1 | P a g e
CROSS-BORDER MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: CHALLENGES AND
OPPORTUNITIES
1. Legal and Regulatory Issues
1.1. Compliance with Local Laws
In the field of cross-border M&A activity, the issue of adherence to local regulations is a key
consideration. It is crucial to ensure that Multinational Enterprises respect the Host Country
Laws since within this Laws is where every transaction is conducted and failure to respect might
lead to legal consequences or even corporate reputation. Local laws can contain information
regarding any number of topics, i.e employment, environmental, or product-specific laws. Both
the number of these laws and their definitions differ between jurisdictions, which is a major
challenge for companies. As stated by Meyer (2004) firms need seriously to analyse the legal
environment of the target country in order to prevent any regulatory incidents (Meyer, 2004). In
addition, López-Duarte, Vidal-Suárez, and González-Díaz (2016) posit that cultural disparities
can exacerbate these issues as divergent legal systems including their application and
enforcement norms can cause conflicts and violations (López-Duarte et al. , 2016). because legal
environments keep evolving it lays the need of constant surveillance and changes. Legal and
political factors may change extremely fast nullifying the legal validity and legitimacy of
previously agreed trading terms. For instance, as argued by Brouthers, Dikova, and Kostova
(2016), post-merger integration is likely to be enhanced by having clear knowledge of local
legal changes (Brouthers et al. , 2016). The legal implication of failure to comply with the laws
of the host country could have far-reaching effects such as financial compensations, cancellation
of the transaction which explains why the services of legal brains and local collaborators are
crucial. Hopkins (1999) moreover stresses out that legal due diligence should not be confined
2 | P a g e
only to pre-merger phase due to the fact that it should be continuously applied throughout the
period of the lasting mergers with the purpose to diminish the exposed risk and to ensure the
ongoing compliance (Hopkins, 1999). Consequently, the lack of a comprehensive legal
compliance program that is embedded in the strategic planning for international acquisitions
through M&A deals must be addressed to prevent risks and ensure successful cross-border
M&A transactions.
1.2. Antitrust and Competition
Competition laws are of paramount importance in cross-border M&A transactions because they
help to preserve the relative market strength before and after acquisitions. These laws aim at
ensuring that the market remains competitive as well as protect the consumers from monopolistic
like practices by companies that are expected to show beyond reasonable doubt that by engaging
in mergers and acquisition the level of competition is likely to reduce. As correctly indicated by
Erel, Liao, and Weisbach (2012), the antitrust concerns must be analyzed in relation to the nature
and management of domestic and international laws that can differ with regard to the scope and
the enforcement approaches. Businesses must communicate with entities such as the EU‟s
European Commission or the US Federal Trade Commission to receive regulatory approval for
merger transactions to ensure that their actions will not lessen the competition in the market. One
more obstacle to address the concerns of antitrust in cross border M&A deals is that the
transaction has to conform to the regulatory standards of different jurisdictions. Kim and
Finkelstein (2009) also highlight that such differences in the antitrust standards as well as the
procedures of enforcement lead to conflicts and further add to the delays in the approval of the
merger and thus create problems in the implementation of the merger. Angwin, Mellahi, Gomes,
and Peter (2020) also argue that organizations should engage in communication and negotiations
3 | P a g e
with these regulatory bodies to have their concerns addressed and to receive the necessary
approvals for their operations. This is commonly made up of the technical evaluation of the
impact that the suggested merger could have on market competition, customer prices along with
innovation. They may be forced to give up some of their holdings or firms to the
regulators. Ashraf, Herciu, and Stoian (2021) add that this means that companies will have to
continually assess their market behaviour for violations in order to determine whether they may
be subject to further sanctions in the future, which can take the form of hefty fines and forced
asset sales. Hence, the intention and ability to adhere to antitrust laws need to be established in
good time for cross-border M&A transactions to be concluded and their gains sustained.
1.3. Regulatory Approvals
These are required to ensure that the merger will not be against the legal and regulatory statutes
of the concerned countries. Huang, Li, and Chi (2019) explain that the approval process is time-
consuming and may require the submission of materials to several regulatory bodies with
varying requirements. Firms must be prepared to provide extensive documentation and
rationalization to support the M&A and make sure it complies with domestic laws and promote
the market and economy. They review several factors before approving the merger for instance
the competition, security of the country and the public interest. The lessons learned by Kale,
Singh, and Raman (2009) state that pharmaceutical companies should maintain close
collaboration with health regulators throughout the approval process and communicate
frequently. This is because any potential concern is addressed at the same time used as a means
of preventing delays and rejections. In addition, Beckman and Gomes (2018) further note that
cultural understanding and knowledge of the host nation‟s business practices can influence
regulating attitudes and behaviours. The regulatory planning strategy also entails the ability to
4 | P a g e
anticipate potential dangers and counteraction from interest groups for example competitors and
consumer organisations. Cai and Sevilir (2020) also state that heavy lobbying and negative
publicity can enhance the regulatory pressure that requires the right coordination and advocacy
response. Such organizations should be prepared at times to haggle and even to make
concessions in order to get things approved. This may involve disposing of assets that are
undesirable or transforming the business model to adhere to the requirements. Firms also have to
maintain records of alterations in the regulatory environments and respond to them where
appropriate.
2. Cultural and Communication Barriers
2.1. Cultural Integration
Some of the challenges that are attributed by language differences in cross-border Mergers and
Acquisition have profound effects in the communication systems among the employees, in
developing strategies to cooperate with each more as well as the entire integration process.
Corporate language problems may arise due to economic integration where communication
between firms involved in strategic partnerships are often from different language backgrounds
and failure to communicate properly can result in misinterpretations and conflicts. Kogut and
Singh (1988) asserted that language differences are a key aspect in the integration process
because they hinder or make it difficult to distribute knowledge across people (Kogut & Singh,
1988). This can be achieved by having an official language for the business written and verbal
communication which is the language that is widely understood and accepted by the company
and this is usually English. However, this strategy may be costly as it needs the company to
invest in language courses for workers to have the expertise in the second language. López-
Duarte, Vidal-Suárez, and González-Díaz (2016) note that even giving language training
5 | P a g e
significantly improves the communication and creates an impression of the firm‟s dedication to
employee‟s growth and assimilation (López-Duarte et al. , 2016). there is a necessity to use
professional translation and interpretation services in case of need when there is a demand for
utmost exactness of conversation like in legal and financial talks. The use of technology can help
address communication challenges, especially when dealing with multicultural employees. Real
time translation software might also be employed as means of ensuring smooth communication
between such employees with advanced communication tools that can also translate. As Cai and
Sevilir (2020) argue, the integration of such technologies into everyday activities can promote
effective communication and prevent potential challenges with interaction, such as
misunderstandings (Cai & Sevilir, 2020). Yet businesses should also be aware of the potential
caveats of automated translations and provide additional human review when translated text is
particularly crucial. Besides these operational strategies, the psychological factor that contributes
to the issue must be addressed: the patients should be educated to take their time.On the one
hand, Meyer (2004) illustrates that there is potential for the increased cultural awareness and
sensitivity to reduce the adverse consequences of language barriers act as a favourable factor for
integration (Meyer, 2004).
2.2. Language Differences
The use of language as a tool when communicating in businesses across different borders has
been a challenge in businesses cross-border mergers and acquisitions. In cases where two
companies from diverse linguistic groups are integrated, linguistic conflict may emerge as a
result of poor communication that arises from language differences which results in
miscommunication and lack of collaboration between the two groups. Kogut and Singh (1988)
are of particular relevance with regards to the issue of language differences and their impact on
6 | P a g e
the integration process Language differences have been identified as one of the most important
factors which affect integration as they may hinder coordinated work and knowledge transfer
(Kogut & Singh, 1988). Companies need to adopt the best practices that will help in achieving
this as there are challenges like linguistic barriers that hinder clear communication.One such
measure entails instituting a corporate language for business transactions and all recording and
writing tasks to be in English. This is however a long term plan which will involve heavy
investment in language courses for employees in order for them to be proficient in the language.
López-Duarte, Vidal-Suárez and González-Díaz (2016) further claim that language training
offered does not only improve communication but also emphasizes the company‟s support for
the professional and social development of employees and their integration into the business
(López-Duarte et al. , 2016). Further, the professional translation and interpretation services are
critical in instances where clarity of communication is demanded, as in legal and financial
matters.Technology can be useful in eliminating language disparities. Cai and Sevilir (2020)
further note that introducing such technologies to daily operations will make communication
more effective and minimize the likelihood of misconceptions (Cai & Sevilir, 2020). But firms
must also be aware of the downsides of automated translations, for instance many translate will
not be accessible at certain critical touchpoints. However, that is not enough; there should be a
culture of being tolerant and taking things slowly as they are. Meyer (2004) also argues that
encouraging the public to be more culturally aware and increase their tolerance can prevent the
language barrier from causing numerous adverse effects on integration (Meyer, 2004).
2.3. Management Practices
In the cross-border M&A, the management style can become a significant issue due to factors
such as organizational structure, power and well-established routines, and decision-making
7 | P a g e
processes. As it often happens that two different countries combine their businesses into a single
organization, the needs for integrating the styles of management of each participating company
arises to adequately develop an organizational structure for the newly formed business. Kogut
and Singh (1988) … hold that the management composition is crucial to cross-border mergers, as
it has the direct bearing on organizational effectiveness and job satisfactions (Kogut & Singh,
1988). Among the practices that are regarded to manifest differences in management is
leadership. For example, Western companies may prefer a more participative leadership where
everyone in the team has an equal say whilst the Asian firms may embrace a more authoritarian
way of management whereby decisions come from the management. As Beckman and Gomes
(2018) outline, it is also crucial to comprehend any contrasting differences and try to reach an
equilibrium between the two styles that enables them to co-exist in a working environment
effectively (Beckman & Gomes, 2018). This may include some programs for leaders to improve
their cross-cultural leading skills and special management strategies for inclusive approaches that
combine the best practices from two organizations. Another difference is in decision-making
approach between the two cultures. In some cultures, everyone is allowed to express an opinion
before a decision is reached, while in others, the management team makes the decision without
seeking the input of other employees. Lopez-duarte, Vidal-suarez, and Gonzalez-diaz (2016)
note that decisions should not be made in isolation for companies to operate effectively and
without resistance (lopez-duarte et al . , 2016). This can be achieved through defining and
implementing both decision-making procedures and communication flows that fit both of these
approaches. In addition, performance management and appraisal systems may vary from
organization to organization and this may also affect the motivation and performance of the
employees. Cai and Sevilir (2020) also point out that it may be challenging to combine different
8 | P a g e
performance management practices due to the necessity to adequately evaluate the benefits and
drawbacks of each system and create a new holistic strategy that is aligned with the new
corporation‟s mission (Cai & Sevilir, 2020).
3. Financial Considerations
3.1. Valuation Challenges
There are various valuation challenges in cross-border M&A transactions which are a major
factor in M&A negotiations and processes. Valuing a company in a foreign country of operation
is subject to numerous complexities because of differences in accounting principles, economies,
and trading practices. Bruner (2004) believes that the fundamental challenge in valuation is to
ensure that true and fair view of financial statement of target firm is achieved through restating
its financial statements. This includes calculating a normalized earnings figure, understanding
asset quality, and other factors that may only be relevant on a local level (Bruner, 2004).
accounting differences including difference between IFRS and GAAP can cause difference in
interpretations of the financial statements. Brigham and Daves (2019) argue that differences such
as these must be identified and how they are valued. This often involves financial statement
analysis and discussing accounting practices with local professionals who understand the target
country‟s accounting conventions (Brigham & Daves, 2019). One more major issue in valuation
is the estimation of cash flows. However, in cross-border M&A, forecasting future performance
is difficult as there are many uncertainties during the prediction process like political instability,
economic instability, increased competition, etc. In line with Damodaran (2012)‟s thoughts, the
application and adjustment of the discount rates for country risk premiums are crucial for cash
flow forecasting. This helps in capturing the peculiar risks outlined with the target‟s environment
(Damodaran, 2012). The valuation process must account for non-operational or non-physical
9 | P a g e
assets, especially for fast-moving consumer goods, which often have a high value in brands and
patents. These assets can play a vital role in the overall valuation, and hence, must be qualified
through based on qualitative and quantitative methods as stated by Liu and Wang (2013) (Liu &
Wang, 2013). Assessment of intangible assets also alleviates the risk of the acquiring firm not
valuing the assets it is buying correctly or failing to plan for them.
3.2. Currency Fluctuations
Currency exchange rates are a crucial economic factor in international M&A deals because they
determine the value of the exchange or acquisitions. This forecastable risk can change the exact
amount of money that a given country would pay for its imports hence affecting the financial
viability of the transaction. As noted by Eiteman, Stonehill, and Moffett (2016), companies need
to deal with exchange rate risk through effective hedging techniques to ensure that the
transaction value remains constant. Such strategies include the forward contract, the options
contract, and the swap contract that fixes exchange rates at future points in time. Such financial
instruments enable firms to commit to a specified exchange rate hence minimise the risk
associated with exchange rate changes during the M&A negotiation and finalisation processes.
Also the currency fluctuations would have an impact on the value of assets and liabilities of the
merged entity and hence would have an impact on the financial statements as well. Brigham and
Ehrhardt (2020) point out that when foreign financial statements are expressed in the parent
company‟s reporting currency, this can lead to the occurrence of translation gains or losses due
to exchange rates. This demands an effective currency risk management structure able to
minimise the negative effects on the financial statements. Organizations should embrace risk
management principles which should involve constant evaluation and modification of financial
strategies as guided by the rates of exchanges in the market to ensure the maintenance of a strong
10 | P a g e
financial structure for the merged firm. Currency risk also impacts the operational stage of
MNEs through economic exposure to transaction currency. Shapiro (2010) argues that changes
in the value of a currency may affect the relative price of the goods produced by the company
and sold overseas, altering revenues and profits. Firms therefore need to keep evaluating and
regulating currency risk through operational hedges including production and procurement in
multiple nations. Third, changes in exchange rates may affect M&A financing choices in a
cross-border context. Butler (2012) explains that the cost of capital can be quite volatile
depending on the fluctuations of exchange rates and thus have a direct impact on the overall
financing aspects of the merger. Organizations may choose to have financing in different
currencies to allow for currency risk management and equalize their financial state.
3.3. Tax Implications
Tax is another important economic factor in cross-border Mergers and Acquisition since it has
direct impact on overall profits and transactional make-up. Tax laws between countries may also
vary and this may cause elaborate tax planning and compliance concerns. suggest that tax
planners should be aware of tax conditions in both the home/taxing and the target/tax haven
countries in order to achieve the highest tax efficiency from the merger. These different tax
terrains require careful study as it aims to determine the best tax states or states that could
provide the least tax burden. The first problem that tax officials in the M&A cross-border trade
could encounter is double taxation where the income is taxed in the home country and also in the
host country. To protect themselves against such risk, companies will usually assume the help of
tax treaties that offer them relief through various means, most notably through tax credits or
exemptions. With reference to Reuven S. Avi-Yonah (2011) once the transaction is properly
structured it may utilise these treaties to minimise the tax liability. For example, tax conventions
11 | P a g e
can provide for determining the allocation of taxing jurisdiction between states to avoid double
taxation and ease cross-border economic operations. The other important concern is transfer
pricing because it involves the determination of price of goods sold between entities in different
jurisdiction. Eden (2009) argued that the rules governing transfer pricing are put in place to try
and eliminate situations where profits are being shifted and the trade transpires at unrealistically
high or low prices. Policies on transfer pricing must fulfil the global or regional benchmark
requirements, like the ones recommended by the OECD, to avert transfer pricing fines and
adjustments by the tax authorities. In addition, taxes are also used to determine the method of
acquisition that is used; this could be a stock acquisition or an asset acquisition. As stated by
Scholes, Wolfson, Erickson, Hanlon, Maydew, and Shevlin (2015), Several features related to
the structure of the transaction also entail important tax consequences for the acquiring company
and the target company, such as liabilities and accessibility to tax attributes like net operating
losses.
4. Strategic Alignment
4.1. Business Objectives
shared commercial objectives are essential in M&A transactions to ensure congruence and
compatibility of the acquiring and target companies in international deals. Business ideals can be
deemed to be the central visions and missions that are held by each business entity. These goals
require day-to-day review of each organization‟s strengths and weaknesses and the
opportunities/challenges present in the marketplace. According to Hitt, Ireland & Hoskisson
(2017), business synergy implies that two or more businesses can come together to share
resources, capabilities, and market positions among the participants of the sharing scheme. One
more challenge for the process of business alignment is cultural, priorities, and strategic
12 | P a g e
misalignments between the companies. As noted by Brouthers, Dikova, and Kostova (2016),
differences in culture may prevent organizations from establishing a mutual platform for further
cooperation and achieving common objectives. firms have to engage in significant negotiation
and interaction to identify common perceptions and establish agreements between them about the
goals of the mergers and acquired firm. strategic alignment also involves definition of
organizational goals and promoting communication of these goals within the organization.
Managers are obliged to communicate the goals resulting from the strategic management across
all organizational levels and prove their connection to operational activities. Johnson et al.
(2019) state that strategic leadership incorporates the aspect of inspiring and enabling employees
to cohere to change and meet organizational objectives. Further, strategic alignment refers to the
internal focus and does not only concern organizational aims and goals but also implies the
satisfaction of external stakeholders, for instance, customers and shareholders. Kim and
Mauborgne (2015) state that strategic management should adopt the perspective that considers
the impact of strategic management decisions on different stakeholders and focuses on the
creation of value for all participants of economic activities. Thus, in conclusion, it can be stated
that business objective congruence has to be embraced in international acquisitions.
4.2. Market Positioning
Strategic positioning is a key factor of M&A transactions that shape the success of a cross-border
M&A in developing a stronger competitive position and enhancing growth prospects of the
merged entity. Market positioning implies the place that the company‟s products and services
occupy in the mind of target market consumers as compared to competing brands. The third type
of strategic fit is market positioning – This type of strategic fit deals with strategic alignment in
the areas of customer needs and competitor and industry analysis. As these authors underline:
13 | P a g e
“Market positioning, as stressed by Kotler, Kartajaya, and Setiawan (2017), empowers the
business to achieve differentiation and create value in the market” (Kotler et al. , 2017). The
difficulty in coordinating market position when companies carry out strategic merger and
acquisition of another firm arises when the merged or acquired firm has a brand image,
reputation and customer relationship that is not aligned with the acquiring or merged firm. Aaker
(1996) stated that effective brand extension is the ability to maintain the most important aspects
of the brand identity while also utilizing the favorable aspects of the extended brand and the
extending brand to form an attractive value proposition to consumers (Aaker, 1996). This may
include the creation of new products or services that incorporate the significant features of each
of the brands or even venturing into new sectors that the merged company will benefit from.
Furthermore, market positioning is highly influenced by the contextual knowledge of each target
market, especially the local market conditions and consumer behavior. Market positioning is
influenced by various factors such as culture, regulations and competition environment. As
indicated by Lu and Beamish 2001 One should acknowledge that companies should conduct
careful examination and evaluation of each market to define proper positioning strategies (Lu &
Beamish, 2001). This may include to some extents changing marketing communication, channels
of distribution, and products to fit the locals‟ needs and the overall trends in the market.
Additionally, there has to be harmony with respect to positioning in the market and this has to be
strategically monitored and adjusted to changes in the market environment. Markets are
continuously growing, expanding and changing, therefore, companies should be adaptive to
changes in order to face the changing opportunities and threats in markets. In this respect, it
should be noted that the current trends towards the dynamic development of innovation and
14 | P a g e
changes in the market positions are the major factor determining improved competitive
advantage and higher growth rates (Porter 1996).
4.3. Long-term Goals
Horizontal integration is one of the innate aspects of cross-border M&A that essentially deals
with the creation of a firm that can achieve and maintain an optimal level of operational
performance. Long term goals are related to the vision or mission or initiatives or aims of the
organisation in the long run. At the strategic level, organizations are directed towards
accomplishing long-term objectives, and these comprise of vision, and of innovation and of risk.
Barney and Hesterly (2015) further explain that strategic management is concerned with how the
firm can accomplish its long-term objectives and how it can attain value to stakeholders by
emphasizing on its competitive gains and core competency provided by Barney and Hesterly
(2015). One issue is that in firms‟ strategic and investment aims do not go together. Some other
conflict among the companies may arise in form of competing growth strategies and appetite for
risk or the investment strategies that have to be bargained for. Long-term goal congruence has
been defined by Datta, Herrmann, and Zhang (2005) as an endeavour to improve shareholder‟s
wealth and reduce risk through searching for long-term synergies and tradeoffs (Datta et al. ,
2005). This may involve selling of non-core assets, rationalizing of product lines or entry into
new related growth industries. However, the absence of variation in future-oriented items points
to the need to add sustainability/CSR indicators. Businesses need to think about where future
plans might take the ESG and to what extent these strategies are compatible with stakeholder
objectives. According to Eccles, Ioannou and Serafeim 2014 Sustainability and competitive
advantage: exploring structural embeddedness as a key determinant for corporate sustainability
from a network theory perspective. Sustainability and competitive advantage -a network theory
15 | P a g e
perspective on corporate sustainability .This includes adopting aggressive sustainability goals
and objectives, reporting on key sustainability metrics, and communicating improvements in
ESG factors to shareholders. In addition, such strategic alignment can only be realized
particularly in long-term objectives when the company has the right leadership and corporate
governance that focuses on creating long-term shareholder value. As indicated by Van den Steen
(2010), boards have the responsibility of overseeing the organisation, giving strategic guidance,
and also authorising the accountability of organisational performance and also the capability of
the management in achieving organisational goals for the long term (Van den Steen, 2010).
5. Operational Integration
5.1. Systems and Processes
There is also the need to have systems and processes in cross border M&A so that all systems
and processes that are conducted in the MNE are done in the right manner. Technology consists
of the technological platform; business activities; and other supporting systems and processes.
Integration in systems and processes is a capability which has three phases: Capacity evaluation;
Potential advantages; Implementation strategy. From the explanation provided by Cartwright and
Cooper (2014) from the mentioned notion of systems and processes integration is an operational
efficiency as well as cost reduction and competitiveness (Cartwright & Cooper, 2014). The last
issue in the area of operational synergy is the disparities on both technology platforms and
applications and enterprise systems of the combining entities. The workers can work with
various ERP systems, CRMs, and communication tools that make it hard to process and
synthesize information as well as the collaboration process. Davenport argues that there is a
requirement for information congruence and data enhancement to further information
amalgamation and management procedure over the firm (Davenport, 1998). Hammer and
16 | P a g e
Champy (2001) have observed that reengineering the business processes effectively delivers
value in resources and time, efficiency and customers (Hammer & Champy, 2001). This may
include value stream mapping and other process analysis tools/techniques as well as identifying
the current problems and outlining new processes in terms of standards and outcomes which are
relevant in the particular organization. Brands need to use OSS/Communication Platforms in
order to enable information and value transfer in the value network. Chopra and Meind explain
that supply chain integration allows companies to make plans for production and inventory and
even the demand for products (Chopra & Meindl, 2019).
5.2. Human Resources
Implementing strategic HR development is a process common to all countries and organizations
but taking into consideration the culture, legal demands, and employee‟s expectations. In line
with such an approach, Cascio and Boudreau (2010) point out that the lack of effective HR
integration is directly linked to issues, such as the loss of core workers, lowering organizational
commitment, and weak post-merger outcomes (Cascio & Boudreau, 2010). One obstacle in
SHRM integration is the incompatibility of organizational culture, values, and leadership
approaches between different organizations that are undergoing the M&A process. Cultural
integration is best described as the process of promoting togetherness and identification of
workers with the company regardless of their cultural background. Schneider and Barsoux
(2003) mention that cultural integration involves proactive communication, cultural sensitivity
initiatives and leadership congruence to address cultural distances among employees and create a
positive working atmosphere (Schneider & Barsoux, 2003). This include the encouragement of
international interaction, diversification recognition, and the development of shared expectations
that govern behaviour and the making of organisational decisions. the area of HR integration
17 | P a g e
refers to synchronizing activities and processes, for instance, recruiting, developing, and
appraising employees, with the strategic initiatives of a company. Such companies have to find
out competency and skilled employees within their company, analyze gaps in competency or
skills and then train such employees in a way that can fulfill gaps of competency or skills. as
defined by Ulrich, Brockbank, Younger, and Ulrich (2012) means the establishment of a shared
talent approach that brings out the best of both organizations while also promoting talent growth
and development in the organization (Ulrich et al. , 2012). This may involve exchange
assignments, tutoring schemes and development processes that facilitate team members to
expand their professional fields and support the merged organization. Additionally, the scope of
managing and overseeing HR integration goes beyond internal workers to involve contingent
workers, contractors, and the gig economy workers whose contribution towards organizational
success is equally critical. Enterprises need to develop strict rules and regulations on how they
are going to deal with flexible work arrangements; the engagements between organizations and
outsourcing organizations; and the various policies that govern contingent workers. According to
Phillips and Gully (2014), workforce planning and management are important in ensuring that
organization have enough resources to produce goods at low costs and meet the needs of
customers effectively [Phillips & Gully, 2014].
5.3. Supply Chain Management
SCM integration is an important component of cross-border M&A to continue the operation and
competitiveness of supply chains. SCM refers to managing the design, procurement, production
and delivery of products to consumers. The shared commitment in the achievement of the
strategic goals in the SCM entails the collaboration, coordination, and optimization of the supply
chain networks, processes, and relationships. According to Chopra and Meindl (2019) integration
18 | P a g e
of companies through SCM allows optimising internal processes, and decreasing the costs of
business and its response to changes in the market (Chopra & Meindl, 2019). Another difficulty
associated with the integration of SCM is related to the discrepancy between distinct supply
chain structures, supplier relationships, and distribution strategies of the merging companies.
Some companies may be located in different geographical locations, focus on different markets
or have different supplier for raw materials which may make integration difficult. According to
Monczka, Handfield, Giunipero, and Patterson (2015), supply chain mapping and analysis are
crucial to determining areas of collaboration, conflicts, and possible optimization (Monczka,
Handfield, Giunipero, & Patterson, 2015). This may include checking on the suppliers,
inspection of the transport system, and analysis of the supplies in the stores to determine if the
supply system is effective or not. Benton and Maloni have stated that supply base rationalization
and consolidation allow a company to achieve economies of scale and reduce lead times while
enhancing supply chain responsiveness (Benton & Maloni, 2005). In addition, there is the
downstream value chain integration of SCM that includes distributors, retailers, and logistics
companies that are important in product delivery to customers. Businesses need to have effective
interaction and communication, information availability at the right time, and coordination with
other members and partners to be able to deliver the right number of products and services to
customers at the desired quality. As noted by Christopher (2016), supply chain visibility and
transparency allow for companies to be able to predict disruptions, manage risks, and maintain
optimal levels of inventory at various stages of the supply chain (Christopher, 2016).
19 | P a g e
6. Risk Management
6.1. Political Risks
Political risks are significant as far as cross-border M&A is concerned since they affect the
decision-making process and transaction outcomes in aspects relating to changes in the policies
and regulations implemented by the government together with the effects of geopolitical
concerns. Political risks are associated with issues like increase in taxes, import duty, foreign
direct investment restrictions, political instability among others. In the case of political risk, it
involves early detection and response as well as the option of adopting mitigation strategies and
plans. Rugman and Verbeke (2003) argue that the political atmosphere is crucial for the business
risks and investment guarantees (Rugman & Verbeke, 2003). The second challenge in managing
political risk is that the political environment of different countries is often unpredictable. It is
important for firms to look at the nature of different markets in terms of the political strength of
the political environment for instance the political stability, the degree of political openness and
the level of political support for foreign investments. Li and Rugman (2007) shows that political
risk assessments essentially need a comprehension of a variable such as regulations, political
stability and the history of political instability (Li & Rugman, 2007). Companies have to develop
crisis communication and risks communication to handle the situation. Some of the political risks
for instance that have been noted by Wells (2004) to be mitigated through investments
diversification, through appropriate management of the currency risk and through good
government relations (Wells, 2004). This might include engaging in lobbying, working through
local influencers as well as aligning oneself with government departments to get around
bureaucracy. Moreover, political risks do not necessarily refer to risks present in a host country
alone but can also refer to the overall international geopolitical climate and global trade tensions
that may also affect international business activities.As Henisz puts it, „scenario planning‟, or
20 | P a g e
„stress testing‟, helps firms to prepare for different political scenarios and hence attain political
versatility and malleability (Henisz, 2000).
6.2. Economic Instability
This is a big challenge in cross-border M&A since economic instability represents changes in
macro-economic variables, exchange rates, and market conditions, which influence cross-border
M&A transaction fundamentals and the risk profile of the transaction. Economic instability
refers to various factors which can be inflation, devaluation or real appreciation, interest rates,
and recession. Obtaining the strategic fit in the management of economic risks implies the
careful analysis of adverse economic events, developing preventative and responsive action
plans, and risk elimination. As highlighted by Eiteman, Stonehill, and Moffett (2016), economic
uncertainties are very crucial for effective business operation and performance of financials in
the business (Eiteman et al. , 2016). One need in administering economic instability is the
condition of networks and global trade resulting in the „spill-over‟ effect of economic shocks
across borders. Firms need to consider the macro envirnoment of target markets such as potential
growth rate inflation levels and fiscal policies. Madura (2012) notes that carrying out economic
risk assessments comprises the analysis of several economic factors, which can act as early
warning indicators to spot potential risks or opportunities, including GDP growth,
unemployment rates, consumer confidence, etc. Also, the economic instability can be presented
in several ways, for instance, country currency depreciation, credit market dislocations, or supply
shocks that affect production or distribution. Organizations have to prepare for any kind of crisis
response and plan how to minimize the impact of risks. According to Brealey et al. (2017),
several strategies may be useful when it comes to managing operational risks associated with
economic instability: revenue and currency diversification, liquidity buffers (Brealey et al. ,
21 | P a g e
2017). This may include stress testing financial models, scenario-based forecasting, and What-If
analysis that helps identify the likelihood of adverse economic events affecting cash flow and/or
profitability.
6.3. Mitigation Strategies
Risk management is a non-excludable feature of cross-border M&A transactions as it presents a
range of intervention programs designed to minimize the negative effects of potential threats.
Embracing an effective risk mitigation process starts with an adequate risk assessment-the
identification of potential threats or vulnerabilities that might be associated with a particular
merger or acquisition activity in multiple dimensions. Due diligence remains crucial to identify
previously unknown or overlooked risks and uncertainties and support effective decision-making
as well as risk classification and management. To minimise the threats through a more detailed
analysis of legal, financial and operational factors, companies may try to formulate more specific
action plans to combat them. The concept of diversification of investments proves to be a
fundamental element of risk management as it implies the allocation of investment portfolios to
various types of assets and industries and geographical areas to avoid the concentrated exposure
to particular risks. It also deals with risks such as changing rates of exchange which creates an
element of uncertainty in the financial life and can result in losses hedging currency exposure
eliminates such risks and thus provides stability and predictability in the face of currency
volatility. Sound risk management includes effective policies, procedures, and controls that
reflect the principle of risk management to identify, assess and mitigate risk as mature culture in
any organization. open collaboration with stakeholders such as drug licensing regulatory bodies,
advisory panels, and communities at risk improves risk management activities. Services of
professionals who are experienced in international commercial transactions may be helpful in the
22 | P a g e
choice of appropriate legal structures and offsetting legal risks as well as in other legal and
financial issues connected with legal regulation of the transaction.
7.0 Reference
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Page
numbers. https://doi.org/xx.xxx/yyyy
Alhenawi, Y., & Krishnaswami, S. (2020). Firm, industry and international determinants of
cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from the USA. Research in
International Business and Finance, 53, 101202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101202
Angwin, D. N., Mellahi, K., Gomes, E., & Peter, E. (2020). How communication approaches
impact mergers and acquisitions outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 115, 229-
241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.065
Ashraf, R., Herciu, M., & Stoian, C. (2021). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Financial
performance, valuation and risk. Transnational Corporations Review, 13(3), 307-324.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2021.1885249
Bauer, F., & Matzler, K. (2019). Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic
complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration. Strategic
Management Journal, 40(2), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2989
Beckman, T., & Gomes, E. (2018). The role of cultural due diligence in successful cross-border
mergers and acquisitions. International Business Review, 27(6), 1221-1236.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.06.007
23 | P a g e
Bhagat, S., Malhotra, S., & Zhu, P. C. (2019). Emerging economy cross-border acquisitions: A
review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 101, 664-677.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.062
Boateng, A., Hua, X., & Nisar, S. (2020). Cross-border M&A, institutional quality, and firm
value: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Financial Markets,
Institutions and Money, 67, 101220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101220
Brouthers, K. D., Dikova, D., & Kostova, T. (2016). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A
review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1492-1520.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316651211
Cai, Y., & Sevilir, M. (2020). Board connections and M&A transactions. Journal of Financial
Economics, 135(1), 246-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.009
Chakrabarti, R., Gupta-Mukherjee, S., & Jayaraman, N. (2009). Mars–Venus marriages: Culture
and cross-border M&A. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 216-236.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400312
Collins, J. D., Holcomb, T. R., Certo, S. T., Hitt, M. A., & Lester, R. H. (2009). Learning by
doing: Cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 62(12),
1329-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.11.010
Deng, P., & Yang, M. (2015). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms:
A comparative investigation. International Business Review, 24(1), 157-172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.005
24 | P a g e
Erel, I., Liao, R. C., & Weisbach, M. S. (2012). Determinants of cross-border mergers and
acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1045-1082.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01741.x
Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. (2010). Do international
acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of
Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 397-418.
https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.47
Hopkins, H. D. (1999). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Global and regional perspectives.
Journal of International Management, 5(3), 207-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-
4253(99)00011-7
Huang, Q., Li, J., & Chi, J. (2019). Political risk and cross-border mergers and acquisitions by
Chinese firms: The role of home-country institutions. International Business Review,
28(5), 101590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101590
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Raman, A. P. (2009). Don't integrate your acquisitions, partner with them.
Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 109-115. https://hbr.org/2009/12/dont-integrate-
your-acquisitions-partner-with-them
Kim, J. Y., & Finkelstein, S. (2009). The effects of strategic and market complementarity on
acquisition performance: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry, 1989–
2001. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 617-646.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.753
25 | P a g e
Kish, R. J., & Vasconcellos, G. M. (1993). An empirical analysis of factors affecting cross-
border acquisitions: US-Japan. Management International Review, 33(3), 227-245.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228177
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode.
Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
López-Duarte, C., Vidal-Suárez, M. M., & González-Díaz, B. (2016). International business and
national culture: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of
Management Reviews, 18(4), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12070
Markides, C. C., & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international
diversification: Evidence from US international acquisitions. Journal of International
Business Studies, 25(2), 343-366. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490204
Meyer, K. E. (2004). Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal
of International Business Studies, 35(4), 259-276.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400084
Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2005). Wealth destruction on a massive
scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. The Journal of
Finance, 60(2), 757-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00745.x
Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border
acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 137-158.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490029
26 | P a g e
Oh, C. H., & Oetzel, J. (2011). Multinationals' response to major disasters: How does subsidiary
location influence the extent of philanthropic response? Strategic Management
Journal, 32(6), 658-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.904
Peng, M. W. (2004). Identifying the big question in international business research. Journal of
International Business Studies, 35(2), 99-108.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400070
Reddy, K. S., Nangia, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2014). The 2007–2008 global financial crisis, and
cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A 26-nation exploratory study. Global Journal
of Emerging Market Economies, 6(3), 257-281.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910114540720
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise:
