Page 1 of 24
ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF INTERNAL REVOLUTIONS ON
STATES' PROPENSITY FOR EXTERNAL AGGRESSION AND
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY DYNAMICS
Introduction
Internal revolutions as catalysts for shifts in foreign policy
Political revolutions within a country also act as triggers for changes in the course of the
country’s foreign policy and strategic course. Whereas, after revolution or change of guard, new
political players and ideologies come into power who, more often than not, seek to review and
reorient the foreign policy to reflect new directions, new vision and new political goals and
directions at home. The October Revolution of 1917 significantly shifted the Soviet Russian
attitude towards the west towards being anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist and pro-Communist.
Iran’s political shift from the Shah, who was certainly pro-American, to anti-West sentiment
under the new leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini following the Iranian Revolution of 1979. In
the same sense Egypt’s foreign policy became more independence and non-aligned with the rise
of Gamal Abdel Nasser and the Free Officers Movement through the 1952 revolution. In
different instances, revolutionary regimes may try to extend the export of ideological models or
offer support in the form of financial and moral assistance to similar movements, such as the
Soviet Union supported communist parties globally after the October Revolution of 1917.
Sometimes, internal factors pressurize states to adopt a defensive foreign policy and radical
internal reformation before reasserting themselves on the global arena. Not all revolutions bring
about drastic changes in foreign policies; however, if there is an ideological break, a
restructuring of relations with major allies and antagonists follow. While it is possible for policy
to remain fairly consistent across a revolution event, the personalities and public speaking of
diplomats will change to match the public. In conclusion, for the better or worse, the popularity
that drives the political revolutions based on the need for a new order is usually not contained by
the national frontiers of a country, but creates a new reality on the international level.
Interconnection between domestic upheaval and international aggression
Page 2 of 24
Interconnection between domestic upheaval and international aggression is in most cases
true that domestic turmoil is closely linked to war like behavior. There may be instances where
internal conflict, unrest or instability forces a country’s leadership to act aggressively in foreign
policy affairs as a way of directing social frustrations and energies externally rather than
internally. Such a concept is called ‘diversionary foreign policy theory’, which may mean that
with internal unrest, a leader will wage a war, with weaker countries, and in the process gain the
support of the citizens by portraying himself as a strong figure and the protector of the country.
European History such as Napoleon’s advance during the French Revolution or more recent
events like the Argentine invasion of the Falkland Islands in the year 1982 after internal turmoil
in their country shows that the regimes have not hesitated to apply aggressive foreign policy and
militancy for dealing with internal unrest and gaining popularity among the citizens. The danger
is that by focusing outside in order to explain internal instability, the authoritarian leader or a
struggling democracy strengthens his position in the short term, while in the long term the
process of generating an external threat does not eliminate the fundamental sources of internal
conflict and discontent. Instead, it can solidify militarism, nationalism or any other socio-
pathological processes that contribute to repression and war. Such a plan is to deal with domestic
discontent and injustice democratically, through political liberalization, compromise, growth,
and decencies. But there is still a tendency in authoritarian and democratic countries to shift the
problems inside the country outside. Internal factors such as increasing radicalization, economic
crises, or renewed internal conflicts and social crisis result in the resurgence of populist
nationalism and enable aggression against an external enemy seen as a threat to the national
identity or interest. So, even as the dangers to long-term militarization mount, leaders persist in
outsourcing dependence whenever turbulence emerges inside.
Implications for global security and conflict prevention strategies
The findings of the issues related to conflict prevention in the world therefore has
immense consequences for the global security and stability. When interconnectivity between
organisms has been made easier by friendly environments such as globalization, threats are
bound to come up and spread with a wide coverage. In addition, the nature of conflict is
changing with civil wars and battles that do not match the capabilities of today’s armies. It
means that matters cannot be resolved only by diplomatic, economic or military ways, however
Page 3 of 24
all these aspects should be implemented in conflict prevention and settlements. Measures call for
concentration on building up societies which can forge conflict recovery, avoiding the creation of
conflict and establishing proper early signals. It can be supposed that stable societies that possess
efficient political power, fairly distributing the resources and the economic opportunities, and
having social cohesion are not capable of becoming the violent ones. The rights of education,
health care, political freedom, and protection against problems resulting from climate change can
preempt settings that nurture terrorism and war. When there is a better early warning mechanism
that is capable of dissecting the data that suggest that there is higher threat level, the international
community is able to act faster by trying to solve the conflicts by diplomatic means, mediation
and other peaceful methods. However, when conflicts occur, it has to be met with a combined
response, instantaneous, and complicated. Use of armed forces for the purpose of peace,
sunshine and arms control, dealings to stop gross violation of people’s rights, bargaining,
international criminal court and tribunals, and political and economic changes are the
components of conflict solutions that help to avoid violence and establish permanent peace. In
the future, regional organizations and bilateral relations for exchanging, mobilizing, and
developing of strategies for conflict management will still be necessary for the applying of the
presented strategies. Providing efficient and synchronized multilateral, bilateral and national
cooperation and actions in the development, diplomacy, security and governance fields at local,
national, regional and multilateral levels it is possible to enhance the stability and human security
all over the world.
Revolutionary Ideologies and Foreign Policy Reorientation
Radical worldviews reshaping perceptions of international order
Evolution in trends of radicalism and the orientation towards the world-order is
significantly shifting the ways countries and societies perceive the contemporary international
system. While the process of globalization unites people of the world, it at the same time
increases people’s concern about people’s inequality; More people dissatisfied with the current
state of affairs have begun to rebel against the authorities and traditional values. Politics and
economics, religion, and social justice are not just themes for discussion – radical transformation
Page 4 of 24
is occurring in these areas faster than in any other; the world is being constructed based on new
principles as to how it should be done. It does not matter if a person is of left or right-wing
political view, an extreme religious or a humanist, all are characterized by a rejection of power
and the desire to overthrow existing paradigms. In the present time, the extreme right has
emerged, and it makes the moderated centre-right opinions seem clumsy or utterly unaware of
the contemporary society because of the social media platform. Leadership that is benevolent and
has no clue of such passions for revolution cannot understand why substantial portions of the
world’s population feel the status quo of the current society, economy, and ecology is hostile,
unjust, and cruel. Thus, one can only wonder what the further development of these ideologies in
the years and decades to come will be like, as well as the nature of the future international
relations – and the answer to this question seems to depend on how the current incumbent great
powers cope with these emerging ideological challenges. Any attempts to suppress radicalism or
to just fight against such movements, will only result in further aggravation of the situation and
emergence of anger and anarchy. However, if some of the grievances that they have are
perceived as real, then there is a possibility that they will be integrated into policy change, thus
eliminating their presence in negative transformation. The problem with these forms of
worldviews is that it cannot be easily reconciled with pragmatic and utilitarian structures of
power; this remains the biggest challenge of human societies, to come up with original ways of
dealing with these forms of worldviews. The state of two ideologies, two extremes, may indeed
constitute a permanent characteristic of highly developed modern society; however, it is
necessary to eradicate this problem not by striving to overcome one extreme with another but by
searching for a balance between stability and progress that would strengthen societies.
Rejection of pre-revolution alliances and security agreements
Page 5 of 24
The breakdown of pre-revolution relationship and security commitments may thus hold
significant geostrategic consequences. Normally, revolution is followed by a new revolutionary
government, and this is because revolution is either an uprising or civil war; Hence, the new
government has to chart its own course as to what it wants domestically and internationally.
Most of the previous agreements with other countries are ignored not to continue with the
previous government in order to prove the state’s new independency. But at the same time it
creates much instability and randomness into the system of international relations if the
functional and effective cooperation and protection arrangements are withdrawn unilaterally.
Other neighbor countries that would have relied on such assurance of mutual security might feel
insecure with the political vices across the borders. Other countries that had kind of an economic,
military or ideological tie with the now non-existent regime might lose influence because the
new government may look at such ties as remnants of oppression or imperialism. It is quite
understandable after a change of power to demarcate a clear break from the previous
government, but this erases the very clear difference between the revolutionary enthusiasm of
leaders, and the recognizably more self-interested, densely connected web of interests that will
shape their actions. However, some degree of pragmatic continuity cannot be wholly rejected
even in the modern world so that the striving for maximal autonomy at any cost may prove to be
detrimental to the nation’s long-term interests in the long run. One can realize that instead of the
initially felt enthusiasm of independent security, the threats such as insecure security, fluctuating
economy, and international isolation may take over. The course of action therefore lies in an
evaluation of which of these current partnerships is worth sustaining and which is best left
unresolved in order that a bad situation does not worsen and the nation is prepared to face the
outcome of economic decline in the new phase of its existence.
Page 6 of 24
Ideological exportation as driver of aggressive policies
The ‘exportation of ideologies’ as a reason to explain why countries formulated
‘assertive’ policies recognize that countries aim at forcing the exportation of their ideologies into
other countries. Countries that think their way of ruling or their social changes are the right one
try to establish them in other nations through policies. This desire to enforce one’s perception of
the world marks the tendency to compensate for aggressive behavior towards the selected
country. Another good example includes the Soviet Union, which with religious like
commitment to the communism during the cold war era provided rationalizations of subversion,
regime change as well as invasion in east Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. The USSR
was the leader of the socialism revolution and that is why its foreign policy was extraordinarily
military oriented, involved in conducting the Marxist-Leninist regimes in the third world through
proxies, weapons and the Red Army. This ideological missionary led to many conflicts and civil
wars as the Soviets sought to impose the new Soviet order unto the world. Similarly, a recent
string of foreign-policy calamities demonstrate that America can deploy an uplifting,
democratizing crusade to spread reckless warmongering internationally. What they were doing
was painting the change of regimes in Iraq and Afghanistan as not only being tactically
necessary, but as being a glorious process that was meant to help free people in the region from
oppression. The liberal ideological factor increased the conflicting threshold and an inclination to
the use of force and reckless actions proved to be disastrous. Hence, the historical experience of
Cubans shows that exportative ideologies that categorize the world into revolutionary and
counterrevolutionary ones generate a passionate, often irrational foreign policy that is
intrinsically military. Theories that see other societies as that which need to be transformed pave
the way for explanations of the use of forceful instruments in the effort to transform the societies
Page 7 of 24
in question. Replacing realistic selfish motives, militant ideologies ensure the policies capable of
condemning administrations more in the name of ideas than real threats.
Post-Revolutionary State Consolidation and External Threats
Internal instability fueling perception of foreign threats
Postures that there are external enemies and or doubts about the security of the nation
tend to develop during internal political or economic instabilities in the nation in question. In this
case, when there is internal conflict within the domestic domain, the leaders may use the state
image of hostility from other countries as a means of mirroring out rather than in. From the
studies of the societies’ ideologies, ethnicity or religious differences to help direct the populace
in the process of perceiving culturally different strangers from the other side of the border as
being a threat. In this regard, when inequality, job opportunities and discontent levels are on the
rise within a country, then it becomes easy to point a finger on the foreign nations and non-state
actors. This is joined with threats that arise from alterations in perceived standing and
recognition within the system of interstate relations particularly where a state or nation’s
standing or power is declining. Crooks and political figures, who feel the conflict within, find
value in using threats from other nations to rally citizens at home. It means that these
mechanisms reduce the voices of protest, justify security measures and urge the citizens to stand
for the leadership against the other countries who challenge elements of the spheres of influence
or non-state actors who plan to carry out attacks. But threat misperception can put the states into
armed conflicts which weaken their potential and create new external threats. Saying that there
are foreign threats may be self-enabling, as provocation will lead to counter-provocation and
escalate the conflict. Thus, although threat exaggeration has its advantages in terms of benefiting
leaders who can essentially be described as insecure, the application of this method to
Page 8 of 24
consolidate one’s position has its drawbacks when used in the context of antagonism of states
because, if these threats are not being actively contained and dismantled at the present time, they
can become a reality in inter-state conflict. Thus, Intelligence based threat assessment is
preferable to worst case approach or politically feasible threat enhancement in internal conflict
and dissent.
Military restructuring impacting offensive and defensive capabilities
As long as military forces in key locations are transitioning their structures of operations,
both the offense and the defense are impacted a lot. Restructuring appears to aim at and attempt
to create forces more adaptive; formable are more variable and more operational in relation to
the new threats and in the new theaters. But they also have hard trade-offs that, one must admit,
it is significant to acknowledge and realize. One of the significant messages of the paper is that
the measures as the simplification of the command-and-control systems, personnel reduction,
and incorporation of innovative technologies may increase the striking power; however, the
strike capacity and resiliency will be diminished. In terms of offence, it tends to synthesize
distribution with networked combat and intelligent weapons and frequently overlooks a
significant force magnifier. The integrated communication system enables the distribution of
information and management of attacks, resulting in a time frame of minutes and hours within
tactical domains in the air, on the ground, on the seas, in space, and in cyberspace. The equipage
of the actual combat organizations with cruise missiles, UCAVs and other high techno-logical
weapons and systems enhances the velocity, range, accuracy and efficacy. Still decreases in end-
strengths, vehicles, ships, and aircraft may limit the size and duration of Offensives before the
latter are depleted. It is also a possibility of overloading the satellite or computer systems and
revealing insertions into special operations to the opposition. At the same time, there is a
Page 9 of 24
requirement shifting of the defending force and pressing packaging more towards denial and
deception than structures, postures and formations that are easy targets. Changing forces are
replacing MBTs and artillery with ATGM and Air platforms; however, these are portable and
very much efficient. Modular brigades do enhance the maneuver flexibility of the forces in a
manner that allows the protection of umbrella systems and creation of a wide front trench or a
large-scale entrenchment system. Efforts to eliminate the complexity and its related medical
aspect improve survivability, but at the same time detract from potentialities to counter heavy
missile strikes or to recover after they hit. Last but not least, restructuring raises the odds over
the concentration of efforts to penetrate into the enemies’ supply chain or disperse efforts to
oppose them. Balancing for each of the factors, however, was still rather a challenging feat even
as of today.
Economic pressures incentivizing resource-driven territorial expansion
Scarcity of resources and pressure from the economy act as the push factors that make
states look for territory with the aim of obtaining more resources and this is normally prevalent
in the areas which are known to have porous boundaries. Motor: In order to achieve control over
and ownership of minerals, oil, water, timber, agricultural land or other valuable items, states
may resort to using force or use legal or historical aspects in claiming territories and exercising
control over the resources or territories in the said areas. For example, the phenomenon of
climate change through the melting of the Arctic ice has revealed new ship routes and has
revealed the offshore oil and gas fields that are easily accessible; therefore, there are the presence
of Russia and other Arctic states increasing their military activity in the far North to defend
newly found economic strength. China has also engaged in damming and diversion of
transboundary rivers that flows through Tibet and originating from the Tibetan plateau has raised
Page 10 of 24
tension with downstream neighbors in regard to sharing of water resource. Presence of rich
mineral resources have triggered disputes on the sovereignty of such facilities in certain areas
such as the South China Sea, and, therefore, the militarization of such an area and provocation of
two or more parties. Perhaps, the idea of getting control of strategic resources like oil may be
more attractive for the governments of those developing states where population grows really
fast, and there is an increased demand for energy. But if by such actions one state sees the
actions of the other as an attempt to seize resources, then these actions can turn into a
destabilizing factor in the relations between countries and limit the possibility of the formation of
stabilities in the region. They may give rise to nationalist policies and tendencies together with
arms race among the affected states that feel threatened in access to the resources or the
sovereignty of the delimited territories. Hence, although fear of economic loss may force states
into seeking control of the resources and going to war over such a cause, there are geopolitical
implications of such an action and the risks are high as it promotes conflict. By improving
integration, as well establishing a proper procedure to share the resources, it would go along way
to eliminate the need for the spontaneous aggressive action in the regions believed to host the
disputed commodities.
Revolutionary Leadership and Risk-Taking in International Relations
Charismatic leaders emboldening aggressive foreign policy stances
Lodestar personalities, especially the force of personality, prays for aggressive
uncompromising foreign policies which is nurturing by the public. The skills to stage and to
mobilize emotion in a population can thereby transform even such doubtful global gambles into
popular crusades. Nevertheless, charismatic leaders do give them the special authority to set the
story, but generally it comes with the lack of ability to be rational, wise, and have facts on their
Page 11 of 24
hands. An example of a modern personality is the president of Russia Vladimir Putin, with
whom one would like to have a face-to-face, he is a man who is handsome with a face that looks
like an image cast on a Soviet statue of a man. He makes home approval for assertiveness and
hostility such as annexation of Crimean and supporting rebels in eastern Ukraine through
exhibiting compulsion, choice and nationalist Russian tenets. These are received at home
positively, therefore, they make violations of international norms regarding interferences.
However, as seen, even within the territory of Russia itself, Putin does not feel much of that
pressure. He likes the position of charismatic authority and people rely on him in making the
right choices. True democracy only manifests in voting; nevertheless, the actual opposition is
generally inexperienced as the contenders do not convince the public in the same way. In the
same way, other defiant autocrats, such as Turkish Erdogan, who eliminate protest through sheer
bravado. It mobilizes personal investment into the leader and that is why we have demagogic
communication. Effective propaganda, on which legends, which restore a nation’s past victories
often, depend on, is an emotional appeal rather than a rational one. This is where more detailed
policy specifics or factual reasoning, or at any rate, such thinking, recedes to the background.
Rigging of the political decentralization and narrowing down of the mass concerns to just the
handsome face of the state leader. Therefore, the motives of the strategies, as well as the
necessities for the measures for instance, Erdogan’s partial restriction of human rights and
antagonism towards Kurdish groups, have remained to some extent, unchanged.
Admittedly, politico-optimal for the given contexts, charismatic leadership offers these
dominant characters a great potential for exercising the informal power and navigating the
visions of the foreign policy, which is inspired by their desire and has rather dubious ethical or
empirical grounds. The nation plays a major role in constructing their identity as they engage
Page 12 of 24
themselves in the defense of their nation’s interest. The following shows how faithful subjects
provide the benefit of the doubt and trust the leader’s judgment over accuracy: Correctly
implemented this style can motivate people during the warfare; however, the difference between
motivational and malicious populism is a razor’s edge. The public does become partisan and lets
their leaders encourage actions or initiations that will not benefit the long-term well-being of a
given country but which help strengthen the hold of the leader only.
Inexperienced decision-makers miscalculating international power dynamics
Whereas inexperienced decision-makers cannot balance the complex power relations
equilibrium in the international system, it leads to diplomatic fumbles and avoidable conflict
between nations. This is so the case when world leaders are new and quite clueless on the
international relations history where they basically only see the bond as rather placing only
emphasis on a short-term nationalism view. It can manifest itself in reckless given rhetoric that
threatens the future partnership; in idealistic political initiatives that do not correspond to reality;
and in rather clumsy negotiations that compromise the position of a country. Besides, leaders can
have little or no understanding of other nations’ adversaries, due to their inexperience and
temptation to dismiss real motivations and choices, possibly on issues as diverse as trade
relations, military threats, or spheres of interest of conflicts. Such leaders may feel that through
applying threats and force, they will be able to force their opponents to bend and make
substantial concessions; however, it tends to encase the resolve of one’s opponents. Or it gets
that new leaders do not have inherent knowledge of the partnerships that require monitoring. It
means that such illusions often alter the rather precarious balance in such outstanding
multifaceted organizations as the NATO or the EU or beset the regional conflicts that are in any
case irresolvable. In domestic politics, the bolder foreign policy platforms are seen in the eyes of
Page 13 of 24
the public as attractive although governments function most efficiently, when the deciders have
enough diplomatic experience that would enable a rational promotion of national interests
through reasonable geopolitical activities. Similar to our domestic matters, there exists no other
equivalent for experience when it comes to such integration of interests that define today’s states.
This, if neglected, affects generations in the process since a generation is the basic competency
of society.
Ideological fervor overriding pragmatic diplomatic considerations
The ideologies can actually supersede the practicalities in a diplomatic relation between
countries or groups making the relationship rather stressful or even hostile. The leaders who are
following the set of ideological beliefs might not negotiate or look for middle ground with an
opponent, or organization even when the diplomacy could be more correct. For example, a
regime that has climbed to power on an Islamic or political radicalism view is likely to deem it
wrong to yield even in their bargaining or negotiating with moderates or secular counterparts
because doing so will demoralize the fanatics. Similarly, two nations can find themselves in such
confrontations as their nationalists or ideologues are provoking them to do so or there may be
small-scale war for almost any insignificant reason that such hostile feelings may develop that
two nations may feel that they are likely to be at war with each other even if there is no cause
such as territory or resources. Still, though some loses are inflicted through open fighting in
terms of material and diplomatic loss at international level, the devotees are held by Ideological
glamour as well as the desire for saving face. As for ideologies of rigorism, they metamorphose
into a burden imposed on diplomacy which involves state and non-state actors; as a result,
variability, moderation, and temperate bargaining are ruled out. Ideological fanaticism negates
social contract and security, and when the diplomats speak with passion instead of rationality, the
Page 14 of 24
likelihood of an accidental confrontation escalates sharply. Of course, principled beliefs are not
entirely devoid of value for IR, but most often pragmatic diplomacy as a rule entails some level
of compromise, interaction and recognition of the reciprocity which is not allowed due to nature
of pure ideologies. When ideological stakes are qualified as non-negotiable and zero-sum, there
isn’t any agonistic incentive or potentiality of building acceptable agonism. Hence, the
application of moderation in pulling out passion on ideologies is vital so that pragmatic
diplomacy in adverse power relations and hostile environment can translate into positive and
sustainable gain for the antagonistic parties at the national and international levels.
Domestic Opposition Management Through External Conflict Initiation
Rallying national unity against perceived external enemies
The use of Political appeals to mobilize the community for a specific reason or to ask for
their assistance from a presumed enemy has been made severally with different results and with
ethical implications. On the one hand, when a nation is faced with a common enemy people are
willing to place their money and efforts at the service of the state and business is stimulated. For
example, during the first and second world wars, the USA had feelings of nationalism,
volunteering, food and other goods’ scarcity, funds such as war bonds for supporting the military
and production. This nationalism and common goal of the nation enabled the country to endure
vast amounts of pain and come out winning. But such calls can also assist the leaders in
achieving even more power and influence over people; suppress dissidents, and detrimental to
civil liberties. For example, presidents and prime ministers have time and again tried to influence
the public with tales of ‘the enemies from outside who wants to harm the nation’ as a tool to
justify increased spying on citizens, prevent protest activities, suppress the media, and ensure
people’s obedience. Furthermore, the nature of nationalism and ‘anti enemy’ feelings created
Page 15 of 24
during such periods fuels bigotry and racism, and in some instances ethnocide against ‘spies’
within the society. For instance, the US put Japanese Americans into concentration camps during
the Second World War that is as a result the public fear is easily inclined to infringe on the tenets
of democracy. In conclusion, the leadership is always on a thin line in terms of rallying the
nation for a legitimate defense against dangerous adversaries outside the country as compared to
developing adversaries in an effort to achieve the leadership’s objectives as well as in order to
justify repressive measures within the country’s territorial domain. Ethical leader will specify
that people will be asked to give sacrifice only in the interest of public good also stressing that
certain foundational components of the structure of society and certain basic rights and liberties
should not be threatened.
Diverting attention from internal problems via aggression
Political leaders of nations have from time inconceivably used aggression and conflict as
a way of addressing sociopolitical challenges back at home as well as a way of gaining support
for certain political causes. It is quite easy to use outside threat when the economy diminishes or
the head of state is unpopular as people are called to support the flag and the country. This
strategy simply appealed to the inherent desire of every individual to belong to a group: it is
rather simple to point at another nation or group as culprits who are to blame for the internal
problems. An example of psychological factors that may affect the decision-making of leaders
include the events that led to the Argentine military junta’s decision to invade the Falkland
Islands in 1982 after an economic crisis accompanied by protests. The war with the United
Kingdom was relatively short, and this helped to increase the approval of the regime even if the
conditions were to be deteriorated. Of course once the first stage of nationalism was over,
Argentinians came back to the usual topics of a bad and oppressive government. Russia’s actions
Page 16 of 24
regarding Ukraine in 2022 also have significant components of the strategy to distract the
audience from unsound leadership and a declining economy. The invasion relies on the
reminiscence of the Soviet empire and attempts to consolidate Vladimir Putin as a powerful
leader against the evil western actors. It is possible to justify the continuation of Ukraine’s
propaganda of the so-called ‘Ukrainian aggression,’ thanks to which the criticism of corruption
and the ineffective decision-making process can be suppressed. However, as costs accumulate
including sustained economic isolation the Russian citizens might not be blinded by the
nationalist rhetoric and realize that the war is primarily maintained for an oligarchy to retain its
rule instead of the Russian people. It means that even short victorious wars are not such for
unaccountable regimes when the public alters its view regarding existing issues. Even if the
nations are able to escape focus on the internal strife for a while the latter always come back and
without offering solutions they damage the leaders.
Legitimizing revolutionary regime through military victories abroad
Benevolent dictators are still in existence in many parts of the world and their leaders
may embark on military crusades to prolong their rule and consolidate their power domestic
front. To make people more nationalist and for them to support the new government, they
demonstrate that they are hard and triumphant against the foreign entities in the several wars.
Militancy can create achievements of an economic kind, for instance through the acquisition of
territories, resources, and taxes. Napoleon Bonaparte himself might be cited here as a historical
example of a leader who appeared in Revolutionary France at the end of the eighteenth century
and later more than a decade spent in military campaigning in different countries of Europe. His
brilliant victories over many formations of the enemies like at Marengo in 1800, Austerlitz in
1805, among others, established him and his authority in France. It allowed him to install his
Page 17 of 24
relations on the throne of other nations, while receiving astronomical indemnities and ransoms
from defeated states. Similar developments were witnessed some ninety years later with
Napoleon III whose international military adventures were intended to replicate his famous
relative for political unification in France. In the twentieth century such leaders of the new
Bolshevik regime in Russia as Trotsky called for revolutionary defeatism and the need for war in
order to spread revolution as an essential doctrine. The Red Army and other Soviet forces fought
counter revolutionary movements in a bloody civil war later aided Marxist revolutions and
putting in place Soviet socialist states in countries such as Mongolia and Central Europe. The
plan was that it is possible to defend friends in other countries and simultaneously build up the
command economy and communism all over the USSR. In the recent past Iran had the revolution
in 1979 and in the short span of time the Iran-Iraq war in the eighties’ provided the religious
leaders and the Revolutionary Guards to mobilize the Iranian nation against the newly formed
Islamic republic and the secular Arab neighbor under Saddam Hussein. In total, going out to
spread an ideological message to other countries through the barrel of a gun has been one of the
effective ways in mobilizing against the threats at home for the revolutionary governments. It has
created chances for the start-up governments to perform their newly reorganized military to
undertake a trial in this manner, while on one hand, they take care of the morale of their people
along with their political obedience back home.
International Community Responses to Revolutionary State Behavior
Sanctions and isolation exacerbating aggressive tendencies
Sanctions and isolation exacerbating aggressive tendencies indicates that using economic
and diplomatic pressures with political isolation and intentional isolation techniques can cause
severe aggressive traits in a state or a group. If a country or regime is placed under sanctions,
Page 18 of 24
ignored and ostracized by much of the global community and vilified in the media, this certainly
creates resentment, victim identity issues, and the ‘With us or against us’ mentality. The
sanctioned groups begin to feel that they are unfairly penalized and lack appreciation, which
leads to focusing inward and adopting even more rigid and confrontational, or militant-like,
attitudes and measures towards the external environment that is perceived as unfriendly. In this
respect, their actions then perpetuate that perception internationally. For example, severe
penalties imposed on Germany which were after the WWI had led to economic downturn,
political instability, and feeling of ‘injustices done’ which spearheaded the coming up of Nazism
and aggressive ultranationalism. North Korea has been out of touch with the international
community for decades, and it has been a dictatorship that has been worsened by the sanctions it
has been subjected to; this focus on building up dangerous military power than diplomacy.
Western powers’ economic measures and the support of autocratic regimes created the
perception that Iran was under attack pre-revolutionary Iran, paving way for an anti-US and anti-
Israel revolutionary government. There, and in other situations, the sanctions and isolation were
supposed to deter aggression or political oppression, but they only contributed to the escalation
of nationalism and the aggressive foreign policies rather than promoting the moderation and the
reconciliation. That is why punitive measures are thought of at times; they come with a
substantial likelihood of failure by creating a defiant, adversarial spirit when the targeted nation
feels it has no hope for redemption. Thus, while cautious political relations and information and
communication technology selection can be less advantageous and more challenging, they can be
more effective in the long run.
Preemptive interventions destabilizing post-revolutionary state development
Page 19 of 24
Interventions by foreign powers prior to the consolidation of power can manifest in a
number of ways in terms of the ability of a state to establish itself after a revolution. As seen in
any revolution where a country shifts from one form of government to another, such a period
may be very sensitive because the new ruling is yet to firmly establish itself and undertake
relevant reformation within a period of struggling with internal conflicts. Even when it comes to
interventions that are introduced to achieve what could be perceived as noble goals or to curb
threats, they threaten the state-building process in its early stages. For instance, an anticipative
military intervention aimed at dismantling the weapons inventory might lead to the formation of
a power vacuum, and thus be filled by other warring parties. Economic measures aimed at
emasculating ‘errant’ new leadership can also undermine the standard of living and provoke
public hostility toward the not yet firmly seated executive. Furthermore, unilateral preemptive
interventions are not normally considered legitimate under international law; therefore, the new
government’s assertion of authority and sovereignty is weakened, which can then reinforce
nationalist and populist movements within the post-revolutionary state, perpetuating further
disorder and provoking bolder demonstrations of power at the expense of the construction of
pertinent institutions. Although preemption has good motives of dealing with threats and human
rights abuses, the actions can divert the attention of key individuals, reverse incentives in
destructive ways, create new splits, and hinder the nation’s organic paths it has to build after a
revolution. This simply goes to show that the relation between the two is very complex as it is
during transition and regime change especially given the fact that the world is so inter-connected.
Any external power that requires security and stability to unfold should consider the
consequences of pre-emptive interventions against the likely impact of interrupting a state that
has already started its revolution and has a still undefined vision at that time in history.
Page 20 of 24
Diplomatic engagement strategies for moderating revolutionary aggression
Measures that relate to reduction of aggression of the revolutionary include the following;
The general strategy that is employed in the measures of engagement is therefore a
comprehensive one. Unlike condemnation or aggression which aims at taking sides, or even
winning a battle, or fighting, diplomacy aims at negotiating, relationships, interests, and winning
the war without firing a single shot. The potential avenues for engagement can be such: the
promising incentives may concern the rights enhancement and which is connected to the
financial rewards, the mediators who would negotiate with the targeted state or conduct the
dialogue with the third party, or the sponsoring of the exchange based on the people’s
diplomacy. One has to ensure that any pressure is applied from outside to start the change
process, and this should not create resistance or be met with any push back. One should always
be patient and persistent because change whether negative or positive it is a process that may
take years and sometimes decades. Behind the scenes, there may be diplomas in order to attract
supporters to synchronize words and threats and promises on multilateral levels. Nevertheless,
for the engagement strategies to work, these strategies must respect the dignity of the targeted
populace, be based on culture and history, and justice claims. The extremism that occurs does not
happen out of the blue but out of social conflict and political turbulence, which revolutionary
movements may come from a genuine concern in regards to the state of the world. Liberationists
must consequently acknowledge and endorse such assertions when promoting non-violence
among diplomats. This implies being aware of political and cultural systems of the country that
one operates in. Pricing and returns can be affected by impartial and reliable consultants who
may partly or directly explain geopolitical chiefs’ aggression. Thus people to people relations
especially through students, business, cultural and sports exchanges to arrive at mutual
Page 21 of 24
appreciation promote state manners as indirect balancing mechanisms in some ways. It is costly
to handle the various aspects of engagement and always call for complex solutions. Without it,
diplomatic influence goes up in smoke and primary threats come out of the closet. Consciously
and consistently, however, diplomacy can alter revolutionary movements for a more passive line,
with plans, friends, and force.
Conclusion
Complex interplay between internal revolutions and external aggression
Internal revolutions and external aggression do not occupy isolated positions, but they
influence each other in various ways. It is for this reason that sometimes the outside pressure
plays a role in motivating revolutionary changes from within as groups are formed to counter a
common foe. This solidarity however can just as easily disintegrate as soon as conflict arises,
and old group loyalties resurface. On the other hand internal revolutions are known to trigger
some sort of response from external actors keen on maintaining their pull string in the region.
The prerequisites for revolution itself also come into play ironically. As we have seen, where the
main issues giving rise to revolution are of an economic nature, the revolutions may be more
likely to find compromise as a solution. The revolutions inspired by ideology can in many
situations pose a more confrontational, rebellious stance towards interference by outsiders. There
is the question of how to defend sovereignty yet stay committed to the revolutionary goal, and
how not to goad the enemy. An inward focus on purging counterrevolutionaries and
implementing reforms poses a risk to overpower the government from outside. However, going
overboard with hostility means that the revolutionaries will have hostile foreign parties against
the revolutionary state that will lead to war. The onset of war however has the potential to
destroy every known virtue and harmony that the revolution sought to achieve in the first place.
Page 22 of 24
Consequently for revolutionary governments the complexities of these dynamics of self-
determination, revolutionary spirit, and realistic diplomacy are major. The path chosen has
implications for the existence of revolution, let alone its success; not only for the future regional
security. The relationship between revolution and external aggression comprises of much higher
volatilities in terms of vision and imperative, freedom and safety, and in terms of pure principles
and practicality. Mostly, these dilemmas sometimes define the nature of decisions revolutionary
leaders have to make in order to sustain the viability of the revolution.
Need for nuanced international approaches to revolutionary states
The questions which arise before the international community whenever states are
involved in overhaul revolutionary changes affecting their political systems and societies are
always challenging. Applying harsh measures such as sanctions or use of force may appear
reasonable when dealing with revolutionary regimes which challenge the existing world order
and are violating human rights. Nevertheless, the more sophisticated frameworks that take into
account that these states are not black and white after the transition period would be much more
helpful. It remains true that even the revolutionary governments that have authoritarian traits can
rely on significant popular support that stems from real concerns about the previous regime.
These broad-brush external condemnations mostly act as a catalyst for further radicalization of
the post-revolution regimes by their right-wing ideologues. Moreover, the drastic social and
economic change such states seek, despite moreso being disruptive in the short-run, can correct
the injustices that cause conflict provided room is afforded to develop apace. The international
order would thus derive large benefits from greater differentiation in the global politics that does
not automatically condemn states in the process of revolution. Despite the need for alertness due
to turbulence and instability that attend such historical transitions, the comprehension of each
Page 23 of 24
case and distinguishing deserved dissent from hyperbolic threat are crucial for building the
engagement paradigms that foster effective and sustainable transformations over time. Quite
contrary to the idea that revolutionary movements are programmed to transform state along
certain ideological line, their developmental path still remains unpredictable due to the internal
struggle between the moderate and the radical factions who are struggling to control the future of
the state. Conditional diplomacy and other related international policies aimed at supporting
reformists by dialogues and incentives rather than isolating these societies altogether appear to
be more solid grounds for progressive living together in the future. Lastly, although
revolutionary states can disrupt the global order in the short-term, revolution itself brings the
potential for change, if not the right care is taken to nurture the forces at work in society, more
representational liberal orders, based on equality and human dignity can be grown.
Importance of addressing root causes of revolutionary instability
It is important to focus on understanding the sources of revolutionary instability so as to
bring about positive change in the world’s societies. Revolutions occur as a result of social issues
such as unfairness, prejudice, subjugation, disease, hunger, joblessness, and disease that manifest
itself over the years and reaches a burning point. In the event that the underlying causes of the
people’s discontent are not addressed, then new rounds of conflict and instability occur.
Revolutionary pressures, therefore, rise to the point where governments over time do not
implement the required political, economic, or social changes to alleviate key generalized
suffering in the populace. However, it is essential to note that international policymakers often
tend to be overly concentrated on revolution external manifestations and acts of aggression rather
than addressing the root causes of sickness. A more enlightened view, however, understands that
revolutionary unrest serves as an indication that the society has developed certain pathologies
Page 24 of 24
which need to be treated. But if the disease is not treated, then the symptoms are bound to come
again in some other form at a later time. However, if we are to understand why large parts of
society are ready to turn to violence and overthrow existing order, by becoming revolutionaries,
we can learn what needs to change structurally and through democratization to set the ground for
a more stable peace. Some common destabilizing factors historians point to that can accumulate
over decades before sparking revolutions under oppressive regimes include: large-scale income
disparities, high levels of hunger, chronic economic shocks, no ways to engage in political
protests other than violence, huge scale corruption and embezzlement, youth unemployment, low
wages, discrimination and persecution of minorities, use of force against protesters, and rulers
who remain indifferent to demands for fairness or sustenance. If these and other related systems
errors can intentionally be ‘un-done’, societal tensions might gradually decline rather than
perpetuate further polarization, extremism, and revolution. In the long-term creating societies
that are based on justice and human dignity instead of focusing on revolutionize can assist in
stabilizing as opposed to fueling revolutions.
