Page 1 of 26
GEOPOLITICAL FACTORS SHAPING BALANCE OF POWER DYNAMICS IN
GLOBAL SECURITY
Introduction
Geopolitical tensions reshaping global security architecture
New conflicts that have arisen due to changes in the power relations within the
international system, especially between the US, China, Russia, and other powers have led to a
shift in the world order that has only existed since the post-WWII period. These include the
territorial disputes in the South China Sea, where China is seeking to assert its hegemony,
Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine, illustrating Moscow’s desire to regain dominance within
the sphere of influence it historically had on its western front, political and civil liberties and
governance system between liberal democracies and more authoritarian minded countries like
China and Russia, and the new frontier domains like space, the Arctic, and cyber, which are still
not fully regulated or controlled These tensions are exploring institutions such as NATO and the
UN, creating deadlock which reduces multilateral approaches to international matters. They are
also deepening the division of technology as a new Western community and China-Russia-
centric networks, satellites, and payment systems are emerging and these tensions have led to
enhanced expenditures on defense and security competition with focus on advanced equipment
such as hypersonic weapons and AI-based systems. The dangers on the use of nuclear weapons
have worked as a deterrent factor towards the direct confrontation of major powers but the
geopolitics has tilted towards more proxy wars, weaponization of space and cyber domains and
also the chances of cut offs or distortion of communication during criticality. The future
evolution of the security architecture depends in equal measure on whether the US and China can
navigate around a clear confrontation and the part Russia will play, whether it will be moving
Page 2 of 26
closer to China or reestablishing relations with the West. The global system is still struggling to
come up with ways to manage destructive security conflicts, and to promote dialogue and
cooperation based on reciprocity through the creation of norms and institutions that could help
address common threats such as climate change, pandemics, terrorism, and networks of
organized crime that take advantage of such rivalries.
Emergence of new power centers challenging existing security orders
The trend is the creation of new power poles and the shift of the world centers of power,
which affect the security standards and world systems that have been formed since the Second
World War. Giant powers such as China and India coupled with their growing and large
populations as well as their fast developing economies and emerging military muscles are
beginning to assert themselves more in their regions and internationally. China especially is a
country that has plans such as Belt and Road Initiative and is in the process of modernizing its
military in order to expand its influence way beyond East Asia. Assertiveness in the EEZ and
SCMs has increased tension with neighbors and US likewise reemerging Russia under Putin
using military force in Georgia, Ukraine and Syria to ensure the protection of Russian interest in
its backyard. Russia has also not been timid in directly confronting the West and NATO alliance
in any way possible. These developments indicate that the so-called post World War liberal
international order led by the United States is gradually unraveling. The UN and other global
multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF are also reportedly losing
significance with emerging parallel bodies led by China and Russia; AIIB and EEU respectively.
The shale revolution has also reduced the US as a consumer of oil imports from the Middle East
and its security obligations and concerns as well. Still, the US is the largest economy and the
only super power with the ability to deploy troops and force throughout the world, although the
Page 3 of 26
American public is war weary. However, post-Soviet collapse, the hegemonic control of
America in the political, economic and military structures has slowly being replaced by a much
more complicated bipolar world, which is likely to present complex foreign policy dynamics for
the U.S. and allies in managing, checking and accommodating emerging power competitors and
rivals while at the same time partnering with them in managing global threats that are non-
traditional such as terrorism, climate change, pandemics as well as global trade where interest
continue to overlap. The navigation and containment of outright great power conflicts will also
involve changes from status quo oriented powers such as burden-shifting within the Western
alliance and some degree of deference to the rightful claims of other powers to the structure of a
multipolar international system.
Importance of understanding geopolitical drivers in security policy
Knowledge of the political environment is key in establishing appropriate security
measures which are in harmony with other policies on relations with other countries and their
underlying dynamics. Geopolitical factors migrate from a nation’s location in the globe, relations
with the neighboring nations, availability of essential resources, and the layout of power in the
region. Security leaders are required to have an understanding of the international relations
systems that exist in the world today, as well as the regional environment that they exist in. An
examples is the energy geopolitics determine positions on crucial energy sources and suppliers,
and key sea lanes. Or arms races between superpowers lead to a never-ending cycle of threats
that security systems need to respond to. If these fundamental geopolitical concepts are not
understood then what is produced is security policies that are inconsistent with political goals,
which may be met with resistance from important allies and counterparts, irrelevant to existing
conditions, cautious instead of anticipatory about new threats, and finally, detrimental to the
Page 4 of 26
realization of policy goals. Thus, geopolitical awareness allows for accurate threat analysis and,
correspondingly, timely policy adjustments, unified narratives within the government and more
engagement and support from allies and partners, as well as comprehensive security strategies
that would address the current and future needs of a country. Strategically relevant policies are
sensitive to the political, military, economic, and social relations within specific geographic
areas, relations between prospective opponents and neutrals, the possibility of foreign access to
bases, and the potential for constructive cooperation for building up forces and facilities. While
the concept of security is often colored by military concerns within the framework of geopolitics,
the idea of enlightened analysis encourages the adoption of a more holistic perspective when it
comes to the nature of power and its usage in the favorable resolution of security concerns
without necessarily engaging in armed conflict in all situations. Given the modern trends in the
world where power is no longer equally distributed and conflicts are not as manifest as in the
past but rather as in modern global politics more in the form of great power competition, a
security leader with a good understanding of geopolitics will therefore devise better policies than
a leader who has no contextual knowledge of geopolitics.
Regional Power Blocs and Security Competition
ASEAN's growing role in Indo-Pacific security dynamics
Several aspects and dynamics of the ASEAN community have been expanded
significantly over the recent years as the relations between the USA and the PRC have become
more tense in the context of the great power competition in the Indo-Pacific region, at the same
time opening some new prospects for the further development of the 10-state regional
organization. With the increasing competition between the United States and China across the
economic, technology and military fronts, countries in South East Asia are increasingly being
Page 5 of 26
drawn into the vortex of balancing or aligning their strategic partnership with one of the
superpowers. ASEAN continues to strive for strategic independence in international relations
while respecting non-intervention policy and the principles of peaceful settlement of the dispute
in accordance with the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation. It is therefore in the interest of ASEAN
to use its diplomatic and economic power to foster a regional security order that suits their needs.
For example, the East Asia Summit arrangement, the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting –
Plus arrangement, as well as the Expanded ASEAN Maritime Forum; these arrangements enable
ASEAN to become a part of the regional architecture. ASEAN also endorsed the concept of the
Indo-Pacific Outlook on the Indo-Pacific in 2019 to demonstrate its desire to take a proactive
approach to the negotiating processes within the strategic region extending from Africa to
Oceania. Yet, the ASEAN centrality may be challenged by the geo-economic and geopolitical
fault lines such as the South China Sea issue and limited participation of ASEAN in such formats
as the Quad and AUKUS. Other crises similar to the Myanmar coup in 2021 also question the
credibility of ASEAN as a regional actor in managing crisis. However, there are still values and
importance in symbolism and convening power that still makes ASEAN the most capable to
conduct major power consultations and set up the discourse on the architecture of security in
East Asia. Consequently, ASEAN needs to assert its institutional control, foster maritime
security through localized forums like Our Eyes and rectify internal governance failures in the
future to achieve its dream of assertiveness in the degenerating Indo-Pacific strategic sphere.
Middle Eastern realignments influencing global oil security
Middle Eastern realignments influencing global oil security are changes that are key
indicators of shifting geopolitical trends and realignments that have been evident in the Middle
East region and they impact the global oil security. Several countries that are part of the group
Page 6 of 26
have started to seek for a more dominant position in the region, hence the struggle for control of
oil resources. To sum it up, Iran and Saudi Arabia tensions are more than sectarian divisions and
proxy wars which also indicate the struggle for supremacy in the Middle East region with oil as a
factor. Of all the OPEC countries, Iran has recently rejoined the market after years of ban and is
eager to regain its market position. At the same time, OPEC member Saudi Arabia faces
potential aggression from Iran in production and goal to be on top. The other factor that
contributed to the recent blockade of Qatar by Saudi Arabia and its allies was Qatar policies on
independent export of oil and gas which are deemed to compromise other member states of the
Gulf. I believe that the crisis in Qatar interrupted the prior patterns of cooperation in the Gulf
area that were not perfect but offered stability. The civil wars in Iraq, Syria and Yemen have also
over time altered who manages oil formations and structures since different parties and countries
fight for supremacy. The attack by ISIS that captured many of Iraq’s oil infrastructure
institutions was not only a symptom but also a catalyst to the instability of the region. Russia is
becoming an increasingly active participant in the Syrian market while also being involved in
more questionable political and economic arrangements in the area. The U.S which currently
receives very little Mideast oil despite have a vested interest in stable global markets. This is a
volatile terrain characterized by unstable partnerships, abrupt policy changes and interlocking of
conflict hence the current and future supply of oil entails high uncertainties. In this case, the
more flexible market offered by the US Shale revolution and the rise in non-OPEC production
means that events in the Middle East with its huge reserves remain the dominant factor in oil
security. Any interruption in production or shut down of the vital transport links affecting the
Mideast crude will cause the benchmark prices to shoot up with severe economic effects, which
Page 7 of 26
means the constantly shifting political landscape in this unstable region has indeed become a
significant concern for global oil supply and stability.
African Union's evolving impact on continental stability
The African Union (AU) has evolved since its formation in 2002 into an organisation
with substantive control and involvement in peace and security matters within the African
continent although it faces some challenges in its effectiveness in the prevention and
management of armed conflicts. The present-day AU seems to have stronger norms and
institutions of political and military intervention compared to OAU, as evident from its roles and
responsibilities on issues such as peace and security; democracy and governance; and
humanitarian affairs. This dynamic process, enshrined in the Article 4(h) of the AU Constitutive
Act for the possibility of an intervention in member states in case of war crimes, genocide, and
crime against humanity, has created the opportunity for positive changes in stabilizing contexts
from Burundi to Somalia, although the AU remains highly dependent on external actors such as
the United Nations and the European Union when it comes to carrying out multifaceted
peacekeeping operations. From financial, logistical and political points of view, the AU has had
still significant challenges in the effectiveness of its peacemaking: for instance, the AMISOM
mandated by the AU when it was formed to address the situation in Somalia, in the early years of
its operation, suffered from funding problems, lack of forces to be deployed, and attacks from
Al-Shabaab. In addition, the AU has failed to deter despots from eroding democracy and
tampering with constitution thus destabilizing countries like Uganda, Cameroon, Guinea among
others. As coordinated AU electoral observer missions enhance the quality of electoral systems
and processes, rulers still violate constitutional provisions on term limits to their limited account
with the AU. There are also perpetual dilemmas between state sovereignty and human rights
Page 8 of 26
protection that have limited the responses on AU to mass atrocities and long-standing conflicts in
such locations as South Sudan and DRC. Hence, when again the AU conflict intervention
mechanisms have been proven to be increasingly vital for the security of Africa and its efforts to
sanction the unconstitutional changes of power are important signals that supports
constitutionalism; the AUC goes on requiring more resources and cooperation from UN and
regional mechanisms to surmount some obstacles in effectively implementing its optimistic
stabilization role. The AU lacks positive external actors for improving early warning
mechanisms, timely interventions, and sufficient support for sustaining the organization’s
progressive progress and sustaining political will among the African leaders on political
liberalization and Crisis management also remain pertinent for the AU to discharge the emerging
stabilization capacities.
Maritime Chokepoints as Geopolitical Leverage Points
Strait of Hormuz tensions affecting global energy
The Strait of Hormuz is a 21.5-mile-wide, 4 to 19-mile-deep lane connecting the Persian
Gulf and the Gulf of Oman and it is the world’s singular most important oil transport bottleneck
– more than 30 per cent of all seaborne traded crude oil and other liquids transits through the
strait each day. Relations between Iran and the US have of late turned sour over security and
sovereignty of the Strait and the level of aggression exhibited has raised concerns over possible
skirmishes that may lead to blockage of the waterway and disruption of international oil supplies.
Iran has often warned that it has the capability to shut the Strait in order to deter possible
American action or sanctions meant to curb Iran’s crude exports. Iran has earlier this year mostly
limited itself to less direct measures as occupying and bullying oil tankers in and near the Strait
while not even attempting to close it, but the occasional acts of aggression alone contribute to the
Page 9 of 26
risk and insurance premium associated with shipping oil from neighboring exporters. These
tensions and risks of escalation that could significantly curtail seaborne oil exports out of key
producers, such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, continue to
underpin oil price swings. Energy markets continue to be highly sensitive to possible occurrences
of military conflict in the strait or heavy disruptions, whereby estimates indicate that crude prices
could increase by between -30 per barrel. Oil has some regional substitutability since demand
can be met in global markets, but massive, sudden supply disruptions from the Strait would
challenge the adaptability of supplies and their buffer. Other global consumers of oil, including
big importers, also worry about availability and price effects on them in case transport through
the Strait decreases noticeably for more than one week - previous oil upheavals in the Middle
East have resulted in economic crises globally. The dangers and insecurity concerning this
strategic Straits of Hormuz of 21miles continue to upset world oil markets, aggravate cost
fluctuations, dampen investors’ confidence in future supply assurance, and stir economic
concerns over the accessibility and prices of Middle Eastern petroleum products. Though there is
optimism in the air that the relations between Iran and US/West may be improving and such
tensions may be reduced in the future, so far there have been no major breakthroughs and the
energy world holds its breath during years of conflict and threats in this narrow but critically
important Strait passage adding significant risks to the world oil market.
South China Sea disputes reshaping naval strategy
The South China Sea has turn into a strategic hotspot due to the fact that China as well as
few countries of the South East Asia is on the horns of the dilemma with each of the country
claiming sovereignty over the islands, reefs, and resources of the South China Sea. China is
closing the shops and building the military bases on the artificial islands and sending the patrol
Page 10 of 26
boats to chase the foreign ships, which has provoked concerns in nations such as Vietnam,
Philippines, and Malaysia that have overlapping territorial claims. The United States of America
also fears that China may close the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea which serves
as an important international corridor for trade and these disputes are now redesigning naval
strategies as regional militaries are expanding their contingents in projecting force and asserting
sovereignty. It is good to note that China had rapidly grown its navy over the last two decades,
acquiring sophisticated destroyers, submarines and the country’s first aircraft carrier to project its
power beyond the Pacific. The Philippines and Vietnam have bought more frigates, corvettes and
coastal missile batteries to tackle China’s naval threat in their own backyard and are in a tighter
military alliance with former Cold War ally the United States. The US Navy has committed
additional platforms and aircraft to the Pacific, enhanced partnership, and upped FON operations
to counter China. An added danger arises from the possibility of an armed confrontation whether
deliberate or inadvertent. All sides have stepped up operational rhythms to increase exposure
between contenders to competing groups. Unless the political leaders involved find ways to
temper these rivalries, a disagreement over fishing grounds or oil exploration could in theory
escalate to war. Attempting to resolve who owns what part of the islands and negotiate how they
should behave has been a near impossible task due to the fact that these are not simply economic
issues but more entangled with economic and historical and nationalist sentiments. If the South
China Sea disputes do not quickly reach a peaceful solution, this conflict will send the region to a
more dangerous and uncertain naval period for several years.
Panama Canal's modernization altering hemispheric security calculations
Currently, various construction works on a third set of locks and other new modification
of the Panama Canal is still under way and consequently, it plays a crucial social role in Altering
Page 11 of 26
major trends and shifts in global maritime transport and energy transportation across the Western
hemisphere and simultaneously affects matters relating to security and sovereignty in the region.
The expansion will increase the depth of Canal thus enable to handle many and big ships hence
increase the significance of this crucial water channel through which more than 13, 000 ships
pass a year and transporting 5 percent of the world’s sea borne trade. It may assist in increasing
patriotism for export for countries which are situated near the coasts of the pacific like Peru and
Chile. Nonetheless, some scholars suggested that the importance of the canal has risen over the
decades, the risk and the cost of disruption to the smooth operation of this canal due to
exhaustion of the digging up of the canal, water levels in the lock due to shortage of water
through droughts and hitches instigated by more of man-made factors such as terrorism or rather
cyber warfare rises as the usage of the Canal enhances. Any period of closure of the Canal could
redirect the shipping traffic to go around South America’s Cape Horn which of course would
take more time and fuel to go around the continent. This is why countries get encouraged to
intensify their militancy in the surrounding areas. Also, Panama obtains authority to operate the
canal till at least 2050 based on prior handover treaties with the U. S; however, with the influx of
Chinese capital in infrastructure in Panamá by constructing Margarita Island Port controversies
have emerged as to whether the Chinese might attempt to control or influence the Canal that may
threaten the U.S. sovereignty in the region. Russia has also shown some kind of interest as a
world super power to have a voice near the vulnerable region or the corridor. Thus, as the Canal
grows and improves its handling capabilities of traffic in the future years these deployments of
geopolitical stiff competition over the power of oversight of one of the world’s most esteemed
waterways shall rise higher. Any fluctuations or disturbance emerging from this might be very
Page 12 of 26
dangerous to the cooperation of this region and commercial relations in bilateral and multilateral
levels in the Americas.
Border Conflicts Shaping Interstate Security Relations
India-China Himalayan standoff's impact on Asian security
The situation on the border of India and China has aggravated the confrontation between
these two Asian giants and poses a threat to security in this region including the battles that
began in mid-May 2020, when large formations of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army
approached the Line of Actual Control that separates Indian and Chinese territories in the
Himalayas, and took positions on the dominating heights that cut off traditional Indian patrols; in
response, India also brought thousands of troops and vehicles to The confrontation is the sign of
the rivalry between two powers as they compete for the share of the world and the spheres of the
influence in Asia and has already impacted the third parties ; India has blocked the numerous
Chinese applications as TikTok and WeChat, and limited the Chinese investments, and China
has advised its citizen to refrain from the travel to India for security reasons. This crisis is
capable of degrading the accreditation building process on the regional level, for instance the
BRICS and SCO of the Asian states. In addition, it focuses on the absence of the crisis
management between two nuclear weapon states, India, and China; although small-scale border
issues are not rare, it is evident that the current level of hostility exceeds any previous periods
and prolongation of conflict clearly indicates that three-decade relations have deteriorated. Faced
to the US, as it was expected, America has joined the side of India on the question of territorial
sovereignty and has condemned the Chinese actions, thus making the attempts of Beijing and
New Delhi to regulate the conflict even more complicated. Otherwise, should the two countries
not bring down their military presence or considerable or any extent, and continue to go up the
Page 13 of 26
LAC ladder, the already nascent structure will deteriorate and pose security threat to Asia as it
provokes hawks, increases mistrust and opens avenue for other regional actors to meditate and
fan the tension. It is critical for Asian security to maintain stability in political leadership along
the vulnerable border also known as the LAC that separates South Asian and nuclear countries,
India and China.
Israel-Palestine issue influencing Middle Eastern geopolitics globally
Arab Israeli conflict is identified by the tension and violence that began when Israel was
founded in 1948, displacing Palestinians and terminating Britain’s mandate in the area and has
greatly affected the politics of the Middle Eastern countries. However this conflict is over the
ownership of the same land; Palestinians desire sovereignty in west bank and Gaza Strip as well
as East Jerusalem while Israelis consider those nations as intruders on their land. The actual
attempt to negotiate the final solution has been made repeatedly throughout a long time, mainly
characterized by such factors as mistrust and power imbalance between the two conflicting
parties. What do they suggest the conflict, according to Orient, is Israeli and Palestinian national
identity and politics, recycling itself and becoming almost endogenous? Such an ending also
expresses the constant Palestinian homelessness and Israeli control, as well as offering Israel the
notion of threatened security. This fosters hatred and terrorism that leads to renewed rounds and
conflicts between Israel and Hamas or any other groups operating from Gaza. This conflict is
inextricable to the extent that its context creates conflict escalations in the Middle East and
tensions in the Israel-Arab nations whose support Palestinians’ seek for statehood. It has also
heightened competition in the Arab region among the states with different foreign policies
mainly over the Israel Palestine conflict. For instance, it explained the early Cold War fighting
for loyalty in Middle Eastern states between the Soviet-affiliated Pan-Arabist countries within
Page 14 of 26
the Arab sphere of influence such as Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the conservative non-Arab ally of
Israel against pan-regional foes. Today, the Middle East conflict can still be used to define the
contemporary international relations mainly on the issue of Israel and Palestine. The Arab state
presence and military assistance from the West is viewed as ‘occupation’ and ‘Arab Islamic
identity’ threat by the Islamist ideologies to actualize the Israel and its supporter phantasm
enemy of Muslim identity while degenerating the sovereignty of Muslim shrines in Jerusalem to
rally more cross-national militant groups including Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda. Inability to
construct the Palestinian state to become the sovereign state also affects the solutions of the
western states as well as their soft power in the region. Thus, to reduce these conflictual themes
responsible for radicalization internationally and to offset further volatility in the already shaky
Middle East, Is-Pal is an issue that still needs to be addressed and solved by international actors.
Ukraine-Russia tensions redefining European security paradigms
The conflict between the two nations that began after Putin occupied the Crimean
territory in 2014 alongside the support for rebels in the eastern states of Ukraine is shaking the
security structures in Europe. Moscow’s behaviour over Ukraine has ruptured the intellectual
orthodoxy of the post-Cold War era in Europe, which held that the age of forcible acquisition of
territory in Europe was over. Despite its annexation of Crimea, Russia has demonstrated that it is
willing to infringe on the sovereignty of Ukraine and other states, thus it still wants to dominate
the countries in the region it considers its domain. This is putting European countries as well as
institutions such as NATO in a position where they have to redesign how to prevent any further
Russian invasion. It has become clear that to deal with such states it is necessary to apply new
concepts which are unrecognizable to the Cold War strategies of containment. It has also brought
out the flaws of the European security framework such as institutions like the OSCE and
Page 15 of 26
agreements including the Budapest memorandum that have failed to deter Russia from acting on
its agenda concerning Ukraine. The primary concern in this case is that Ukraine has been forced
to more or less start from scratch in terms of foreign policy and security posture in the face of the
Russian threat. Whereas in the post-Cold war period Ukraine regarded Russia as an ally or a
strategic partner, it now perceives Russia as a potential enemy that poses a direct threat to its
existence. Ukraine has increased partnership with NATO, expressed desire to join NATO for
purposes of security, and effected military reforms and acquisitions with assistance from the US
and other NATO countries such as Canada, UK and Turkey. However, Ukraine’s actions are
limited due to the overwhelming power that Russia possesses, and it cannot do much alone to
prevent further Russian aggression. Hence Ukraine relies on the enhanced NATO and US’s
military assistance and their continued involvement in defending Ukraine’s sovereignty and state
borders. That support has not been sufficient in altering Russia’s behavior as evidenced by the
ongoing conflict in Donbas. Therefore many specialists claim that NATO and the US should go
much further including the creation of permanent NATO bases in Ukraine and dramatically
increasing/lethal military assistance to Ukraine.
The Ukrainian crisis suggests that European security is about to move into a new phase
which is characterized by an assertive Russia that is ready to deploy military force to unseat
neighbors and advance its interests. This is demanding renewed European security structure
based on prevention of Russia as a threat which was not assumed in the past as Russia was
assumed not to be an aggressive foe. Ukraine is, of course, on the receiving end of much of
Russia’s aggression even as the latter’s strategic focus begins to turn to the East. However,
continued NATO and US vigilance in supporting and defending Ukraine’s independence and
territorial borders, perhaps involving continuing NATO bases in Ukraine, may be necessary to
Page 16 of 26
actually deter further disruptive Russian activities not only in Ukraine, but also throughout the
rest of Europe.
Geopolitical Competition in Emerging Technological Domains
5G network control battle influencing intelligence sharing
With the onset of the 5G networks, it came with rivalry as the countries do not only
compete on the control of the networks but also on the standards to the global impacts which I
have in mind has implications to intelligence gathering and sharing. Since networks will grow
with the advancement in 5G technologies, new technologies such as self-driving cars, IoT that
will create big data, controlling such networks will offer chances for spying and monitoring. The
US has forced allies to exclude Huawei from the 5G infrastructure because it believes it presents
itself as exposed to Beijing’s manipulation for espionage. But some partners like the UK have
opted not to completely shun Huawei despite warning from the US that it will withhold info on
spying concerns from China. Some people have a worry that if the US fully shutters allies using
Huawei from intelligence sharing, it may also reduce exchange of information on threats. At the
same time, China has more ambitious goals – the country wants to not only be technologically
ahead of the others on 5G but also dictate the terms of the further development of this
technology, which would enable it to influence the conditions for data flows and intelligence
collection. While the ChiCom cyber espionage capabilities have been previously oriented mainly
towards domestic targets, there are signs that they are extending operations abroad. Beijing
owning over control of 5G networks globally can offer large data access and enhance its
Intelligence capabilities overseas to counter the US. The European Union has rejected the
pressure from the United States to block Huawei 5G and China’s attempt to dominate the market,
not wishing to side with the United States in its battle with China for control of 5G, nor allow
Page 17 of 26
one country to control this vital infrastructure and the data passing through it. Russia also has
competitiveness concerns about the fact that China is now ahead on 5G and the standard-setting
authority that comes with it. As 5G is inseparably linked to the future global economy and
technological advancement, the war over supremacy between the US and China is also a battle
essential for the nature of data transmission and information sharing in decades to come. Who
will eventually win the 5G competition will determine how secure even the most intimate of
partners will be when it comes to their networks and Trojan horses. The competition to establish
dominance in the 5G networks has therefore merged with security, spy and spy between the
global powers of the US, China, Russia and the shifting alliances, which have shaken the
international intelligence cooperation and exchange for years to come.
Semiconductor supply chains impacting military modernization efforts
The threats in the global semiconductor supply chain in the last few years have affected
the attempts of many militaries in the world to update their technologies with new ones that
require the use of sophisticated microchips. Everything from missiles and drones to fighter jets
and naval vessels are filled with various defense platforms and weapons systems that contain and
use semiconductors; in effect, the vast scope of defense platforms and weapons systems that
contain semiconductors has made semiconductors supply availability a critical and strategic
consideration for defense planning. Demand has remained out of supply of high-end
semiconductors used in AI, HPC, autonomous technologies and other disruptive technologies
that are revolutionalizing modern warfare. This chronic state of supply and demand imbalance is
caused by several factors that include: increase in geopolitical tensions that has led to significant
up surges in defense spending on modernization by countries such as the U.S, China, and other
military powers; coming of age in electronics and other devices such as the smartphone; and the
Page 18 of 26
recent constraints in production due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic that has highly
affected the fabrication and packaging of semiconductor Military planners worry that they don’t
have guaranteed access to complex semiconductors, which act as the central nervous system of
networked smart munitions and command and control systems, and that without the necessary
chips they may quickly find themselves outmatched in a future war or unable to achieve key
force modernization goals. As such, the leading military powers such as the United States are
now proactively using strategies to ensure domestic semiconductor supplies through subsidies
and public private partnership and also collaborating with the allies to share the best practices in
verifying and ensuring the integrity of the semiconductors supply chain, risks associated with
semiconductors supply chains across the entire electronics value system including design and
manufacturing, assembly and maintenance where the electronics value chain is critical.
Sustaining the robustness of supply chain security for semiconductors are increasingly
interlinked with the fundamentals of military transformation in the future.
Satellite constellations altering space-based security capabilities
Increased use of large commercial satellite constellations, including Starlink and
OneWeb systems that are currently in the process of deployment, having hundreds or even
thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit, is exerting profound influence on the national security
space domain as it can improve SSA development, expand communications and connectivity,
foster distributed mission execution, and support more robust space architectures. While in the
past there used to be a few large government satellites, which offered important capacities – for
example, the nuclear threat detection or secure governmental communication, the new Starlink
and OneWeb constellations will offer similar communication services commercially. These
mega constellations present better speed, flexibility, and reliability through constant global
Page 19 of 26
coverage with tens of thousands of satellites in low Earth orbits. However, the transfer of a
significantly greater number of on-orbit assets also gives rise to issues associated with the space
situational awareness of the area. The US SSO is the leading SSA and STM supplier for
responsible and safe space uses, but monitoring of objects, especially of mega-constellation
satellites in low LEO orbits requires more sophisticated systems. This requirement has already
pushed the growth of commercial SSA systems with capabilities of tracking and monitoring
constellations. The other security consequences emanating from satellite constellations include
the fact that many of them are designed to be relatively immune to failure because even if a few
among the numerous satellites are lost they do not fundamentally compromise the utility of the
constellation. Mega constellations fundamentally redraw the map of space security for both
civilian and military entities in terms of the density of the space domain with thousands of
satellites, causing problems with space traffic control and requiring new approaches to SSA,
while offering global communication and observation services unparalleled in scale.
Natural Resource Geopolitics in Security Calculations
Rare earth elements shaping defense industry dynamics
The collection of metals popularly referred to as the rare earth elements (REEs), of the
seventeen metal group, mainly impacting on aspects of applications of the defense industry in
precision guided weapons, targeting lasers, radar, sonar, night vision systems, satellites, aircraft
engines, and armor steel alloys has eventually come out as actors in shaping some of the
dynamics in the defense industry in the recent decades. China still controls the global production
and processing of REE, 273 and it produced 90% of the world’s mined resources, which can
enable Beijing to determine the conditions by which other nations can obtain these elements to
support their defense industries. This has evoked concern amongst the western countries and
Page 20 of 26
other countries rely on importation of REE from china and has provided boost on the search for
more suppliers of REE all over the world. For example, china banned the export of REE to Japan
in 2010 for some time due to a diplomatic row over a territorial dispute which anyone depending
on china for the supply of the critical minerals consider a risk. Therefore, countries like the
United States of America, Australia and other strategic partners have sought out new deposits of
REE in all other possible regions of the earth and have also tried to seek new ways of
economically processing the REEs from any other territory other than China. Currently, there are
few of that kind, for example, Lynas Corporation from Australia, it owns one of the highest
grade REE mine, Mount Weld and plans to build domestic refining facility to process ore and
oxides instead of sending them to China. The U. S is also considering other procedures of
recouping REEs from defense technology scrap and stock to supplement importation from
friends. China has lately achieved critical mass in controlling the entire REE production line,
which poses a threat to the global defense supply security of competitors; its actions are
provoking innovation for substitute REE production processes globally. China still controls the
major talent, the physio-physical and human capital resources, and the knowledge in the
processing of REE; and it is difficult for other countries to rival these in the near future. As for
the future, the availability of REE will continue to be one of the factors affecting the further
development of defense technologies and further division of power between states will depend
on the position of the parties regarding the mandatory prerequisites for the need to balance the
economic requirements to create domestic production necessary for the decrease in the delivery
of these, becoming increasingly vital, metals from China.
Page 21 of 26
Lithium reserves fueling competition for battery technology supremacy
Lithium as a rare resource is necessary to make electric vehicles and energy storage
technologies, and the need for lithium only increases around the world, making competition
between companies and countries to become the leader in the use of this material in batteries
very high. Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia host the Lithium triangle that provides early mover
advantages, however, countries such as Australia and China are actively exploring and
developing new lithium mining sites to secure their domestic market share for a better control
over the battery supply chain. Given that many automobile manufacturers are moving to electric
vehicles and more countries are adopting policies to ban production of cars using gasoline
engines in the future decades, getting a hold of lithium deposits has become vital, not only
economically but also politically. This is in an effort to provide backing to the auto industries
within the countries involved, increase energy security, and also lower import dependency. This
is similar to how companies do not want to rely on suppliers but instead aim to have some degree
of control over such key aspects of the battery supply chain as the extraction and refining of
lithium, cathode and battery production. This has led to more specific investments and mergers
and acquisitions in the lithium mining and processing sector, and also billions of dollars being
dedicated towards new battery mega factories globally. The advanced extraction technologies
along with the recycling activities may reduce the future demand growth by exploring new
lithium deposits and reserves. An issue to do with water proves to be another challenge when it
comes to lithium mining due to the environmental effects that arises from extraction of lithium.
The countries and companies that own the necessary materials, refining and battery production
technologies thanks to growing lithium demand, will most likely lead the next generation of
energy storage and electric vehicles.
Page 22 of 26
Renewable energy transitions impacting petro-state security postures
In the last ten years, the popularity of renewable energy has affected the consumption of
the fossil fuel as many countries and companies turned to sustainable energy sources such as
solar power and wind energy, electric cars; this is an ongoing process of the so-called ‘energy
transition’ that poses a threat to petro-states which rely on the export of energy, such as Saudi
Arabia, Russia or Iran, which have largely their economies and government revenues based on
the export The International Energy Agency pointed out that renewable energy sources would
contribute to 95% of the growth in the world’s power-generating capacity to 2026; oil demand,
according to IEA, is set to reach the peak in 2030; this will significantly diminish the purchases
of oil and gas from the petro-states and affect their energy income. The transformation of the
global energy system with the help of the growth of renewable energy and automation of the
exploration, drilling, and transportation of the fossil fuel, which is changing the contexts of the
energy industry, is putting pressure on oil-dependent petro-states to adapt their national security
doctrines. Various petro-states such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE in a bid to break the cyclical
dependency on energy exports and thereby diversify their economies have established multi-
billion dollar sovereign wealth funds, and are investing heavily and undertaking profound
structural shifts in sectors such as financial services, technology, tourism and manufacturing. The
other petro-states like Russia have continued to increase their stakes in the oil and gas resources
through increasing the production and extending the military influence over the continental
shelves and waters in Arctic, Caspian and Black Seas. These contrasting policy shifts point to an
oscillation in the security approach of petro-states as they try to navigate the transition from
fossil fuel dependency, maintain market share within a shrinking oil and gas market; while at the
same time trying to maintain the use of fossil fuel exports to assert power. How the expansion of
Page 23 of 26
renewable energy and its automation impact the petro-states with less diverse economy is going
to result in economic and security policy shift that demands unprecedented change from
increasing energy revenues to meet the budget and military force size and roles.
Conclusion
Geopolitical factors increasingly complex in security considerations
Political factors have shifted from being solely traditional when it comes to security
threats in the contemporary world as international relations, globalization and technological and
political progress have facilitated interdependency between nations and or regions but at the
same time have not lost traditional rivalry especially in terms of ideology, economic prowess and
power politics. As communication and transportation networks connect almost all countries
around the globe, any hostilities and threats emerging in one particular country rapidly affect
political partners, trading partners, and opponents in other countries, including those located far
away. However, different political systems, and cultural and human rights from liberal
democracies to authoritarian and economic instability or competition for resources between allies
remain a cause of tensions. Any formations such as NATO are required to weigh up their
obligations to defend certain states with equal caution as to the possible reactions of the country
that might be defended. Nuclear proliferation in regions of conflict further poses a global
concern as in the wrong hands these weapons can be used by power hungry dictators or even end
up in the hands of terrorists groups. Climate change is even assuming geopolitical characteristics
where the variations in climate affect the flow of refugees, availability of natural resources,
favorable routes for trade and so on and so forth, as if there was a requirement, can worsen the
existing security concerns. As with all of these factors interacting together plus local histories
and interactions forming the regional conflicts, it is apparent that the security threat cannot be
Page 24 of 26
contained and responded to without consideration for all these conundrums of world power,
ideologies, economics and environment, radical networks and allies. It is no longer a case of
distinct threats and clear-cut enemy formations as in defining security threats and in the making
of international relations and warfare strategies, it is a question of balancing between a range of
known factors among the parties within the international system and having to manage with
unpredictable secondary and tertiary effects of any response that any global power may take
across the interconnected global population, economies, political systems, resources, and
geography. Thus geopolitical complexity presents wholly new problems and difficulties for
security understanding, political decision making and operational conduct in an environment that
is characterized by the absence of clear friends/enemies, dividing lines or domains of conflict.
Need for nuanced understanding of regional dynamics globally
In this context, there is an urgent need to have a better understanding of regional context
and political, economic, social and cultural environments around the globe for the policy makers
and business strategists as well as for the active citizens of the globe. Far too many strategic
choices are done with the bare checklists and a mere gut feel, rather than a deep understanding of
the historical, ethnic, religious, and linguistic realities of the region that would define its course
and stability. Similar, a molecular level understanding of our large diverse nations’ domestic
politics no longer allows for ‘red’ and ‘blue’ state stereotyping, a person with a sound knowledge
about international relations understands that Middle East can’t be painted with the same brush,
the interests of an emerging superpower India is a voice of over a billion people and Latin
America that ranges from fast growing economies to socialist to narco-states. For such a
complex understanding, one has to try not to be stereotyping and look for more first-hand
accounts aside from reading the media, understand not just the actions but the reasons behind
Page 25 of 26
them, and not be hasty in judging situations based on prejudice and prejudice alone. For a leader
or analyst who is genuinely interested in resolving long-standing regional conflicts, maintaining
trade relations or sparing countries from humanitarian crises, instead of playing some kind of
political ping-pong, such a scenario is a guide to the complexity of our world, where nothing is
as simple as it seems. Speed is still a valued virtue; however, not acknowledging aspects of a
given situation merely amplifies issues instead of solving them. In the realm of civil wars,
terrorism, refugee crises, and global health crises, often, there is nothing more practical than
solutions based on solid analysis of the region, which in almost all cases, are more effective and
fair. This is a luxury that policymakers and thought leaders cannot afford anymore because the
costs of getting it wrong are enormously steep; and given that there are so many different
viewpoints out there in the information age, they should not want to get it wrong either. Today’s
most pressing and relevant issue does not fit the simple black-and-white rhetoric of either/or;
instead, it is solved by winks.
Importance of flexible security strategies in shifting geopolitical landscape
While the environment of global politics and relations grows more complex and
interconnected, security initiatives and plans must not be set in concrete and bureaucratic, but
must reflect dynamism and adaptability to effectively respond to emerging threats and threats to
stability, while steering clear of unnecessary provocation or confrontation. Static types of
partnerships and arrangements may be detrimental to national security interests when a region or
power dynamic changes or new opportunities for collaboration emerge. The capacity to make
dynamic security strategies and make them in response to assessments of other states and non-
state actors’ likely intentions as opposed to their previous conduct, presumed enmity or previous
interest in conflict is critical. It enables states to coerce, pre-empt and therefore prevent
Page 26 of 26
aggression, disrupt weapons distribution, cut off financing of terrorism, and disrupt smuggling,
all selectively and more accurately depending on the factual specifics of security threats in the
short term. In addition, effective security arrangements make it easier to form, alter, or unmake
ad-hoc coalitions on the basis of need for cooperation against particular common threats without
burdening states with predictable, open-ended military commitments. Regardless of whether the
end is counterterrorism, counter-piracy, cyber-security, or other ephemeral threats that go beyond
attendant fields, divisional paradigms, and regions, common interests in the removal of such
threats can form the basis of cooperation in security despite contentious gross structures and
polarized ideologies at the highest level. There is no question that the nature of such transient,
issue-based collaborations is not measured in time frames, but instead in the degree to which
progress is made in countering these threats as they unfold. Last but not the least, it also enables
the availability of off-ramps, the communication channel during crises and pre-scheduled face-
saving concessions to curb potential miscalculations which may lead to an uncontrollable
emergence of an arm race or even a military confrontation between two powerful poles. The
post-Cold war world is characterized by a fast changing and unpredictable global order, power
distribution and relationships; security must therefore not be rigid but be capable of local
changes.
