Page 1 of 26
EVALUATING THE CONCEPT OF OMNIBALANCING IN DEVELOPING WORLD
SECURITY POLICIES AND ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
Introduction
Omnibalancing as a strategic approach in developing nations
Omnibalancing is an up and coming strategic theory that means that a state will strive to
balance with all the great powers as friends rather than have close friendships with some against
others. The implications of this approach in the developing countries are that there is an added
advantage as well as disadvantage of the approach. In one perspective, omnibalancing offers
leeways and choices to the emergent countries in international politics. An omnibalancing
strategy differs from the Allied cooperation model in that it does not exclude cooperation with
one or another major power due to the strict framework of the alliance; an omnibalancing
strategy enables the countries of the developing world to obtain economic associations,
development aid, investments in infrastructure and security assistance, and other resources from
several powerful states, including the United States, China, Russia, the European Union, and
others. These diverse partnerships may push forward development and enhance the economic
capability of a society. However, critics have argued that it is impossible to juggle relations with
different major powers and that this strategy is inherently risky for small developing states as
they can only devote limited diplomatic capital. Such attempts to avoid over-reliance on any of
the powers can leave these nations inviting suspicion as well as negative responses from
sensitive world powers that feel the sting of defection. As for an omnibalancing developing
country, one may hardly find a key player with which it might fully entrust its commitment. Still,
such potential risks do not detract from the continued allure of the omnibalancing strategic
doctrine for developing state leaders who aim for the highest possible degree of policy freedom,
Page 2 of 26
and who think that their nations can maneuver between the superpowers. Only time will tell
whether the fluid approach of non-alignment or a strong alignment to permanent members of the
Security Council benefits the emerging developing nations.
Balancing internal and external threats in security policy-making
Security policy-making entails the determination of the threats that exist both in the
internal and outside environment, and how the organization‟s responds to them. Externally there
are factors like terrorism from other countries, cyber warfare and transnational criminals for
which one needs policies for protecting borders and important structures and computer networks.
However, if the emphasis is placed on the external threats, domestic spying and privacy violation
together with the elimination of civil liberties are possible outcomes. Concerning the policies that
have been targeted towards the external threats, according to the article, there are balance
measures. The real internal threat comprises internal terror threat, domestic extremism, insider
attacks, and other street crimes that call for intelligence and police readiness but do not let them
arm groups or infringe on individuals‟ rights. The worry of internal security may lead to social
segregation of the minorities and also stems the different versions of suspicion for the authority
of the government, which can cannot encourage for the matters like the freedom of speech. This
balance should be understood by policy-makers, they should also engage stakeholders, while
some of the stakeholders might be interested in domestic security programs only, it is important
that the policy-makers ensure that there is proper scrutiny of such programs and that such
programs should always be evaluating internal and external threats so as to set priority. This can
be achieved by doing targeted rather than blanket security policies as long as they are to given
accountabilities and they respect rights. The other is the enhancement of the amount of resources
that are spent on relation building across the group divisions. To ensure security and rights for
Page 3 of 26
oneself and one‟s family, and to defend a country against threats of aggression, is one of the
most difficult tasks, and possibly one of the greatest services, that can be performed today in the
preservation of liberty, safety, and justice on earth. It simply implies that policy decisions are not
in the set of consequent decisions and that they should be thoroughly assessed for the purpose of
developing well-coordinated and efficient policies. Consultation, supervision, continuous review,
and democrative values enable the security policy, which fights the threats, but does not harm the
liberty.
Implications for global security dynamics and international relations
Globalization introduces tremendous alterations concerning relations between states and,
thus, entails prudence in approach towards potential dangers for international security. Serious
changes in the global context and the mobility of people, capital, information, and technology
means and knowledge crossing frontiers at a rate faster than previously, states are relinquishing
some of their power. One cannot deny the existence of facts that non-state actors are assuming
more important roles. Globalization is characterized by interrelated and complex issues which
include climate change, migration, terrorism and global health risks hence requires collaboration
among the governments, international organizations, business entities and NGO‟s. However,
global relations between such big giants like the United States, China, or Russia are at present
rather volatile and in such context multilateralism is not easy. Competition for spheres of
interest, the situation in the South China Sea, cyber events, and disputes in the sphere of human
rights continue as far as complete replacement of power in the global scale remains unachieved
and strategic dominance shift takes place. Automation and disruptive technologies are also
another added threat that is present. If the structural change by means of globalization process
results in still deeper polarization of winners and losers within society in regard to anisotropic
Page 4 of 26
characteristics this openness may entail instability or authoritarian tendencies. One should,
however, bear in mind that civilian, intelligence, and military strategies have to adapt their
practices regarding diffused non-state adversaries. Thus, should tensions between the states rise
and further combined with internal instability, the probability of an attack or a nuclear accident
will rise as well. The next one is lack of leadership, being that post war order has for a long time
been more or less consistent. Also, intergovernmental institutions such as the United Nations and
the World Health Organization are either bureaucratic or have weak capabilities to address some
of the shocks that happen in the world. However it can be organized more flexibly and openly by
actors in other formations around issues. However, now cooperation on the international level is
becoming a crucial need in all fields of activity while at the same time it seems to be ever more
elusive. Nevertheless, there were still dangers that could be commonly eliminated through
prudential politics.
Origins and Theoretical Foundations of Omnibalancing
Third World security dilemmas shaping omnibalancing theory
In this theory, Third World security dilemmas have been prominent in contributing to
omnibalancing theory. After the decolonization, the smaller states were in a situation where they
needed to balance against threats in an anarchic International System but there were not many
traditions of alliance open to them. Due to the absence of the global power projection capacities
which bigger powers possessed, the ESCs sought to achieve the supreme security through
omnibalancing. Omni-balancing means a policy in which a state tries to balance against threats
by aligning itself with one set of powers but does not fully embrace alliance system. In the case
of the Third World states, omnibalancing gave room for the procurement of economic, military
and diplomatic assistance from various quarters. While Cold War bipolarity offered little agency
Page 5 of 26
to developing states reduced to choosing between alliance blocs, omnibalancing provided choice
between superpowers. Some of the instances of successful implementation of omnibalancing
could be witnessed with states like India which remained aligned with the Soviets for arms and
ammunition and also benefited itself from the western economic assistance. Similarly, Egypt was
also engaged in playing the „U.S.A. and Soviet Union game‟ to get the maximum financial aid.
The nonalignment movement also made possible omnibalancing of big power links. But as it was
stated, omnibalancing was not without its dangers. The fact that Third World states did not form
overt strategic partnerships meant that they did not enjoy the security benefits that came with
those partnerships. This aspect of their operation was also constrained to a certain level after the
Cold War superpowers competition period. Some have argued omnibalancing can lead to free-
riding without commitments in return, to which supporters have argued it fits the different
development objectives of the developing nations. In either case, the structure of the approach
emerged out of the peculiar postcolonial security contexts of Third World states. These force
calculations about threats and opportunities on several fronts have thus given rise to theoretical
enhancement concerning omnibalancing as an alignment behaviour type of the IR theory. Due to
the need to behave in a manner that would provide the highest possible security based on
constraints, there was a pressure to produce new paradigms for cooperation and competition
between the small group of states and the large ones.
Critique of traditional balance of power concepts
The old view of bipolarity in international system is based on the balance of power
approach which presupposes that states constantly strive to ensure that no single state attains a
level of military might to overpower the others. According to this theory, the world system will
remain bipolar with no hegemonic state dominating other nations through power swapping.
Page 6 of 26
However, the balance of power concept as defined traditionally has a couple of problems in
contemporary interstate relations. First, it denies the influence of other interest in the
international system and avers that all states act rationally in the international system with power
maximization as the paramount objective when in fact many states are willing to compromise
power for cultural, religious or ideological beliefs. For instance, Iran has sought to invest
energies and resources into spreading its Islamic revolution as opposed to increasing a state‟s
gross power. Second, globalization has produced a high degree of entanglement of major states
in economic and political terms so that warfare with peers can be ruinously expensive. For
example, China and the United States are trade partners hence their military conflict brings the
essential trade into danger in the developmental process of both states. Finally, there are other
non-state actors across the borders like the terrorist groups and cyber attackers who are also
acquiring more power and or asymmetrical power to undermine the state power structure from
the outside. In an era where mischievous individuals or limited groups can bring down crucial
structures of a country‟s economy and communication networks, simple economic or military
supremacy status does not guarantee immunity and strength to states. At the same time, it has
limited explanatory power when applied to the 21st century, where power is a not only
distributed across state but also across numerous global networks that have emerged as a result
of information technology and economic integration. Such a shift was already necessary back in
the pre-internet period when examining power as a state property based on military capabilities
but is even more so now given the emergence of various actors and their interactions over
political, economic, and informational media using a wide range of identities and interests.
Incorporation of domestic politics into foreign policy
Page 7 of 26
Two major components cannot be separated and are crucial in any democracy, despite the
fact that the linkage may not always be apparent to an observer of the foreign policy. Decisions
that would affect the Relations With Other Countries are an exciting but complex process where
many factors act as constraints to leaders; it is an outstanding and appealing process. On one
hand, they have to define objectives and actively participate in the global playing field for the
purpose of the nation‟s prosperity and in accordance with what the analysts deem to be beneficial
or unfavorable. But they also have to respond to opinions of their voters and bonuses provided
by the domestic political system, even if the voters or some special interested lobby for what in a
rational strategic planning perspective is illogical or unprofitable for them. Domestic politics can
therefore be viewed as a plus the formulation of foreign policy since it can enhance or diminish
the value of the formulation. It is good because it offers a certain degree of responsibility and
democracy back to the people and makes them counter some issues that are cross-border in
nature and equally capable of impacting on the lives of the people. But it also means more
emotion and less reason, a louder voice of money and lobbying, and quicker wins as on the part
of the „the politics of the achievable‟ rather than the strategic „war of the hegemon‟. At certain
times, leaders may even instill nationalist sentiments where internal affairs are concerned
deliberately to draw people‟s attention. The balance can therefore not be well answered in a
definitely comprehensive way so regard the key ideas. Removing domestic players from foreign
policy decisions removes accountability checks that can check the executives and at the same
time absolves presidents to make hard choices mainly anchored on rationalistic diplomacy as
well as security imperatives. This process is further accompanied by the injection of domestic
considerations on a continuing basis either through publicly stated discourse, legislative action
and proceedings, etc., which involve openness as well as elements of unpredictability. However,
Page 8 of 26
no democratic country lies at the extreme of either of these types depending on the culture, the
institutions and the people in governance at a given time. They thus persist as opposites between
reason of state and the will of the people as a conflict which cannot easily be decided.
Internal Threat Management in Omnibalancing Strategies
Regime survival prioritization in security decision-making
Major security and foreign policies decisions are most likely to be made with an eye on
regime survival since this is the greatest concern of authoritarian leaders. Another issue that
entails autocratic leadership is that such leaders do not have the best interest of their people or
the nation at heart but their main agenda is mostly to hold on to power. They are likely to
perceive any signs of danger, which may be internal rebellions or external forces calling for
change, in relation to its effects on the survivability of the dictatorial rule. This regime security
perspective makes authoritarian states to keenly pursue crackdown of internal opponents, control
of information and lots of resources channeled to internal security apparatus. It also has an
impact on their executive relations to military expenditure, alliances, and even the employment
of force. An autocrat in power may escalate tensions with a rival nation or increase nationalist
sentiments in order to garner support for their rule and quash dissent in the form of mass protests.
They tend to have huge armies and buy tanks, aircraft carriers not for any genuine security
reasons but in order to gain the support of head of armed forces and stave off successful coups.
But at the same time, this focus on regime security can also lead the authoritarian states to
overestimate threats and respond with resulting miscalculations. Wishing to look powerful
regarding threats considered in the domestic sphere, the country may engage in reckless exploits
and become engrossed in armed conflicts that jeopardize national stability and economic growth
in the long run. In addition, lack of transparency and restricted freedom of speech within
Page 9 of 26
authoritarianism undermines realistic and efficient decision making due to the lack of
unadulterated policy advice and constructive criticism. In short, the notion of „paranoid style in
the management of regime security „captures much of the security policy behavior of dictatorial
regimes across various geographic locations and time periods. Modern examples like Russia,
North Korea, and Saudi Arabia also have similar features where the consolidation of the
leadership‟s unchallenged despotic domestic power and the denial of change are more important
than other factors that could be expected by the international norms or strategic rationality.
Interestingly, authoritarian regimes are often volatile in international politics due to the
prioritization of regime security goals, including suppression of civil liberties and dissent, large
armed forces and arms accumulation, or assertive foreign policies.
Balancing acts between opposing domestic political factions
It is always very difficult to look for the middle ground between the two warring political
groups in a certain country but this is always very crucial for the democracy to work properly. It
is a dilemma for leaders to reconcile two opposing schools of thought and policies concurrently
while maintaining order. Socializing involves the ability to empathize with the other party and
try to comprehend the reasons for holding a certain view, no matter how much it may differ with
the socializer‟s own view, and to look for common ground on which common goals and
objectives may be found. For instance, arguments with regard to the size and role of government
remain current and relevant issues in the United States. For instance, progressive opinion holders
tend to support an expanded government, and more laws to guarantee the citizens‟ security and
employment, while conservative opinion holders recommend that bureaucracy and taxes should
be kept to a minimum. At a glance, these visions seem to be diametrically oppositional to each
other. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that most people have the opposite goals, goals such as
Page 10 of 26
economic growth and justice. Perhaps politicians could spot particular investment in
infrastructure, skills training or tax incentives that are beloved by the politicians of both parties
because they make both goals happen. Nonprofits are essential in fostering the right sentiments
necessary for advocacy campaigns to identify intersections between progressive social justice
and traditional family values. Mexico‟s polarized electoral landscape and the congressional
standoff are the result of a perpetual struggle between moderation and extremism, but the
healthiest democracies contain elements of both. These risks ought to encourage seek for shared
ground in as many cases as possible. However, what consensus-building implies it does not
suggest the abandonment of key ideas or values. Instead, it entails comprehending other
ontological perceptions, analyzing commonalities and dissimilarities, assessing what can be
tolerated and to what extent, and finally, accepting that there are some things that cannot be
tolerated and therefore, cannot and should not be discussed. In essence, competent leadership of
Democrats means manoeuvring between opposite domestic players and engaging in sincere
attempts at reconciling them for the overall good of the nation, while Republicans must define
which concessions they are willing to make versus which they will not budge on as potential deal
breakers. There are no simple solutions but legislating presupposes that the oppositions have to
come to dialogue through debate, reason, tolerance and understanding resting on the constitution.
Resource allocation dilemmas in addressing internal challenges
Resource management is always a contentious issue and seems to be a nightmare to
organizations and governments that face numerous problems internally. Due to the scarcity of
funds, there are often many interesting and potentially valuable initiatives vying for attention and
resources, and tough choices must be made as to where to invest. This entails proper declaration
of institutional goals, proper identification of the need and proper balance of internal
Page 11 of 26
stakeholders‟ demands. However, there usually is a measure of vagueness and information
uncertainty surrounding such issues or choices. It is challenging to measure the outcomes in the
various domains that would manifest as repercussions; it is also a challenge to capture the
intangible influences such as morale and public trust. There is also the issue of self-interest and
power to influence matters by those who have power and authority. To manage these dynamics,
balancing logics that guide them, one needs to critically evaluate the data available, engage in
ethical reasoning of responsibilities, and values, foster collaborative communication with all
stakeholders, as well as be open to critical self-reflection and new idea generation. Policies might
become more responsive if the organizations approach towards adaptation is focused on
experimentation and evidence-based change rather than rigid and set strategies. In the same way,
feedback can enhance accountability since people are aware of what is expected of them.
However, sound overall overarching strategies connected to the main aims continue to be
relevant to offer a framework. It is possible to achieve only the best and worst results with the
help of choosing between alternatives that must be considered as compromises. However, it is
the reliability of the procedures used for seeking inputs, evaluating choices and providing
reasons for the chosen option that determines the quality of the decision-making process. The
promotion of a better appreciation of common concerns that require collective solutions and the
creation of goodwill due to an honest demonstration of fair assessment and distribution of
resources for the benefit of the community can go a long way in maintaining social order and
harmony in the face of conflict over specific deservingness determinations. If resource allocation
dilemmas are managed in a way that is fair, and where more people are involved and where the
process is accompanied by empathy, they present a potential for positive development in the
Page 12 of 26
sense that they expose sources of inequity, invite creativity and reformation, and assert and
enrich social contracts.
External Alignment Choices in Omnibalancing Framework
Strategic bandwagoning with powerful states for protection
Strategic bandwagoning with powerful states for protection has its application to a
situation where a weak state wishes to sign security compacts with a strong state, or to join an
alliance to be protected. Instead of counterbalancing against emerging powers, the
bandwagoning states simply align with those they consider as potential adversaries in
anticipation that they will not be threatened. The following are some of the reasons why strategic
bandwagoning occurs The reasons include; there is usually a case of bandwagoning when a state
feels threatened directly by another powerful state and decides that the only way to survive is to
side with the potential being rather than the potential enemy. This helps to ensure that they
cannot be forced to confront the more powerful state without the cooperation of other states. One
can observe how smaller and economically and militarily less developed states often do not
possess the necessary means for autonomous security politics, so that alliances with more
powerful actors can be a rational course of action. States may use bandwagoning strategies to
compel adversaries, assuming that the growing power of an alliance will drive an opponent into
finding more benign alternatives. Pundits believe that authoritarian regimes are more likely to
adopt bandwagon since their political livelihood largely hinges on the support of a strong patron
who can offer them various forms of assistance ranging from financial to diplomatic and
ideological. It has also been argued that a bandwagoning trigger a domino effect as the
increasing capability of the leading state creates more pressure for additional nations to flock to
this‟s side. But, of course, the bandwagoning strategies are as dangerous as they are effective and
Page 13 of 26
using such strategy when siding with aggressive revisionist countries, weak states can face
severe consequences. In a way, they may be compelled to engage in wars which are do or die due
to rising conflicts. The patron state could also use economic or military interdependence to set a
policy agenda and constrain the foreign policy choices of junior bandwagoning actors. While
power relations change and the balance of power weaken, the smaller state may be left exposed
because the friend has grown weak. Thus, while aligning with emergent powers may offer
numerous benefits in terms of security and economic growth for the weaker state, it likewise
carries a risk of diminishing any substantial independence and even jeopardizing the fate of the
weaker partners if they rely on the wrong great power to guarantee their long-term security .
Diversification of international partnerships to avoid dependency
Due to the fact that globalization strengthens the dependence between nations, most
nations look forward to entering into other partnerships so that they are not confined to a single
partner country. In contrast to the definition of the partnerships, diversification offers states the
opportunities to mitigate threats, acquire the prospect of a range of relationships, and maintain
autonomy. Want to understand how the analysis of diversification can be useful in partnerships
can be explained with regards to India‟s recent engagements. Earlier, India had the defence
related cooperation and business with Russia for buying and investing. However, because of
Russia aggression to Ukraine and the western countries imposing sanctions on Russia the
question raises about how India can continue the imports of Russian arms and formations of joint
ventures. Therefore, in the course of years India has cultivated defense cooperation with France,
Israel, Japan and the US to have a backup. Meanwhile, India has also attempting to enhance the
business links with Saudi Arabia and the UAE to offset the impact of the reduction of import
from Iran and Russia by sanction. Development of new sources of supplies, funds and partners
Page 14 of 26
increases the strategic potential of India and its protection from operations in the style of a
punitive measure. Like India, china also expanding its outsourcing circle to other countries for
the similar diversification of contacts get more resources and reduce dependence on western
markets. Chinese companies are actively „looking for‟ lithium, cobalt, oil and agricultural
products „everywhere‟ in Latin America, Africa, and Central Asia using the Belt and Road
Initiative. It also aims at non-reliance on the largest trading partner, the US by having diversified
overseas assets including mutual and interactive relations to avert trade war or export ban of
technologies on Chinese corporations.
Incidentally, it still holds that leading contending powers like India and China are
positively involved in searching for new political and business partners all across the world. It
has been observed that leaders have started extending the authority in secularity and in terms of
economic benefits shifting from the fixed allies. To achieve these goals, it is important to sustain
the range of international cooperation which means balance in the number of partnerships, and
recognition of both dominant and emergent states‟ ability to handle externalization, to obtain the
needed resources and technologies, as well as foreign policy autonomy. When it comes to
diversification, a similar shift of focus is evident in countries as they are also attempting to de-
risk from Russia through location diversification due to the Ukraine crisis. This cost of
concentrated dependency is prevented by the rational prudential states therefore diversifying
their dependencies.
Leveraging external support to manage domestic opposition
Exogenous advice may become a successful ploy for those political leaders who want to
strengthen their positions domestically against the opposition. Through the establishment of
Page 15 of 26
foreign supporters, writing goodwill to the international media, and getting supportive words
from well-known personalities around the world, the political leaders in trouble create the
impression of power, influence the public, and discrediting opponents at home. For instance, in
preparation to volatile elections, politicians may go for foreign tours to give assertiveness, to
visit influential associates who can stand for them as being legitimate and to assert diplomatic
credentials. Opportunities to take pictures with other dignitaries and putting out the right words
to international news sources can condition domestic opinions. Likewise, winning the support
and endorsement from other influential outsiders in the form of awards, op-eds, or plain verbal
endorsement can assist the leaders weather accusations from opponents. Authoritarian regimes,
in particular, have been able successfully to use this strategy. They are thus able to counter
criticisms about their records on human rights, using the notion of “interference” and gaining
support from other non-democratic states. They may also use foreign economic and military
assistance to create a condition that benefits some of their loyalists, reinforce security agencies,
and hence fortify their home tyranny. Reliance on foreign support also creates conditions for
resentment and claims of loss of the state sovereignty. In democratic settings, the presidents
seeking a second term in office or struggling to defend their positions will enhance coverage of
the warm meetings with the key friends to convey the message of the international recognition.
Or opposition movements may strive to get external support, to prove that they have support both
in numbers and the street, the government needs to pay attention to. In either case, approval can
be a political resource that can be effectively utilized on a global level. This way, skillful
politicians are able to gain recognition from the international community which is used to
legitimize the leadership and at the same time, demonize critics from within the country. The
Page 16 of 26
strategy is not without danger, but where managed correctly, the potentials for the management
of message and method are considerable.
Economic Considerations in Omnibalancing Security Policies
Development aid as tool for regime legitimacy
Foreign aid as a method of development can in fact be a very useful in the consolidation
of the regime‟s authority, both at home and abroad. Used appropriately together with economic
and security policies that promote stability, aid can enhance development, and hence the living
standards of the people, as well as warrant the governing regime more legitimacy. But what is
also apparent from history is that there are countless examples of development aid being used to
support Authoritarian or corrupt regimes without much concern on the developmental impact.
Government is basically an agreement between the people, on one hand, and the individuals
forming the government, on the other hand, whereby the people subject themselves to the rule of
the government and its officials in exchange for protection and proper economic growth. Foreign
assistance, if well directed in line with effective health, infrastructure and education initiatives,
can greatly enhance the standard of living of the people of a nation. This enables reigning – no
matter how democratic or autocratic – to assert that they are keeping their side of the ruling
bargain. Better counting of literacy, mortality and rates of GDP per capita also gives more
credibility in the eyes of the global society. Development aid is frequently channeled away from
social spending, ending up in different forms of patronage, influential people‟s personal
accounts, or white elephant investments in the capital which do not bring value to the people in
the country. However, the International approval and the dollars continue to pour in that donor
countries ignore corruption or human rights abuses. Cold War politics enabled tyrants such as
Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaire to accumulate staggering sums by embezzling foreign aid designed
Page 17 of 26
to curb rebellion and to allow virtually no economic growth beyond the capital. More recently,
Paul Kagame of Rwanda has used increases in development indicators which are legitimized by
aid to mask political clamp down. When developing the strategies of omnibalancing, the security
and economic policies that are to be implemented, policymakers should think through the
implications of aid to development. Supporting fraudulent but friendly rulers with aid,
globalization perpetuates injustice and hampers genuine growth in the long run. The money
should only be continued to be provided after some corresponding reforms regarding the
democracy representation, poverty, and human rights have been put in place. When it supports
authoritarian rulers, diplomacy may be perceived as more preferable and still far from ideal
against the background of regime unpredicted collapse.
Natural resource management influencing international security posture
Trade relationships impacting alignment and threat perceptions
Trade relationships may be significant with regards to congruence and perceived threats
involving countries in regard to economic drivers that facilitate the balance of security policies.
Nations engaged in business relations may not view each other as competitors and thus the
possibility of two or more parties to have similar interests in security hence promote cooperation.
For example, the USA and China are political and military adversaries to some extent and their
political and military relations are tense, yet they signed the trade deal exceeding more than 0
billion in 2021 and so both sides have to restrain themselves from exacerbating their political and
military influences and lose their large scale trade. In fact, shifts in the trade relations whether
through policy changes or else can largely alter the readjustment and perception of threat as
Page 18 of 26
economic dynamics bear pressure on the security features. The EU‟s dependence on Russian
energy sources is the reason why despite a significant consensus on the EU‟s attitude towards the
Russian actions, there has been disagreement on how to address it. Now that Australia indulging
in a closer economic entity with both India and Japan, security discussions or talks between these
countries which have arisen due to China‟s new status as a super power. It is crucial for the
security policy decision-making to realize the interconnectivity of the operating international
trade and hence, the global economy. The interest of states inter connected in their economies,
therefore, comprises of abandoning part of their security goals for the sake of economic balance
since states with trade linkages overlook economic bonds to concentrate on security. This means
that the nature of contemporary interstate relations in international trade calls for fine-tuning of
developed policies along this bifaceted scale. Taking into account the impact of technological
development, climate, and political setting, the evolution of the international trade is presumed to
rise and fluctuate during the next few decades, and, therefore, the changes in the aforementioned
factors have to be assessed by analysts to determine how they influence the congruency in
security relations between the countries. As described earlier, the national interest will, therefore,
have to be advanced in a delicate balanced way and particular care taken not to cause additional
problems in the economic sphere or escalate hostility.
Omnibalancing's Impact on Regional Security Dynamics
Shifting alliances destabilizing established regional power structures
Another type of change in the system of international relations is reorganization of
relations between states and other non-state actors that can generate shifts in the state structure
and power setting in a number of world regions. It is an instability that stems from the fact that
when the major players in the game change their alliances and affiliations in ways that are new
Page 19 of 26
or otherwise, it disrupts the hegemony that flows from these well-defined categories. One such
instance can be witnessed in the region of Middle East where the emergence of Israel and some
nations of the gulf such as UAE and Bahrain has altered the dynamics of power sharing. Israel
has been for many years antagonistically situated towards its Arab neighbours and virtually
isolated from them–these accords are a complete paradigm shift. It changes presumed realities of
who collaborates with whom as former sworn foes turn friendly partners who aim at fostering
not only better economic but even military cooperation. Iran and many other groups of
Palestinian militant have criticized the deals saying they saw the dismantling of previous anti-
Israel coalitions which they once dominated heavily. However, the alliances appear to be
enduring, a fact that points to the fact that despite personal animosity, there is capacity to balance
interests and cooperate especially where there is convergence of interests. Another major theatre
that has seen volatility owing to the fluctuating support base is the Indo-Pacific with new
tensions surfacing between China and the western world. China had been gradually forging
closer ties with the PIF nations over the last decade by offering them more money and
investment, thereby scoring a strategic diplomatic victory over the West. But anti-China
sentiments over more assertive Chinese actions have forced some of these smaller island nations
such as the Solomon Islands to reconsider their loyalty–from accepting Chinese police trainers to
signing security deals with Australia and the United States instead. The fluctuating shifts that are
depicted show how tenuously vied the allegiance of small, geopolitically situated countries is
sandwiched between two massive powers. Old world powers or new players creating balancing
entities like the Quad of the United States, India, Japan, and Australia have to deal with factors
that could erode their cohesion in the face of Chinese pressure or enticements. In any of these
circumstances, the turn of affiliations changes the relationships of power or its lack, descendant
Page 20 of 26
or ascendant, on a regional level. He uses it to mean that it takes hegemonic powers that were
once in a position to demand supplicium to consistently optimize and reinforce the circles of
amity in order to refresh and convey them. And it reveals opportunities to act for the middle
powers or for a young, a dreaming actor who wants more in the murk of the cooperation. The net
effect is generally less harmonized and less principled reconciliation of the conflicting parties
claims.
Conflict spillover risks from internal security prioritization
Self-security principally consumes resources and attention within a country, and this
means that conflict spillover risks are inevitable since resources and attention are not directed
towards regional cooperation and development. In the event of internal conflict or turmoil within
states, they tend to strengthen security measures, including repression, as a means of
reestablishing order at home. However, it can often overlook external economic, social, and
political relations that if are uncared, may spread instability across borders through refugees,
economic crises, and diaspora subversives in foreign lands. For instance, when the Assad regime
responded to the initially non-violent demands for democracy during the Arab Spring in 2011 by
attacking the protestors, this ignited a civil war that quickly became regional. With millions
forced to seek refuge, damage to infrastructure, and decrease in productivity due to the war, new
terrorist networks both within the confines of Syria and those sympathetic to the situation
abroad, the civil unrest soon began to spread across the Syrian borders affecting neighboring
countries. It affected neighboring states too by providing an influx of refugees they could not
accommodate, integrate, or support; armed militant groups extended cross-border smuggling and
recruitment activities; and sectarian conflicts escalated throughout the region. While Assad was
keen on maintaining domestic security and regime stability, external conflicts have drawn the
Page 21 of 26
attention of regional and international actors like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Russia and more
which raises the possibility of an escalation. Likewise, when the civil war between the Sinhalese
government and Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka intensified under the rule of President Mahinda
Rajapaksa to eliminate the militant group within Sri Lanka‟s territories, the use of force and
bringing the Tamil Tigers to their knees did not include thinking about how these minority
groups could be reintegrated into Sri Lankan society sustainably. Thus, although the internal
conflict was concluded, the motives and resentment within the Tamil diaspora communities
outside continued to provoke unrest and violence funding through abroad and sometimes within
Sri Lanka. In these cases and others, it may be that high levels of internal oppression result in
temporary quelling of internal dissent but more often serve to export radicalization and violent
extremism elsewhere without intention. It may be more effective to combine both the coercive
measures and the reconciliation policies when the world has to better control the total conflict
spillover risks coming from the internal instability.
Regional organizations' effectiveness challenged by omnibalancing practices
Omnibalancing weakens the efficiency of regional organizations since member states
engage in the process of determining their responsibilities and costs at the same time. Bipolarity
is described as states seeking involvement with several leading powers to optimise on advantages
and self-reliance. This has become so prevalent especially when the structure of power within the
global system is changing from uni-polar to multi-polar. While states align against the leading
power, they ally with potential challengers to insure against threats and increase collaboration.
But this complicates regional governance/ cooperation. These are states that omnibalance,
distribute their allegiances and obligations between partners within the region and those beyond
the region. While engaging in multilateral diplomacy, they tend to focus on their strategic
Page 22 of 26
partnerships with the great powers more than regional projects which prevent regional
organisations from forming a coherent agenda, from integrating institutions and from putting
together policies. For example, ASEAN has failed to act with rapid resolve regarding the South
China Sea issue because some members such as Cambodia lean more towards China while others
towards the US. The EU has also stood faced difficulties in implementing sanctions on Russia
because some of its member states depend heavily on Moscow. In Africa the rivalry between
China and western countries has caused split of AU and rendered initiatives to address crises and
develop infrastructure projects across the continent. On the one hand, omnibalancing affords
states with strategic advantages, yet on the other, it hampers the formation of ASEAN
institutions. It enables dominant states to enter regions, pursue a divider and ruler strategy, and
mold organizations to their preference. Others opine that through omnibalancing, one does not
necessarily compromise on regional integration. States can manage separate relationships with
these different partners – cooperation in technical matters and rivalry in the classical security
fields. Middle powers have utilized omnibalancing to gain more representation in regional
organizations, present counterhegemons to overwhelming powers, and bring in new instruments
and norms. Most scholars argue that omnibalancing hinders regional organizations from realizing
their full potential and rising to the level of a dominant power. It results to institutional
stagnation, weak policy measures, and compartmentalized regionalisms. For the concept of
regional cooperation to be meaningful in their context, states may have to sacrifice some long-
term regional objectives for the quest of immediate gains from great power relations. The
deepening of the multi-polarity structure will likely lead to the enhancement of the
omnibalancing incentives. Regional actors must accommodate the governance of alignments in
the place of the place of member-states instead of opposing such trends.
Page 23 of 26
Conclusion
Omnibalancing's significant influence on developing world foreign policies
The omnibalancing theory was firstly formulated and studied in the frameworks of the
states of Southeast and South Asia, but it is gaining the interest of researchers in recent years and
has become the basis for the foreign policies of several developing states. The fact is that as the
global hierarchy namely the order has transitioned from bipolar or unipolar system with the
United States and the former Soviet Union on the top to a more complex one with emerging
giants like China and India, many a weak developing state has found that this has left them with
several choices and opportunities to gain the most out of the powers in a globalized world.
Unlike the states which have firmer political affiliations with a particular super or giant power,
these have foreign policies that are geared towards „hedging‟ their strategic relationships and
getting protection, economic assistance and investments, political support, and technology and
arms from several super or giant powers. This omnibalancing strategy is to maximize
opportunities within the structures of the international system and is achieved by not depending
on one particular dominant state. For instance, across the South East Asia, Central Asia, Africa
and Latin America, the developing countries are gradually shifting their neutral or balanced
foreign policies between the US, China, Russia, Japan, India and the EU; instead, they are
joining the institutions and forums supported by the plethora of influential world powers. This
omnibalancing represents the satisfactory search for the newly emerging developing states for a
new balance in an emerging multipolar system which implies the diversification of external ties
that supply these states with assets that in turn drives their development. As the concept of
omnibalancing might foster international competition for power, it grants the developing states
Page 24 of 26
the ability to play the rivals of the superpowers and enjoy benefits from all sides instead of
becoming the vassal of a single world leader.
Complexities in predicting behavior of states employing omnibalancing strategies
The idea of omnibalancing strategies used by various states in foreign policies
complicates the possibility of forecasting their behavior and positions. Omnibalancing can be
defined as a concept which speaks of states striving to balance threats by engaging in an intricate
web of policies that involve cooperation as well as confrontation with multiple dominant powers
at a time. While the old balancing approach implies that states seek an alliance with the counter
part of their major threat, omnibalancing rather involves forming a partnership with potential
threats and their allies with the aim of achieving the greatest amount of good and avoiding the
worst for all the sides involved. However, this makes for constant changes in loyalty and policies
as the state realizes where danger and advantage is. For instance, a state may align itself to a
particular major power on economic and diplomacy matters while at the same time, they may
adopt an opposing stance in other fields, before swaying sides the moment a new power of
different nature emerges or is perceived to have emerged. This fickleness and complexity
inherent in omnibalancing can bewilder outside analysts to determine where the state‟s interests
are most aligned and how they may shift over future in response to power shifts. Namely,
omnibalancing‟s multidimensionality makes it impossible to use binary classifications that pit
friends against foes to analyze alignments. However, the knowledge of interests in context of
various issue areas and thus the transactional and conditional character of state cooperation is
crucial. An acquaintance with the peculiarities of the economic situations, the internal politics of
factions, the relations with competitor and adversary states, and the security problems in a state
is helpful to start to characterize the elements of change and the behavioral patterns tentatively
Page 25 of 26
involved in omnibalancing strategies. Nonetheless, as is evident, and specialists will agree, there
are always unexpected developments and unforeseen changes.
Need for nuanced approaches in engaging with omnibalancing regimes
Due to the characteristics of the different rules of engagement in omnibalancing regimes,
careful strategies should be undertaken with the aim of achieving diplomatic objectives. The
concept of omnibalancing regimes leads to the foreign policy approach of constant flipping of
sides in order to gain as much independence as possible. Instead of aligning themselves
absolutely to one group or another, they act in a pragmatic manner and form ad hoc coalitions to
counterbalance authorities. This creates problems for conventional constructions of alliance
which are based on the notion of mutual interests of and similar values. But, at the same time,
full isolation or confrontation with omnibalancing states is damaging as well. It may alienate
them further and draw them into the spheres of influence of their competitors. Thus, it is
necessary to encourage more subtle forms of engagement that would be better aligned with the
interests of omnibalancers and their primary concerns for security, status, and freedom. This
implies ensuring that they are respected for their autonomy, avoiding overbearing requests or
expecting them to provide quid pro quo, cultivating relationship with both the ruling and
opposition parties, and presenting any form of cooperation as a win-win proposition. Specific
cooperative relations in trade, climate, health and other spheres of regional security can be the
basis for trust. Omnibalancers also have a better reaction when a company uses positive
inducements as compared to negative sanctions and therefore may prefer positive reinforcements
over punitive measures. None of this implies that progress will come quickly or without major
challenges, which means that omnibalancing regimes will maintain sophisticated forms of
balancing between the rising powers. Still, this sort of „managed‟ or „open-ended‟ engagement
Page 26 of 26
clearly has a better prospect than the alternatives of gradually building the relationships and
dependencies that in the long run can bring a consistent conservative force to bear on their
foreign policy directions. It is important to remember that it‟s not a matter of good or bad, but
rather a refined and subtle art of diplomacy and statecraft.
