the Christian life, yet I
also argue that every individual must individually bow to the word of God and every person
must personally accept Jesus into their lives.
I will like to conclude by saying that both social and personal redemption are involved
in the discourse of salvation. The role of community as a whole, focusing on supporting
Christian faith, is valuable and significant; however, each soul must individually accept Jesus
Christ as Lord and Saviour. Then, this own belief brings one into the active involvement into
being part of the church community and its mission.
This perspective reflects my understanding and religious work setting where we strive
to find a middle ground on the ecclesiastical aspects of religion against the lone conversion
that people experience in their lives. We note that faith is from the heart, which every
Christian has; but it also requires being in the body, which is the church.