Page 1 of 35
THE POLITICS OF ECONOMIC NATIONALISM AND PROTECTIONIST MEASURES
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Economic nationalism and protectionism are the two key factors compromise
the free flow of international trade.
Even though the economic nationalism and protectionism is often considered to
be synonyms, they are generally different in economic policy aspects, especially for
global trade (Wren-Lewis, 2018). Economic nationalism, which is represented by a
protectionist policy aimed at ensuring the country’s independence from external
sources, entails a variety of more protective measures towards the national industries
that are under pressure from unfair foreign competition. These protectionist policies,
which cover import tariffs, quotas, and subsidies, suggest that national boundaries
matter more than international cooperation. On the contrary, the protectionism may
even be defined as a set of policies that are brought to an end in order to protect
domestic industries, against foreign competition, by means of trade barriers and other
measures (Zyphur et al., 2015). Various types of protectionist policies are imposed,
such as levies and quotas, and subsidies and regulatory barriers with the aim of
preventing imports and of promoting domestic output. Economic nationalism, on the
other hand, primarily pursues the interests of and control over the national economy,
whereas protectionism typically consists in protecting the domestic sectors from the
outside competition in order to keep them competitive and to ensure job security.
National economicisms and protectionisms stand for the violations of the rules of free
trade and globalization as well as for the measures to protect the national markets from
the goods, services, and capital exchange across the borders. These trends seem to
Page 2 of 35
have brought the subject of national sovereignty and global economic integration to the
fore during policy discussions, among economists and international organizations, and
consequently, discussions on their wider implications to the financial, economic, and
social stability.
National economic policies and protectionism have gained prominence in the
recent period whose drivers are a mix of domestic political and international economic
growth (Wren-Lewis, 2018). The ultranationalism concerning international trades which
has been witnessed in many countries is a sign of discontentment among a significant
population that has been affected by the alleged adverse outcomes of globalizing such
as loss of jobs, wage stagnation and the growing income inequality. This turmoil has not
only led politicians to embrace nationalist toasts and protectionist measures but also it is
a guarantee of the address of the social economic grievances as well as the reach out
to the nationalistic sentiments. As a result, nations are becoming more and more
nationalistic, and they have resorted to adopting national policies and protective
measures which affect trade, supply chains, and flows of investment. The economic
nationalist and protectionist oriented policies have paradigmatically appeared in the
trade field that involves the use of a country’s economy rather than embracing
multilateral agreement. This movement mirrors a raising mistrust of existing trade
negotiating processes and global agreements, where some states prefer to divert to
local interests instead of inter-country collaboration. Furthermore, the tarrif and barriers,
also known as the trade barriers, have led to higher trade tensions level of the major
economies, causing a greater uncertainties in the global economic environment. it
increases anxieties about the chances of economic nationalism and protectionism to
Page 3 of 35
hinder the global economic growth and stability. (Chelaston, et al, 2015). Establishing
new trade routes and means of production through protectionist measures, may result in
the companies running global business to face inefficiency, higher costs, and lowered
competitiveness. On the other side, the trade conflicts and retaliatory measures among
the countries can be further escalated, which will consequently cause the global
economic problems. As a result, the market will decline, and the recovery will be
opposite to the situation. Hence, taking the temperature down of economic nationalism
and protectionism by exposing their root cause and encouraging constructive dialogue
and cooperation among the nations becomes the main focus of building a fairer and
healthier global economy.
Besides, the recent revitalization of economic nationalism and protectionism
weighs in the minds of many people that such phenomena might bring about some
serious and negative consequences of the global economic growth instability, and
cooperation (Zyphur et al., 2015). Such policies direct trade flow to inhibit the efficiency
of international markets, consumers having a few choices and production gains
currently suffering from specialization and comparative advantage. Moreover, they
might tangled trade wars, trade diplomacy, and geopolitical conflicts among trading
partners which will collapse the rules-based multilateral trading system set up by
institutions such as the World Trade Organization. Policymakers, while attending to the
domestic constituents of economic nationalism and protectionism, have the task of
navigating international trade through open, inclusive, and rules-based trade
liberalization. The regaining of economic nationalism and protectionism has led to the
fear regarding its influence on global economy development and stability (Baldwin,
Page 4 of 35
2018). The stabilization of current trading partnerships and supply chains is destabilized
by the imposition of protectionist measures, which in sluggishness, loss of
effectiveness, and the loosening of competitiveness of businesses operating in global
economy. As a consequence, retaliatory measures between countries and trade wars
may even result in the collapse of the global markets' confidence, which in its turn can
further aggravate the struggling economies. Among the most effective ways of coping
with the economic nationalism and protectionism of a nation is to deal with the causes
that do resulted into such problem and promote dialogues among the nations which will
in the long run result into a more stable and prosperous world economy.
2.0 Historical Context
2.1 Post-World War II globalization
While World War II has left heavy regional differences, the most noticeable
feature of the post-war globalization was the increase economic interaction and the rise
of global awareness. Such a phenomena can be observed in the works of F. Stiglitz
(2018). The period of time had the IMF, World Bank, and the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT) set up, all these organizations worked towards the co-
operation between the nations without introducing trade barriers and promotion of
economic development. Bretton Woods system, birthed in 1944 and, is the economic
system, which shifted the world ahead toward greater financial cooperation and greater
stability after the World War. The system was based on the fixed exchange rates which
partners were cooperating in the post-war (Bordo, 1993). These strategies were the
ones that triggered a wave of international trade, investment, and capital flows, so the
process for the modern global economy could begin. The epoch after World War II did
Page 5 of 35
not only see a reconstructing process of the world economy, but also a contribution to
the rebuilding of wrecked nations and preventing further wars, due to the efforts of
economists (Ostry et al., 2019). Establishment of institutions as the IMF, World Bank
and GATT have been deemed as a joint responsibility of the post-war era to facilitate
the process of reconstruction, economic recovery and redevelopment. Instruction for
provision of financial assistance, technical assistance, as well as a common platform for
multilateral cooperation, these institutions were instrumental in promoting predictability,
stimulating the growth, and facilitating international commerce and investment (Bordo &
James, 1991). The Bretton Woods framework as an example had caused monetary
stability and exchange rate manageability to occur, leading to increased global trade
and the economies nation-wide integration into the international system (Eichengreen,
1996).
2.2 Criticism of the free trade
` On one hand, post-World War II globalization era has proved to carry a plethora
of benefits, while on the other, there is a mounting criticism against liberalization and
globalization (Walter, 2021). Critical views of globalization cite as its disadvantages
widening inequality of earnings, job redundancy, and social displacement mainly in the
developed countries. The neoliberals from this side of the debate asserted that free
trade agreements as well as neo-liberal economic policies tends to benefit big
corporations and rich top elites at the expense of workers, local industries and natural
environment (Stiglitz, 2002). Thus, a breed of populism spread across, rebelling against
the ruling principles of free-market capitalism and championing the regulations and
safeguards intended to avert adverse consequences of the globalization issues for the
Page 6 of 35
industries and workers in the domestic markets. The age of globalization brought about
a discussion around the idea of national sovereignty, cultural identity, and economic
growth (Rodrik, 1997). Arguments from globalization opponents referred to the decline
of state sovereignty, as national economic cooperation made the domestic policies
vulnerable to pressure from the global market forces and international regulation. They
asserted that globalization weakened the sovereignty of states, as governments could
not implement their own tailor-made economic policies consistent with their nationwide
needs and concerns. Also, cultural homogeneity and loss of cultural diversity came in
the wake of globalization when it was greatly noted how Western values and materials
consumer culture spread out worldwide (Held & McGrew, 2007). Criticisms from local
actors who argued that the power of transnational Western Corporations and media
giants would overshadow the indigenous cultures and traditions, therefore could lead to
deepening of social grievances and cultural conflicts. However, more critics have
warned of the environmental costs of globalization like resource and pollution
degradation and climate change (Barbier, 200). They maintained that unlimited
economic growth and the tendency for consumption that go with globalization were just
some of the factors that would put strains on natural ecosystems, thereby putting
biodiversity and ecological stability at risk. On the other hand, globalization accelerated
the appearance of extractive industries and industrial agriculture, often leading to
deforestation, habitat losses, and land degradation in fragile parts of the world (Gore,
2013).
Page 7 of 35
2.3 Populist movements become more influential.
Becoming a powerful factor in the political world during the recent years, more
and more populist movements generate a higher impact on designing agendas and
debates dealing with public policies on global scale (Velut et al., 2022). These
movements were mainly fueled by the mighty real-time grievances over economic
injustice, cultural identity, and political system failure, which map to the public
discontentment with the situation and are supported by anti-establishment sentiments to
make their agenda. From Brexit in the UK to the election of Donald Trump in the US,
populists have gained on the wave of discontent with globalization, immigration and
market freedoms, if we follow Mudde (2019). Their recent rise has significantly shaken
up the present consensus on free trade and globalization, foreshadowing a fundamental
change to the global political landscape towards more closed economies, protectionism,
and economic nationalism. The success of the populist movements in various
developed countries indicates a hostility towards the globalization and neoliberal
economic policies which brought about many unanticipated side effects (Rodrik, 2018).
Opponents insist that globalization might be the source of job losses and stagnant
wages in many areas vulnerable to the effects of globalization, which causes the
deprivation of lower classes and increases their resentment to political decision makers
and the governing parties (Stiglitz, 2002). Populists have used the discontent and
frustration of their supporters to promise them that they will put national interests before
international commitments, shield national industries from foreign competition, and limit
immigration in order to safeguard cultural identity and social cohesion, which is
imperative for their supporters. Their xenophobic slogans have a great appeal to the
Page 8 of 35
segments of the society that are underrated and are unhappy with the consequences of
globalization that are manifested in lack of equality and a failure to tackle top priorities
like social and economic issues (Müller, 2016). The populist revolutions have introduced
new value added content to the gobal politics and they have redesigned the politics of
global relations (Mudde, 2017). A populist leader usually chooses conflictual way
towards multilateral organizations, the substantial agreements, and the diplomatic
norms. By this, he or she defends the vision of more nationalist and self-sufficient
foreign policy.
3.0 Economic Arguments
3.1 Each trade agreement strives to protect local industries and jobs.
Trade agreements are usually designed to safeguard industries and employment
opportunities at home, which contain provisions meant to prevent the local markets from
inexpensive competition from foreign producers (Margalit, 2019). Through imposing
tariffs or quotas and other trade barriers, the countries seek protection of their industries
as well as compensation from unfair competition and job losses, import competition
causes. Proponents of protectionism say that this measures required to keep domestic
employment on the more or less good level and to secure the role of the core industries,
particularly in the areas at risk of outsourcing and offshoring (Bown, 2017; L. B. Irwin,
2017). They argue that barriers to entry such as import tariffs and tariff quotas insulate
the domestic industries from foreign competition which in turn leads to economic
stability, less reliance on the imports, and their self-sufficiency thereby strengthening
national security and independence. The pro-protectionists further argue that the
barriers to the trade might as well be valuable in stimulating the domestic investment,
Page 9 of 35
innovation and technical progress by contributing to the formation of the business
friendly setting that is hospitable to the domestic industry (Irwin, 2017). On the flip-side,
protectionists critics claim that these measures distort market dynamics, curtail
economic efficiency and, ultimately, restrict consumer choice; this is because these
measures limit options for foreign goods and services (Baldwin, 2016). The argument
goes further, saying that protectionist policies usually are reciprocated by trading
nations, which intensifies exchanges of blows among trade partners leading to the
deterioration of global cooperation and prosperity. Furthermore, protectionism critics
states that the protective measures applied by domestic industries to shielding them
from foreign competition can be a self-defeating undertaking such as reducing
innovation, productivity and eventually in the long run can stifle economic
competitiveness. They support the enterprise for non-discrimination and free trading
policies which enable competition, innovation and consumer welfare and on the other
hand ensure the connectivity between the world economies through international trade.
3.2 Arguments against free trade
Critics of free trade demonstrate negative effects of surplus trade on trading
balance, as it means only export-oriented countries may have surpluses while on the
other hand, import-dependent ones may have deficits (Mayda & Rodrik, 2005). They
argue that removing trade barriers may make such economic disparities even wider and
worsen existing inequities among different countries. First of all, developing countries
are likely to be in the disadvantaged position when it comes to being competitive in
global markets with advanced economies, that results in a pattern of trade deficits which
is most of the time resolved in a similar manner as foreign borrowing to finance imports.
Page 10 of 35
In addition, protectionist measures are sometimes regarded as a sort of trade
adjustment and means for safeguarding national interests in the global economy
(Aizenman & Jinjarak, 2009). As far as critics are concerned, trade deficits may
seriously harm national industries, cause the job losses, and weaken the domestic
economy via draining of resources and funds from the territory. They argue that
currency depreciation, inflation, and decreased financial stability that are characteristic
of trade imbalances can threaten macroeconomic stability and, if left unchecked, growth
(Sgherri & Zoli, 2009). The opponents of free trade also state that the trade imbalances
may play part in the social and political tensions; as for example, trade barriers are put
for defensive purposes to protect local industries and job from foreign competition
(Oatley, 2012). In the context of protectionism, this phenomenon is usually seen as a
way of responding to unfair means in foreign trade, which are blowmanipulation of
national currencies, dumping and subsidies, and can result in market distortion and
harm to domestic companies (Eichengreen & Irwin, 2010). Trade policy critics also
demand that maintaining trade balance involves a basket of policy tools like exchange
rate adjustment, structural reforms and competitiveness upgrades to further the cause
of balanced trade globally (Blanchard et al., 2015).
3.3 The provision of self-sufficiency and security of green economic system
Besides, the martialists of protectionism believe that it can help to bring the self-
sufficiency and provide security to the country's green economic system (Melitz &
Redding, 2015). Through domestic manufacturing, production of fundamental products
and services, nations can get a decrease in their dependence on foreign suppliers and
thus avoid the shock coming from the world around or stop the chains of supply
Page 11 of 35
disruptions. Having such independent capacity is considered to be one of the vital
factors for national security and balance in case of the economic, environmental or
geopolitical challenges. Moreover, the protectionism argument many times is justified as
a way of shielding nationwide industries, and preserving positions especially in areas
that are considered strategic such as green energy, technology and advanced
manufacturing (Dutt & Mitra, 2008). Supporters contend that being able to shield
important industries from the competition of foreign countries can lead to more domestic
investments, innovations and technological advances which effectively multiplies the
competitive advantage and resilient nature of the green economy (Dehejia & Gatti,
2005). Protectionism will come about by encouraging the growth of domestic industries
and creating conditions that are conducive to business. This will lead to the creation of
possibilities for green growth and sustainable development, which will make the
economic objectives to balance with the environmental and social priorities (Costinot et
al., 2016). Moreover, protectionist measures should be used to cultivate the
environmental sustainability, efficiently combat global warming, by taxing the products
exceeding the standards of emission and environmental standards (Grossman &
Krueger, 1995). In such a way, it aligns business' objectives with those of environmental
protection, by motivating them to implement cleaner methods for production, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, and invest in renewable energy systems, in turn helping to
achieve a greener and sustainable economic environment (Busse & König, 2008). In
general, the supporters of protectionism, based on their arguments, believe that
protectionism can play a critical role in the promotion of green economy and in the
development of a long-term resilience and sustainability (Baker & Smith, 2015).
Page 12 of 35
4.0 Political Motivations
4.2 The same nationalist rhetoric and feelings are displayed.
Nationalism and nationalist reasoning often are used as an argument and
justification for the protectionist logics, by governments interested to satisfy citizens'
needs and emotions (Irwin, 2017). Through highlighting the value of national industries
which provides people with jobs political leaders can address nationalist feelings and
receive the backing from the sections of the population who panics about the economy
and national values. It is this method which can creatively tap into feelings of anxiety
among lower-class voters who believe that globalization would threaten their jobs.
Furthermore, nationalist language can help to uphold national pride through its
emphasis on the national pride and the unity of the individuals, whose economic
sovereignty can be asserted as a means to protect the nation’s autonomy from the
infiltration of foreign threats (Eichengreen and Irwin, 2010). Through patriotism and a
sense of togetherness, the political leaders could drive public opinion in favour of
protectionist policies and take off from the public attention issues, or a policy failure.
Also, nationalism rhetoric is a major factor in creating general public perceptions about
trade and globalization, which view world economics relations somehow as lose-lose
game in which only the nation can defend and pursue its interests against foreign
competitors (DeLong & Eichengreen, 2017). It is immigration which strengthens the
persuasion, that importation is only and solely the response to the unfair competition
and therefore must be aimed at maximizing the national interest. In general, nationalistic
rhetoric is very important as it helps in the molding of public opinion on the matter of
Page 13 of 35
protectionism and intervenes in national politics over trade policy and economic
nationalism.
4.2 Working people may be encouraged by seeing policies which are tailored to
their needs.
Besides, policies placed in the hands of the working people also acts as a means
of political mobilization and consolidation of power (Kurtz, 2021). Governments can
solve these trade problems either by taking a protectionist approach to address the
problems of their constituents or to make sure that they strengthen their political base
and the electoral prospect. Through the endorsement of policies designed to protect
jobs while advancing the national industry, political leaders have the ability to build a
feeling of unity among the lower class of voters and become saviors of national affairs in
the face of perceived external danger. The effectiveness of those politicians in
answering the concerns of ordinary people has built the trust and legitimacy among the
electorate and, as a result, the politicians become national leaders in economic matters.
trade protectionism additionally might be used as a political stabilizing instrument, as it
addresses social unanimity challenges deriving from unemployment, waged stagnation,
and the entire economic insecurity. Through fostering mechanisms that protect
domestic industries from international competition, rulers can effectively reduce the
chances of globalization and free trade negative impact on particular social groups that
are turned-down, thus lowering the risk of social unrest. This purposeful way of using
protectionism, either in political slogans or even policy, is a reflection of the multilayer
interplay among economic considerations, and political processes that influences trade
policy (Haggard & Kaufman, 2016). it is also crucial to stress that protectionism can be
Page 14 of 35
exploited for the sake of national sovereignty and independence in situations where a
state, regardless of its purpose, can get threatened by the global actors. Governments
may proffer protectionism measures as an a priori precaution as a step toward
protecting strategically important industries, crucial goods, and national assets from
foreign control or interference. Through the limit of foreign ownership, the management
of strategic resources, and the promotion of self-sufficiency in the vital sectors, the aim
for the country is to eliminate the vulnerabilities for the domestic market against external
shocks and political pressures. The story of safeguarding the country's interests is well
liked by the nationalists, who in turn see that they are struggling for the interests of the
nation.
4.3 The big power governments’ attempt to impose national sovereignty and
power
At the international level, protectionism in the times of globalization could be led
by desires of major government powers to preserve their national sovereignty
(Lester&Manak, 2018). There could be a situation where more powerful countries stay
away from opening up their markets to foreign products, to name a few, trade
restrictions or tariffs. Such measures may be aimed at protecting their own domestic
industries against the possibility of they being overtaken by foreign competition and to
strengthen the economic power of the country on the international stage. The intentional
use of protectionism represents a broader geopolitical assessment that aims to amplify
national power and highly balances the trade relations with the other states. Sometimes
these strong players of economy need barriers in order to resist other competitors to
reach the certain economic level of the country (Baldwin & Evenett, 2009). The
Page 15 of 35
imposition of import restrictions and the development of the domestic industries in these
countries will lead to a stronger economic base which can be used to defeat the
competitors and maintain its industries competitive and adaptable in the global market
competitions. Also, it is a perfect instrument of pressure which could be used for getting
concessions or losses from partners in public international relations and crises, thus
assuring big powers. Countries may use strike trade obstacles to their advantage for
pressuring their rival to do what they want, or face retaliatory actions. This may lead to
resolution of diplomatic disputes and geopolitical rivalry in favor of some countries, while
others would most likely suffer in most circumstances. Another possible justification for
protectionism is that it is a tool or a mechanism of international or national politics
(Hufbauer & Schott, 2008). Major government actors might decide to protect specific
industries or sectors which are considered vital for the military and ideological purposes
by imposing trade blocking strategies. National security strategies of countries often
involve the planning to produce key things within their own country, with things such as
arms, power, or technology being amongst them, while this reduces dependency on
foreign suppliers and increases self-sufficiency, it bolsters the strategic autonomy and
affects the external landscape of these countries.
5.0 Impact on International Relations
5.1 Tense relations or even tearing the bonds of alliances and partnerships.
The consequences of protectionist measures, far from just being simply
diplomatic implications, they might as well destroy alliances and partnerships (brought
on by Hays, 2015). When nations react to these trade measures by subjecting foreign
products to tariffs or other trade barriers, frequently this leads to counter-measures from
Page 16 of 35
trade partners who are adversely affected by the tariffs or the barriers. Such retaliatory
measures are often condign, and as such it can sometimes rapidly lead into trade
clashes that may become hurdles for diplomats. When the relationship is tense, there is
a risk to undermine the need for cooperation and lead to negative consequences for the
international dimension of the partnership. Multilateral institutions and cooperation
agreements aimed at promoting economic ties and peace for instance, the World Trade
Organization (WTO') may run into difficulties as member states give more value to
national interests than to the collective ones (Bown & Irwin, 2017). It is not only these
existing diplomatic frameworks that ends up being compromised via the undermining of
the trust and cooperation. Even more, it makes it extremely hard to work together in
order to solve the common problems or to pursue common objectives on the world
stage. Moreover protectionism can bring a disharmony in talks and communication
between countries which will intensify the hostility among nations (Mansfield &
Reinhardt, 2008). Conclusively, such disputes may fester into wider geopolitical
contests unless there is adequate room for dialogue and peaceful resolution of
differences. Therefore, regional stability and security are at risk. As such, protective
policies appear to be working both to advance domestic industries and address
economic problems. However, in the meantime, they can also strain reciprocal
diplomatic relations and ultimately weaken the essential aspects of international
cooperation. It sharpens the intricate interdependence of economic policies and
diplomatic ties by outlining the impression to be cautious in protectionist actions through
their impacts on global security and peace. By implementation of prosectional policies
diplomatic relations can be damaged by violation of the established international trade
Page 17 of 35
and norms of cooperation (Eichengreen, 2011). The erection of barriers between
markets and imposition of tariffs by individual states constitutes an undermining of the
spirit of trade freedom between partners who earlier established trade rules that depend
on open markets and the freedom of trade.
5.2 The trade war and a retaliatory response from other countries.
Trade wars that are fought due to the imposition of such protectionist policies or
retaliation are very dangerous for the global economic stability and geopolitical relations
(Guajardo et al., 2020). In the tit-for-tat tariff retaliations of trading partners that follow,
along with country countermeasures, the escalation of the conflict border lessens the
risk of a full-scale trade conflict. However, the consequences of such turmoil involve a
much more complex multidimensional framework that encompasses the diplomatic
world and many different cooperation spheres. Often, the trading disputes expand into
the other domains of international relations even security relationship, therefore,
provoking the geopolitical tensions and at times, undermining the efforts established for
the building of peace and stability. That trade frictions might sure diplomatic channels
and therefore render it hard to deal with common problems and cooperate towards the
same objectives. Moreover, the trade wars might result in obstruction of international
logistic flow and sourcing of resources, therefore increasing market demand and shaken
investment level ultimately reducing the growth expectations (Bown & Irwin, 2017).
Therefore, geopolitical turmoil is bound to follow as a result of recessions and job losses
that are precipitated by the lower growth rates, and these, in turn, prolong the instability
and trigger a number of social unrests. In addition, trade conflicts among nations cause
a more profound erosion of trust and cooperation, which disables their efforts to deal
Page 18 of 35
with a transnational issues, such as climate change, pandemics and terrorism
(Hufbauer & Schott, 2018). The pillars of the world economic order might finally collapse
if protectionism and trade wars are further pursued as they are capable of making
economic and geopolitical tensions worse which is a big problem for the world security
and peace. Consequently, it is clear that countries must search for diplomatic answers
and engage in dialogue that would be used to resolve the disputes and avoid further
outbreak of crises.
5.3 Lack of confidence in global economic collaboration .
As a result of the protectionist policies, which are focused on addressing the
specific national interests rather than promoting multilateral cooperation, the aura of
uncertainty and the low degree of confidence regarding international economic
collaboration is created (Huemer, 2019). By withdrawing from the treaties and trade
agreements, the use of protectionism indicates a move towards independence of
nations which are based on the principle of co-operation, collaboration and common
good. This declining trust will potentially have longer reaching effects which will inhibit
countries in making meaningful negotiations and collaborative efforts that could help
with the solving of various global dilemmas. Instead, either protectionist measures are
met with increased reluctance from countries in committing to a longer term cooperation
in climate change or poverty reduction. This aversion is rooted in the uncertainty about
the stability of the global markets and the riskiness of the partnerships across the globe.
Furthermore, there is a tendency for protectionism to fuel distrust between nation-states
and each country's need to shield its own interest prevent wider collaborations and
international cooperation. This damage to the credibility can result in more efforts to
Page 19 of 35
reach an agreement not be kicked off successfully and taking steps to accomplish the
common goal be held back. On the other hand, protectionism could lead to a scattered
and interrupted scheme in the solution to challenges which are transnational in nature
like diseases or natural pestilences. In times of crises, effective cooperation and
coordination among nations are the expected ways of coming together as a unitary
force and controlling the impact of the crisis. This response is not fully comprehensive, it
will only result in long-term suffering while reducing the preparedness of the global
community for future disasters by eroding confidence and favorable behavior among
countries. As a result, an understanding of the international collaboration is of
paramount importance for countries to avoid isolationist approach which could escalate
to protectionism in situations of uncertainty. Consequently, in the opposite direction,
establishment of an environment of trust, mutual support and intimacy is essential in this
case to overcome common problems and build a more prosperous and persevering
world.
6.0 Domestic Economic Implications
6.1 Consumer prices and cost rises hundreds of feet.
Measures for protection of market, by means of tariffs and barriers, certainly do
distort the relationships in the internal economies; and these might be very harmful for
consumers (Arkolakis et al., 2012). While tariffs can be a double-edged sword when it
comes to importing goods and thus disrupt supply lines, they may also restrict the level
of competition within domestic markets. As a result, consumers have fewer options and
this increases the high prices across different sector that is, economy. Native industries
have an opportunity to capture part of the market by raising their products’ prices once
Page 20 of 35
the foreign producers are not able to compete strongly with the domestic industries.
This can result in inflation. Hence the average consumer ends up paying more and
eventually their buying time is shortened by such action. Mostly, imposition of tariffs
extends beyond the sector directly targeted as it has an impact on the whole economy
(Irwin, 2017). Supply chains troubled in demand by high production costs can contribute
more to the inflationary pattern, and it worsens the conditions of families. protectionist
measures could misdirect the resource use in internal economies and the result could
be inefficiencies and lower productivity. The problem is that the blocked markets do not
foster an environment of competitiveness. As a result, companies hunting for profits will
tend to cut down on research and development. With this result in mind, local
businesses may fall into stagnation and even do worse on the global position. In such
cases, sustainable growth and prosperity may become difficult to achieve as domestic
companies get involved too few in the race of economic creativity and knowledge
acquisition. Furthermore, retaliatory actions by trading partners can stem as a
consequence of protectionist policies thereby provoking international disputes and
tension among partners of the international arena (Walter, 2021). These types of
reciprocity actions may disrupt global trade even more, and this is likely to add more to
the already existing negative impact of the economic crisis on the domestic economies
as the companies have to pay more for their inputs and new export as well. Hence,
along with a short-term benefit which can respectively be achieved by individual sectors,
protectionism always carries major long-term expenses for consumers and the economy
as a whole.
Page 21 of 35
6.2 Possible workers' losses and their dysfunctionality
If special protectionism is allowed it can definitely be destructive to employment
level and economic performance, especially in the territories, which ones are very
sensitive to international trade exchange (Bown, 2017). Through guarding the local
production from the international competition the protectionist measures could
unintentionally create a hindrance for the process of innovation and productivity
improvements resulting in inefficiency of resources allocation. The competitive
environment surrounding trade, which is driven by the global market in sectors like
manufacturing and agriculture, can create cascading effects such as downsizing, layoffs
or even business closures if restricted access to international trade occurs In this
situation, when companies strive to compete with their rivals, they often go astray and
end up laying off workers to cut expenses and maintain their running in the market.
Therefore, the unemployment rate increases, and employment chances for those
people become negligible, which leads to overshadowing of their economic welfare with
their families and relatives. Not only does unemployment associated with protectionism
reach person who lost jobs, but general economic indicators such as disposable income
and investment are also affected by trade barriers (Bown, 2017). People who are
dismissed by their employers or have a reduced income due to layoffs tend to reduce
their outstanding expenses, as a result of which the decline in consumer demand for
goods and services follows. Moreover, together with the decline of consumer spending
can result in the decrease of economic performance, which in turns leads to a halt
production and investment. Furthermore, unpredictability of trade policies and market
access can restrain business confidence and consequently interfere in decision making
Page 22 of 35
of otherwise companies when it comes to investment in technology and expansion.
Hence, protectionist policies can be one of the key factors affecting the ecomomic
stagnation and dysfunctionality, leading to the economic turmoil and a further decline in
the economy strength and resillence. However, trading barriers may be brought to
protect domestic industries and workers, but such move may be a push in the wrong
direction because of its potential impacts to the labor markets and well-being of the
people.
6.3 Anxiety and situation irregularity are just a few reasons why there is a fear of
stock market risk.
There is no doubt that protectionist measures result in heightened uncertainty
coupled with unpredictability of market behavior, which in turn generates investors'
anxiety and a rise in the level of risk (Evenett & Fritz, 2018). When the governments put
in place tariffs or trade barriers, it is like caused to a problem of the trade conditions and
market access uncertainty, and the impairment effects on your supply chains and
profitability follow. When personal risk assessments are a topic of this uncertainty,
investors tend to evaluate their risk tolerance and investment choices, which may have
a direct impact on market volatility and asset prices. Apart from the downward trend in
confidence in the financial markets, there could also be a flight to safety where investors
find out the less risky assets like government bond or gold to protect their investment
(Evenett & Fritz, 2018). This flight to safety can be regarded as another factor
contributing to the destabilized capital markets and disrupted capital flows, when
investors withdraw equity from risky assets and reallocate their portfolios to safer ones.
As a result, asset prices could see dramatic swings and liquidity of the market could fall,
Page 23 of 35
putting investors and businesses in a position of difficulty of attracting new investors by
borrowing capital at higher interest rates. such an uncertainty will make investors to
reduce their investments in the country, driving away foreign capital and dampening
investor confidence (Evenett & Fritz, 2018). A foreign investor can interpret protectionist
measures as an impediment to trade and investment, which may cause him to re-think
his investment or even divert capital to another market that is more stable and
predictable. It may create the lack of investment, which prevents the flow of capital,
disallows the growth of economy and limits employment, all of which contribute to
negative effect of protectionism on the economy. interlocking protectionist regulations
can create a wave of insecurity in financial markets, where investors begin to lose their
confidence which in turn interferes with the mobility of capital. The resulting market
volatility and fall in investor confidence can lead to negative impact on economic
development and stability that may have long lasting implications.
7.0 Alternative Approaches
7.1 Agreeing upon more advantageous trading arrangements
There exists an increasing prosecution of the belief that country should produce
various more viable trading arrangements as a reaction to the threats which are brought
by the implementation of trade protectionist measures (Arkolakis et al., 2012). Rather
than practicing the policy of protectionism, states can use active participation in the
negotiations on trade agreements that would facilitate more connections and openness
among nations. Normally, free trade agreements work through duties' reduction or
elimination, along with the duties of the kind of the proportion of goods and services.
Such agreements motivate governments to open more integrated and free trading
Page 24 of 35
system. It consequently leads to economic growth, efficiency, and new opportunities for
business and individuals. Trade agreements can also serve as the means to counter the
unpredictability and the instability created by the protectionism by setting up a
framework of trade relationships based on predictable and rules-based trade (2019).
Through setting out clear regulations and rules in the trade agreement, business and
investors can get more certainty about market access which in turn reduces the chance
for them to encounter type of disruption or change in policy. Investors may increase the
confidence level, hold on to their investments for the long term, which will play a crucial
role in economic stability and growth. the trade agreements on the other hand make
way for regulatory cooperation and convergence, which helps the standardisation and
regulation are on one plate on the border (Hoekman, 2019). Through establishing
common regulatory standards, countries may limit trade obstacles planted in tertiary
technical standards and requirements, further increasing businesses' chance of
compliance and market penetration in foreign markets. There is the chance that this
harmonization will lower regulatory costs for the businesses, cause technical efficiency,
and facilitate trade both in goods and services, so consumers will be given the
opportunity to buy more products that are high – quality and purchased at low prices.
bilateral and multilateral trade agreements create an attractive gateway rather than a
barrier to protectionism, ultimately leading to more liberal, cooperative and trading
intentions among countries.
7.2 Consuming capital through the education budget and professional retraining.
Whether it may be through education or professional retraining programs,
another viable alternative method is to put an investment in human capital that will
Page 25 of 35
tackle the challenges that globalization together with technology advancements are
posing (Guajardo et al., 2020). In the face of economic structural changes, which could
be triggered by the adoption of technology and cross border trade, the demand for
certain skills changes and employment more likely to depend on the type of job
required. Government could, through investment in education and training initiatives,
equip workers with the needed expertise and knowledge to navigate the traditional work
sectors and work in the developing industries and professions. Education and
professional development based retraining can have a key value in teaching skills that
are in demand for workers in the labor market that is changing (Acemoglu & Restrepo,
2020). Vocational training programs can help employees to refresh their existing skills,
gain new skills or build new areas of expertise, increasing their level of preparedness for
the economic shocks and evolving market demands. Governments can take a proactive
measure to meet the changing needs of industries by redesigning the educational
programs and training them in the same way. It will ensure that potential employees are
fully prepared to catch the emerging job opportunities and contribute to economic
development. it is possible to see the economic potential that lies behind the societal
benefits of investing in human capital, excluding the individual position on the labor
market (Hanusch & Pyka, 2017). The creation of a highly educated, skillful and
competent workforce ensures that innovation, productivity and economic
competitiveness are strengthened, and in the long run, this works as the foundation of
sustainable economic development and prosperity. Not only can the discussions and
education programs can contribute to social inclusion and narrow divides by giving
disadvantaged people the road toward the economic development and social
Page 26 of 35
promotion, but also. human capital development through education and
reskilling/upskilling programs provides a multidimensional solution to both the
globalization challenges and the new work context due to technological advancement.
Through training of the work force in the relevant skills, knowledge and capabilities the
governments and the employers can redouble their work force adaptability, livelihood
competitiveness and capacity to endure in the dynamic economic environment.
7.3 Taking the route of comparative goodness and specialization among nations.
By reinforcing the idea of comparative advantage and specialization, and keeping
economic sustainability in mind, we have an alternative way to reach the goals of
development (Huemer 2019). Not all countries need to produce all the goods they
require at home. They can make use of their unique resources and abilities by
producing those goods and services which other countries are unable to produce better
or cheaper. The advantage resulting from this competitive advantage could boil down to
technical skills, natural resource, or technological expertise. To further the development,
it is important for countries to focus on what they do best and trade with other countries
for things they don't produce as efficiently. In doing so, resources will be optimally
allocated and productivity will be maximised, thus leading to an overall increase in
economic output. Specialize of countries makes for efficient allocation of resources
among them as well as it helps achieve greater efficiency, having the same advantage
in producing specific goods and services (Krugman, 2018). Therefore, the economy
benefits from increased production and output as sources are channelized to their most
effective uses. Along with promoting competitiveness, specialization also provides the
avenue for innovation and technology growth, as firms invest their research and
Page 27 of 35
resources in the sector they specialize in. Even for the longer run, this might raise the
economic output and living standards for the people on the population. employing
comparative advantage based trading arrangement is capable of promoting
international trade and collaboration, which creates an interdependent economy and
mutual progress (Ricardo, 1817). Through trade countries can have access to a wider
range of goods and services at relatively lower prices compared to what they would
have spend on the whole set of goods if produced domestically. It means not only better
quality of consumer products as a result of that but also new opportunities for firms to
reach out and come into markets that were previously unavailable to them with the
possibility of generating higher earnings on the back of that. Moreover, international
trade serves as a instrument for the establishment of friendly relations between the
trading partners and makes the possible that they won't face conflicts with each other.
the practice of comparative advantage - with its specific focus on specialization - is a
key element for ensuring the peaceful flow of wealth and prosperity on a global scale via
sustainable economic development.
8.0 Future Outlook
8.1 The threat of new trade barriers to safeguard national industries
The economic arena around the globe keeps transforming into a point where
dismal outlooks of new trade protectionist tendencies arise (Mayda & Rodrik, 2005).
Countries as a result of the fluctuations in the economy that may be caused by
technological disruptions or shifts of comparative advantages, may find protectionist
policies as the best option to safeguard their domestic industry from foreign competitors.
Although these moves might intensify trade conflicts, they may disrupt the supply chains
Page 28 of 35
and play against economic growth, which therefore will render the resources inefficient
utilization and lessen consumer welfare. Trade barriers tend to be protectionist and may
divert trade away from the world market as well as affecting global flow of goods and
services across the borders. through the enforcement of trade barriers, counties shut
down the markets for inward and deny exporters access to new customers. This may
spark retaliation from other trading countries which results in further trade conflicts and
weakens the world trading system. Added to this, protectionism can produce a series of
negative events, including less availability of goods on the market and higher prices for
imported products (Evenett & Fritz, 2018). What happens, when countries,
unfortunately, have to impose tariffs, quotas, on imported products is that the portfolio of
goods for consumers shrinks and gets more expensive as it's now driven by a declining
level of competition. This consequently can increase the cost of purchasing even the
basic goods which may put consumer in a bind and as a result, they have less
purchasing power and their welfare is strained. the drawback of the protectionist
measures which are made to insulate national companies from foreign competition is
that they may develop major and unexpected disturbances in the global economy.
Through trade bans and breaking up of delivery networks, protectionism is the one that
harms efficiency of the economy as well as diminishes the well-being of consumers.
Instead, the nations are better to challenge the economic problem more on cooperation,
innovation, and dialogue than through tariff that consequently hurts both the domestic
and the international stakeholders.
Page 29 of 35
8.2 Making changes to it due to a transforming reality.
Intertwined with these ambiguities, the decision-makers and those relevant
parties do not deny or move away from realities that are transforming (Rodrik, 2018). It
will be a very significant issue of the flexibility in the trade policy formulation and
applications, to overcome the complexities of the global economy which is inter-
dependent. This could mean reconsidering the existing trade agreements, engaging in
trade negotiations with new markets, and finding the creative solutions to adopt
emerging trade issues. Through familiarity with changes and also by introducing
forward-looking strategies, countries can successfully form a more fertile ground for the
exploitation of new opportunities and the reduction of risk related with protectionism.
Also, building an atmosphere of dialogue and cooperation is a core element of the
formula for addressing mutual issues or looking for solutions that are acceptable to all
nations (Lester & Manak, 2018). Instead of jumping into a unilateral decision, countries
should make efforts for constructive dialog and negotiation to be able to resolve trade
disputes and initiate trade cooperation. But among those issues it imposes a condition
that the way the solutions would be reached should be through multilateralism and there
has to be a compromise towards the common objective. In addition, there is a need for
the development of countries' educational quality, innovation, and technology, which is
essential for countries in order to be competitive and adaptable when it comes to the
economic challenges of the world (Arkolakis et al., 2012). Digitizing the economy also
improves the workforce of a country by teaching the skills and knowledge needed for
the 21st century. The countries can then foster innovation, productivity, and economic
growth. In addition to that, investing in research and innovations will play an important
Page 30 of 35
part in technical progress programming and leading to the diversification of the
economy, which will be less dependent on the industries affected by trade shocks.
identifying with the unpredictable nature of the world economy presumes embracing
flexibility, collaborative efforts, and being open for changes. If change is adopted and
policies and stakeholders put in place more proactive strategies, then a situation
whereby protectionism leads to the situations whereby inclusive and sustainable
economic growth is dampened shall be avoided.
8.3 The art of compromising on the conflicting views.
Also, for the sustainable economic growth and for strengthening of cooperation
globally, the negotiation and compromise of contrasting views would be a rather key
important task (Stiglitz, 2018). It is crucial to understand the interests of all stakeholders,
including government officials, business representatives, employees as well as
consumers, and the concerns of each need to be taken into account when pursuing
common goals while at the same time respecting multiple perspectives. Working
together to bridge ideological gaps and find bases common to trade issues, invariably,
will play a great role in promoting economic stability, fostering international peace, and
enhancing prosperity not only for the countries, but also for the world. The other way
round, keeping these negotiations open and clear in their policy making processes is as
significant as building trust and legitimacy (Hays, 2015). Through promoting broader
access to information and the inclusion of civil society members in the trade
negotiations, the governments will be building trust in the system of liberalized trade and
make the process more inclusive. This can in turn resolve the issue of information deficit
within global trade governance and provide citizens with means for better understanding
Page 31 of 35
of trade liberalization and economic integration which will make it easier for these
citizens to be in favor of it. Furthermore, putting resources into training and technical
support for developing countries is another way to eliminate the negelct towards these
countries in trade negotiations and empower them to participate more actively in global
trade trade (Bown 2017). Through facilitating the construction of the platform for trade-
related infrastructural development, institutions, and human capability improvement, the
international community can provide equal space to all countries from participating in
global trading or benefiting from various trade opportunities. This could be a great
instrument in order to fight poverty, to boost economic growth on a global scale and to
create economic inclusion as well. the quest for sustainable economic progress and
global collaboration in trade will entail a holistic grafting that takes negotiation,
transparency, and capacity building into consideration. Through facilitating discussions,
promoting trust, and providing all the same tools to all participants policy-makers can
strive for the creation of an even more inclusive and equitable global trading system that
boosts prosperity and decent lives for everyone.
9.0 Conclusion
The upheaval at the expense of major transportation channels, regardless of the
nature of disasters, political conflicts, or other related tensions, can be rather profound
for global supply chains and the balance of power. Such closures might stand in the
way of ensuring the uninterrupted flow of products, goods and services, leading to the
specific shortage and price fluctuations, and, consequently, economic destabilization.
Similarly, they can be looked at from the perspective of rebalancing power among
nations, since the domination of new routes can yield new geopolitical formations and
Page 32 of 35
pursuits. In summary, ethically this is an issue that deserves to discussed more. The
route closures do not act only economically. In addition, they affect the lives of those
individuals and whole communities who see their wellbeing and livelihoods highly
dependent on the continually flowing stream of products. These are also factors that
contribute to the spread of the disease where inequalities to resources are present, in
addition to route accessibility in areas which are already struggling with socio-economic
issues. Resolving these ethical problems is beyond countries only; it requires a
comprehensive and participatory approach that involves the interests of all the parties,
emphasizes humanitarian concerns, and ensures that fairness and sustainability are the
norm of global supply chains around the world. Through the process of discourse,
building cooperation and the end of partiality, officials and concerned parties can
effectively devise a solution that will maintain ethical principles and also mitigate the
negative effects of route closures on society as a whole.
Page 33 of 35
9.0 References
Arkolakis, C., Costinot, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2012). New trade models, same old
gains? American Economic Review, 102(1), 94-130.
Bown, C. P. (2017). Protectionism and the global politics of trade. The World Economy,
40(11), 2363-2376.
Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2018). Protectionism, state discrimination, and international
business. In International Business in the Information and Digital Age (pp. 39-58).
Emerald Publishing Limited.
Frieden, J. A. (2018). The politics of globalization: Making the case for the 21st century.
In Global Political Economy (pp. 19-41). Routledge.
Guajardo, J., Molina, D., & Weber, R. (2020). Trade and growth: A synthetic control
approach. Review of Economic Dynamics, 37, 67-105.
Hays, J. C. (2015). Globalization and the new politics of embedded liberalism. Oxford
University Press.
Huemer, M. (2019). Protectionism and the ethics of nationalism. Journal of Social
Philosophy, 50(1), 38-66.
Irwin, D. A. (2017). Clashing over commerce: A history of US trade policy. University of
Chicago Press.
Kurtz, J. (2021). The rise of nationalist political parties in Europe. In The Routledge
Handbook of Euroscepticism (pp. 192-206). Routledge.
Page 34 of 35
Lester, S., & Manak, I. (2018). Joining the club: Why acceding countries should
embrace the WTO's trade facilitation agreement. Journal of World Trade, 52(6),
975-998.
Linsi, L. (2020). Protectionism, state discrimination, and international business since the
onset of the Anthropocene. Transnational Corporations Review, 12(1), 5-25.
Margalit, Y. (2019). Economic insecurity and the causes of populism, reconsidered.
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 152-70.
Mayda, A. M., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Why are some people (and countries) more
protectionist than others? European Economic Review, 49(6), 1393-1430.
Melitz, M. J., & Redding, S. J. (2015). New trade models, new welfare implications.
American Economic Review, 105(3), 1105-46.
Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International
Business Policy, 1(1-2), 12-33.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). Globalization and its discontents revisited: Anti-globalization in the
era of Trump. WW Norton & Company.
Velut, J. B., Luzio, G. D., Genna, G., Carvalho, A., & Onali, E. (2022). The impact of
protectionism on firm investment and productivity. Journal of World Business,
57(2), 101285.
Walter, S. (2021). The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political
Science, 24, 421-442.
Page 35 of 35
Wren-Lewis, S. (2018). The rise of anti-trade populism: Why the economics profession
must start to prioritize policy impacts over pure theory. In The Populist Challenge
to Globalised Trade (pp. 47-64). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
Zyphur, M. J., Li, W. D., Zhang, Z., Arvey, R. D., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). In support of
improved factor structure in protectionism measurement in cross-cultural services
research. Journal of Service Research, 18(2), 156-168.
