NSEC 502
Ethical Scenario Paper: Basic
Gary Driscoll
Dr. Carl Rehberg
NSEC502: Ethics in National Security
Liberty University
September 18, 2022
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
1
NSEC 502
From: Gary Driscoll (Liberty University Online Student)
To: Dr. Carl Rehberg, NSEC502 Instructor
Date: “TBD”
Re: NSEC 502 Ethical Scenario Paper Assignment: Basic (100 pts)
Background.
Joe and his wife Bev have committed Christians, whereby Joe serves as a deacon in their
local church. The couple has three sons. Their firstborn son, Tom, is about to join high school.
According to the law in the region, Tom should be enrolled on the local public high school,
which has a bad reputation for poor academics and serious drug problems among students on
campus. Nevertheless, Joe's sister lives in the adjoining district with a better school, and she's
willing to use her address as our legal address and have Tom admitted to the school. Her
proposal is not new since other parents have successfully used this approach for the well-being
of their children. For this strategy to work, Joe had to instruct his son that whenever asked, he
must lie that he lives at his aunt's address. Failure to implement this strategy would lead to a
more difficult situation of having to look for a private school for the boy or moving to another
district which is difficult due to financial constraints. Joe has been a model of integrity in his area
due to his law-abiding nature. However, Tom has challenges handling minor ethical issues, and
Joe is greatly concerned about his son's character.
Examine the Facts.
Joe's case is the complicated case due to the ethical dilemmas it presents. Like other
parents, Joe wants the best for his son, so choosing the best school for him is the best option.
Considering his spirituality, Joe understands that the bible verse ‘bad company corrupts good
moral’ (1 Corinthians 15:33). Besides, he understands that it is his obligation to protect his son
from the drug culprits in the school and also offer him the best opportunity to build his future
through quality education. However, Joe experience a dilemma since the available school
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
2
NSEC 502
threatens his son's future through low-quality education and drug exposure. Besides, his only
option is unethical since it requires him to lie and teach his son how to lie about their residential
area. This is a critical situation for Joe since his son already has issues with his morality. Joe
knows that telling his son to lie will make him lose his moral authority in building his character,
increasing his deviance. The alternative solution to his problem is taking his son to a private
school or moving to a different district with a better school which is unaffordable due to high
financial demand. Since the easiest available option is making his son lie about his residential
address for him to go to the good school in his aunt's place, Joe is in a dilemma on whether to
compromise his integrity and lie or risk enrolling his son on their local school regardless of the
possible negative consequences.
Truth Matters—Seek the Truth.
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
3
NSEC 502
Following the Christian call to holiness just as Christ is holy (1Peter 1:15), Joe needs to
consider biblical insight in his decision-making process. Individuals can gain Godly insight
directly from studying the bible or through earnest prayers for God to help them discern (Rae,
2018). To begin with, Joe needs to remember that lying will compromise his relationship with
God since God hates a lying tongue (Proverbs 6: 16- 19) and the bible says that "the Lord detests
lying lips but He delights in people who are trustworthy" (Proverbs 12:22).
Besides, it will be important for Joe to pray to discern God’s will about his situation. As a
believer, Joe understands that God has placed him in that place for a purpose. Through the Holy
Spirit, Joe will discern God’s will since Christ said that the Holy Spirit is the helper of believers
who will give wise counsel. In this case, Joe learned from Apostle Paul's strategy, who always
sought God's will and noted that "these are the things God has revealed to us by his Spirit. The
Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. For who knows a person’s thoughts
except for their own spirit within them? In the same way, no one knows the thoughts of God
except the Spirit of God” (1 Corinthians 2: 10- 11).
Help from Others.
Joe can also acquire effective insight from consulting with other people. Proverbs 20: 18
states, "Plans are confirmed by getting advice, and with guidance one wages war". Being a
virtuous person, it is important that he seek advice from people who understands his course of
life. Hebrews 3:13 encourages believers to continue with daily encouragement to each other to
ensure that none of them is 'hardened by the deceitfulness of sin'. Thus, it is advisable for Joe to
consult with his fellow deacons and the clergy to determine the best action as a Christian.
Besides, he can assess the decisions of Godly people in the bible to identify their responses when
they experience challenges.
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
4
NSEC 502
Identify the Ethical Absolutes, Principles, Precepts, Values and Virtues/Character that
Relate to the Dilemma(s).
The proposal to Joe to tell his son to lie about their home address poses a critical ethical
dilemma because it is against the ninth commandment, 'You shall not lie (Exodus 20:16). It is
also important to employ the virtue ethics and the deontological ethical in decision making to
help in balancing the aspects of 'being' and 'doing' (Tyra, 2015). Ethical consideration requires an
individual to make decisions according to the virtues and values that they must conform to hence
ensuring they are in the right (Rae, 2018). In Joe’s case, it was important for him to uphold the
cardinal virtues of prudence and fortitude. Prudence is employed when an individual identifies
the right thing and chooses to do it, and fortitude is when an individual stays positive in an
endeavour until things get right (Zollo et al., 2017). Besides, the situation requires Joe to
embrace various ethical values. First, the situation tested his ability to remain honest in
difficulties. An honest person does not deviate from the truth even when subject to a pressuring
problem. In this case, honesty would make Joe the tough choice of enrolling his son in a private
school or relocating to a district with better education and morals. Second, maintaining his
integrity values would also determine his cause of action since the decision to lie would
compromise his integrity. Besides, the situation tested Joe’s value of responsibility through the
guidance he is willing to offer to his son.
Consider the Consequences, Creative Alternatives and Other Applicable Theories and
Doctrines, etc.
Whether Joe chooses to instruct his son to lie or decides to uphold his integrity and enrol
his son in the local school, there would be significant consequences of the decisions. The
utilitarianism theory dictates that an act is ethical if the ultimate results benefit the highest
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
5
NSEC 502
number of people (Trammel, 2015). Hence, in this case, the optimum decision would be for Joe
to enrol Tom in the local school and work diligently to improve her academic performance and
eliminate the drug problem among students in the school. By so doing, the changes in the school
would benefit not only his son but also other students in the school and the future. However,
taking his son to a school in another district or a private school would only help the boy but leave
the local school unchanged, ultimately affecting society's well-being.
Discussion/Decision/Rationale.
The most ethical decision for Joe was to enrol his son at the local school and not use his
sister’s address since it would be wrong to lie about his child’s residence and to put his child in a
position where he must lie. However, since the cost of private school tuition would require
financial sacrifice and moving is such a complex process, he would send him to the local public
school and make the best of it. Being a Christian, it would be essential to seek the truth from the
bible and to pray fervently for revelation. Joe should also remember that lying is the work of the
devil. In John 8: 44, Jesus addressing the Pharisees, said, "You belong to your father, the devil,
and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not
holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for
he is a liar and the father of lies”.
It is also essential for Joe to uphold the virtues of honesty and responsibility to defend his
image of integrity. Through honesty, Joe would not dare tell his son to lie since it would show
that he is not as trustworthy as he appears. Besides, his son is already having challenges with
minor ethical issues, showing him that there are situations when one is allowed to break or bend
the law would show irresponsibility hence deteriorating his moral standards.
Stand for God.
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
6
NSEC 502
Although choosing to take Tom to the local school is the most optimum decision for Joe,
there are complex challenges that Joe must endure as a Christian. It will be vital for him to
remember that God is omniscient, knows their challenges, and has the power to change his
situation. Acts 17:26 says, "God began by making one man. From him came all the different
people who live everywhere in the world. He decided exactly when and where they must live".
Besides, God warns his people from behaving like godless people because He knows what they
need before they ask (Mathew 6:8). Joe should remember Christ's instructions of seeking the
kingdom of God and its righteousness to receive God's provision in every other thing. In this
case, he will pray for guidance to engage appropriate stakeholders to identify effective strategies
for improving the school's academics and handling the drug problem in the school.
Implementation/Fallback.
When Christian encounters a difficult situation requiring them to consider ethical
principles and virtues, it is difficult for them to understand whether they made the right choices.
The challenges occur since the ethical considerations do not necessarily match with results from
other approaches, such as the cost-benefit analysis (Bazerman & Sezer, 2016). It is therefore
essential for the individual to develop a strategy of evaluating the results of their decision hence
understanding whether it was the most optimum. Nevertheless, Christians need to remember that
God's graces are sufficient for them to complete a complicated task.
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
7
NSEC 502
Appendix 1
Ethical Scenario: Basic
Background: You (Joe) and your wife (Bev) have three children—all boys. You are a known
Christian and a deacon at your local church. Your eldest son (Tom) is about to enter high school.
The local public high school that your son will have to attend, based on your residence, has a
poor academic reputation and is known to have problems with drug use on campus. Your sister
lives in an adjoining district with a much better school. She is willing to let your child use her
address as your legal residence. You know other parents have done similar things for their kids.
In order for this to work, you would have to instruct your child to say he lives at your sister's
address even though this is not true. It would be financially difficult to afford private school and
you do not want to move to another district. You have been a fairly good model of integrity and
have been law-abiding. Your son is having difficulty dealing with some minor ethical issues and
you are concerned about his character.
Select the best alternative or develop your own alternative. Describe and justify your
selected option and rationale in the template (not here) in “Discussion/Decision/Rationale”
section. For the other options NOT selected, briefly discuss why those options are incorrect
(1-2 sentences and the rationale listed is faulty (1-2 sentences).
______(1) Use your sister's address even though you think it is wrong to do. Your child's
schooling is just too important to allow where you live to stop your child's attendance at a
better school.
_____ (2) Use your sister’s address even though you think it is wrong to do so because others
do it and you would be putting your own child at disadvantage. This is justice in action.
_____ (3) Discuss the matter with your child, explaining the importance of schooling but that he
would have to lie about his residence; then, let him decide.
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
8
NSEC 502
_____(4) Not use your sister’s address since it would be wrong to lie about your child's
residence and to put your child in a position where he must lie. However, since good
schooling is so important, you would make the financial sacrifice to either send him to
private school or move to another district.
_____(5) Not use your sister’s address since it would be wrong to lie about your child's
residence and to put your child in a position where he must lie. However, since the cost
of private school tuition would require financial sacrifice and moving is such a difficult
process, you would send him to the local public school and make the best of it.
References
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
9
NSEC 502
Bazerman, M. H., & Sezer, O. (2016). Bounded awareness: Implications for ethical decision
making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 95-105.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597815001181
Rae, S. (2018). Moral choices: an introduction to ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Testament, O. (2018). The Holy Bible. http://www.modernliteralversion.org/books/8303111.pdf
Trammel, R. C. (2015). Mindfulness as enhancing ethical decision-making and the Christian
integration of mindful practice. Social Work and Christianity, 42(2), 165.
https://search.proquest.com/openview/4b7934d172750aef15e0ca517f7f94cd/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=40430
Tyra, G. (2015). Pursuing moral faithfulness: ethics and Christian discipleship. Grand Rapids,
MI: Baker Academic.
Zollo, L., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017). What sparks ethical decision-making? The
interplay between moral intuition and moral reasoning: lessons from the scholastic
doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(4), 681-700.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-016-3221-8
NSEC 502
9/18/2022
10