Strategies to Meet the Budgeted Ratio Between
Adjunct and Full-Time Faculty
Section 1: Foundation of the Study
Human resource managers (HRM) play a strategic role in managing people and
the workplace culture and environment (Azeez, 2017). With reduced government funding
forcing many institutions to fundamentally shift their business models, human resource
departments have had to adapt to support a changing workforce (Aviso et al., 2019).
Thus, business strategies that human resource managers use within higher education
institutions to manage the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty were
explored in this study.
Background of the Problem
The growth of part-time faculty, often referred to as adjunct professors, nontenure
instructors, or contingent faculty, has been an ongoing trend. The move toward hiring
more part-time and non-tenure-track instructors began in the 1980s (Tirelli, 1997). In
1969, about 78% of faculty members at colleges and universities in the United States held
tenure-track positions, and about 22% accounted for adjunct roles (Tirelli, 1997). In the
mid-1970s, the U.S. economy began to falter, and college tuition rates and fees increased
faster than the inflation rate (Abel & Deitz, 2014). Schools changed positions to more
adjunct and part-time professors to reduce costs.
As leaders and managers at colleges and universities look to reduce their budget,
reducing the number of tenure-track and full-time professor positions became the
standard. Colleges often use part-time professors and adjuncts to teach courses rather
than full-time faculty (Henkel & Haley, 2020). This hiring practice is way to save money
amid increasingly reduce budgets but can cause controversial business practice. A review
of the literature revealed little data about why human resource managers (HRM) lack
faculty hiring strategies to manage the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time
faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget and meet certification standards.
Human resource managers align business strategies by addressing the hiring process, the
profit/loss ratios, the measurables, and the retention of full-time and adjunct instructors
within four-year state colleges.
Problem and Purpose
Adjunct faculty compose more than half of all faculty in American colleges and
universities (Kimmel & Fairchild, 2017). Adjunct positions account for 70% of
instructional staff in American higher educational institutions, a trend that increased since
the start of the 1990s (Anthony et al., 2020). The general business problem is that human
resource managers in the United States fail to achieve retention and financial outcomes
for meeting educational institutions’ overall budgeting operating expenses. The specific
business problem is that some human resource managers lack faculty hiring strategies to
manage the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty to maintain the
institutional operating budget and meet certification standards.
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies
used by human resource managers to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and
fulltime faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget. The population in this
study was three human resource managers in 4-year state colleges in the southeastern
United States who hire adjunct and full-time faculty. The results of this study may
contribute to improving human resource managers’ decision-making for delivering
positive results enabling institutions to improve environmental stewardship by increasing
awareness of both the risks and opportunities and implement initiatives within the
organization to protect, reduce, and re-think processes, which can improve economic,
environmental performance, and quality of life between adjunct and full-time faculty.
Nature of the Study
The three research methods are qualitative, quantitative, and mixed (Baskarada &
Koronios, 2018). I selected the qualitative methodology to interview higher education
human resource managers using semistructured, open-ended questions. Qualitative
researchers use open-ended questions to yield more direct information and unique insight
for researchers as respondents may find them less threatening than scaled questions
(Pagan, 2019). In contrast, quantitative researchers use close-ended questions to test
hypotheses that provide respondents with a fixed number of responses from which to
choose an answer (Barnham, 2015). Mixed methods research includes both a qualitative
element and quantitative element (Almalki, 2016). Quantitative methodology and mixed
method are not appropriate for this study because hypotheses about variables’
characteristics or relationships did not need to be tested for addressing this study’s
purpose.
I considered four research designs to study the strategies human research
managers used for meeting the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty: (a)
mini ethnography, (b) focus group, (c) narrative, and (d) case study. Mini ethnography is
a systematic study of people and cultures to describe the nature of phenomena through
detailed investigations of individual cases (Grossoehme, 2014). Mini ethnography was
not the optimal choice of my study because of the focus on observing a cultural
phenomenon which was not the focus for my proposed study. Business researchers use
focus groups to gain an in‐depth understanding of a social issue and provide feedback
designed to gather desired information (Grossoehme, 2014). Focus group was not the
optimal choice for my study because a focus can be hard to control and manage and
involves a group of anywhere from four to eight participants which can be difficult to
analyze and be difficult to encourage all people to participate equally.
A narrative design entails collecting information and soliciting participants
personal stories in detail about an event or a significant aspect of a certain time in their
personal lives (Babchuk, 2017). A narrative was not the optimal choice for my study
because a narrative design addressed detail and free-ranging discussion with emphasis on
personal storied experiences, which aims to explore and develop human experience when
represented in textual form. Case study researchers base the study on an in-depth
investigation of a single individual, group, or event and select methods of data collection
and analysis that will generate material suitable for comparing results from multiple case
studies (Yin, 2018). Multiple case study was the optimal choice instead of a single case
study because a multiple case study can identify the differences and the similarities
among the cases to explain results in the study by developing a more in-depth
understanding of the phenomena which a single case cannot provide.
Research Question
How do human resource managers manage the budgeted ratio between adjunct
and full-time faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget and meet certification
standards?
Interview Questions
1. What strategies have you used to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty
and full-time faculty?
2. What strategies do you use to recruit and retain adjuncts and full-time faculty?
3. Based upon your experiences, what strategies did you find worked best to
maintain the ratio between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty?
4. How did employees respond to different processes for managing the ratio
between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty?
5. What were any barriers regarding implementing strategies for hiring adjunct
over full-time faculty?
6. How did your managers address the primary barriers to implement strategies
for meeting the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty?
7. What else would you like to add that was not addressed about your strategies
to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty?
Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework for this study was human capital theory. The basic
concept of human capital theory is that investments in individuals can be measured based
on the economic value they are able to contribute (Olaniyan & Okemakinde, 2008). In
1960, Theodore Schultz proposed human capital theory, which makes a direct link
between an increase in investment in human capital, and causes increase in workers’
earnings (Schultz, 1961). Understanding human capital theory allows individuals to make
decisions about the inherent cost of future opportunities weighted with the opportunity
cost of present situations to include investment risks and assumptions about opportunity
costs (Olaniyan & Okemakinde, 2008). Human capital theory applied to my data analysis
by seeking to explain the phenomena using the economics point of view. The human
capital view asserts that to invest in human capital a competitive advantage and
sustainability in the complex business world would be gained.
Managers can improve their understanding regarding the differences in earnings
across workers that play a pivotal role in the acquisition, development, and retention of
human capital for an organization. The conceptual framework of human capital theory
facilitated the understanding of the strategies human resource managers use to guide
human capital investments for school quality, training, and for meeting the budgeted ratio
between adjuncts and full-time faculty. Human capital theory allowed me to find out how
education increases the productivity and efficiency of workers by increasing the level of
cognitive stock of economically productive human capability within an organization.
Operational Definitions
Adjunct: An educator hired on a part-time basis, often teaching introductory
undergraduate or preparatory courses contracted semester-by-semester throughout an
academic year (Buch et al., 2017).
Budgeted ratio: Ratios that provide information about the performance level or
the extent of deviation of the actual performance form the budgeted performance and
whether the actual implementation is favorable or unfavorable (Strouhal, 2015).
Full-time faculty: A person whose employment is based upon an official contract,
appointment, or agreement with a school and given full-time assignments in teaching
and research (Kimmel & Fairchild, 2017).
Higher education institutions (HEI): Any universities, colleges, or other
educational institutions, public or nonprofit, offering and delivering higher education that
admits persons having a certificate of graduation from a school providing secondary
education and is legally authorized to provide an educational program for which the
institution awards a diploma, certificate or bachelor’s degree, or awards a degree that is
acceptable for admission to a graduate or professional degree program (Ramísio et al.,
2019).
Human resource management (HRM): The department of a business organization
that focuses on the function of people within the business, ensuring best work practices
are always in place (Kianto et al., 2017).
Operating budget: Budget that consists of all revenues and expenses over a period
which a corporation, government, or organization uses for its operations and must be
prepared in advance of a reporting period as a goal or plan that the business expects to
achieve (Otley, 2016).
Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations
Assumptions, limitations, and delimitations are fundamental components of a
research study. Assumptions are accepted as true, limitations are constraints largely
beyond a person’s control but could affect the study outcome, and delimitations are those
characteristics that arise from limitations in the scope of the study that the researcher can
control (Theofanidis & Fountouki, 2018). The delimitations, limitations, and assumptions
of this study will be clarified in the following sections.
Assumptions
Assumptions provide a basis of truth that helps the researcher develop theories
and influence the research process’s development and implementation (Theofanidis &
Fountouki, 2018). Three assumptions are found in this study. One assumption was that
human resource managers are involved in the performance of employee retention
strategies. Another assumption was that participants in this study would answer honestly
and unbiased when answering interview questions. Another assumption was interviewees
in this study would respond to interview questions with truthful information.
Limitations
Limitations are weaknesses that impact a study and its outcomes and can hinder
or influence the interpretation of the writer’s findings (Queirós et al., 2017). Four
limitations are found in this study. One limitation was that participants in this study might
not communicate all the details related to their strategies to reduce employee turnover.
Another limitation was that researcher bias could have influenced the analysis of data
based on the short time limit of the study. Another limitation was that the value of
collected data depends on the participants’ truthfulness and experience in this study.
Another important limitation was that the time and accessibility of observations may be
limited.
Delimitations
Delimitations are factors that can restrict the questions a researcher can answer or
the conclusions a researcher can draw from the findings (Bloomberg & Volpe, 2018).
Three delimitations are found in this study. One delimitation was that only human
resource managers in 4-year state colleges in Florida are the only participants in this
study. Another delimitation was only human resource managers who had experience
implementing effective employee turnover strategies participated in the study. A final
delimitation was that only retention strategies in higher education institutions were
studied.
Significance of the Study
Contribution to Business Practice
Higher education, especially within 4-year state colleges, has been undergoing
many challenges, budgetary demands, and requirements (Pucciarelli & Kaplan, 2016). In
the 1960s adjuncts were typically hired because they possessed technical skills and
practical knowledge that were beneficial to students and their expertise, including
workplace experiences that assisted in keeping curriculum up to industry standards
(Kezar & Maxey, 2014). Understanding the strategies for meeting the budgeted ratio can
lead to a better understanding of the ways in which managers can more efficiently and
effectively recognize adjuncts’ offerings to the overall quality of higher education and
student success. The issues that caused the increase in hiring adjuncts are based on
operating expenses, decreasing government funding for education, lack of strategies, and
knowledge of employing adjunct faculty over full-time instructors (Kezar & Maxey,
2014). The results of this study may provide human resource managers the needed
information to better manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty to
meet the goals for their institutions’ operating budgets.
Implications for Positive Social Change
The implications for positive social change include the potential for managers to
develop and implement strategies for budgetary flexibility for supporting gains in adjunct
retention, and institutions financial performance enabling better quality of life for faculty
and their family. In addition to growth and financial success, universities have become
accountable for their impact on society and the environment (McCaffery, 2018). The
results of this study may contribute to positive social change by allowing human resource
managers to have a deeper understanding of meeting budgeted ratios between adjunct and
full-time faculty that could enable institutions to increase funds for increasing
scholarships for students and their families in need, and when graduated, can support
employee needs, their communities, and the environment.
Review of the Professional and Academic Literature
The objective of this qualitative study was to reveal effective faculty hiring
strategies used by human resource managers to maintain the budgeted ratio between
adjunct and full-time faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget and meet
certification standards. Employees are less likely to leave when they share similar
organization values, and HRM practices can strategically improve hiring strategies and
improve retention (Presbitero et al., 2016). The significant challenge by most of the
organizations is not only managing their workforce but also retaining them (Azeez,
2017). Hiring, securing, and maintaining a skilled workforce plays a major role in any
organization, central to an institution’s ability to be economically competitive for growth
and sustainability. The impact of trust on the relationship of HR strategies and knowledge
sharing is examined and explains how hiring strategies, practical training, fair
compensation, and performance appraisal created a trustworthy environment in
organizations (Imran et al., 2016). The review begins with the organization of the
literature, following the study’s purpose, and analyzing and synthesizing the conceptual
framework of human capital theory.
Literature Review Organization
The literature review begins with an outline of effective HR faculty hiring
practices to manage the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty to maintain
the institutional operating budget and meet certification standards. This research proposes
a model for human resource management in higher education and investigates the current
hiring practices in higher education institutions, in terms of the applied techniques.
Because of the lack of recent research on faculty hiring practices within 4-year state
colleges related to the topic of adjunct and full-time faculty, I used relevant academic
works involving HR processes in other industries. Incorporating the human capital theory
into the literature review showed that compensation policies to retain staff to compete
and strategies set in place could affect employee retention strategies set in place is
achievable through a variety of new HR practices. The review also includes HR
managers hiring strategies to address the business problem. The review will consist of
HR managers’ successful methods when hiring adjuncts and full-time faculty and making
final selections.
Literature Review Strategy
A search strategy is necessary to retrieve published academic works related to a
study topic during selected years (McGowan et al., 2016). Various resources identified
provided the information needed to gather appropriate literature. The first choice of
identifying resources came from the Walden University database. The second option for
identifying resources came from other academic databases such as EBSCO, SAGE
Premier, Academic Search Complete, ResearchGate, Online Journals Search Engine,
ProQuest, and the third from Google Scholar provided peer-reviewed information. Two
major themes emerged when using primary sources and secondary sources: (a) human
resource management hiring strategies and (b) strategies used to maintain the institutional
operating budget and meet certification standards about adjunct and full-time faculty
hiring. I used the literature to identify limitations and the need for future studies on the
topic under review. I explored effective HR hiring practices used for maintaining the
institutional operating budget and certification standards. In this study, the number of
articles and the percentage derived from peer-reviewed sources published between 2016
and 2021 include 151 (86%). However, the literature review comprised of several articles
and citations from peer-reviewed sources published before 2016.
Human Capital Theory
Human capital theory is the most predominant economic theory of Western
education, which dates to the early 1960s (Schultz, 1961). The human capital theory is
seen as a definitive part of economic performance and a primary strategy to achieving
technological change, research, innovation, or education. After Theodore Schultz
proposed human capital theory, Gary Becker introduced the human capital theory to
advance organizations in a sustainable competitive way (Weiss, 2015).
When hiring and training, organization managers analyze through the lens of the
human capital theory. In the discussion of the human capital theory for education, four
questions are addressed: (a) what it is, (b) why it is essential, (c) whether it has affected
higher education decisions, (d) and whether there is an alternative or related theory that
should be considered. Human capital consists of habits, personality attributes, and
knowledge that create the ability to achieve economic value (Olaniyan & Okemakinde,
2008). Human capital is unique as it differs from any other capital because the need for
organizations to evolve and achieve goals.
Human capital theory conveys both decisions from individuals to invest in human
capital for training purposes and education, and the system of lifetime earnings (Peers,
2015). Individuals’ multiple levels of investment in education and training are described
in terms of expected returns that entail costs both indirect expenses and foregone earnings
during the investment period (Peer, 2015). Human capital theory applies the idea of the
opportunity cost in schools or training settings (Schultz, 1961). The investment aspect is
important in the human capital theory as a pivotal factor of the theory. The acquisition of
human capital through education and training is an investment in the sense that the
individual foregoes current income for increased earning potential in the future (Peers,
2015). A significant concept of the human capital theory is that training employees in
specific skills encouraged workers to remain in their positions, increased productivity,
and earning potential (Weiss, 2015). Human resource managers need compensation
policies to retain staff to compete, and strategies set in place can affect employee
retention (Buta, 2015). When organizational leaders or managers invest in human capital,
they expect a positive return on their investment leading to a prosperous society.
Business leaders who support human capital theory and invest in their workforce
and employees who remain employed in their positions contribute to the overall
economy. Research shows that leaders who invest in employees as assets achieve higher
gains for the organizations, both productively and economically (Kuzminov et al., 2019).
The human capital theory provides organizations with a main concept for economic gain,
which is important to the sustainability of education institutions (Kuzminov et al., 2019).
Because human resource management is involved in acquiring, cultivating, and retaining
human capital, the need to find, recruit, and select people possessing the right knowledge,
skills, and abilities that the organization needs is vital.
The theory that has been discussed so far is mainly in the tradition of Becker’s
approach to human capital. Human capital is viewed as processes within the production
methods where leaders can survey human capital as a wealth of knowledge or ability that
is directly part of the production role within an organization. The alternative is to view
education purely as a signal. The signaling theory was developed by Michael Spence
based on observed knowledge gaps between organizations and possible employees, and
its innate method led it to conform to other sectors, such as business, financial areas, and
Human Resource Management (Bergh et al., 2014). Though the human capital theory
claims that education expands wages by increasing productivity, the signaling theory
claims that education improves wages simply because education levels is a signal of the
workers skillset (Marginson, 2019). The primary difference between signaling and
human capital models is that signaling models allow organizations to produce
assumptions about unobserved characteristics of workers based on the work or
educational experience, or on direct measures of features for job performance and human
capital theory posits that human beings can increase their productive capacity through
considerable education and skills training (Amankwah-Amoah, 2018).
The hiring function can be thought of as acquiring human capital. When referring
to HRM, human capital is a vital aspect within organizations. Human capital theory
proposes that society and individuals procure economic benefits from investments in
people (Canlas, 2016). The rise of higher educational collages joined with globalization
and technology give awareness to competitiveness. To survive and succeed in a
competitive environment, institutions must complete protocols, and establish a practice of
procedures and how they help the successful improvement of academic quality in higher
educational institutions.
Relationship of Human Capital Theory to Managing the Budgeted Ratio
Human capital theory contends that human capital is a primary factor of economic
success in all professions. Human capital theory is closely linked to human resource
management, as found in macroeconomics and business administration (Buta, 2015).
Human resource management takes part in the development, acquisition, and retention of
human capital for an organization. Human capital theory is relevant to the
decisionmaking stages for human resource managers. Organizational leaders see human
capital as the range of economically useful human capabilities, which can be established
by joining ingrown capabilities with investments in human beings. Education is seen as a
significant investment in human capital (Psacharopoulos & Patrinos, 2018), as human
skills are seen as a factor of production in the development process (Canlas, 2016).
Access to instruction and schooling ensures an increase in human capital stock in society
and enhances national productivity and economic growth (Canlas, 2016). Human capital
theory affirms that education and enrollment is an investment decision by which
individuals forgo time and resources in return for higher wages in the future (Cherkesova
et al., 2016).
Higher education is sometimes thought of as an individual-level investment,
where the dedication of time and tuition dollars yields rewards in improved skills and
higher earnings (Cherkesova et al., 2016). Although higher education pays off for many,
individuals’ exact returns are highly uncertain and evolve (Canlas, 2016). Factors
contributing to an individual’s ROI in higher education can be broken down into several
parts, including the cost for higher full-time faculty over adjuncts, the length of time to
hire and train an instructor, and the likelihood of meeting certification standards. The
assumption of aligned human capital accumulation and labor market returns is partially
dependent on managers possessing the appropriate information they need to make hiring
decisions.
Various ways of investments exist into human resources on top of competencies
in managing the budgeted ratio. Businesses can commit in general human capital, an
investment into distinct training that grants fruition of general knowledge, operational in
numerous businesses (Riley et al., 2017). General human capital can result in a higher
future expected return of investment. Another option in investment into human resources
is to invest in specific human capital, which entails a commitment to enhancing
individual competencies and skills for a job (Morris et al., 2017). Other forms exist
through which a business can supply investment in human resources, such as improving
working conditions and by using more innovative protective aids and efficient tools
(Morris et al., 2017). When investing in human capital, business leaders should seek
attention to the specifications used for investments into fixed capital, considering factors
that affect the investment processes and procedures.
Experts have been inquiring, testing, and verifying methods that objectively
determines the value of human capital (Pravdiuk et al., 2019). The primary intent in
measuring the amount of human capital is its approximation, which is essential for a
business's management and financial decisions of a business (Lee & Lee, 2016). When
bearing in mind the philosophy of managing and planning involved in human resources,
specific rules are imperative to take into consider: first, the viability of the investment,
which answers underlying questions about the availability of needed resources, time
aspect, coherence, and the magnitude of capital invested (Pasban & Nojedeh, 2016).
Human Resource Recruiting and Hiring Strategies
The early 2000s brought a shift of challenges and changes to higher education.
With reduced government funding forcing many institutions to shift their business
models, HRM has had to adapt to support an ongoing changing environment including
limited resources available to HR departments, compensation concerns, and limited
longterm job security (Aviso et al., 2019). With cutbacks in government funding
regarding hiring, headcounts are paramount, and HR professionals will need to adapt to
attract and retain the best employees. As organizations dedicated to learning and
development, higher education institutions are falling behind regarding offering growth
and opportunities for staff (Alonderiene & Majauskaite, 2016). When they are not in the
business of educating students, universities rank around the bottom quartile for
employment opportunities to learn and grow, compared with other industries in the
United States (Mian et al., 2020).
To close the gap, higher education institutions must start to center more on
learning and development strategies and programs for employees. Universities have a
vast educational system to educate their students, but they do not necessarily have the
needed procedures to educate faculty staff and admin (Elrehail et al., 2018). With
institutions overspending large amounts of capital to attract top talent from the United
States, HR practitioners must work even harder to appeal to candidates by incorporating
strategic opportunities into their employer brand (Engel & Curran, 2016). Universities
looking to attract top candidates should articulate the best aspects of their institution and
ensuring external touchpoints like their website and recruitment processes (Rutter et al.,
2016). Offering multiple elements will help align institutions with its employer brand,
allowing them to put their best foot forward in a competitive job market.
Addressing the environment of higher education, which has become more
competitive and influential in decision making, human resources are the most dynamic
and essential assets that an institution could secure to fit in this competitive environment.
Any educational institution’s success depends mainly on its quality and its determinant of
human resource management as the core of educational administration (Azeez, 2017).
This research focuses on higher education’s human resources as the necessary element of
improving higher education quality, which is considered a significant factor for social,
technological, economic, and professional development. Higher education institutions
have become more interested to implement human resource management as a full
strategic partner in their operations, critical in hiring employees (Alonderiene &
Majauskaite, 2016). Their major efforts have been to increase the higher education
systems’ quality to be more productive in structure and hiring strategies (Aviso et al.,
2019). These efforts require a structural transformation on the methods of handling the
changes in relationships and the work environment and the way strategy and resources
are managed, developed, and retained to accomplish a sustainable environment.
HR practices have had to adapt to focus on the candidate journey, and institutions
should consider incorporating academic mobility and view their mission when managing
academic talent needs. The right recruitment strategies assist businesses to draw perfect
candidates. With effective recruitment strategies and talent investment, businesses can
become more successful (Maheshwari et al., 2017). Still, productivity and profitability
can negatively impact a business if procedures are unbecoming. The fundamental method
to finding and hiring the right people is to be observant of culture yet given the pace that
some businesses employ new people, culture can become a second thought (Engel &
Curran, 2016). Hiring is not about screening applicants who are anxious to work for a
business, but the position of hiring rests with the recruiting strategies, candidates, and
finding the right fit (Bhalla, 2019). If not done correctly, an organization’s recruitment
attempts can generate unqualified job applicants, which in turn may be prone to turnover
if hired (Bhalla, 2019). Recruiting the proper employees can be demanding, but the
rewards of a well-assembled strategy are limitless because productive recruiting is based
on which talent management initiatives establish and produces results.
Human Resource Practices and Policies in Higher Education
Human resource management share concerns which require increased attention on
an individual institutions level (Aviso et al., 2019). Bhalla (2019) stated that the need is
to recruit and retain highly skilled and motivated staff to transform higher education
sustainability. While more attention is paid to administrators' working conditions,
academic staff need to be considered to assure the commitment and contribution to the
process of higher education institution (Pucciarelli & Kaplan, 2016). Presbitero et al.
(2016) included that HRM is considered broader than managing recruitment processes
and salaries. Issues such as training, incentives and rewards, evaluation and development,
and planning of future staffing demands are all part of human resource management
(Maheshwari et al., 2017). While job duties vary and change with technology and other
initiatives progress, managing people within an institution continue to remain an
important HRM function.
Procedures, as well as contractual conditions and options for faculty and staff
development and career advancement, are components in sustaining and attracting
qualified faculty and staff at institutions (Henkel & Haley, 2020). Techniques are
important to ensure skills and capacities are modernized continuously to meet the
changing requirements set on the higher education systems (Al Shobaki et al., 2017).
Guest (2017) stated that some issues lack open competition for positions, the lack of
sufficient selection criteria based on the skills needed, the lack of training requirements,
and the different influences that management may be exposed to. Human resource
management strategies serve as guiding principles for improving capital and general
resources which are inherent factors of production.
Besides the many challenges that HRM faces, the strategies and procedures
implemented, university departments, and the direct functions of divisions and its
distinctiveness, shows what HR stands for collectively (Javed et al., 2019). Khan (2020)
expressed that modern strategies could be achieved if human resource management
departments restructure along with HR activities away from its traditionally routine
procedures and tasks and position itself to center attention on strategic importance. HRM
involves the contribution of individuals to understand an institution’s planned objectives
and the fulfilment of each worker’s requirements in an organization. Quality management
of educational institutions way of tracking the academic standards and helps build
confidence within the society.
HRM has an important role at different levels and stages of processes. HRM
depends on policies and systems that carry and influence staff’s attitude and performance
(Guest, 2017). HRM is a process that includes tasks which attract, develop, motivate, and
retain human resources (Lim et al., 2017). Kianto et al. (2017) stated that human resource
management objectives are to achieve the desired results to assist in developing the skills
of people and providing material, practices, and developmental needs created to align
personal goals and objectives of the organization.
HR procedures, strategies, and policies can alter from organization to
organization. HR policies provide guidelines for employee behavior, interactions,
employment laws, job descriptions, disciplinary, health, and safety measures (Azeez,
2017). Zardasht et al. (2020) expressed that HRM policies and procedures of an
organization are made to comply with the laws and regulations and are made to prevent
lawsuits, in case of problems faced within the workplace. Policies implemented provide
guidelines that organizations use to administer rules and ensure the organization is
meeting compliances and procedures (Guest, 2017). Organizations should keep HR
policies current and relevant to meet the ethical and legal standards expected of a
sustainable work environment.
HR Practices for Managing the Budgeted Ratio between Adjunct and Full-time
Faculty
Human resources play a more prominent role on the academic side more than
ever. Pay and working conditions for adjunct faculty are surprisingly inadequate and
scrutinized in passing years (Abel & Deitz, 2014). Higher education institutions hold
themselves as an inspiration to others regarding best practices (Al Shobaki et al., 2017).
In managing the budgeted ratio between adjuncts and full-time faculty, issues between
adjuncts and full-time faculty seem to be gaining more public attention. Schools are
taking steps to manage the budgeted ratio via human resources more effectively (Azeez,
2017). Al Shobaki et al. (2017) pronounced that colleges and universities have begun
taking additional measures to organize, train, and support adjuncts. In a time of needed
accountability and limited costs, effective management of adjuncts is growing into a
necessary environment.
Mangers contributing to the needs of adjuncts and maintaining a budgeted ratio
promotes employee satisfaction and assists employee performance (Azeez, 2017).
Adjunct faculty began with hiring and retaining career professionals who brought
realworld experience into the classroom (Bhalla, 2019). Historically, colleges also hired
adjunct faculty when enrollment spiked; and colleges needed to acquire a particular type
of expertise when full-time faculty could not teach a specific course (Buch et al., 2017).
Henkel and Haley (2020) explained how adjunct faculty have become a fundamental
factor of the economic model that sustains institutions and education. Adjuncts are
known to have lower pay than full-time faculty and receive limited benefits, which make
adjuncts at institutions' the least expensive way to deliver instruction (Kimmel &
Fairchild, 2017).
College costs that regularly decline, forces colleges to find ways to limit costs to
sustain college access and resources. Part-time faculty outnumber full-time faculty at
most colleges by far, and this remains relative for HRM and leaders to maintain the
budgeted ratio (Kimmel and Fairchild, 2017). McCaffery (2018) stated that whatever the
economic strategy, colleges committed to assisting students in earning degrees must
rethink their model for working with part-time faculty so that all faculty prepare to serve
students and institutes effectively. HRM, administration, and financial departments must
all be on the same accord. Managers must increase collaborative efforts to minimize
barriers, maximize efficiencies, and increase employee engagement among adjuncts.
Budgeting for HR involves fundamental components and practices to manage the
budgeted ratio. Practices such as compensation and benefits, include payroll expenses,
incentive compensation, and all benefits costs (DeGeest et al., 2017). For hiring reasons,
components include costs jobs advertising, background checks, applicant systems and
more (DeGeest et al., 2017). Budgeting for human resources can become complicated
because employee capabilities are intrinsically interrelated. The human resources
department must calculate budgets based on headcounts of employees, increased benefit
and salary costs, growth projections, and turnover rates, which use data to help set a
budgeted plan (Walk et al., 2019). Regarding benefits and compensation, budgets effect
nearly every part of the business, especially in an increased growth year where hiring
increases, and numbers are continuously adjusting.
HR budgets are highly unique to a company’s strategic direction. Most HR
budgets will involve reviewing historic financial performance, choosing a budgeting
strategy, analyze real-time performance data, and retrieve a comprehensive view of how
finance influences operations (Buller & McEvoy, 2016). For HR to budget and maintain
for the future, they will have to review past budgets and the strategic plan moving
forward each year. By reviewing past plans this allows HR departments to establish goals
and identify capital expenditures based on past performance (Madhani, 2020). A
considerable HR practice is to execute an analysis of HR performance data and budget
actuals in real-time (Rauch & Hatak, 2016). An analysis should include departmental and
organizational revenue expenses, hiring, turn-over, and employee compensation practices
(Rauch & Hatak, 2016). A budget must allow HR to accomplish its strategic objectives
and by creating the budget, HRM will have accurate information about past costs.
Budgeting involves the systematic collection of information and data so that the
finances needed to support an organization's objectives can be projected (Buller &
McEvoy, 2016). Prior to the budgeting process, an organization needs to complete a
strategic plan to identify annual goals and objectives. That will allow departments to
concentrate their allotted budgets in supporting those objectives. Javed et al. (2019)
affirmed that HRM strategies if effectively used may become a source of developing a
transparent performance management system, a collaborative environment in schools and
of promoting teachers’ efficiency in the areas of knowledge, skills and development as
professionals, as well as enhancing a school’s productivity and improving performance.
Colleges and universities have distinct programs, goals, and procedures to acquire
and spend financial assets and capital revenues. Bhalla (2019) expressed no all-around
model is used to budget financial capital within higher education institutions. The word
budget constitutes both an institution's revenue expenditures and resources (Chirica &
Puscas, 2018). For public institutions, accounts consist of legislative provisions, tuition
based on credit hours and courses taken, grants, or contracts, consisting of revenues from
outside sources (Chirica & Puscas, 2018). Combined revenue resources constitute an
institution’s operating budget and the entirety of monies required to finance the
institution's ongoing and recurring expenses, but the complete picture for institutions
operating budget is much more (Kelchen & Stedrak, 2016).
The HR department spending’s constitutes the most familiar understanding of the
word budget (Kianto et al, 2017). The central part of the budget process used for
operations and research is known as the center of institutions' activities. Evans (2017)
communicated that HRM should know precisely how budgets are allocated within central
expenditure departments and categories, whether financed by public or restricted
expenditures. Monies fall into three categories: (1) capital, which refers to significant
purchases for resources or equipment, (2) salaries and benefits, (3) expense items, and
continuing costs (Umbricht et al., 2017). Colleges and universities that seek the lack of
budgeting must react and ensure proper allocation adaptation to increase pliability and
the condition of instruction and programs.
The issues acquired within traditional allocations and budget procedures specify
the need for new techniques. Drucker (2016) included that an institution subjected to
reduce allowances must sometimes cover budget requests in another area to reach
institutional targets. Meeting the faculty's salary needs, resource allocations decrease
remarkably for systems, facilities, or maintenance concerns (Kianto et al, 2017). The
question facing human resource departments within higher education is how to welcome
new views of how the institution can move from the way processes currently run to what
direction the processes should go.
Applicable resource allocation procedures can no longer be based on what
worked in previous years. An integrated resource allocation model called the
Responsibility Center Management model, allows resource-allocation choices shared
between academic and administrative departments (Hensley, 2020). After establishing
strategic priorities, optional strategies allow areas to keep the resources generated yet
holds them responsible for gathering costs they collect and imposes a tax on expenditures
to supply some resources for operations and funding (Hensley, 2020). Other substitutes
for resource budgeting and allocations involve; carryover of excess from one year to
another, tuition rates based upon the popularity of programs, and allowing the most
productive research areas to gather a portion of contingent costs (Li, 2017).
Budgets and allocations are intricate areas for institutions and personal to work.
Umbricht et al. (2017) voiced that during evolving higher educational times, the
deficiencies of systems and procedures, a needed demand for accountability by
legislation, stakeholders, and managers, processes for budgeting and allocating financial
means must be examined. Traditional resource allocation and budgetary methods used in
America's colleges and universities rely upon sustainable continued processes, and
misuse can cause damage the system of higher education and its practices (Schulze-
Cleven & Olson, 2017). To understand how higher education institution’s lead, managers
must seek certain measures that should be implemented to accomplish goals and what
environmental elements exist within and externally that can enhance the
accomplishments of the mission.
HR Management Strategies for Maintaining the Institutional Operating Budget
College's approach the management of budgeting differently with appropriate
forecasting, institutional support, and procedures. There is a myriad of information
leaders use to manage and enhance university budgets successfully. Mitchell et al. (2017)
disclosed how revenue is the most seen difference in public institutions which receive
state funds. States have been under financial pressures which leads to state funding of
total revenue for public schools in a decline (Li, 2017). On the expense side, the major
initiatives are the same as labor, including salaries, benefits, facilities, and technology
(Li, 2017). Goodell et al. (2020) stated that for-profits have net earnings targets, whereas
notfor-profits take their budget excess into reserves or end up lengthening their programs
and services.
Since the early 2000s the price of managing budgets has affected higher education
(Li, 2017). Meaning there would be replacement costs and upward pressure on salaries to
remedy salary compression. Due to forces on the revenue side, as states move to restrict
tuition, leaders may seek less expensive pathways to degree completion and public policy
initiatives (Hagood, 2019). Leadership and managers will have to do better with less and
make a case for how they do it. Leaders need to clear about what they cannot do if they
do not have the funding. For leaders and managers to keep an eye on programs and
services and cut what is not working and look to exhaust programs to partners with more
resources or support those success programs from other sources is much beneficial (Chan
et al., 2017). This can permit a department to use internal reallocation to develop
negotiations and bring in new revenue.
When leaders refer to the HR budget, the most basic definition of an HR budget is
the fund's HR allocates to all HR processes (Cools et al., 2017). When done right, an HR
budget will avert over hiring and give an analysis of the organization's staffing needs and
talent. HR budget plans require the strategic separation of the basic allocation elements to
address the human needs within the organization (Arnold & Artz, 2019). Some specific
categories for budget expenses in HR have to do with recruitment, onboarding,
compensation packages, benefits, training, and professional development (Howells,
2020). A human resources department is not a revenue generator, meaning the
department's focus is not on earning money but also on the strategies that help ensure the
organization runs smoothly.
Leaders must identify the strategies and priorities for the HR department and the
entire organization. HRM must determine how HR's goals fit in with the organization's
goals and how they prioritize with the budget appropriately. HR budgets are highly
unique to an organization's strategic direction. Shivajee et al. (2019) revealed that
strategies include reviewing historic financial performance, choosing a budgeting
strategy, analyzing real-time performance data, and setting a comprehensive view of how
finance effects operations. An analysis of real-time performance data will help HRM by
looking at revenue, departmental and organizational expenses, staffing for recruiting,
hiring, turnover, and employee compensation details (Shivajee et al., 2019). Setting
effective strategies will ensure a more realistic budget cap, help managers understand
where they can build flexibility in the budget, and help monitor the budget's performance
in real-time.
A well-planned budget ensures that HR receives the essential funding to support
employee initiatives and programs required to captivating and retaining a skilled work
environment (Aviso et al., 2019). HR budgeting also gives managers a chance to invest in
employees' well-being by making the work environment a safer, healthier place. By
putting aside some of the budgets for specific programs or initiatives, the organization
can reap the rewards of focusing on costs, safety, and security. Developing an HR budget
and planning for a business's talent needs requires an ability to gather relevant
information, interpret data, and apply cost accounting principles (Aviso et al., 2019).
After collecting data, HRM can analyze the data for underlying trends and interpret how
they affect your company's talent needs.
HRM can together specify employment statistics that influence workforce supply
and demand, turnover, and productivity ratios. HRM must understand that the economy,
employment policy, and competition help define the business environment in which it
functions. HRM must ensure they are structured data collectors who know how to
interpret the impact of information on strategic planning. Cost accounting serves HR well
when preparing departmental and program budgets (Monday, 2017). HRM forecasts
labor demand regarding the skills and headcount needed to execute the strategic plan to
ensure the right business (Stankevičiūtė & Savanevičienė, 2018). One forecasting tool,
the trend analysis, studies previous employment levels against business variables to
predict future staffing demands (Altonji & Zimmerman, 2017).
The merit of a trend analysis hinges on the operational factor adopted. HR can use
trend analyses to seek patterns that influence staffing levels (Altonji & Zimmerman,
2017). Turnover and retirement affect the availability of skills and experience and may
showcase shortcomings in training, planning, or professional development (Howells,
2020). For example, tracking turnover might show that new adjuncts leave within so
many months of employment or that full-timers are opting to retire earlier. The outcome
of various trend analyses set the presence for the devising of the HR budget. Knowing
how many positions it must fill or eliminate, HR can realistically estimate costs
associated with staff adjustments such as recruitment, training, equipment upgrades,
severance packages, or relocation (Shivajee et al., 2019).
HRM uses ratio analysis, a demand-side forecasting model used to forecast
demand and contrast forecasting results against industry standards or business
competition (Zhong et al., 2018). Where HR are concerned, ratios develop a relationship
between a factor such as previous staff levels or future revenue forecast and employee
staffing needs (Ajunwa, 2016). The contrast makes standard the first number in the ratio,
and the staffing requirement is the second number. For example, a ratio of 30:1 based on
college revenues can mean that for every $30,000 in college revenues, HR estimates the
department will need one full-time employee.
A benefit to ratio analysis is that HR can use a ratio calculation to estimate
staffing demands differently. Sutcher et al. (2019) explained that some analyses include
employee turnover ratios, cost-per-hire ratios, or the time it takes to fill positions.
Turnover ratios allow HR to change initial workforce estimates based on the number of
employees replaced and may need hired within the coming year (Sutcher, 2019). Filling
jobs helps HR with a time frame for the hiring process and decides how, when, and
where to post open positions (Zhong et al., 2018). Cost-per-hire ratios help HR budget
planning, and ratio calculation equations differ according to the ratio calculated (Zhong et
al., 2018).
When HRM calculates turnover ratios, they must divide the number of personal
terminated for the past year or an approximate turnover number by the average number of
employees employed during the year (Erten-Bucha & Strunkb, 2016). HRM can assess
the time it takes to fill jobs by figuring the total for all the available days of open
positions during the previous year and dividing this number by the number of jobs filled
positions led during that time (Erten-Bucha & Strunkb, 2016). HRM can calculate
costper-hire by totaling the hiring costs or calculations for the previous year, multiply this
number by 1.10 and divide the total by the number of employees hired during that time
(Huselid, 2018). Tepavicharova (2016) stated that once ratios analysis is complete, HRM
typically authenticates their strategic plans by benchmarking expenditures, such as
budget allocation by the department, to other organizations.
HR Skills Used for Budgeting and Recruiting
Developing an HR budget and planning an organization's talent needs requires
gathering relevant information, interpreting data, and applying cost accounting principles.
HR professionals need proficiency in budgeting and forecasting to manage the workforce
in line with growth plans (Aviso et al., 2019). Viitala et al. (2017) expressed that one-way
HR managers can manage the workforce is by fact-gathering and pulling together
employment-specific statistics that influence workforce supply and demand, turnover,
and productivity ratios. HR managers need to be structured collectors of data who know
how to interpret information that influences the strategic plan.
After gathering data, HRM analyzes the data for underlying trends and interprets
how the data will affect an organization's talent needs (Diaz-Fernandez et al., 2017). The
HR plan and budget rely on statistical analysis expertise, concluding, and anticipating
probable outcomes based on historic data (DeGeest et al., 2017). These are the same
compelling thinking skills employers look for in a budget manager. HRM experienced in
cost accounting can show the return on investment in compensation and benefits
packages, the impact of turnover and layoffs, and the viability of using temporary or
parttime employees (Cools et al., 2017). Budgeting and cost accounting serve HR well
when preparing departmental and program budgets.
Evaluating recruiting attempts requires assessing hiring procedures as well as
employee turnover. To assist with the impact of turnover, organizations need qualitative
and quantitative measurements to gauge where they shine and where they need to grow
(Queirós et al., 2017). HRM can calculate an organization's cost-per-hire (CPH) or the
cost to fill a job position (Huselid, 2018). CPH includes time involved in vetting
candidates, creating job postings, leading screenings, and interviews, coordinating
schedules with managers, and participating in board interviews (Huselid, 2018). Postoffer
expenses include fees for drug tests, background checks, and employment assessments
(Huselid, 2018).
HRM can calculate whether the organization is investing too much on recruiting
and hiring by adding the average CPH to the budget for employee compensation and
benefits (Howells, 2020). When recruiting costs max out the HR budget, it might seem
like a simplistic measure to determine whether recruiting efforts are practical. However,
if the organization's recruiting costs cause HR to reallocate money for training and other
workforce costs to recruiting, there could be excessive costs to hire new employees.
HRM can determine the cost of employee turnover by adding the CPH and turnover
expenses to provide a better perspective of what it costs the business to complete the
cycle of recruiting from employee placements to termination (Karthikeyan & Thomas,
2017).
HR can use trend analyses to seek internal patterns that have an impact on staffing
needs and levels (Javed et al., 2019). Howells (2020) confirmed that turnover, seniority,
and retirement affect the availability of skills and experience and highlight shortcomings
in training, planning, or professional development. According to "Strategic Planning for
Human Resources," a trend analysis can demonstrate essential when HR concerns
education levels of entry-level candidates and ethnic influences on the recruitment
strategy and training programs (Bryson et al., 2018). The results of trend analyses set the
stage for the preparation of an HR budget. Knowing how many positions must be filled
or eliminated, HR can realistically estimate costs associated with changes such as
recruitment, training, equipment and clothing, severance packages, and relocation.
HRM conduct assessments to evaluate a candidate's skills and knowledge,
identify an employee's competency, determine employee satisfaction, or discover training
needs (Diaz-Fernandez et al., 2017). Lee and Ahn (2020) explained that influential HR
professionals use industry-standard techniques such as the Myers-Briggs personality type
indicator. HRM also use online survey tools to establish assessments for inside use
(DiazFernandez et al., 2017). Business leaders use the results of evaluations to make sure
they obtain the correct personnel with the needed skills to assist the organization meet its
strategic goals (Khan & Ahmed, 2020). Assessments can result in programs addressing
issues in work and personal balance, professional and career development, and wellness
(Diaz-Fernandez et al., 2017). HR professionals can use the results to account for
investments in services and programs to start or discontinue initiatives.
A major difficulty emerges in higher education based on the standard
organizational structure of HR. HR is a staff function consisting of creating reports and
certain employee functions such as pay, benefits, and retirement (Javed et al., 2019). The
division between academic and staff personnel can be an issue regarding creating talent
strategies that serve the entire organization (Imran et al., 2016). HR must work together
with academic affairs to restructure its procedures and practices and move from
traditional based operations to proactive workforce techniques that strengthen and
establish sustainability within adjunct and full-time faulty workforce.
Strategies to Sustaining a Diverse Adjunct and Full-time Faculty Workforce
Managers at colleges doing the hard work of transforming themselves to become
concentrated on accountability for success, must think about faculty in the general aspect
of the change process, and study how certain practices that might be waged at each
position in the process is useful. Procedures created to assist college leadership and the
strategic decisions about how and when to interact faculty in organizational change aid in
the organization’s success (Bhalla, 2019). A strongly independent faculty may reduce
systemic limitations on faculty engagement, such as unsuitable hiring practices (Buch et
al., 2017). Applications deemed as well thought out plans can assist leaders to rethink
their efforts to seize adjunct and full-time faculty more thoroughly.
When committing to institutional change and improvement, leadership that
employs motivates an eagerness among adjunct and full-time faculty to become engaged
partners in the strenuous work of change is preeminent. Kimmel and Fairchild (2017)
shared that when performing strategies, providing resources, and incentives for full-time
and adjunct faculty, this all assists in the sustainable institutional change outcome.
Enhancing strategies, implementing, and evaluating, it assists HRM and leaders to
standardize assumptions and opportunities for constant involvement to build up full-time
and adjunct faculty loyalty to change efforts (Khan, 2020). Gorski and Mehta (2016)
stated that a benefit of exploring faculty engagement through the process of change is
that it becomes easier to contemplate how to employ strategies suitable to the goals of
change efforts and the barriers and opportunities that subsist at numerous steps along the
way.
HRM understands that change is never as simple and linear as on paper. A
framework like the human capital theory can assist colleges with the when and where to
invest and what resources to use in engaging full-time and adjunct faculty in ways that
will boost student success capabilities (Olaniyan & Okemakinde, 2008). Researchers
Mansour and Dean (2016) shared that HRM within college settings that have time to
attract adjunct faculty with well thought out plans about building connections between
adjuncts and full-time faculty improve collaborative strategies for professional
development and the advancement of students. Regardless of the stage of the change
process, colleges and HRM must seek ways to assimilate opportunities for constant
participation of full-time and adjunct faculty.
HRM managers perceive that full-time and adjunct faculty have become a pivotal
attribute of the economic model that colleges use to sustain education (Allui & Sahni,
2016). Sutcher et al. (2019) explained that as public funding, a percent of college costs,
has steadily declined, colleges are forced to find ways to subdue costs. Part-time faculty
far outnumber full-time faculty at most colleges (Kimmel & Fairchild, 2017). Expanding
the contingent workforce size is a rational economic solution because it minimizes costs
and maximizes flexibility. Colleges can simply reduce or enlarge instructional volume
based on changes in enrollment (Kezar & Maxey. 2014). Kelchen and Stedrak (2016)
stated that plans are driven solely by economics that do not always serve students well.
Whatever the economic strategy, colleges committed to helping students earn credentials
must rethink their model for working with part-time faculty so that all faculty are
prepared to serve their students effectively.
When colleges' commitment to part-time faculty, the contingent commitment may
be reciprocated, but both pay, and explicit expectations are low for most part-time faculty
(Kezar & Maxey, 2014) This arrangement essentially turns teaching into a transaction
defined by a few specific tasks, and there is often no expectation or even invitation to do
more. Full-time faculty expectations typically include teaching, developing, and
evaluating programs and curriculum, holding office hours, and participating in
institutional governance (Bhalla, 2019). Students' educational experiences are often
contingent on the employment status of the faculty members they happen to encounter
(Buch et al. 2017).
Different abilities exist, at least partly because colleges too often are not fully
supporting part-time faculty or engaging them in elements of the faculty experience.
Researchers Chan et al. (2017) vocalized that a college can change its relationship with
its faculty but making that change will require some investment of both financial and
political capital. In an environment perpetually characterized by funding constraints,
colleges can control how they use the resources they have (Altonji & Zimmerman, 2017).
Some strategies that HRM can implement for full-time, and adjunct faculty are
professional development, incorporate high-impact practices, and reallocate existing
dollars to make sure part-time faculty have the support they need (Allui & Sahni, 2016).
College leaders can ask themselves whether their expectations for part-time faculty are
aligned with the college's expectations.
Faculty, particularly part-timers, face poor working conditions are commonly
characterized by last-minute hiring decisions and a lack of time to prepare to provide
instruction and exclusion from meaningful participation in governance and professional
development (Kezar and Maxey, 2014). Javed et al. (2019) advised that college leaders
develop a plan for achieving student success goals and hire to accomplish and meet those
goals. Chirica and Puscas (2018) concluded that institutions do not invest in hiring
because they are not investing in the faculty because the institution is making no
longterm commitment to them, and there is no need to spend a vast deal of time and
money during selection.
Colleges are making substantial and important commitments to their students,
their communities to redesign educational experiences, and improve college completion
while closing achievement gaps across a diverse student population (McCaffery, 2018).
Allui and Sahni (2016) expressed that colleges HRM determined to make good on these
commitments understand that they must rethink their relationship with faculty. Abel and
Deitz (2014) argued that HRM within colleges know they cannot effectively foster higher
student success without making sure that full-time and part-time faculty have the support
they need to serve their students effectively. Efforts used to improve the budgeted ratio
between full time and adjunct faculty can begin with a better understanding of each
faculty group's strengths, challenges, teaching practices, concerns, and aspirations
(Canlas, 2016). Focusing persistently on what matters most for improving student
success, colleges can determine what changes to their interactions with adjunct faculty
will most powerfully promote that improvement.
HRM within colleges can take steps to engage faculty and the hiring process.
Establishing effective solutions related to all dimensions of a college's interactions with
these teaching professionals is essential (Drucker, 2016). HRM must recognize that not
all part-time faculty want to be full-time faculty (Javed et al., 2019). Henkel and Haley,
(2020) stated that student success and effective educational practice as primary
considerations, strengthens and brings talents of part-time faculty by matching each to the
professional tasks that bring a significant benefit to the organization. HRM must
recognize part-time faculty in monetary ways, when possible, and in non-monetary ways
as well.
Data that accurately depicts faculty experiences at colleges should be the starting
point for leadership conversations (Kelchen & Stedrak, 2016). Pucciarelli and Kaplan
(2016) voiced that faculty engagement survey data, data from focus groups, and data
from other sources must routinely be disaggregated to reveal significant disparities in
part-time versus full-time faculty experiences. Data will often lead to more questions than
answers so that an inquiry process will require a commitment of effort over time
(Pucciarelli & Kaplan, 2016). Building knowledge and understanding will help colleges
create new systems that better support part-time faculty (McCaffery, 2018). Systems in
place and actions will, in turn, produce conditions more consistently conducive to
faculty-student success.
The relevance of having full-time faculty instead of adjuncts, has been recognized
as essential by college leaders that have executed a non-tenure-track full-time faculty
structure where instructors are obligated and upraised on the skillset they can bring to the
table (Sutcher et al., 2019). Nica (2018) expressed that faculty who obtain salaries related
to their tenure-track peers does not mean decreased cuts but rather a way to provide skill
sets to students with the benefit of full-time instructors instead of an arrangement of
adjuncts. The result of such a system is not that much of a concern, but more recognized
that there is some added merit when a faculty member is full-time, instead of being hired
as an adjunct (Nica, 2018).
As educational institutions continue strategic initiatives, the dependency on
parttime employees as a means of cost-cutting grows (Li, 2017). Managers apprehensive
with affairs must take a position on a stance and consider the value of full-time and
adjunct faculty in a truly academic manner. Higher education structures modify to
changing circumstances, limiting the number of part-time and adjunct faculty, and
ensuring proper employment conditions will help sustain trust and organizational values
(Mian et al., 2020). Javed et al. (2019) included that HRM defining suitable ratios
between full and part-time faculty would warrant refinement in teaching with
consideration of the diversity among routines and higher education institutions and
reconsider this ratio regarding the rapidly changing circumstances within higher
education organizations.
Transition and Summary
The transition and summary section includes the problem statement and the
purpose statement that address how human resource managers in the United States fail to
achieve retention and financial outcomes for meeting educational institutions’ overall
budgeting operating expenses. The research question, interview questions, conceptual
framework, significance of the study, and literature review are introduced in Section 1.
Throughout the literature review, the need for strategies to improve HRM
decisionmaking for delivering positive results enabling institutions to improve the
budgeted ratio and quality of life between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty is verified.
In the literature review, research on the human capital theory, HR recruiting and hiring
strategies, and HR practices for managing the budgeted ratio between adjunct and
fulltime faculty is summarized. The nature of the study includes the use of a qualitative
method with a multiple case study design.
In Section 2, the purpose statement, the role of the researcher, participants,
research method and design, population and sampling, data collection instruments and
techniques, organizational techniques, data analysis, and reliability and validity are
presented. Section 3, I will include (a) present my findings, (b) discuss the application to
professional practice, (c) express implications for social change, (d) provide
recommendations for action, (e) propose recommendations for further research, (f) offer
my reflections, and (g) close with a conclusion.
Section 2: The Project
A comprehensive explanation of a qualitative multiple case study is explored in
Section 2. Section 2 includes the purpose of this study, my role as the researcher, a
description of the participants, the research method and design, sampling and population,
ethical research to protect participants, data collection techniques and analyses, and the
validity and reliability of this study. This section expands on the information outlined in
the literature review in Section 1 and includes further details on the importance of
exploring the research question.
Purpose Statement
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies
used by human resource managers to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and
fulltime faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget. The population in this
study was three human resource managers in 4-year state colleges in the southeastern
United States who hire adjunct and full-time faculty. The results of this study may
contribute to improving human resource managers’ decision-making for delivering
positive results enabling institutions to improve environmental stewardship, by increasing
awareness of both the risks and opportunities and implement initiatives within the
organization to protect, reduce, and re-think processes which improve economic,
environmental performance, and quality of life between adjunct faculty and full-time
faculty.
Role of the Researcher
In a qualitative study, the role of the researcher is to act as the chief mechanism
for clarification, data collection, organization, and examination (Yin, 2018). In this study,
I administered the data collection instrument consisting of open-ended research questions
by completing phone and online Teams interviews. The use of open-ended interview
questions using additional questioning to provide additional information in qualitative
research is an acceptable method to collect data in qualitative research studies (Weller et
al., 2018). Before data collection, the participants were informed of the purpose of the
study and gave informed consent. I interacted with study participants and served as the
interviewer and observer. The advantage of personal interviews is that the researcher can
make additional observations and collect nonverbal clues from participants (Lancaster,
2017). As an observer all my observations were disclosed that occurred during the
interview process, and the interviewees were asked semistructured interview questions to
explore their perceptions and lived experiences.
I implemented ethical framework and guidelines when performing the research.
The Belmont Report contains the ethical framework and guidelines when performing
research involving human subjects (Friesen et al., 2017). The framework was followed to
include obtaining informed consent from the participants, informing the participants of
the right to withdraw from the research at any given time, and protecting the identity and
potential risks of the participants. The researcher’s responsibility is also to present study
results in an ethical and unbiased way (West et al., 2018). Bias can occur in the recording
of responses and during the interaction with participants because of a researcher’s
perceptions (West et al., 2018). Any bias was mitigated to the best of my ability. The
results and data were viewed through the lens of other researchers and focused on the
study through the participants’ experiences. Further, I have no direct experience working
with human resource managers from colleges or the participants of the study, but I do
understand the hiring process and the way human resource managers make decisions as
part of my current career path. Proper standards were implemented as they pertain to
ethics, validity, and honesty to obtain the truest results possible.
Participants
The participants in this study consisted of three human resource managers in
4year state colleges in the southeastern United States who hire adjunct and full-time
faculty. The eligibility criterion for participants was having one or more years of HR
management experience and successful strategies to retain adjunct and full-time faculty.
The rationale for selecting HR leaders from 4-year state colleges was that HR leaders
might have knowledge and information about implemented retention strategies and adapt
to leverage changes to improve talent management processes within colleges.
Researchers must ensure that the selected participants know about the topic (Kyngäs et
al., 2020). HR leaders are responsible for identifying, hiring, and improving the human
capital within the business organization (Azeez, 2017). HR leaders are significant
employees of any organization because of their aptness, contribution, and attention to
detail to their overall success (Evans, 2017).
The selection of 4-year state colleges began with a search of public listings on the
Internet of all colleges in the southeastern United States to obtain contact information for
human resource departments. The process researchers use to contact participants consists
of obtaining initial contact, establishing rapport, building trust, member checking, and
securing access to the research site (Thomas, 2017). To gain access to potential
participants, I followed the guidelines of Saunders and Townsend (2016) by contacting
three human resource managers in-state colleges in the southeastern United States. The
participants were contacted by via email with an introduction of myself, explanation of
my role as a student researcher, what the intent of the study was, and a request access to
complete interviews with human resource managers.
A follow-up contact was an emailed letter of agreement to request permission to
interview and conduct research at that specific organization. After receiving Walden
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval to conduct research (approval no. 04-
26220694108), contact with human resource managers at each state college involved a
team’s meeting and a second email to provide a copy of the IRB approval letter to secure
access to potential participants. A researcher should be upfront about their identity and
the significance of the research to gain access to the research site and participants
(Cormier, 2018). Researchers have identified that recruitment tactics using collaboration
with gatekeepers and face-to-face interaction with participants are essential aspects of
qualitative research (Amundsen et al., 2017). Researchers convey with gatekeepers to
establish the agreement to obtain access to participants and the consent of participants by
allocating the intent of the study (McFadyen & Rankin, 2016).
To initiate a working relationship and rapport with participants, a casual
conversation with the participants occurred during the interviews to establish my role as a
researcher and member of the community without discontinuing business operations.
Prospective participants received an email letter of participation that included a statement
of approval from senior management at each of the three colleges to recruit participants
and an email copy of the consent form to review. Potential participants had my contact
information to respond via email or telephone with their agreement to take part in the
study or obtain further information.
To build assurance, I shared with the potential participants that their information
will remain confidential and their value and importance of their experiences for the study.
Researchers establish a rapport with interviewees by building a trusting relationship
(Prior, 2018). Creating trust between the researcher and the participants is relevant when
depending on interviews for data collection (McGrath et al., 2019). The researcher must
establish a purposeful relationship with the participants because of the risk accompanied
by the possibility that the participants association may resort to siding with the researcher
or cause biased decision making (Saunders & Townsend, 2016). Building good
communal relations between researcher and participant is a prime aspect that needs to be
considered, primarily when a researcher engages in interviews and observations to
produce rich data (Fritz & Vandermause, 2018).
Research Method and Design
Researchers can use quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (Yin, 2018).
The qualitative method was appropriate for this study to survey and collect data based on
observations and feedback from volunteer human resource managers within 4-year state
colleges throughout the southeastern United States. I used a multiple case study design to
seek the processes and strategies and the overall experiences of human resource
managers from state colleges with regards to the budget ratio between full-time and
adjunct faculty.
Research Method
Research methods consist of three primary methodologies: qualitative,
quantitative, and mixed methods. What method a researcher chooses depends on their
goal and approach to inquiring about a phenomenon (Babchuk, 2017). Each research
method provides a variety of analysis methods and constitutes different data collection
methods. I used the qualitative research method to explore strategies needed to meet the
budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty throughout the southeastern United
States. Using the qualitative methodology, the researcher can obtain a detailed
understanding of the topic and survey participants by speaking directly with the study
subjects (Phillippi & Lauderdale, 2018). A qualitative research method was relevant to
explore the issue in both the context of the participants’ experience and how they
transcribe their experiences in their words (Baskarada & Koronios, 2018). The qualitative
method was suitable for this study because this study was conducted to generate an
indepth and thorough understanding of strategies that human resource managers of state
colleges can use to develop and execute action plans.
A quantitative approach is appropriate when the researcher intends to use
scientific methods to modify variables that pilot specific results. Quantitative researchers
examine the relationships among variables through hypotheses and observe results from
smaller samples to larger populations using the qualitative method (Rutberg & Bouikidis,
2018). Quantitative data collection methods are much more constructed than qualitative
data collection methods and more appropriate for testing hypotheses but are not relevant
for gathering or examining detailed information (Brunsdon, 2018). The results from data
assembled and quantitative data collection methods provide numerical specification
rather than complex narratives, which generally results in researchers not providing a
detailed accounting of the human insight. A quantitative methodology was not acceptable
for this study because I will not quantify a phenomenon or test the relationship between
variables.
The use of the mixed method enables researchers to eliminate the restriction of a
single research method and allows extensive qualitative and quantitative data (Crane et
al., 2018). Researchers use a mixed-method approach to examine and explore complex
problems through a blend of qualitative and quantitative methods (Onwuegbuzie et al.,
2017). The mixed methodology is fitting when researchers intend to take advantage of
the strengths of qualitative and quantitative, when they wish to capitalize on large
amounts of data, and when a single research method is not sufficient to answer the
research question (McKim, 2017). The quantitative and mixed-method techniques are not
appropriate for this study because I did not seek to record or use measurable data. The
intent of this research was to identify strategies human resource managers use to relate to
implementing and meeting the budgeted ratio between adjuncts and full-time faculty to
support the improvement of organizational performance. Because of the exploratory
nature of this study, using the qualitative approach was the most conducive approach to
achieving the objectives of this research.
Research Design
Upon completing an in-depth analysis of research designs, I selected a multiple
case study design to investigate the strategies human resource leaders in education will
need to address to meet the budgeted ratio between adjuncts full-time faculty. Qualitative
researchers choose among multiple research designs, including case studies,
phenomenology, and ethnography (Babchuk, 2017). When the objective of a researcher is
to explore a phenomenon in its natural context without manipulation using multiple
sources, a case study design is most fitting (Harrison et al., 2017). A case study is also
appropriate when the researchers aim to narrate a multifaceted phenomenon (Yin, 2018).
When using a case study research design, researchers gain flexibility, permitting them to
gather data through multiple data sources (Ridder, 2017).
The case study design was more applicable and provided an advantage over
phenomenology or ethnography designs because the researcher can understand the
compound relationships among the participants within a smaller time frame (Harrison et
al., 2017). Researchers use the phenomenological method to describe participants’ lived
experiences (Yin, 2018). When using the phenomenological design, researchers translate
lived experiences within an event and perspectives to appreciate a phenomenon (Adams
& van Manen, 2017). A phenomenological method was not suitable for this study
because I sought to explore a phenomenon, not to describe participants’ experiences.
In ethnography, the researcher seeks to understand a specific culture within his or
her field or natural environment (Eisenhart, 2017). An ethnographic inquiry design meets
the needs of a study when a researcher takes in and becomes a part of the cultural
characteristics of a group of daily activities for a lengthened period (Wutich & Brewis,
2019). The ethnographic research design did not match the needs of the study because the
focus was not to understand the phenomenon of a distinct group or culture.
For this multiple case study, the elements of analysis were human resource
managers in various organizations. Data collection methods in case studies include
interviews, archival records, documents, participants, and direct observation, objects, and
focus groups (Yin, 2018). In this study, the data were collected through semistructured
interviews with four resource managers within state and university institutions. Samples
in qualitative research are removed to reflect the goal and purpose of the study (Sim et
al., 2018). Small sample size is proper when conducting qualitative research (Braun &
Clarke, 2021). Data saturation occurs when the continuing collection of data generates no
new information or additional benefits (van Rijnsoever, 2017). The approach to sample
size aligned with my study and ensure an in-depth understanding of the human resources
policies and strategies employed for meeting the budgeted ratio between adjuncts and
full-time faculty. Based on the case study design and the technique of member checking
to verify the data, I concluded that four participants assure to support the study and
achieve data saturation by performing additional interviews. Using a multiple case study
design will allow a researcher to produce a comprehensive picture to review the strategies
and insight obtained from the human resource professional experiences (Babchuk, 2017).
Population and Sampling
Qualitative researchers have the purpose of gaining insights about a phenomenon
directly from the participants’ viewpoint in the investigation (Saunders & Townsend,
2016). The target population for this study consisted of three human resource managers
from state and university level educational institutions in the southeastern United States
who have experience recruiting and hiring adjuncts and full-time faculty. The quality of
the selected population determined the number of participants required to depict the
research phenomenon adequately. A small sample size requires attaining saturation to
permit research variety and quality (Molenberghs et al., 2016). Data saturation is often
used to dictate the appropriate sample size in qualitative studies (Hagaman & Wutich,
2017). Selecting the sample size is a determining factor in reaching data saturation. Data
saturation occurs when the sample size provides sufficient perspectives and information
from the participants (van Rijnsoever, 2017). I reached data saturation by interviewing
three human resource managers in three different state or university educational
institutions. The justification for the sample size occurred with data saturation, wherein a
particular number of participants is the minimum number needed to reach saturation (Sim
et al., 2018).
In qualitative case studies, purposive sampling practices are more acceptable than
the random sampling method because of the specific limits comprising the nature of the
case study (Yin, 2018). In this study, the type of sample implemented was purposeful
sampling. The goal of purposeful sampling is to obtain information of importance to the
research to gain in-depth knowledge (Braun & Clarke, 2021). Purposeful sampling
assisted with the required sample of four human resource managers who regularly work
with adjuncts and full-time faculty within educational institutions situated in the
southeast United States. The basis of the criteria included the following: (a) the
qualitative design of the study, (b) the commitment to collect in-depth information, (c)
the similarity of the human resource managers population required by the case, (d) and
the state or university must operate within the boundaries of the southeastern United
States.
Human resource professionals selected had to be 18 years or older, had a
minimum of one or more years of experience in their institution, and can hire employees
to be eligible participants for this research. The location for the participant interviews
should be at a secure site of selection and convenience (Yin, 2018). I ensured that
interviews were in a comfortable and non-threatening environment when conducted. The
interviews allowed participants to be open and honest in their responses with the option
of in-person, by phone, or virtual. Limitations, multiple interviews, and the data collected
ensured data saturation and provided an in-depth, intensive, and detailed approach to the
interviews and research.
Ethical Research
Researchers use protocols and ethical measures to manage the interaction between
a researcher and a participant during the stages of a qualitative study (Roth & von Unger,
2018). To ensure the ethical standards of the research, I sought out the permission of
Walden's IRB to administer this multiple case study. Once IRB approval was granted to
conduct this multiple case study, I abided by the Office of Research Ethics and
Compliance, the Institutional Review Board for Ethical Standards in Research, and
Walden's IRB ethical standards practices. To adhere to the Walden University
requirements, all research participants signed an informed consent before any interviews
occur.
The individuals interested in participating in this study received a notification to
execute the Participant Consent Form electronically and was instructed to reply stating "I
consent." The Participation Consent Form contained the (a) purpose of the study, (b)
responsibility of researcher for ensuring confidentiality, (c) assertion of voluntary
participation, (d) the existence of an audio recording device for documentation, and (e)
collection of documents. The Participation Consent Form also contained a disclosure that
participation in the study were voluntary with no incentives or compensation, and
withdrawal from the study was optional. The participants had a choice to discontinue
from the study at any time by sending me an email.
The purpose of informed consent was to give interviewees appropriate
information regarding participation in the study (Nusbaum et al., 2017). In a manner that
is understandable to all participants, the purpose and connotation of the study and any
potential benefits or risks was explained to those participating in the research study. The
researcher's responsibility to follow ethical standards and principles and informed
consent safeguarded participants' rights within the research study (Arifin, 2018).
Obtaining informed consent is a major part of ensuring reliability in research
development
(Williams & Pigeot, 2017). The act of transparency and transmission is the basis for trust
development between the researcher and the study participants and proves to increase
participants' willingness to partake in a study fully (Surmiak, 2018).
Protecting the rights and privacy of research participants was preeminent in
cumulating, storing, and analyzing participants' data (Ross et al., 2018). Participants of a
study may decline or terminate their involvement at any time throughout the process of
the survey, as their participation is strictly voluntary. To ensure confidentiality and
discretion, pseudonym's name was used to identify participants. Electronic executed Part
Participation Consent Forms, recorded interviews, and the researcher's interpretation of
data was stored in a safe and on a personal password-protected external hard drive for a
minimum of five years, ensuring the rights of the participants and that their identity
remains confidential. After the four-year threshold, all hard copies of the executed
Participant Consent Forms and recorded interview data would be shredded. All electronic
information would be destroyed by redacting the data and ablaze the
passwordwordprotected external hard drive. Protecting participants' privacy is an
essential consideration in establishing participants' trust and willingness to contribute to
the study as the researcher preserves concern for participants' confidentiality and
autonomy
(Moriña, 2020).
Data Collection Instruments
Qualitative researchers use surveying, interviews, focus groups, and research to
accumulate information (Yin, 2018). Qualitative researchers apply open-ended questions,
discussions, or surveys to collect in-depth data about the participants' interpretation
(Almalki, 2016). This study was a qualitative case study, in which I served as the primary
instrument for data collection. Qualitative researchers are the prime instruments for data
collection because the researcher composes the study protocol, asks the interview
questions, and records the answers for examination (Clark & Vealé, 2018).
Semistructured interviews are suitable to gather qualitative data from participants that
include an in-depth analysis of the applied exposures of the research topic (DeJonckheere
& Vaughn, 2019).
Researchers use semistructured interviews to exhibit credibility and reliability of
participants' subjective responses and findings regarding a distinct phenomenon
(Cypress, 2017). Semistructured interviews in a virtual environment were used in this
study to assemble information. An interview protocol (see Appendix A) was used to
ensure uniformity by capturing participants' agreement via email to engage voluntarily,
along with an email reminder that they may elect to stop at any time by using an
informed consent form. Participants had a window of time to ask questions before I
began the interview process. During the interviews, with participants' permission, an
online recorder was used to record the interview and take handwritten notes during the
interview process. The last step will consist of follow-up online interviews and
complete member checking.
In addition to participants interviews, HR documentation such as reports,
employee manuals, and other substantive documents needed for data triangulation was
used. Researchers use distinct approaches such as triangulation and member checking to
authenticate data quality cumulated from participants (Turner et al., 2017). Member
checking is a helpful method the researcher could use to boost the research study's
accuracy, credibility, and validity (Saunders and Townsend, 2016). Instruments'
reliability and validity would be addressed by conducting member checking with all
participants.
The procedure of member checking continued until all participants were satisfied with
the transcripts. Data saturation is when participants repeat answers with no new
information, no more themes appear from the interviews, or use the same construct
during the discussions and the same results would occur (Saunders et al., 2018). I
continued interviewing, member checking, and data review until findings from the
interviews indicate data saturation.
Data Collection Technique
A qualitative researcher can use a range of data collection approaches that include
(a) designing a case study database, (b) using sources for evidence, and (c) being wary
when using data from web-based sources (Moser & Korstjens, 2018). The predominant
data collection method used for this qualitative research study was the semistructured
interview. Advantages of semistructured interviews are that they (a) provide more
academic rigor, (b) aid the researcher in enabling coding of emerging themes, and (c)
allow for elaborated dialogue (DeJonckheere & Vaughn, 2019). Brown and Danaher
(2019) expressed that researchers also use semistructured interviews to allow the
participants to communicate their opinions in their style.
Before conducting any research, approval from the Walden University IRB was
obtained and all participants were required to acknowledge via email a consent form
which was sent via email. I started my research by investigating four-year state colleges
in the Southeastern United States who hire adjunct and full-time faculty. During the
research process, I reached out to eight different universities via email within the
Southeastern United States, and three of them agreed to participate in my research. The
other five denied participation due to IRB rules and procedures. Once I established a list,
I reached out via email to three organization’s human resource department using the
internet and the organization’s point of contact website information and emailed my
invitation letter. Once I heard back from the three participants with a positive response, I
emailed my informed consent form to gain permission and to set up times to conduct the
interview via online Microsoft Teams, requesting that it be in a quiet place where there
would not be any distractions. The interview was recorded via Microsoft Teams
recording selection and then transcribed into Microsoft Word, a popular word-processing
program, and ATLAS.ti, a computer program used mostly for qualitative research or
qualitative data analysis. I chose Microsoft Teams recorder versus using a cell phone or
digital recorder for better quality of sound because the recorder is imbedded in the
Microsoft
Teams application.
Once the participants received the consent form, they acknowledged their
acceptance via email. I chose Microsoft Teams compared to other tools because
Microsoft Teams shines with integrations of the wider suite of apps and services used for
Microsoft 365. For example, Teams is intertwined with OneDrive and SharePoint,
making managing notes during presentations, and engaging with the audience less
challenging and file-sharing easy and intuitive. Conducting interviews for the
participants' conveniences was appropriate for giving a comfortable environment to save
the participants' time and enhance understanding of the questions asked (Harrison et al.,
2017). I also included a written statement within the Email Invitation of how I protected
their identities and the data obtained during the investigation.
Once I established consent by emailing a consent form to the head of the
organization HR department with required signature response back, I continued with the
Microsoft Teams scheduling the interviews via email (see Appendix B). Participants had
a week time frame to respond to the invitation email from the date sent and another week
to sign the consent form from the date sent for participation in the interview. I recorded
the interviews using the recorder button on Teams and transcribe the interviews for
analysis. I also kept a journal of notes from the participants feedback during the
interview. Research data analysis is a process used by researchers for reducing data to a
story and interpreting it to derive insights (Bhat, 2019). The information applied in my
data analysis and later in my finding’s section provided in reducing a large chunk of data
into smaller fragments.
Qualitative data collection methods are exploratory, and they focus more on
gaining insights and understanding underlying reasons by enhancing the quality of the
results (Arifin, 2018). My qualitative data collection was done through observations,
interviews, and the collection of documents. I used triangulation as a technique to analyze
results of the same study using different methods of data collection. The purpose of
methodological triangulation within market research was to increase the validity of a
study and to interrogate different ways of understanding a research problem (Dzwigol,
2020). I applied the methodological triangulation by conducting interviews with human
resource managers, watched body language, and kept a journal with annotated notes for
the strategies implemented within the organization and reviewing documents and reports.
I pulled any public records of documents or financial statements. The documents
that I reviewed consisted of public records showing the hiring of adjuncts and fulltime
faculty and pay charts reflecting salary information. This information applied to my
research by allowing me to compare my findings across three different universities and
showed the ratio of adjuncts and fulltime faculty hired with salary information for each.
The information found from the public documents and financials allowed me to develop
my themes by comparing the documents information to the information I received form
each interview. Following the interviews, I conducted member checking with
interviewees, which consisted of following up with each participant via Teams to review
questions and answers from previous interviews and included follow-up emails. The
follow-up emails included asking the participants to review the interview transcripts and
confirm findings for data saturation. Participants had a week time frame to respond to the
follow up email from the date sent. No changes were recommended within the follow up
interviews.
Data Organization Technique
Vigorous data organization is an important part of research to exhibit sound
processes for scientific inquiry and provide support for exploration (Yin, 2018). The
qualitative researcher can use numerous arrangements to categorize the data mustered
from participants. Gibbs (2018) contributed to the thought process of using data
organization techniques for audio recording, participant coding and written notes. The
data that I collect during the research process was safeguarded both electronically and
physically. Specific documents and data included signed consent forms, interview
recording audio files, and printed transcripts. Files were labeled in alphabetical order by
college name to include the interviewee name with a DYMO Label Maker Label
Manager. For example, I entered the labels by entering the text using the computer-style
QWERTY keyboard and one-touch fast-formatting keys on the label maker. All recorded
data was guarded and stored in an encrypted password-protected external driver and
guarantee that it remains in my safe deposit box for five years.
Researchers should arrange data collected from participants by formulating a
database (Saunders & Townsend, 2016). The alignment of data authorizes the researcher
to augment the research merit (Gibbs, 2018). Carpendale et al. (2017) indicated
researchers could use coding for examining, assembling, and analyzing data in a
structured way. Coding was used to facilitate managing data from multiple sources and to
support analysis. I will destroy all data that I collected after four years following the
study as required by Walden University policy by shredding all documents and
recordings and physically destroying the thumb drive containing electronic data.
Data Analysis
Qualitative researchers can use distinct data analysis procedures that pertain to
research studies (Saunders et al., (2018). Researchers could use various data resources to
generate an in-depth understanding of the research study. Abdalla et al. (2018) pinned
down four types of triangulations, including (a) investigator triangulation, (b) data source
triangulation, (c) method triangulation, and (d) theory triangulation. I used data source
triangulation and the method triangulation throughout my study to assist with data
analysis. Following the interview sessions, transcribed the recorded interviews using
ATLAS.ti version 9.1.5 for Windows and Microsoft Word 10 for Windows to help me
code written journal notes to compare strategies to assist with identifying themes. I chose
ATLAS.ti over other qualitative software like NVivo or Quirkos because the software is
leading for qualitative data analysis and use of details. I chose Microsoft Word because
the immediate benefit of low-cost. Other scholars are known to use Microsoft Word for
coding purposes like a most recent study published by Marc Bellucci from Walden
University which used Microsoft Word for comparing his data and charts for figuring out
how to use Microsoft Word comments for tagging text-based data and reviewed for
patterns found (Bellucci, 2020).
The benefits of using ATLAS.ti was that it works with multiple documents and
networks, works with documents in any character set, and directly imports data and offers
a coding technique that can be done by simply dragging codes onto the selected piece of
data. Compared to using NVivo or Quirkos, ATLAS.ti offers the ability to filter the data
in various ways and run basic reports for different groups, which allows for easy data
comparison, to include its wide applications and cost effectiveness. Thematic analysis
was used to discern, interpret, and properly illustrate the emerging themes within the
recorded data. Methodological triangulation is a way for researchers to ensure the
objectivity and validity of findings (Abdalla et al., 2018). Researchers triangulate data to
request access to other data and information, such as an organization's reports or
documents (Lodhi, 2016).
Peer-review articles and semistructured interviews was used as method
triangulation to convene data from human resource managers. From reviewing the
documents and financial information I gathered was allowed me to develop my themes
by comparing the how many adjuncts and fulltime faculty was hired with salary
information for each, to the information I received form each interview about the quantity
of adjuncts hired compared to fulltime faculty. No salary was discussed in the interview
process. The qualitative researcher can regulate data analysis through four steps,
including (a) data transcription, (b) data coding, (c) data validation, and (d) data
organization (Castleberry
& Nolen, 2018). Coding the recordings for the interviews of each participant is a proper
method for sustaining confidentiality and anonymity (Maher et al., 2018). The recordings
were coded with alphabetic and numeric characters and document each interview using
ATLAS.ti and manually from the recordings. The manual process was appropriate
because the researcher might gain more understanding of participants' verbatim replies.
Connecting, comparing, and categorizing the codes from participants' answers are
part of the qualitative analysis of the study findings, which included rearrangement,
summarizing, and identifying significant themes to confirm results (Deterding & Waters,
2021). According to Yin (2018), there are three basic steps to use when handling data: (a)
compiling the data, (b) disassembling the data of emerging themes and codes, and (c)
reassembling the data using themes to arrive at meaningful sound observations. I began
by analyzing data from the literature review to discover possible themes among current
research used. Following the interviews, I analyzed transcriptions and compare the
themes I found from the literature review to those I discovered in the discussions.
The conceptual framework used was, human capital theory, and was used to
improve understanding the differences in earnings across workers that play a fundamental
part in the acquisition, development, and retention of human capital for an organization.
Human capital theory applies to this section by allowing HRM to identify human capital
analytics begin to understand what the data means and what types of analyses and other
data may be needed to respond to the questions and issues that stakeholders really want
and need to know about the strategies needed to meet the budgeted ratio between adjunct
and full-time faculty. To close the data analysis section out, I searched for any research
regarding my study topic “Strategies for Meeting to Meet the Budgeted Ratio Between
Adjunct and Full-Time Faculty” or conceptual framework of human capital theory for
further analysis and comparison with themes that emerge during analysis of literature
review and interviews.
Reliability and Validity
Quantitative researchers use statistical processes to exemplify reliability and
validity which is why qualitative researchers must provide equivalent methodological
proof of credibility (Cypress, 2017). In qualitative research, the relation for quantitative
reliability points to the study's dependability (Mohajan, 2017). The validity refers to data
saturation, credibility, transferability, and confirmability (Mohajan, 2017). To
demonstrate adequate methodological rigor, qualitative researchers must furnish evidence
of the reliability and validity of their studies. In this qualitative research study,
prioritizing was used to establish research reliability and validity.
Reliability
Qualitative researchers prove the realistic and trustworthiness of the data
collected from actual participants by addressing study reliability (McDonald et al., 2019).
Reliability is the degree of dependability of research (Tracy & Hinrichs, 2017).
Qualitative researchers can strengthen the trustworthiness of findings by ensuring process
transparency and the ability of other researchers to replicate the research (Cypress, 2017).
For this study, predetermined interview protocol was used to aid in replicability, thereby
making it possible for other researchers to repeat the process for similar studies. I asked
the same question in the interviews for all four organization’s human resource managers.
Financial statements were reviewed for each organization, which was multiple sources of
data collection for this study.
Member-checking, triangulation, review of transcripts, peer review, and enabling
external audits are sufficient tools for establishing dependability (Varpio et al., 2017).
Methodological triangulation was vital for study reliability, which includes different data
sources to support the triangulation requirement for the dependability of the study
findings on the data analysis method employed (Abdalla et al., 2018). I combined the
analyzed codes from the participants' answers and arrange them in groups to collect the
themes from the process, which is a procedure to attain reliability (Yin, 2018).
Memberchecking was incorporated within the research, to include organizational archival
documents, reporting of triangulate, and the data to assure the study's dependability.
Validity
Qualitative researchers should guarantee the trustworthiness and accuracy of the
study to procure research merit (Mohajan, 2017). Qualitative research validity confirms
accuracy in conducting the study, collecting data, analyzing data, and confirming
findings (Hayashi Jr et al., 2019). Qualitative case study validity includes appropriate
sample selection for the study that demonstrates the purpose of the study (FitzPatrick,
2019). Yin (2018) suggested the assembly of data from numerous sources for enhancing
the value of research.
Credibility
Researchers can use a conglomerate of approaches to assure the credibility of the
research. Abdalla et al. (2018) noted that researchers could use method triangulation and
data processes to convey credibility. Useful approaches to establishing creditability were
methodological triangulation, peer debriefing, and member checking (Stewart et al.,
2017). I used peer-reviewed articles and semistructured interviews as method
triangulation to communicate credibility and establish the validity of this study.
Confirmability
Confirmability refers to objectivity that the accuracy, relevance, or meaning of
the collected data can be followed as a process, replicated by other researchers (Williams
& Pigeot, 2017). Researchers should contribute sufficient precise data to analyze and
utilize the data for other circumstances (Mohajan, 2017). Researchers should covey
confirmability by revealing that the meaning and results derive from the data (Korstjens
& Moser, 2018). I adhered to a strict interview protocol (see Appendix A) to demonstrate
the findings' confirmability and used ATLAS.ti as an appropriate method for analyzing
qualitative data and coding transcripts during the research process.
Transferability
Transferability is a research validity that includes application in the different form
of the research site, which indicates for conclusion of the findings depending on
similarities or differences between sites (FitzPatrick, 2019). Qualitative researchers
present descriptions to include accounts of the context, the research methods, and
examples of raw data to enhance the transferability of the study (Mohajan, 2017). Broad
and rich data was presented as descriptions of the research context and participants’ data
to augment the transferability of this case study. In qualitative research, achieving data
saturation helps to ensure transferability because the researcher has demonstrated that no
new insights are gained from additional research (Munthe-Kaas et al., 2019).
Data Saturation. Data saturation for the qualitative researcher is that the
researcher will not get further details from purposefully sampled participants; therefore,
data saturation determines the purposeful sample size (Lowe et al., 2018). Member
checking and follow-up email correspondence was incorporated until I reached saturation
when no new information about the study topic emerged. I reached data saturation with
the coded interview data collected from the four participants that was accessed for this
study and continue to cumulate more data until saturation was obtained. The strategy of
credibility, conformability, and transferability increased the validity of the current case
study to ensure data saturation and to enhance the trustworthiness of this study.
Transition and Summary
The objective of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies
used by human resource managers to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and
fulltime faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget. In Section 2, I (a)
described the role of the researcher, (b) identified study participants, (c) provided
research method and design, (d) discussed population and sampling method, (e) described
the need for ethical research, (f) specified data collection, analysis, and organization
techniques, and (g) provided strategies for assuring reliability and validity. In Section 3, I
will (a) present my findings, (b) discuss the application to professional practice, (c)
express implications for social change, (d) provide recommendations for action, (e)
propose recommendations for further research, (f) offer my reflections, and (g) close with
a conclusion. I intend for my research to illuminate strategies for solving a problem in
business practice by identifying and exploring effective strategies for maintaining the
institutional operating budget between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty within higher
educational institutions.
Section 3: Application to Professional Practice and Implications for Change
Introduction
Section 3 consists of the presentation of the findings, application for professional
practice, implication for social change, and recommendations for action. This section
concludes with suggestions for further research, my personal reflections, and a
conclusion.
Presentation of the Findings
The objective of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies
used by human resource managers to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and
fulltime faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget. The research question in
this study was “How do human resource managers manage the budgeted ratio between
adjunct and full-time faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget and meet
certification standards?” In this study, I implemented Schultz’s human capital theory as
my conceptual framework to represent factors contributing to earnings across workers
that play a pivotal role in the acquisition, development, and retention of human capital for
an organization. Human capital theory and its methods facilitated the understanding of
the strategies human resource managers use to guide human capital investments for
school quality, training, and for meeting the budgeted ratio between adjuncts and fulltime
faculty.
Qualitative data collection was completed through interviews and the collection
of documents. After I completed the interviews, I complied the data by transcribing and
using ATLAS.ti software to interpret and properly illustrate the emerging themes within
the recorded data. All data sets were guarded and stored in an encrypted
passwordprotected external driver and guarantee that it remains in my safe deposit box
for 5 years. To ensure validity and reliability of the emerging themes, each participant
was given a follow up interview to their responses through member checking.
Based on methodological triangulation and the coding and patterns found in the
transcripts, three themes emerged in relation to strategies that meet the budgeted ratio
between adjunct and full-time faculty: (a) compensation and benefits (b) faculty and
adjunct training (c) student enrollment and retention. The hiring managers of the
organizations were familiar with strategies supporting adjunct faculty and full-time
faculty. Findings confirmed that compensation and benefits, adjunct and full-time faculty
training, and student enrollment have a significant impact on the ratio needed to maintain
the institutional operating budget for the organization.
Theme 1: Compensation and Benefits
The first theme to emerge was compensation and benefits, which aligned to the
body of literature and related to the human capital theory. The information I reviewed in
the documents and financial information applied to creating my themes by allowing me
to compare hiring ratios and salaries that addressed what the participants in the interviews
stated about compensation and benefits. Hiring managers place value on the need to
compensate employees because this practice promotes an attentive and understanding
culture within the organization. It is paramount to find employees that fit into an
organization; however, those employees require benefits and compensation to accept the
position and/or remain at the organization. Though the hiring managers need to acquire
skilled faculty and adjuncts to meet job requirements, the objective is also for hiring
managers to understand the strategies needed for gaining employees.
As an organization grows, the need for faculty and adjunct instructors increases.
During the recruitment process, having a benefit package could help hiring managers
with finding qualified candidates. The hiring managers who participated in this study
agreed that compensation and benefits is a strategy used to hire faculty and adjuncts. The
hiring managers also indicated that the organization’s budget and yearly strategic goals
determine the level of compensation and benefits earned by an employee. P1 noted, that
“based on the level of expertise of a candidate, compensation is determined.” P1 went on
further to say, “we need qualified workers, which costs money.” Hiring management
should understand this when determining the hiring requirements. P2 noted that qualified
employees require a higher wage yet may require training based on experience regardless
of the circumstances, costs are involved. P3 went a step further and stated that “removing
benefits and setting pay to the lowest cap” limits the organization’s ability to hire skilled
faculty and adjuncts. P3 also noted that “candidates have turned down jobs to go to other
organizations for the pay and benefits.”
All participants noted that “faculty and adjunct require the hiring of skilled
technical personnel both on the hourly level and on salary level. In addition to needing
employees with a special skill set, P2 added that “a strategy for an organization is to find
faculty and adjuncts that can work and agree on the benefits and the amount of
compensation that the role plays.” When an organization requires certain skills to
complete job duties, finding qualified faculty and adjuncts may be difficult. Because of
this difficulty, skilled employees require a certain threshold or higher wages to do the
job.
The hiring managers in this study all agreed to this.
The approach of hiring managers was that providing compensation to workers
was paramount to achieve and maintain competitive advantage by meeting budget radios.
Salary, compensation, and benefits might affect the hiring of employees (Abel & Deitz,
2014). In addition to compensation, employers attract candidates with health care plans,
bonuses, and annual leave (DeGeest et al., 2017). The human capital theory pertains to
the process used by leaders and analysis conducted when making decisions
(Galiakberova, 2019). Due to the human capital connection between decision making and
hiring management, the conceptual framework of human capital theory facilitates the
understanding of strategies human resource managers use to guide human capital
investments for school quality, training, and for meeting the budgeted ratio between
adjuncts and full-time faculty (Holden & Biddle, 2017).
Theme 2: Faculty and Adjunct Training
The second theme to emerge was faculty and adjunct training, which also aligned
with the literature and conceptual framework. Faculty and adjuncts are significant in
higher education’s aim to refine outcomes, yet full-time and adjunct faculty are
positioned differently within institutions due to their work responsibilities, teaching
methods, and learning process (Kalkbrenner et al., 2021). The information I reviewed in
the documents and financial information applied to creating my themes by allowing me
to compare hiring ratios and salaries that addressed what the participants in the interviews
stated about hiring and training of employees in the beginning stages of being hired. P1
noted that “perceptions of adjuncts by full-time faculty and department chairs can be
mixed.” P1 also stated that “full-time faculty members do stress that fact that adjuncts
that are more segregated from the institutions or departmental mission.” P2 stated, “some
department chairs appreciate newer practices and training models used for adjunct
faculty, but some believe adjuncts are still too disconnected.”
P2 further reported that “adjunct faculty themselves feel alienated due to lack of
participation or understanding of the necessary knowledge and skills needed to maintain
their position. P3 noted, “by uncovering how training and participation plays a role
within a university or state level may contribute to more positive outcomes or even
suggest a rationale for altering the roles of some faculty members to enhance educational
goals.” P3 went on to further state “for instance, scheduling departmental meetings so
that all adjuncts and faculty members can attend may be one-way roles may change and
enhance the training process.” The increase in involving program coordinators, chairs,
and deans of education colleges and departments, as well as other professional colleges
and departments can magnify the ability to learn more about the needs and practices
needed to onboard new adjuncts and faculty (Nica, 2018). P1 noted that department
leaders should alter the type of faculty interaction and participation within program
implementation and departmental decisions to positively affect student learning for
purposes of accountability measures.
The duration of work and involvement in a university defines the status of adjunct
faculty, who comprise full-time and part-time members (Bhalla, 2019). P2 noted, “it is
important to take in account that fulltime adjuncts usually work on average one term to
one year for a college or university and that some colleges hire adjuncts and bargain pay
which usually restricts them to become full-time faculty.” P2 further stated, “therefore
most adjuncts, do not participate in meeting or trainings, rarely hearing an adjuncts
voice.” Some higher educational institutions are negotiating union contracts with adjunct
faculty that allow them to participate in training processes and program implementation
(Kovaleski & Arghode, 2021). P3 revealed how “adjunct faculty continue to learn and
practice despite the lack of faculty development resources to which they have access and
find that the learning is limited due to their contracts.” P1 stated that “any adjuncts within
institutions lucky enough to participate in any training initiatives, as well as discuss and
reform their practice, has benefited from their participation and has enhanced the quality
of student learning.”
Training and development have long been proven to deliver many benefits,
including improved overall job satisfaction, reduced employee turnover, decreased costly
errors, employee productivity, and increased overall quality of work (Höfrová et al.,
2021). Human capital theory relates to the training of adjunct and fulltime faculty by
allowing leaders to understand that businesses thrive with the right training and
development strategies in place and develop economic value which in return increased
overall quality of work (Aboobaker, 2020). Organizations today operate in a “knowledge
economy,” in which higher educational institutions are more willing to govern the
strategies for the designing and sharing of knowledge amongst its employees (Iqbal et al.,
2018). This puts more strategic importance on human capital management and
measurement. The need for training and professional development highlights the
importance of understanding the general and overall requirements concerning pay and
benefit specifics (Luna-Arocas et al., 2020). Leaders should evaluate the organizational
structure and evaluate whether adequate support mechanisms are present for adjunct and
fulltime faculty together, and ask important questions considered to determine why
training and development are needed for future development and productivity.
Theme 3: Student Enrollment and Retention
The third theme to emerge was student enrollment and retention. The student
enrollment and retention theme aligned to the body of literature and related to the human
capital theory. High student retention rates are considered an added gain for academic
institutions, particularly for tuition-driven colleges and universities that rely on a
substantial student population to remain sustainable (Tight, 2020). The information I
reviewed in the documents and financial information applied to creating my themes by
allowing me to compare hiring ratios and salaries that addressed what the participants in
the interviews stated about retention and the turnover rate of employees. P1 stated that
“retention is a financial obligation for institutions because each student who remains
enrolled for an additional semester positively impacts the institution’s finances.” For
institutional leaders to be able to understand how to get ahead involves a shared approach
involving the institutional staff who are responsible for building retention programs and
faculty (Tudor, 2018). P1 goes on to further state that” understanding how faculty feel
about their involvement in the process is an imperative first step for institutions.” When
faculty engage in regular interaction and contact with students, it helps to reinforce their
learning efforts, determination, and persistence to stay in class and fulfill their degree
graduation requirements, which in turn helps retention and financial assistance needed to
hire faculty (Hempel et al., 2020).
P2 stated that “it is no longer a question of whether institutions should involve
faculty in retention strategies, but rather how they can incorporate faculty. P2 also stated
that “to aid in the retention process, faculty tend to believe that advising represents a
measure of involvement in the student retention process. By understanding faculty
approaches regarding roles and responsibilities in student retention efforts, organizational
leaders can begin to magnify efforts to advance faculty involvement in student retention
efforts beyond the classroom and advising environment (Cuseo, 2018). P2 further noted
that “by using advising strategies, faculty can begin enhancing retention efforts beyond
the classroom environment.” P3 added “in addition, faculty involvement in student
recruiting endeavors amplifies student retention, specifically focusing on early faculty
connection with incoming first-year students.”
Kalkbrenner et al. (2021) found that faculty and student interactions in and
outside the classroom environment boosted student motivation to graduation. P3 stated
that “regression when it comes to retention strategies could be related to a lack of
continuing and experienced faculty and student interactions, advising, and best
practices.” P2 further stated that “the decrease in student retention could be directly
related to a lack of student and faculty association outside normal classroom meetings.”
P3 noted that “many faculty and leadership pride themselves on their ability to build a
bridge with students and that faculty and student interactions advocate student success.”
Human capital theory relates to enrollment and retention of students by
association of the types of higher education institutions with the attraction, development,
and retention of human capital, which is defined as the skills, training, and education of
individuals (Faggian et al., 2019). All participants noted that “most institutions use
retention rates as a part of their strategies for recruitment and enrollment targeting.” Al
Hassani and Wilkins (2022) concluded that administrators are now looking to faculty
connections to support with improving student retention initiatives through student
relationships and faculty diligence. Having a considerable understanding of how faculty
feel about their involvement in retention efforts can lead to more faculty participation in
retention strategies and the roles and responsibilities faculty play within organizations
(Barbera et al., 2020).
Applications to Professional Practice
The results from this research study contributed to the variety of strategies used
by human resource managers and provided useful evidence as to how relevant it is to
maintain the budgeted ratio between adjunct and full-time faculty within in higher
education institutions. Human resource managers within higher education institutions use
(a) strategies needed for gaining employees though compensation and benefit packages,
(b) training strategies and models used for full-time faculty and adjuncts, and (c) student
retention and enrollment strategies and patterns based on the findings in this study. In
addition, the importance of strategic alignment and the practice of making better hiring
strategies a core pillar of an institution’s organizational standards demonstrates inclusive
leadership and leader’s ability to function effectively with people.
Investments in human capital depend upon the costs of acquiring the skills and
the returns that are expected from the investment. The study’s conceptual framework and
literature review align with my conclusions by allowing human resource managers and
leaders to set achievable goals, provide coaching and training for your staff, and deliver
constructive feedback on improvement. Beyond hiring and retention, college and
university departments will increase transparency by including the voices of all faculty
members in decisions that directly affect them. In some ways, human capital
management may be complicated for performance management, but HRM can create
foundations for profitable human capital management and a function workplace.
Implications for Positive Social Change
Human resource managers who take advantage of the recommendations for action
from this research will create a successful workplace that will increase effectiveness
while promoting a strong positive social change. Bhalla (2019) stated that a collective
audit on what colleges and universities are doing and not doing to attract, retain, and
cultivate diverse talent is needed to improve hiring strategies. Implications of this study
for positive social change would be helpful in addressing the recruitment policies and
hiring practices of institutions allowing them to integrate the benefits, training, and
retention strategies needed to enhance the livelihood of the employees, student success,
and the community. Higher education institutions’ focus should be on ensuring that they
have taken the necessary steps to create an inclusive work environment that will allow all
faculty and adjuncts together to thrive and feel included (Al Hassani & Wilkins, 2022).
The findings provided the potential for improving leaders’ and human resource managers
efficiency in using human resource management processes to provide resources and
strategies during and after the hiring phase to assist in the overall organizational
performance.
Recommendations for Action
The study focused on the strategies used by human resource managers to manage
the ratio between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty to maintain the institutional
operating budget. The following recommendations may assist human resource managers.
Human resource mangers and leaders should (a) offer professional workshops, seminars,
conferences, and training to full-time and adjunct faculty, (b) set up a better pay system
and find benefits that will attract and retain highly qualified educators, and (c) establish
an inclusive environment that aims to help educators and students of all backgrounds.
The role of HR in higher education is that today’s HR professionals is increasingly
becoming directly involved in the recruitment and hiring of employees both faculty and
staff (O’Meara et al., 2020). With the higher education landscape consistently changing,
HRM play an important role to support emerging and changing processes and hiring
practices.
To fill this gap, HRM and leaders within higher education institutions need to
focus more on employer branding and how they attract qualified candidates, development
of training programs for new and current faculty and adjuncts and integrate a
performance management system with goal-oriented objectives that assist both faculty
and adjuncts. Higher education HRM departments need to go beyond focusing on the
acquisition of new talent and offer their existing staff adequate opportunities to develop
new skills and grow in their careers (Grunspan et al., 2018). It’s also critical for the HR
M and leaders to serve as a bridge between workers and management so that the voices
of both faculty, adjuncts, and staff are heard, resulting in effective dialogue and less
frustration. The findings of this study demonstrate a true commitment needed from
senior leadership and human resource managers that stem from recommendations and
experiences needed to create a meaningful change that will create a work environment
that is beneficial for full-time and adjunct faculty.
Recommendations for Further Research
The aim of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore the strategies used
by human resource managers to manage the ratio between adjunct faculty and full-time
faculty to maintain the institutional operating budget. Recent studies have shown that
high performing business organizations practice strategic human resource management
(Hamadamin & Atan, 2019). There is a gap in both conceptual and applied studies for
human resource managers in higher education (Aleixo et al., 2018). The results of the
study indicate that based on participants’ perceptions, the higher education institutions
under study have a level of awareness that more strategies are needed to budget the ratio
between adjuncts and fulltime faculty. The results of the study show that higher
education is facing major problems surrounding the development of human capital,
especially of the faculty members and needs to devote more attention to their human
resource practices.
The result of study also shows the recruitment and selection process are largely
inadequate and needs more constructive attention. The study also reflects that human
resource managers and leaders need to continue to work on the performance appraisal
and compensation system. As a result of these findings, there are strong implications for
administrators, faculty, and other higher education personnel interested in applying and
improving their best practices in strategic human resources management. Future research
should include more universities, both public and private. In addition, future research
should also consider moderating variables such as organizational climate, university
culture, the labor market. Drawing on the analysis, the study contributes rich and fruitful
findings to the area of strategic human resource management.
Reflections
As a professional advisor and adjunct instructor working in higher education for
the last 12 years, I have reflected on the experiences of being on the administrative side
and the adjunct side, but admittedly, pursuing the DBA with my specific topic has been
informational and a very rewarding task. Going into my doctoral process I knew there
were many strategies and procedures that human resource managers targeted that assisted
adjuncts and fulltime faculty for gainful employment. What I did not know or fully
understand at the time was the level of understanding, dedication, and commitment that
HRM and leaders within higher education institutions need to understand specific actions
that personnel in this role could take to review the applicant pool to ensure adequate
representation. When I started data collection, I had no prior experience or personal
contact with any of the participants, and I was not made fully aware of the strategies used
by HRM until I started my research. I believe my limited exposure to HRM business
practices allowed me to remain open and unbiased throughout the process.
Throughout the research process, I made sure I focused solely on the interview
data and documents reviewed and remained aware of my biases. The HRM and leaders
provided valuable practical experience and strategies for hiring adjuncts and fulltime
faculty from multiple perspectives. Throughout this study I have learned that successful
hiring and recruitment strategies are vital to building strong organizations, and HRM can
benefit from these perspectives and strategies. My doctoral committee assisted me with
their corrections, advice, and coaching which helped me improve my quality of work,
and
I gained a wealth of knowledge and experience from them in the process. All the research
I have completed about hiring strategies needed to manage the ratio between adjunct
faculty and full-time faculty, I have broadened my understanding of the topic and
strategies for implementing effective hiring strategies that I hope other HRM, and leaders
will share within there institutions.
Conclusion
Human resource professionals face challenges on how to manage the ratio
between adjunct faculty and full-time faculty to maintain the institutional operating
budget. The aim of the qualitative multiple case study was to use the human capital
theory as a lens to identify strategies that some HRM professionals use to facilitate the
hiring process. The results of this study addressed the research found via the Literature
Review, which identified there was a need for strategies needed to manage the processes
geared towards adjuncts and fulltime faculty in reference to hiring practices. Using
openended questions, I conducted semistructured interviews with three HRM/leaders to
collect data to answer the research questions. Three themes emerged from the thematic
data analysis of data indicating the strategies that some human resource professional and
leaders use to screen and recruit adjuncts and fulltime faculty within the southeastern
U.S. region. The themes that emerged were (a) strategies needed for gaining employees
though compensation and benefit packages, (b) training strategies and models used for
full-time faculty and adjuncts, and (c) student retention and enrollment strategies and
patterns based on the findings in this study.
Human resource professionals who are facing challenges when it comes to
strategies to screen and select job applicants may use the findings of this study to enhance
their hiring practices. By enhancing their hiring practices to screen and select potential
faculty and adjuncts, HR professionals might expand and diversify their job applicant
pool, which may foster creativity and innovation of for institutions and leadership within
the higher education sector. Although there is a need for future research, this qualitative
case study contributed to the limited existing body of HRM touch points of within
literature. Within the study I discovered and cross-referenced the material using the
conceptual framework to explore the strategies pertaining to the hiring process and how
the process can change and/or alter the outcome of adjuncts and fulltime faculty
experiences. The research confirms that there has been increased effectiveness in the
strategies needed to hire adjuncts and fulltime faculty, but there are still opportunities for
improvement. The study findings support the conclusions of previous scholarly research
pertaining to the use of strategies needed to enhance and facilitate the hiring process.